Articles | Volume 17, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6153-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6153-2024
Development and technical paper
 | 
19 Aug 2024
Development and technical paper |  | 19 Aug 2024

ShellSet v1.1.0 parallel dynamic neotectonic modelling: a case study using Earth5-049

Jon B. May, Peter Bird, and Michele M. C. Carafa

Related authors

The European Fault-Source Model 2020 (EFSM20): geologic input data for the European Seismic Hazard Model 2020
Roberto Basili, Laurentiu Danciu, Céline Beauval, Karin Sesetyan, Susana Pires Vilanova, Shota Adamia, Pierre Arroucau, Jure Atanackov, Stéphane Baize, Carolina Canora, Riccardo Caputo, Michele Matteo Cosimo Carafa, Edward Marc Cushing, Susana Custódio, Mine Betul Demircioglu Tumsa, João C. Duarte, Athanassios Ganas, Julián García-Mayordomo, Laura Gómez de la Peña, Eulàlia Gràcia, Petra Jamšek Rupnik, Hervé Jomard, Vanja Kastelic, Francesco Emanuele Maesano, Raquel Martín-Banda, Sara Martínez-Loriente, Marta Neres, Hector Perea, Barbara Šket Motnikar, Mara Monica Tiberti, Nino Tsereteli, Varvara Tsironi, Roberto Vallone, Kris Vanneste, Polona Zupančič, and Domenico Giardini
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3945–3976, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3945-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3945-2024, 2024
Short summary
Seismogenic depth and seismic coupling estimation in the transition zone between Alps, Dinarides and Pannonian Basin for the new Slovenian seismic hazard model
Polona Zupančič, Barbara Šket Motnikar, Michele M. C. Carafa, Petra Jamšek Rupnik, Mladen Živčić, Vanja Kastelic, Gregor Rajh, Martina Čarman, Jure Atanackov, and Andrej Gosar
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 651–672, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-651-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-651-2024, 2024
Short summary
A sanity check for earthquake recurrence models used in PSHA of slowly deforming regions: the case of SW Iberia
Margarida Ramalho, Luis Matias, Marta Neres, Michele M. C. Carafa, Alexandra Carvalho, and Paula Teves-Costa
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 117–138, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-117-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-117-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Solid Earth
FastIsostasy v1.0 – a regional, accelerated 2D glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) model accounting for the lateral variability of the solid Earth
Jan Swierczek-Jereczek, Marisa Montoya, Konstantin Latychev, Alexander Robinson, Jorge Alvarez-Solas, and Jerry Mitrovica
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5263–5290, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5263-2024, 2024
Short summary
Automatic adjoint-based inversion schemes for geodynamics: reconstructing the evolution of Earth's mantle in space and time
Sia Ghelichkhan, Angus Gibson, D. Rhodri Davies, Stephan C. Kramer, and David A. Ham
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5057–5086, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5057-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5057-2024, 2024
Short summary
Reconciling Surface Deflections From Simulations of Global Mantle Convection
Conor P. B. O'Malley, Gareth G. Roberts, James Panton, Fred D. Richards, J. Huw Davies, Victoria M. Fernandes, and Sia Ghelichkhan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1893,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1893, 2024
Short summary
Benchmarking the accuracy of higher-order particle methods in geodynamic models of transient flow
Rene Gassmöller, Juliane Dannberg, Wolfgang Bangerth, Elbridge Gerry Puckett, and Cedric Thieulot
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4115–4134, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4115-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4115-2024, 2024
Short summary
REHEATFUNQ (REgional HEAT-Flow Uncertainty and aNomaly Quantification) 2.0.1: a model for regional aggregate heat flow distributions and anomaly quantification
Malte Jörn Ziebarth and Sebastian von Specht
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2783–2828, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2783-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2783-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Austermann, J., Ben-Avraham, Z., Bird, P., Heidbach, O., Schubert, G., and Stock, J. M.: Quantifying the forces needed for the rapid change of Pacific plate motion at 6 Ma, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 307, 289–297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.043, 2011. a
Baumann, T. S., Kaus, B. J., and Popov, A. A.: Constraining effective rheology through parallel joint geodynamic inversion, Tectonophysics, 631, 197–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.04.037, 2014. a
Bird, P.: Testing hypotheses on plate-driving mechanisms with global lithosphere models including topography, thermal structure, and faults, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 103, 10115–10129, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JB00198, 1998. a
Bird, P., Ben-Avraham, Z., Schubert, G., Andreoli, M., and Viola, G.: Patterns of stress and strain rate in southern Africa, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 111, B08402, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003882, 2006. a
Bird, P., Liu, Z., and Rucker, W. K.: Stresses that drive the plates from below: Definitions, computational path, model optimization, and error analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 113, B11406, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005460, 2008. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, y, z, aa
Download
Short summary
ShellSet is a combination of well-known geoscience software packages. It features a simple user interface and is optimised through the addition of a grid search input option (automatically searching for optimal models within a defined N-dimensional parameter space) and the ability to run multiple models in parallel. We show that for each number of models tested there is a performance benefit to parallel running, while two examples demonstrate a use case by improving an existing global model.