Articles | Volume 4, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-1103-2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-1103-2011
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
05 Dec 2011
Methods for assessment of models |  | 05 Dec 2011

Evaluation of a Global Vegetation Model using time series of satellite vegetation indices

F. Maignan, F.-M. Bréon, F. Chevallier, N. Viovy, P. Ciais, C. Garrec, J. Trules, and M. Mancip

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Implementing the iCORAL (version 1.0) coral reef CaCO3 production module in the iLOVECLIM climate model
Nathaelle Bouttes, Lester Kwiatkowski, Manon Berger, Victor Brovkin, and Guy Munhoven
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6513–6528, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6513-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6513-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes within the adjoint-based data assimilation system – Nanjing University Carbon Assimilation System (NUCAS v1.0)
Huajie Zhu, Mousong Wu, Fei Jiang, Michael Vossbeck, Thomas Kaminski, Xiuli Xing, Jun Wang, Weimin Ju, and Jing M. Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6337–6363, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6337-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quantifying the role of ozone-caused damage to vegetation in the Earth system: a new parameterization scheme for photosynthetic and stomatal responses
Fang Li, Zhimin Zhou, Samuel Levis, Stephen Sitch, Felicity Hayes, Zhaozhong Feng, Peter B. Reich, Zhiyi Zhao, and Yanqing Zhou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6173–6193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6173-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6173-2024, 2024
Short summary
Radiocarbon analysis reveals underestimation of soil organic carbon persistence in new-generation soil models
Alexander S. Brunmayr, Frank Hagedorn, Margaux Moreno Duborgel, Luisa I. Minich, and Heather D. Graven
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5961–5985, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5961-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5961-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring the potential of history matching for land surface model calibration
Nina Raoult, Simon Beylat, James M. Salter, Frédéric Hourdin, Vladislav Bastrikov, Catherine Ottlé, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5779–5801, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5779-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5779-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abramowitz, G.: Towards a benchmark for land surface models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L22702, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl024419, 2005.
Berrisford, P., Dee, D., Fielding, K., Fuentes, M., Kallberg, P., Kobayashi, S., and Uppala, S.: The ERA-Interim archive, ERA-40 Report Series N°1, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, 2009.
Blyth, E., Clark, D. B., Ellis, R., Huntingford, C., Los, S., Pryor, M., Best, M., and Sitch, S.: A comprehensive set of benchmark tests for a land surface model of simultaneous fluxes of water and carbon at both the global and seasonal scale, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 255–269, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-255-2011, 2011.
Bonan, G. B. and Levis, S.: Evaluating aspects of the community land and atmosphere models (clm3 and cam3) using a dynamic global vegetation model, J. Climate, 19, 2290–2301, 2006.
Download