Articles | Volume 10, issue 12
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4307–4319, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4307-2017
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4307–4319, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4307-2017

Model evaluation paper 29 Nov 2017

Model evaluation paper | 29 Nov 2017

Evaluation of integrated assessment model hindcast experiments: a case study of the GCAM 3.0 land use module

Abigail C. Snyder et al.

Related authors

Modeling land use and land cover change: using a hindcast to estimate economic parameters in gcamland v2.0
Katherine V. Calvin, Abigail Snyder, Xin Zhao, and Marshall Wise
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 429–447, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-429-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-429-2022, 2022
Short summary
The GGCMI Phase 2 emulators: global gridded crop model responses to changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen (version 1.0)
James A. Franke, Christoph Müller, Joshua Elliott, Alex C. Ruane, Jonas Jägermeyr, Abigail Snyder, Marie Dury, Pete D. Falloon, Christian Folberth, Louis François, Tobias Hank, R. Cesar Izaurralde, Ingrid Jacquemin, Curtis Jones, Michelle Li, Wenfeng Liu, Stefan Olin, Meridel Phillips, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Ashwan Reddy, Karina Williams, Ziwei Wang, Florian Zabel, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3995–4018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3995-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3995-2020, 2020
Short summary
Fldgen v1.0: an emulator with internal variability and space–time correlation for Earth system models
Robert Link, Abigail Snyder, Cary Lynch, Corinne Hartin, Ben Kravitz, and Ben Bond-Lamberty
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1477–1489, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1477-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1477-2019, 2019
Short summary
A crop yield change emulator for use in GCAM and similar models: Persephone v1.0
Abigail Snyder, Katherine V. Calvin, Meridel Phillips, and Alex C. Ruane
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1319–1350, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1319-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1319-2019, 2019
Short summary
GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems
Katherine Calvin, Pralit Patel, Leon Clarke, Ghassem Asrar, Ben Bond-Lamberty, Ryna Yiyun Cui, Alan Di Vittorio, Kalyn Dorheim, Jae Edmonds, Corinne Hartin, Mohamad Hejazi, Russell Horowitz, Gokul Iyer, Page Kyle, Sonny Kim, Robert Link, Haewon McJeon, Steven J. Smith, Abigail Snyder, Stephanie Waldhoff, and Marshall Wise
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 677–698, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
BioRT-Flux-PIHM v1.0: a biogeochemical reactive transport model at the watershed scale
Wei Zhi, Yuning Shi, Hang Wen, Leila Saberi, Gene-Hua Crystal Ng, Kayalvizhi Sadayappan, Devon Kerins, Bryn Stewart, and Li Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 315–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-315-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-315-2022, 2022
Short summary
Modeling the short-term fire effects on vegetation dynamics and surface energy in southern Africa using the improved SSiB4/TRIFFID-Fire model
Huilin Huang, Yongkang Xue, Ye Liu, Fang Li, and Gregory S. Okin
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7639–7657, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7639-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7639-2021, 2021
Short summary
Explicit silicate cycling in the Kiel Marine Biogeochemistry Model version 3 (KMBM3) embedded in the UVic ESCM version 2.9
Karin Kvale, David P. Keller, Wolfgang Koeve, Katrin J. Meissner, Christopher J. Somes, Wanxuan Yao, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7255–7285, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7255-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7255-2021, 2021
Short summary
Performance analysis of regional AquaCrop (v6.1) biomass and surface soil moisture simulations using satellite and in situ observations
Shannon de Roos, Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy, and Dirk Raes
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7309–7328, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7309-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7309-2021, 2021
Short summary
OMEN-SED(-RCM) (v1.1): a pseudo-reactive continuum representation of organic matter degradation dynamics for OMEN-SED
Philip Pika, Dominik Hülse, and Sandra Arndt
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7155–7174, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7155-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7155-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Baldos, U. L. C. and Hertel, T. W.: Looking back to move forward on model validation: insights from a global model of agricultural land use, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 034024, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034024, 2013.
Beckman, J., Hertel, T., and Tyner, W.: Validating energy-oriented CGE models, Energ. Econ., 33, 799–806, 2011.
Calvin, K., Wise, M., Kyle, P., Clarke, L., and Edmonds, J.: A Hindcast Experiment Using the GCAM 3.0 Agriculture and Land-use Module, Climate Change Economics, 8, 1750005, https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007817500051, 2017.
Clarke, L., Lurz, J., Wise, M., Edmonds, J., Kim, S., Smith, S., and Pitcher, H.: Model documentation for the minicam climate change science program stabilization scenarios: Ccsp product 2.1 a, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-16735, 2007.
Download
Short summary
Experiments conducting a model forecast for a period in which observational data are available are rarely undertaken in the integrated assessment model (IAM) community. When undertaken, results are often evaluated using global aggregates that mask deficiencies. Comparing land allocation simulations in GCAM with FAO observational data from 1990 to 2010, we find quantitative evidence that global aggregates alone are not sufficient for evaluating IAMs with global supply constraints similar to GCAM.