the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
OMIP contribution to CMIP6: experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project
Stephen M. Griffies
Gokhan Danabasoglu
Paul J. Durack
Alistair J. Adcroft
V. Balaji
Claus W. Böning
Eric P. Chassignet
Enrique Curchitser
Julie Deshayes
Helge Drange
Baylor Fox-Kemper
Peter J. Gleckler
Jonathan M. Gregory
Helmuth Haak
Robert W. Hallberg
Patrick Heimbach
Helene T. Hewitt
David M. Holland
Tatiana Ilyina
Johann H. Jungclaus
Yoshiki Komuro
John P. Krasting
William G. Large
Simon J. Marsland
Simona Masina
Trevor J. McDougall
A. J. George Nurser
James C. Orr
Anna Pirani
Fangli Qiao
Ronald J. Stouffer
Karl E. Taylor
Anne Marie Treguier
Hiroyuki Tsujino
Petteri Uotila
Maria Valdivieso
Qiang Wang
Michael Winton
Stephen G. Yeager
Related authors
ocean eddies, which are the largest source of ocean variability and modulate the mixed-layer properties. We find that the mixed-layer depth is better represented in eddy-rich models but, unfortunately, not uniformly across the globe and not in all models.
Related subject area
Inaccuracies in air–sea heat fluxes severely degrade the accuracy of ocean numerical simulations. Here, we use artificial neural networks to correct air–sea heat fluxes as a function of oceanic and atmospheric state predictors. The correction successfully improves surface and subsurface ocean temperatures beyond the training period and in prediction experiments.
FINAM is not a model), a new coupling framework written in Python to dynamically connect independently developed models. Python, as the ultimate glue language, enables the use of codes from nearly any programming language like Fortran, C++, Rust, and others. FINAM is designed to simplify the integration of various models with minimal effort, as demonstrated through various examples ranging from simple to complex systems.
This study introduces a new 3D lake–ice–atmosphere coupled model that significantly improves winter climate simulations for the Great Lakes compared to traditional 1D lake model coupling. The key contribution is the identification of critical hydrodynamic processes – ice transport, heat advection, and shear-driven turbulence production – that influence lake thermal structure and ice cover and explain the superior performance of 3D lake models to their 1D counterparts.