Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1213-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1213-2023
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
21 Feb 2023
Methods for assessment of models |  | 21 Feb 2023

Multifidelity Monte Carlo estimation for efficient uncertainty quantification in climate-related modeling

Anthony Gruber, Max Gunzburger, Lili Ju, Rihui Lan, and Zhu Wang

Related authors

A comparison of two Stokes ice sheet models applied to the Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for plan view models (MISMIP3d)
Tong Zhang, Stephen Price, Lili Ju, Wei Leng, Julien Brondex, Gaël Durand, and Olivier Gagliardini
The Cryosphere, 11, 179–190, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-179-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-179-2017, 2017
Short summary
Parallel algorithms for planar and spherical Delaunay construction with an application to centroidal Voronoi tessellations
D. W. Jacobsen, M. Gunzburger, T. Ringler, J. Burkardt, and J. Peterson
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1353–1365, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1353-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1353-2013, 2013
Manufactured solutions and the verification of three-dimensional Stokes ice-sheet models
W. Leng, L. Ju, M. Gunzburger, and S. Price
The Cryosphere, 7, 19–29, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-19-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-19-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Numerical methods
Strategies for conservative and non-conservative monotone remapping on the sphere
David H. Marsico and Paul A. Ullrich
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1537–1551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1537-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1537-2023, 2023
Short summary
Modeling large‐scale landform evolution with a stream power law for glacial erosion (OpenLEM v37): benchmarking experiments against a more process-based description of ice flow (iSOSIA v3.4.3)
Moritz Liebl, Jörg Robl, Stefan Hergarten, David Lundbek Egholm, and Kurt Stüwe
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1315–1343, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1315-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1315-2023, 2023
Short summary
A mixed finite-element discretisation of the shallow-water equations
James Kent, Thomas Melvin, and Golo Albert Wimmer
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1265–1276, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1265-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1265-2023, 2023
Short summary
Massively parallel modeling and inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data using PFLOTRAN
Piyoosh Jaysaval, Glenn E. Hammond, and Timothy C. Johnson
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 961–976, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-961-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-961-2023, 2023
Short summary
Parallelized domain decomposition for multi-dimensional Lagrangian random walk mass-transfer particle tracking schemes
Lucas Schauer, Michael J. Schmidt, Nicholas B. Engdahl, Stephen D. Pankavich, David A. Benson, and Diogo Bolster
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 833–849, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-833-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-833-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Addcock, B., Brugiapaglia, S., and Webster, C.: Sparse Polynomial Approximation of High-Dimensional Functions, SIAM, 1–310, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611976885, 2022. a
Anderson, D., David, L., and Gill, A.: Spin-up of a stratified ocean, with applications to upwelling, Deep-Sea Res. Ocean. Abstr., 22, 583–596, https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(75)90046-7, 1975. a
Blatter, H.: Velocity and stress fields in grounded glaciers: A simple algorithm for including deviatoric stress gradients, J. Glaciol., 41, 333–344, https://doi.org/10.3189/S002214300001621X, 1995. a, b
Bleck, R. and Boudra, D.: Wind-driven spin-up in eddy-resolving ocean models formulated in isopycnic and isobaric coordinates, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 91, 7611–7621, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC091iC06p07611, 1986. a
Clare, M. C. A., Leijnse, T. W. B., McCall, R. T., Diermanse, F. L. M., Cotter, C. J., and Piggott, M. D.: Multilevel multifidelity Monte Carlo methods for assessing uncertainty in coastal flooding, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2491–2515, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2491-2022, 2022. a
Download
Short summary
This work applies a novel technical tool, multifidelity Monte Carlo (MFMC) estimation, to three climate-related benchmark experiments involving oceanic, atmospheric, and glacial modeling. By considering useful quantities such as maximum sea height and total (kinetic) energy, we show that MFMC leads to predictions which are more accurate and less costly than those obtained by standard methods. This suggests MFMC as a potential drop-in replacement for estimation in realistic climate models.