Articles | Volume 17, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8521-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8521-2024
Model description paper
 | 
02 Dec 2024
Model description paper |  | 02 Dec 2024

Three-dimensional analytical solution of self-potential from regularly polarized bodies in a layered seafloor model

Pengfei Zhang, Yi-an Cui, Jing Xie, Youjun Guo, Jianxin Liu, and Jieran Liu

Related subject area

Solid Earth
Accelerated pseudo-transient method for elastic, viscoelastic, and coupled hydro-mechanical problems with applications
Yury Alkhimenkov and Yury Y. Podladchikov
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-160,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-160, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
ShellSet v1.1.0 parallel dynamic neotectonic modelling: a case study using Earth5-049
Jon B. May, Peter Bird, and Michele M. C. Carafa
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6153–6171, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6153-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6153-2024, 2024
Short summary
FastIsostasy v1.0 – a regional, accelerated 2D glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) model accounting for the lateral variability of the solid Earth
Jan Swierczek-Jereczek, Marisa Montoya, Konstantin Latychev, Alexander Robinson, Jorge Alvarez-Solas, and Jerry Mitrovica
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5263–5290, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5263-2024, 2024
Short summary
Automatic adjoint-based inversion schemes for geodynamics: reconstructing the evolution of Earth's mantle in space and time
Sia Ghelichkhan, Angus Gibson, D. Rhodri Davies, Stephan C. Kramer, and David A. Ham
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5057–5086, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5057-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5057-2024, 2024
Short summary
Reconciling Surface Deflections From Simulations of Global Mantle Convection
Conor P. B. O'Malley, Gareth G. Roberts, James Panton, Fred D. Richards, J. Huw Davies, Victoria M. Fernandes, and Sia Ghelichkhan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1893,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1893, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ai, H., Ekinci, Y. L., Balkaya, Ç., Alvandi, A., Ekinci, R., Roy, A., Su, K., and Pham, L. T.: Modified Barnacles mating optimizing algorithm for the inversion of self-potential anomalies due to ore deposits, Natural Resources Research, 33, 1073–1102, 2024. a
Alarouj, M. and Jackson, M. D.: Numerical modeling of self-potential in heterogeneous reservoirs, Geophysics, 87, E103–E120, 2022. a
Bérubé, A. P.: A Graphical 3D Finite Element Program for Modelling Self-Potentials Generated by Flow Through a Porous MediumA Graphical 3D FEM Program for Modelling SP, J. Environ. Eng. Geoph., 12, 185–197, 2007. a
Bhattacharya, B. and Roy, N.: A note on the use of a nomogram for self-potential anomalies, Geophys. Prospect., 29, 102–107, 1981. a
Biswas, A.: Self-potential method: theoretical modeling and applications in geosciences, vol. 10, Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79333-3, 2021. a
Download
Short summary
Our study proposes a three-dimensional analytical solution for the self-potential (SP) method to detect seafloor massive sulfide deposits. Using the mirror image method, we derived formulas for the SP generated by polarized bodies in layered media. We conducted experiments with a simulated  environment and compared the results with our theoretical predictions. The findings confirmed a high degree of accuracy, demonstrating the reliability of our approach for faster and precise SP modeling.