Articles | Volume 9, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3231-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3231-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Methods for assessment of models
| 
19 Sep 2016
Methods for assessment of models |
| 19 Sep 2016
OMIP contribution to CMIP6: experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project
Stephen M. Griffies
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey,
USA
Gokhan Danabasoglu
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado,
USA
Paul J. Durack
Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
Alistair J. Adcroft
NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey,
USA
V. Balaji
NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey,
USA
Claus W. Böning
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany
Eric P. Chassignet
Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies (COAPS), Florida
State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
Enrique Curchitser
Rutgers University,
New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Julie Deshayes
Sorbonne Universités (UPMC,
Univ Paris 06-CNRS-IRD-MNHN), LOCEAN Laboratory, Paris, France
Helge Drange
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Norway
Baylor Fox-Kemper
Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences (DEEPS),
Brown University, USA
Peter J. Gleckler
Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
Jonathan M. Gregory
Met Office Hadley Centre and University of
Reading, UK
Helmuth Haak
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Bundesstrasse
53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
Robert W. Hallberg
NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey,
USA
Patrick Heimbach
Institute for Computational
Engineering and Science and Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of
Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
Helene T. Hewitt
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
David M. Holland
New York
University, New York, USA
Tatiana Ilyina
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Bundesstrasse
53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
Johann H. Jungclaus
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Bundesstrasse
53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
Yoshiki Komuro
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science
and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan
John P. Krasting
NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey,
USA
William G. Large
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado,
USA
Simon J. Marsland
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere,
Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
Simona Masina
Centro Euromediterraneo sui
Cambiamenti Climatici, and Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia,
Bologna, Italy
Trevor J. McDougall
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
A. J. George Nurser
National Oceanography Centre Southampton (NOCS), Southampton, UK
James C. Orr
IPSL/LSCE, UMR8212, CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Anna Pirani
Université Paris Saclay, France, and Abdus Salam Institute for
Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy
Fangli Qiao
First
Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao, China
Ronald J. Stouffer
NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey,
USA
Karl E. Taylor
Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA
Anne Marie Treguier
Laboratoire d'Oceanographie Physique et
Spatiale, Ifremer, Plouzane, France
Hiroyuki Tsujino
Meteorological Research
Institute (MRI), Japan Meteorological Agency, Tsukuba, Japan
Petteri Uotila
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Maria Valdivieso
University of Reading, Reading, UK
Qiang Wang
Alfred Wegener
Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Bremerhaven,
Germany
Michael Winton
NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey,
USA
Stephen G. Yeager
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado,
USA
Viewed
Total article views: 17,138 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Apr 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,002 | 6,617 | 519 | 17,138 | 432 | 432 |
- HTML: 10,002
- PDF: 6,617
- XML: 519
- Total: 17,138
- BibTeX: 432
- EndNote: 432
Total article views: 15,448 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Sep 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9,143 | 5,789 | 516 | 15,448 | 420 | 425 |
- HTML: 9,143
- PDF: 5,789
- XML: 516
- Total: 15,448
- BibTeX: 420
- EndNote: 425
Total article views: 1,690 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Apr 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 859 | 828 | 3 | 1,690 | 12 | 7 |
- HTML: 859
- PDF: 828
- XML: 3
- Total: 1,690
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 7
Latest update: 06 Dec 2025
Short summary
The Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP) aims to provide a framework for evaluating, understanding, and improving the ocean and sea-ice components of global climate and earth system models contributing to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). This document defines OMIP and details a protocol both for simulating global ocean/sea-ice models and for analysing their output.
The Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP) aims to provide a framework for evaluating,...
