Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.240 IF 5.240
  • IF 5-year value: 5.768 IF 5-year
    5.768
  • CiteScore value: 8.9 CiteScore
    8.9
  • SNIP value: 1.713 SNIP 1.713
  • IPP value: 5.53 IPP 5.53
  • SJR value: 3.18 SJR 3.18
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 71 Scimago H
    index 71
  • h5-index value: 51 h5-index 51
Volume 10, issue 12
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4307–4319, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4307-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4307–4319, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4307-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Model evaluation paper 29 Nov 2017

Model evaluation paper | 29 Nov 2017

Evaluation of integrated assessment model hindcast experiments: a case study of the GCAM 3.0 land use module

Abigail C. Snyder et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,284 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
898 355 31 1,284 59 47 54
  • HTML: 898
  • PDF: 355
  • XML: 31
  • Total: 1,284
  • Supplement: 59
  • BibTeX: 47
  • EndNote: 54
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jun 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jun 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,235 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,229 with geography defined and 6 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 06 Jul 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Experiments conducting a model forecast for a period in which observational data are available are rarely undertaken in the integrated assessment model (IAM) community. When undertaken, results are often evaluated using global aggregates that mask deficiencies. Comparing land allocation simulations in GCAM with FAO observational data from 1990 to 2010, we find quantitative evidence that global aggregates alone are not sufficient for evaluating IAMs with global supply constraints similar to GCAM.
Experiments conducting a model forecast for a period in which observational data are available...
Citation