Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1019-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1019-2016
Model description paper
 | 
10 Mar 2016
Model description paper |  | 10 Mar 2016

pynoddy 1.0: an experimental platform for automated 3-D kinematic and potential field modelling

J. Florian Wellmann, Sam T. Thiele, Mark D. Lindsay, and Mark W. Jessell

Related authors

Perspectives of physics-based machine learning strategies for geoscientific applications governed by partial differential equations
Denise Degen, Daniel Caviedes Voullième, Susanne Buiter, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, Harry Vereecken, Ana González-Nicolás, and Florian Wellmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7375–7409, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7375-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7375-2023, 2023
Short summary
GeoINR 1.0: an implicit neural network approach to three-dimensional geological modelling
Michael Hillier, Florian Wellmann, Eric A. de Kemp, Boyan Brodaric, Ernst Schetselaar, and Karine Bédard
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6987–7012, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6987-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6987-2023, 2023
Short summary
PySubdiv 1.0: open-source geological modeling and reconstruction by non-manifold subdivision surfaces
Mohammad Moulaeifard, Simon Bernard, and Florian Wellmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3565–3579, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3565-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3565-2023, 2023
Short summary
Clustering has a meaning: optimization of angular similarity to detect 3D geometric anomalies in geological terrains
Michał P. Michalak, Lesław Teper, Florian Wellmann, Jerzy Żaba, Krzysztof Gaidzik, Marcin Kostur, Yuriy P. Maystrenko, and Paulina Leonowicz
Solid Earth, 13, 1697–1720, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1697-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1697-2022, 2022
Short summary
Constraining stochastic 3-D structural geological models with topology information using approximate Bayesian computation in GemPy 2.1
Alexander Schaaf, Miguel de la Varga, Florian Wellmann, and Clare E. Bond
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3899–3913, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3899-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3899-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Solid Earth
High-precision 1′ × 1′ bathymetric model of Philippine Sea inversed from marine gravity anomalies
Dechao An, Jinyun Guo, Xiaotao Chang, Zhenming Wang, Yongjun Jia, Xin Liu, Valery Bondur, and Heping Sun
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2039–2052, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2039-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2039-2024, 2024
Short summary
Deciphering past earthquakes from the probabilistic modeling of paleoseismic records – the Paleoseismic EArthquake CHronologies code (PEACH, version 1)
Octavi Gómez-Novell, Bruno Pace, Francesco Visini, Joanna Faure Walker, and Oona Scotti
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7339–7355, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7339-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7339-2023, 2023
Short summary
Modelling detrital cosmogenic nuclide concentrations during landscape evolution in Cidre v2.0
Sébastien Carretier, Vincent Regard, Youssouf Abdelhafiz, and Bastien Plazolles
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6741–6755, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6741-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6741-2023, 2023
Short summary
A new temperature-photoperiod coupled phenology module in LPJ-GUESS model v4.1: optimizing estimation of terrestrial carbon and water processes
Shouzhi Chen, Yongshuo H. Fu, Mingwei Li, Zitong Jia, Yishuo Cui, and Jing Tang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-212,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-212, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
IMEX_SfloW2D v2: a depth-averaged numerical flow model for volcanic gas–particle flows over complex topographies and water
Mattia de' Michieli Vitturi, Tomaso Esposti Ongaro, and Samantha Engwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6309–6336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6309-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6309-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Armit, R. J., Betts, P. G., Schaefer, B. F., and Ailleres, L.: Constraints on long-lived Mesoproterozoic and Palaeozoic deformational events and crustal architecture in the northern Mount Painter Province, Australia, Gondwana Res., 22, 207–226, 2012.
Bernecker, T., Woollands, M., Wong, D., Moore, D., and Smith, M.: Hydrocarbon prospectivity of the deep water Gippsland Basin, Victoria, Australia, APPEA Journal, 41, 91–113, 2001.
Bistacchi, A., Massironi, M., Dal Piaz, V. G., Monopoli, B., Schiavo, A., and Toffolon, G.: 3-D fold and fault reconstruction with an uncertainty model: An example from an Alpine tunnel case study, Comput. Geosci., 34, 351–372, 2008.
Bond, C. E.: Uncertainty in structural interpretation: Lessons to be learnt, J. Struct. Geol., 74, 185–200, 2015.
Bond, E. C., Shipton, K. Z., Jones, R. R., Butler, W. R., and Gibbs, D. A.: Knowledge transfer in a digital world: Field data acquisition, uncertainty, visualization, and data management, Geosphere, 3, 568–576, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00094.1, 2007.
Download
Short summary
We often obtain knowledge about the subsurface in the form of structural geological models, as a basis for subsurface usage or resource extraction. Here, we provide a modelling code to construct such models on the basis of significant deformational events in geological history, encapsulated in kinematic equations. Our methods simplify complex dynamic processes, but enable us to evaluate how events interact, and finally how certain we are about predictions of structures in the subsurface.