Articles | Volume 10, issue 12
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4307–4319, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4307-2017
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4307–4319, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4307-2017

Model evaluation paper 29 Nov 2017

Model evaluation paper | 29 Nov 2017

Evaluation of integrated assessment model hindcast experiments: a case study of the GCAM 3.0 land use module

Abigail C. Snyder et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,764 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,113 582 69 1,764 82 78 84
  • HTML: 1,113
  • PDF: 582
  • XML: 69
  • Total: 1,764
  • Supplement: 82
  • BibTeX: 78
  • EndNote: 84
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jun 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jun 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,635 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,629 with geography defined and 6 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 19 Jan 2022
Download
Short summary
Experiments conducting a model forecast for a period in which observational data are available are rarely undertaken in the integrated assessment model (IAM) community. When undertaken, results are often evaluated using global aggregates that mask deficiencies. Comparing land allocation simulations in GCAM with FAO observational data from 1990 to 2010, we find quantitative evidence that global aggregates alone are not sufficient for evaluating IAMs with global supply constraints similar to GCAM.