Articles | Volume 11, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3071-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3071-2018
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
31 Jul 2018
Methods for assessment of models |  | 31 Jul 2018

Bayesian inference of earthquake rupture models using polynomial chaos expansion

Hugo Cruz-Jiménez, Guotu Li, Paul Martin Mai, Ibrahim Hoteit, and Omar M. Knio

Related authors

Atmospheric Forcing as a driver for Ocean Forecasting
Andreas Schiller, Simon A. Josey, John Siddorn, and Ibrahim Hoteit
State Planet Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-13,https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-13, 2024
Preprint under review for SP
Short summary
Improving Accuracy and providing Uncertainty Estimations: Ensemble Methodologies for Ocean Forecasting
Ibrahim Hoteit, Eric Chassignet, and Mike Bell
State Planet Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-10,https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-10, 2024
Preprint under review for SP
Short summary
Towards Earth System Modeling: Coupled Ocean Forecasting
Ségolène Berthou, John Siddorn, Vivian Fraser-Leonhardt, Pierre-Yves Le Traon, and Ibrahim Hoteit
State Planet Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-28,https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-28, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for SP
Short summary
Data assimilation schemes for ocean forecasting: state of the art
Matthew J. Martin, Ibrahim Hoteit, Laurent Bertino, and Andrew M. Moore
State Planet Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-20,https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-20, 2024
Preprint under review for SP
Short summary
Investigating the long-term variability of the Red Sea marine heatwaves and their relationship to different climate modes: focus on 2010 events in the northern basin
Manal Hamdeno, Aida Alvera-Azcárate, George Krokos, and Ibrahim Hoteit
Ocean Sci., 20, 1087–1107, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1087-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1087-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Solid Earth
Three-dimensional analytical solution of self-potential from regularly polarized bodies in a layered seafloor model
Pengfei Zhang, Yi-an Cui, Jing Xie, Youjun Guo, Jianxin Liu, and Jieran Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8521–8533, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8521-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8521-2024, 2024
Short summary
A fast surrogate model for 3D Earth glacial isostatic adjustment using Tensorflow (v2.8.0) artificial neural networks
Ryan Love, Glenn A. Milne, Parviz Ajourlou, Soran Parang, Lev Tarasov, and Konstantin Latychev
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8535–8551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8535-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8535-2024, 2024
Short summary
Accelerated pseudo-transient method for elastic, viscoelastic, and coupled hydro-mechanical problems with applications
Yury Alkhimenkov and Yury Y. Podladchikov
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-160,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-160, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
ShellSet v1.1.0 parallel dynamic neotectonic modelling: a case study using Earth5-049
Jon B. May, Peter Bird, and Michele M. C. Carafa
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6153–6171, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6153-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6153-2024, 2024
Short summary
FastIsostasy v1.0 – a regional, accelerated 2D glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) model accounting for the lateral variability of the solid Earth
Jan Swierczek-Jereczek, Marisa Montoya, Konstantin Latychev, Alexander Robinson, Jorge Alvarez-Solas, and Jerry Mitrovica
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5263–5290, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5263-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abrahamson, N. A., Silva, W. J., and Kamai, R.: Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions, Earthq. Spectra, 30, 1025–1055, 2014.
Alexanderian, A., Winokur, J., Sraj, I., Srinivasan, A., Iskandarani, M., Thacker, W. C., and Knio, O. M.: Global sensitivity analysis in an ocean general circulation model: a sparse spectral projection approach, Comput. Geosci., 16, 757–778, 2012.
Arroyo, D. and Ordaz, M.: Multivariate Bayesian regression analysis applied to ground-motion prediction equations, part 1: theory and synthetic example, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100, 1551–1567, 2010a.
Arroyo, D. and Ordaz, M.: Multivariate Bayesian regression analysis applied to ground-motion prediction equations, Part 2: Numerical example with actual data, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100, 1568–1577, 2010b.
Atkinson, G. M. and Boore, D. M.: Modifications to existing ground-motion prediction equations in light of new data, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 101, 1121–1135, 2011.
Download
Short summary
One of the most important challenges seismologists and earthquake engineers face is reliably estimating ground motion in an area prone to large damaging earthquakes. This study aimed at better understanding the relationship between characteristics of geological faults (e.g., hypocenter location, rupture size/location, etc.) and resulting ground motion, via statistical analysis of a rupture simulation model. This study provides important insight on ground-motion responses to geological faults.