Articles | Volume 16, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6433-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6433-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review and perspective paper
| Highlight paper
| 
14 Nov 2023
Review and perspective paper | Highlight paper |
| 14 Nov 2023
| 14 Nov 2023
Machine learning for numerical weather and climate modelling: a review
Catherine O. de Burgh-Day
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
The Bureau of Meteorology, 700 Collins St, Docklands, Victoria, Australia
Tennessee Leeuwenburg
The Bureau of Meteorology, 700 Collins St, Docklands, Victoria, Australia
Cited articles
Ackmann, J., Düben, P. D., Palmer, T. N., and Smolarkiewicz, P. K.: Machine-learned preconditioners for linear solvers in geophysical fluid flows, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.02866, 6 October 2020.
Adams, S. V., Ford, R. W., Hambley, M., Hobson, J. M., Kavčič, I., Maynard, C. M., Melvin, T., Müller, E. H., Mullerworth, S., Porter, A. R. Rezny, M., Shipway, B. J., and Wong, R.: LFRic: Meeting the challenges of scalability and performance portability in Weather and Climate models, J. Parallel. Distr. Com., 132, 383–396, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.02.007, 2019.
Alemohammad, S. H., Fang, B., Konings, A. G., Aires, F., Green, J. K., Kolassa, J., Miralles, D., Prigent, C., and Gentine, P.: Water, Energy, and Carbon with Artificial Neural Networks (WECANN): a statistically based estimate of global surface turbulent fluxes and gross primary productivity using solar-induced fluorescence, Biogeosciences, 14, 4101–4124, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4101-2017, 2017.
Arcomano, T., Szunyogh, I., Wikner, A., Pathak, J., Hunt, B. R., and Ott, E.: A Hybrid Approach to Atmospheric Modeling That Combines Machine Learning With a Physics-Based Numerical Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14, e2021MS002712, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002712, 2022.
Atkinson, S.: Bayesian hidden physics models: Uncertainty quantification for discovery of nonlinear partial differential operators from data, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.04228. 7 June 2020.
Bar-Sinai, Y., Hoyer, S., Hickey, J., and Brenner, M. P.: Learning data-driven discretizations for partial differential equations, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 15344–15349, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814058116. 2019.
Battaglia, P. W., Hamrick, J. B., Bapst, V., Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Zambaldi, V., Malinowski, M., Tacchetti, A., Raposo, D., Santoro, A., Faulkner, R. and Gulcehre, C., Song, F., Ballard, A., Gilmer, J., Dahl, G., Vaswani, A., Allen, K., Nash, C., Langston, V., Dyer, C., Heess, N., Wierstra, D., Kohli, P., Botvinick, M., Vinyals, O., Li, Y., and Pascanu R.: Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.01261, 4 June 2018.
Beucler, T., Rasp, S., Pritchard, M., and Gentine, P.: Achieving conservation of energy in neural network emulators for climate modeling, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.06622, 15 June 2019.
Beucler, T., Pritchard, M., Rasp, S., Ott, J., Baldi, P., and Gentine, P.: Enforcing analytic constraints in neural networks emulating physical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett., 126, 098302, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.098302. 2021.
Bhattacharya, K., Hosseini, B., Kovachki, N. B., and Stuart, A. M.: Model reduction and neural networks for parametric PDEs, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.03180, 7 May 2020.
Bi, K., Xie, L., Zhang, H., Chen, X., Gu, X., and Tian, Q.: Pangu-Weather: A 3D High-Resolution Model for Fast and Accurate Global Weather Forecast, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.02556, 3 November 2022.
Bihlo, A. and Popovych, R. O.: Physics-informed neural networks for the shallow-water equations on the sphere, J. Comput. Phys., 456, 111024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111024. 2022.
Bolton, T. and Zanna, L.: Applications of deep learning to ocean data inference and subgrid parameterization, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 376–399, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001472, 2019.
Breiman, L.: Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, 2001.
Brenowitz, N. D. and Bretherton, C. S.: Prognostic validation of a neural network unified physics parameterization, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 6289–6298, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078510, 2018.
Brenowitz, N. D. and Bretherton, C. S.: Spatially extended tests of a neural network parametrization trained by coarse-graining, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 2728–2744, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001711, 2019.
Brenowitz, N. D., Beucler, T., Pritchard, M., and Bretherton, C. S.: Interpreting and stabilizing machine-learning parametrizations of convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 4357–4375, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0082.1, 2020a.
Brenowitz, N. D., Henn, B., McGibbon, J., Clark, S. K., Kwa, A., Perkins, W. A., Watt-Meyer, O., and Bretherton, C. S.: Machine learning climate model dynamics: Offline versus online performance, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.03081, 5 November 2020b.
Brenowitz, N. D., Perkins, W. A., Nugent, J. M., Watt-Meyer, O., Clark, S. K., Kwa, A., Henn, B., McGibbon, J., and Bretherton, C. S.: Emulating Fast Processes in Climate Models., arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.10774, 19 November 2022.
Carranza-García, M., García-Gutiérrez, J., and Riquelme, J. C.: A framework for evaluating land use and land cover classification using convolutional neural networks, Remote Sens.-Basel, 11, 274, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030274, 2019.
Chaney, N. W., Herman, J. D., Ek, M. B., and Wood, E. F.: Deriving global parameter estimates for the Noah land surface model using FLUXNET and machine learning, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 13–218, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024821, 2016.
Chantry, M., Christensen, H., Dueben, P., and Palmer, T.: Opportunities and challenges for machine learning in weather and climate modelling: hard, medium and soft AI, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 379, 20200083, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0083, 2021a.
Chantry, M., Hatfield, S., Dueben, P., Polichtchouk, I., and Palmer, T.: Machine learning emulation of gravity wave drag in numerical weather forecasting, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2021MS002477, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002477, 2021b.
Chase, R. J., Harrison, D. R., Burke, A., Lackmann, G. M., and McGovern, A.: A Machine Learning Tutorial for Operational Meteorology, Part I: Traditional Machine Learning, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.07492, 2022a.
Chase, R. J., Harrison, D. R., Lackmann, G., and McGovern, A.: A Machine Learning Tutorial for Operational Meteorology, Part II: Neural Networks and Deep Learning, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.00147, 2022b.
Chattopadhyay, A., Subel, A., and Hassanzadeh, P.: Data-driven super-parameterization using deep learning: Experimentation with multiscale lorenz 96 systems and transfer learning, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002084, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002084, 2020.
Chevallier, F., Chéruy, F., Scott, N. A., and Chédin, A.: A neural network approach for a fast and accurate computation of a longwave radiative budget, J. Appl. Meteorol., 37, 1385–1397, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037%3C1385:ANNAFA%3E2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Clare, M. C., Jamil, O., and Morcrette, C. J.: Combining distribution-based neural networks to predict weather forecast probabilities, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 4337–4357, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4180, 2021.
Cuomo, S., Di Cola, V. S., Giampaolo, F., Rozza, G., Raissi, M., and Piccialli, F.: Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's next, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.05624, 14 January 2022.
Dagon, K., Sanderson, B. M., Fisher, R. A., and Lawrence, D. M.: A machine learning approach to emulation and biophysical parameter estimation with the Community Land Model, version 5, Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 223–244, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-223-2020, 2020.
De Bézenac, E., Pajot, A., and Gallinari, P.: Towards a hybrid approach to physical process modeling, Technical report, https://dl4physicalsciences.github.io/files/nips_dlps_2017_9.pdf (last access: 3 November 2023), 2017.
de Witt, C. S., Tong, C., Zantedeschi, V., De Martini, D., Kalaitzis, F., Chantry, M., Watson-Parris, D., and Bilinski, P.: RainBench: towards global precipitation forecasting from satellite imagery, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.09670, 17 December 2020.
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L. J., Li, K., and Fei-Fei, L.: Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami, FL, USA, 248–255, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848, 2009.
Digra, M., Dhir, R., and Sharma, N.: Land use land cover classification of remote sensing images based on the deep learning approaches: a statistical analysis and review, Arab. J. Geosci., 15, 1003, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10246-8, 2022.
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S. Uszkoreit, J., and Houlsby, N.: An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.11929, 22 October 2020.
Dueben, P. D. and Bauer, P.: Challenges and design choices for global weather and climate models based on machine learning, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3999–4009, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3999-2018, 2018.
Dueben, P. D., Schultz, M. G., Chantry, M., Gagne, D. J., Hall, D. M., and McGovern, A.: Challenges and Benchmark Datasets for Machine Learning in the Atmospheric Sciences: Definition, Status, and Outlook, Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems, 1, e210002, https://doi.org/10.1175/AIES-D-21-0002.1, 2022.
ECMWF: Ifs documentation (cy45r1), https://www.ecmwf.int/en/publications/ifs-documentation (last access: 7 February 2023), 2018.
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016.
Flora, M., Potvin, C., McGovern, A., and Handler, S.: Comparing Explanation Methods for Traditional Machine Learning Models Part 2: Quantifying Model Explainability Faithfulness and Improvements with Dimensionality Reduction, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.10378, 18 November 2022.
Friedman, J. H.: Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine, Ann. Stat., 29 1189–1232, https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451, 2001.
Fuhg, J. N., Kalogeris, I., Fau, A., and Bouklas, N.: Interval and fuzzy physics-informed neural networks for uncertain fields, Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 68, 103240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103240, 2022.
Gagne, D. J., McCandless, T., Kosovic, B., DeCastro, A., Loft, R., Haupt, S. E., and Yang, B.: Machine learning parameterization of the surface layer: bridging the observation-modeling gap, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2019, IN44A-04, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AGUFMIN44A..04G/abstract (last access: 3 November 2023), 2019.
Gagne, D. J., Chen, C. C., and Gettelman, A.: Emulation of bin Microphysical Processes with machine learning, in: 100th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, AMS, https://ams.confex.com/ams/2020Annual/webprogram/Paper368156.html (last access: 3 November 2023), 2020a.
Gagne, D. J., Christensen, H. M., Subramanian, A. C., and Monahan, A. H.: Machine learning for stochastic parameterization: Generative adversarial networks in the Lorenz'96 model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001896, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001896, 2020b.
Garg, S., Rasp, S., and Thuerey, N.: WeatherBench Probability: A benchmark dataset for probabilistic medium-range weather forecasting along with deep learning baseline models, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.00865, 2 May 2022.
George, T., Gupta, A., and Sarin, V.: A recommendation system for preconditioned iterative solvers, Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Pisa, Italy, 803–808, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2008.105, 2008.
Gettelman, A., Gagne, D. J., Chen, C. C., Christensen, M. W., Lebo, Z. J., Morrison, H., and Gantos, G.: Machine learning the warm rain process, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002268, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002268, 2021.
Goodfellow, I., Yoshua B., and Aaron C.: Deep learning, MIT press, ISBN 9780262035613, 2016.
Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y.: Generative adversarial networks, Commun. Acm., 63, 139–144, https://doi.org/10.1145/3422622, 2020.
Grigo, C. and Koutsourelakis, P. S.: A physics-aware, probabilistic machine learning framework for coarse-graining high-dimensional systems in the Small Data regime, J. Comput. Phys., 397, 108842, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.053, 2019.
Gurvan, M., Bourdallé-Badie, R., Chanut, J., Clementi, E., Coward, A., Ethé, C., Iovino, D., Lea, D., Lévy, C., Lovato, T., Martin, N., Masson, S., Mocavero, S., Rousset, C., Storkey, D., Vancoppenolle, M., Müeller, S., Nurser, G., Bell, M., and Samson, G.: NEMO ocean engine, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1464816, 2019.
Ham, Y. G., Kim, J. H., and Luo, J. J.: Deep learning for multi-year ENSO forecasts, Nature, 573, 568–572, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1559-7, 2019.
Ham, Y. G., Kim, J. H., Kim, E. S., and On, K. W.: Unified deep learning model for El Niño/Southern Oscillation forecasts by incorporating seasonality in climate data, Sci. Bull., 66, 1358–1366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2021.03.009, 2021.
Han, Y., Zhang, G. J., Huang, X., and Wang, Y.: A moist physics parameterization based on deep learning, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002076, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002076, 2020.
Harder, P., Watson-Parris, D., Stier, P., Strassel, D., Gauger, N. R., and Keuper, J.: Physics-informed learning of aerosol microphysics, Environ. Data Sci., 1, e20, https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2022.22, 2022.
Harris, L., Chen, X., Putman, W., Zhou, L., and Chen, J. H.: A scientific description of the GFDL finite-volume cubed-sphere dynamical core, NOAA technical memorandum OAR GFDL, https://doi.org/10.25923/6nhs-5897, 2021.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J. H., and Friedman, J. H.: The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, New York Springer, 2, 758 pp., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5, 2009.
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition, Proc. CVPR IEEE, 770–778, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1512.03385, 2016.
He, X., Liu, S., Xu, T., Yu, K., Gentine, P., Zhang, Z., Xu, Z., Jiao, D., and Wu, D.: Improving predictions of evapotranspiration by integrating multi-source observations and land surface model, Agr. Water Manage., 272, 107827, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107827, 2022.
Hewamalage, H., Ackermann, K., and Bergmeir, C.: Forecast Evaluation for Data Scientists: Common Pitfalls and Best Practices, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.10716, 21 March 2022.
Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J.: LSTM can solve hard long time lag problems, Adv. Neur. In., 9, https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/1996/hash/a4d2f0d23dcc84ce983ff9157f8b7f88-Abstract.html (last access: 3 November 2023), 1996.
Holloway, A. and Chen, T. Y.: Neural networks for predicting the behavior of preconditioned iterative solvers, in: International Conference on Computational Science,Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 302–309, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72584-8_39, 2007.
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., and White, H.: Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators, Neural Networks, 2, 359–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8, 1989.
Horvat, C. and Roach, L. A.: WIFF1.0: a hybrid machine-learning-based parameterization of wave-induced sea ice floe fracture, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 803–814, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-803-2022, 2022.
Hsieh, W. W.: Introduction to Environmental Data Science, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107588493, 2023.
Hu, Y., Chen, L., Wang, Z., and Li, H.: SwinVRNN: A Data-Driven Ensemble Forecasting Model via Learned Distribution Perturbation, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 15, e2022MS003211, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003211, 2023.
Huang, Z., England, M., Davenport, J. H., and Paulson, L. C.: Using machine learning to decide when to precondition cylindrical algebraic decomposition with Groebner bases, 18th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC), Timisoara, Romania, 45–52, https://doi.org/10.1109/SYNASC.2016.020, 2016.
Johnson, S. J., Stockdale, T. N., Ferranti, L., Balmaseda, M. A., Molteni, F., Magnusson, L., Tietsche, S., Decremer, D., Weisheimer, A., Balsamo, G., Keeley, S. P. E., Mogensen, K., Zuo, H., and Monge-Sanz, B. M.: SEAS5: the new ECMWF seasonal forecast system, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1087–1117, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1087-2019, 2019.
Kapp-Schwoerer, L., Graubner, A., Kim, S., and Kashinath, K.: Spatio-temporal segmentation and tracking of weather patterns with light-weight Neural Networks, https://ai4earthscience.github.io/neurips-2020-workshop/papers/ai4earth_neurips_2020_55.pdf (last access: 3 November 2023), 2020.
Karpatne, A., Atluri, G., Faghmous, J. H., Steinbach, M., Banerjee, A., Ganguly, A., Shekhar, S., Samatova, N., and Kumar, V.: Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data, IEEE T. Knowl. Data En., 29, 2318–2331, https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2017.2720168, 2017.
Karunasinghe, D. S. and Liong, S. Y.: Chaotic time series prediction with a global model: Artificial neural network, J. Hydrol., 323, 92–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.048, 2006.
Kashinath, K., Mustafa, M., Albert, A., Wu, J. L., Jiang, C., Esmaeilzadeh, S., Azizzadenesheli, K., Wang, R., Chattopadhyay, A., Singh, A., Manepalli, A., Chirila, D., Yu, R., Walters, R., White, B., Xiao, H., Tchelepi, H. A., Marcus, P., Anandkumar, A., Hassanzadeh, P., and Prabhat, N.: Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 379, 20200093, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0093, 2021.
Keisler, R.: Forecasting Global Weather with Graph Neural Networks, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.07575, 15 February 2022.
Kelotra, A. and Pandey, P.: Stock market prediction using optimized deep-convlstm model, Big Data, 8, 5–24, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.07575, 2022.
Kim, J., Kwon, M., Kim, S. D., Kug, J. S., Ryu, J. G., and Kim, J.: Spatiotemporal neural network with attention mechanism for El Niño forecasts, Sci. Rep.-UK, 12, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10839-z, 2022.
Kipf, T. N. and Welling, M.: Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.02907, 9 September 2016.
Kochkov, D., Smith, J. A., Alieva, A., Wang, Q., Brenner, M. P., and Hoyer, S.: Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2101784118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101784118, 2021.
Krasnopolsky, V. M., Chalikov, D. V., and Tolman, H. L.: A neural network technique to improve computational efficiency of numerical oceanic models, Ocean Model., 4, 363–383, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(02)00010-0, 2002.
Krasnopolsky, V. M., Fox-Rabinovitz, M. S., and Chalikov, D. V.: New approach to calculation of atmospheric model physics: Accurate and fast neural network emulation of longwave radiation in a climate model, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1370–1383, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2923.1, 2005.
Krasnopolsky, V. M., Fox-Rabinovitz, M. S., and Belochitski, A. A.: Using ensemble of neural networks to learn stochastic convection parameterizations for climate and numerical weather prediction models from data simulated by a cloud resolving model, Advances in Artificial Neural Systems, 2013, p. 5, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/485913, 2013.
Kuefler, E. and Chen, T. Y.: On using reinforcement learning to solve sparse linear systems, in: International Conference on Computational Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 955–964, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69384-0_100, 2008.
Ladický, L. U., Jeong, S., Solenthaler, B., Pollefeys, M., and Gross, M.: Data-driven fluid simulations using regression forests, ACM T. Graphic., 34, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818129, 2015.
Lam, R., Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Willson, M., Wirnsberger, P., Fortunato, M., Pritzel, A., Ravuri, S., Ewalds, T., Alet, F., Eaton-Rosen, Z. Hu, W., Merose, A., Hoyer, S., Holland, G., Vinyals, O., Stott, J., Pritzel, A., Mohamed, S., and Battaglia, P.: GraphCast: Learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.12794, 24 December 2022.
Lanthaler, S., Mishra, S., and Karniadakis, G. E.: Error estimates for deeponets: A deep learning framework in infinite dimensions, T. Math. Appl., 6, tnac001, https://doi.org/10.1093/imatrm/tnac001, 2022.
LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., and Haffner, P.: Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, P. IEEE, 86, 2278–2324, https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791, 1998.
Leufen, L. H. and Schädler, G.: Calculating the turbulent fluxes in the atmospheric surface layer with neural networks, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2033–2047, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2033-2019, 2019.
Li, Z., Kovachki, N., Azizzadenesheli, K., Liu, B., Stuart, A., Bhattacharya, K., and Anandkumar, A.: Multipole graph neural operator for parametric partial differential equations, Adv. Neur. In., 33, 6755–6766, 2020a.
Li, Z., Kovachki, N., Azizzadenesheli, K., Liu, B., Bhattacharya, K., Stuart, A., and Anandkumar, A.: Neural operator: Graph kernel network for partial differential equations, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.03485, 7 March 2020b.
Li, Z., Kovachki, N., Azizzadenesheli, K., Liu, B., Bhattacharya, K., Stuart, A., and Anandkumar, A.: Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.08895, 18 October 2020c.
Lopez-Gomez, I., McGovern, A., Agrawal, S., and Hickey, J.: Global extreme heat forecasting using neural weather models, Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems, 2, e220035, https://doi.org/10.1175/AIES-D-22-0035.1, 2023.
Lorenz, E. N.: Predictability: A problem partly solved, in Proceedings of Seminar on Predictability, 4–8, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617652.004, 1996.
Lu, L., Jin, P., and Karniadakis, G. E.: Deeponet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1910.03193, 8 October 2019.
Lundberg, S. and Lee, S.: A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions, Adv. Neur. In., 30, 4768–4777, 2017.
McCulloch, W. S. and Pitts, W.: A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity, B. Math. Biophys., 5, 115–133, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259, 1943.
McGovern, A., Lagerquist, R., Gagne, D. J., Jergensen, G. E., Elmore, K. L., Homeyer, C. R., and Smith, T.: Making the black box more transparent: Understanding the physical implications of machine learning, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 2175–2199, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0195.1, 2019.
Meyer, D., Hogan, R. J., Dueben, P. D., and Mason, S. L.: Machine learning emulation of 3D cloud radiative effects, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14, e2021MS002550, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002550, 2022.
Moishin, M., Deo, R. C., Prasad, R., Raj, N., and Abdulla, S.: Designing deep-based learning flood forecast model with ConvLSTM hybrid algorithm, IEEE Access, 9, 50982–50993, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3065939, 2021.
Molina, M. J., O’Brien, T. A., Anderson, G., Ashfaq, M., Bennett, K. E., Collins, W. D., Dagon, K., Restrepo, J. M., and Ullrich, P. A.: A Review of Recent and Emerging Machine Learning Applications for Climate Variability and Weather Phenomena, Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems, 2, 1–46, https://doi.org/10.1175/AIES-D-22-0086.1, 2023.
Mooers, G., Pritchard, M., Beucler, T., Ott, J., Yacalis, G., Baldi, P., and Gentine, P.: Assessing the Potential of Deep Learning for Emulating Cloud Superparameterization in Climate Models With Real-Geography Boundary Conditions, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002385, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002385, 2021.
Mudigonda, M., Kim, S., Mahesh, A., Kahou, S., Kashinath, K., Williams, D., Michalski, V., O’Brien, T., and Prabhat, M.: Segmenting and tracking extreme climate events using neural networks, in: Deep Learning for Physical Sciences (DLPS) Workshop, held with NIPS Conference, https://dl4physicalsciences.github.io/files/nips_dlps_2017_20.pdf (last access: 3 November 2023), 2017.
Neale, R. B., Chen, C. C., Gettelman, A., Lauritzen, P. H., Park, S., Williamson, D. L., Conley, A. J., Garcia, R., Kinnison, D., Lamarque, J. F., Marsh, D., Mills, M., Smith, A. K., Tilmes, S., Vitt, F., Morrison, H., Cameron-Smith, P., Iacono, M. J., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Liu, X., Rasch, P. J., and Taylor, M. A.: Description of the NCAR community atmosphere model (CAM 5.0), NCAR technical note, 3, https://www2.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm1.0/cam/docs/description/cam5_desc.pdf (last access: 3 November 2023), 2012.
Nelsen, N. H. and Stuart, A. M.: The random feature model for input-output maps between banach spaces, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 43, A3212–A3243, https://doi.org/10.1137/20M133957X, 2021.
Nguyen, T., Brandstetter, J., Kapoor, A., Gupta, J. K., and Grover, A.: ClimaX: A foundation model for weather and climate, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.10343, 24 January 2023.
Nielsen, A. H., Iosifidis, A., and Karstoft, H.: Forecasting large-scale circulation regimes using deformable convolutional neural networks and global spatiotemporal climate data, Sci. Rep.-UK, 12, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052%3C1237:WRRAQS%3E2.0.CO;2, 2022.
O'Brien, T. A., Risser, M. D., Loring, B., Elbashandy, A. A., Krishnan, H., Johnson, J., Patricola, C. M., O'Brien, J. P., Mahesh, A., Prabhat, Arriaga Ramirez, S., Rhoades, A. M., Charn, A., Inda Díaz, H., and Collins, W. D.: Detection of atmospheric rivers with inline uncertainty quantification: TECA-BARD v1.0.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6131–6148, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6131-2020, 2020.
O'Gorman, P. A. and Dwyer, J. G.: Using machine learning to parameterize moist convection: Potential for modeling of climate, climate change, and extreme events, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 2548–2563, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001351, 2018.
O'Leary, J., Paulson, J. A., and Mesbah, A.: Stochastic physics-informed neural ordinary differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 468, 111466, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111466, 2022.
Ott, J., Pritchard, M., Best, N., Linstead, E., Curcic, M., and Baldi, P.: A Fortran-Keras deep learning bridge for scientific computing, Sci. Programm., 2020, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8888811, 2020.
Pal, S. and Sharma, P.: A review of machine learning applications in land surface modeling, Earth, 2, 174–190, https://doi.org/10.3390/earth2010011, 2021.
Pan, S., Pan, N., Tian, H., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Shi, H., Arora, V. K., Haverd, V., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Lienert, S., Lombardozzi, D., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Ottlé, C., Poulter, B., Zaehle, S., and Running, S. W.: Evaluation of global terrestrial evapotranspiration using state-of-the-art approaches in remote sensing, machine learning and land surface modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1485–1509, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1485-2020, 2020.
Patel, R. G., Trask, N. A., Wood, M. A., and Cyr, E. C.: A physics-informed operator regression framework for extracting data-driven continuum models, Comput. Method Appl. M., 373, 113500, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113500, 2021.
Pathak, J., Subramanian, S., Harrington, P., Raja, S., Chattopadhyay, A., Mardani, M., Kurth, T., Hall, D., Li, Z., Azizzadenesheli, K. and Hassanzadeh, P., Kashinath, K., and Anandkumar, A.: Fourcastnet: A global data-driven high-resolution weather model using adaptive fourier neural operators, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.11214, 22 February 2022.
Peairs, L. and Chen, T. Y.: Using reinforcement learning to vary the m in GMRES (m), Procedia Comput. Sci., 4, 2257–2266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2011.04.246, 2011.
Pelissier, C., Frame, J., and Nearing, G.: Combining parametric land surface models with machine learning, Int. Geosci. Remote. S., 2020, 3668–3671, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9324607, 2020.
Pincus, R., Mlawer, E. J., and Delamere, J. S.: Balancing accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility in radiation calculations for dynamical models, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 3074–3089, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001621, 2019.
Prabhat, Kashinath, K., Mudigonda, M., Kim, S., Kapp-Schwoerer, L., Graubner, A., Karaismailoglu, E., von Kleist, L., Kurth, T., Greiner, A., Mahesh, A., Yang, K., Lewis, C., Chen, J., Lou, A., Chandran, S., Toms, B., Chapman, W., Dagon, K., Shields, C. A., O'Brien, T., Wehner, M., and Collins, W.: ClimateNet: an expert-labeled open dataset and deep learning architecture for enabling high-precision analyses of extreme weather, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 107–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-107-2021, 2021.
Psaros, A. F., Meng, X., Zou, Z., Guo, L., and Karniadakis, G. E.: Uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning: Methods, metrics, and comparisons, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.07766, 19 January 2022.
Rasp, S.: Coupled online learning as a way to tackle instabilities and biases in neural network parameterizations: general algorithms and Lorenz 96 case study (v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2185–2196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2185-2020, 2020.
Rasp, S., Dueben, P. D., Scher, S., Weyn, J. A., Mouatadid, S., and Thuerey, N.: WeatherBench: a benchmark data set for data-driven weather forecasting, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002203, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002203, 2020.
Rasp, S., Pritchard, M. S., and Gentine, P.: Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 9684–9689, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810286115, 2018.
Rasp, S. and Thuerey, N.: Data-driven medium-range weather prediction with a resnet pretrained on climate simulations: A new model for weatherbench, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002405, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002405, 2021.
Ravuri, S., Lenc, K., Willson, M., Kangin, D., Lam, R., Mirowski, P., Fitzsimons, M., Athanassiadou, M., Kashem, S., Madge, S. Prudden, R., Mandhane, A., Clark, A., Brock, A., Simonyan, K., Hadsell, R., Robinson, N., Clancy, E., Arribas, A., and Mohamed, S.: Skilful precipitation nowcasting using deep generative models of radar, Nature, 597, 672–677, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03854-z, 2021.
Rizzuti, G., Siahkoohi, A., and Herrmann, F. J.: Learned iterative solvers for the Helmholtz equation, in: 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, Vol. 2019, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901542, 2019.
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T.: U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in: International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, Springer, Cham, 234–241, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28, 2015.
Rosier, S. H. R., Bull, C. Y. S., Woo, W. L., and Gudmundsson, G. H.: Predicting ocean-induced ice-shelf melt rates using deep learning, The Cryosphere, 17, 499–518, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-499-2023, 2023.
Ross, A., Li, Z., Perezhogin, P., Fernandez-Granda, C., and Zanna, L.: Benchmarking of machine learning ocean subgrid parameterizations in an idealized model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 15, e2022MS003258, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003258, 2023.
Rupe, A., Kashinath, K., Kumar, N., and Crutchfield, J. P.: Physics-Informed Representation Learning for Emergent Organization in Complex Dynamical Systems, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.12586, 25 April 2023.
Russell, S. and Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th Global Edn., Pearson Education, ISBN 0-13-461099-7, 2021.
Samek, W., Montavon, G., Lapuschkin, S., Anders, C. J., and Müller, K. R.: Explaining deep neural networks and beyond: A review of methods and applications, P. IEEE, 109, 247–278, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2021.3060483, 2021.
Sawada, Y.: Machine learning accelerates parameter optimization and uncertainty assessment of a land surface model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032688, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032688, 2020.
Scarselli, F., Gori, M., Tsoi, A. C., Hagenbuchner, M., and Monfardini, G.: The graph neural network model, IEEE T. Neural Net., 20, 61–80, https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2008.2005605, 2008.
Scher, S.: Toward data-driven weather and climate forecasting: Approximating a simple general circulation model with deep learning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 12–616, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080704, 2018.
Scher, S. and Messori, G.: Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2797–2809, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2797-2019, 2019.
Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D. Y., Wong, W. K., and Woo, W. C.: Convolutional LSTM network: A machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting, Adv. Neur. In., 28, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.04214, 2015.
Taylor, J. and Feng, M.: A Deep Learning Model for Forecasting Global Monthly Mean Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.09967, 21 February 2022.
Tompson, J., Schlachter, K., Sprechmann, P., and Perlin, K.: Accelerating eulerian fluid simulation with convolutional networks, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, 3424–3433, https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/tompson17a.html (last access: 3 November 2023), PMLR, 2017.
Toms, B. A., Barnes, E. A., and Ebert-Uphoff, I.: Physically interpretable neural networks for the geosciences: Applications to earth system variability, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS002002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002002, 2020.
Turing, A. M.: Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Mind, Volume LIX, 236, 433–460, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433, 1950.
Ukkonen, P. and Mäkelä, A.: Evaluation of machine learning classifiers for predicting deep convection, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 1784–1802, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001561, 2019.
Ukkonen, P., Pincus, R., Hogan, R. J., Pagh Nielsen, K., and Kaas, E.: Accelerating radiation computations for dynamical models with targeted machine learning and code optimization, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002226, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002226, 2020.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO]: Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, UNESCO programme and meeting document code SHS/BIO/REC-AIETHICS/2021, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455 (last access: 3 November 2023), 2021.
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł. and Polosukhin, I.: Attention is all you need, Adv. Neur. In., 30, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762, 2017.
Virnodkar, S. S., Pachghare, V. K., Patil, V. C., and Jha, S. K.: Remote sensing and machine learning for crop water stress determination in various crops: a critical review, Precis. Agric., 21, 1121–1155, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09711-9, 2020.
Vlachas, P. R., Byeon, W., Wan, Z. Y., Sapsis, T. P., and Koumoutsakos, P.: Data-driven forecasting of high-dimensional chaotic systems with long short-term memory networks, P. Roy. Soc. A, 474, 20170844, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0844, 2018.
Walters, D., Boutle, I., Brooks, M., Melvin, T., Stratton, R., Vosper, S., Wells, H., Williams, K., Wood, N., Allen, T., Bushell, A., Copsey, D., Earnshaw, P., Edwards, J., Gross, M., Hardiman, S., Harris, C., Heming, J., Klingaman, N., Levine, R., Manners, J., Martin, G., Milton, S., Mittermaier, M., Morcrette, C., Riddick, T., Roberts, M., Sanchez, C., Selwood, P., Stirling, A., Smith, C., Suri, D., Tennant, W., Vidale, P. L., Wilkinson, J., Willett, M., Woolnough, S., and Xavier, P.: The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 6.0/6.1 and JULES Global Land 6.0/6.1 configurations, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1487–1520, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1487-2017, 2017.
Wang, S., Wang, H., and Perdikaris, P.: Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepONets, Sci. Adv., 7, eabi8605, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abi8605, 2021.
Wang, X., Han, Y., Xue, W., Yang, G., and Zhang, G. J.: Stable climate simulations using a realistic general circulation model with neural network parameterizations for atmospheric moist physics and radiation processes, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3923–3940, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3923-2022, 2022a.
Wang, S., Sankaran, S., and Perdikaris, P.: Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networks, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.07404, 2022b.
Watson, P. A.: Machine learning applications for weather and climate need greater focus on extremes, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 111004, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac9d4e, 2022.
Watt‐Meyer, O., Brenowitz, N. D., Clark, S. K., Henn, B., Kwa, A., McGibbon, J., Perkins, W. A., and Bretherton, C. S.: Correcting weather and climate models by machine learning nudged historical simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL092555, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092555, 2021.
Watson-Parris, D.: Machine learning for weather and climate are worlds apart, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 379, 20200098, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0098, 2021.
Watson‐Parris, D., Rao, Y., Olivié, D., Seland, Ø., Nowack, P., Camps‐Valls, G., Stier, P., Bouabid, S., Dewey, M., Fons, E. and Gonzalez, J., Harder, P., Jeggle, K., Lenhardt, J., Manshausen, P., Novitasari, M., Ricard, L., and Roesch, C.: ClimateBench v1. 0: A Benchmark for Data-Driven Climate Projections, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14, e2021MS002954, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002954, 2022.
Werbos, P.: Beyond regression: new tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences, Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1571135649638605440 (last access: 3 November 2023), 1974.
Werbos, P. J.: Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it, P. IEEE, 78, 1550–1560, https://doi.org/10.1109/5.58337, 1990.
Weyn, J. A., Durran, D. R., and Caruana, R.: Can machines learn to predict weather? Using deep learning to predict gridded 500-hPa geopotential height from historical weather data, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 2680–2693, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001705, 2019.
Weyn, J. A., Durran, D. R., and Caruana, R.: Improving data-driven global weather prediction using deep convolutional neural networks on a cubed sphere, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002109, 2020.
Weyn, J. A., Durran, D. R., Caruana, R., and Cresswell-Clay, N.: Sub-seasonal forecasting with a large ensemble of deep-learning weather prediction models, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, 7, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002502, 2021.
Wikner, A., Pathak, J., Hunt, B., Girvan, M., Arcomano, T., Szunyogh, I., Pomerance, A., and Ott, E.: Combining machine learning with knowledge-based modeling for scalable forecasting and subgrid-scale closure of large, complex, spatiotemporal systems, Chaos, 30, 053111, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0005541, 2020.
Wu, K. and Xiu, D.: Data-driven deep learning of partial differential equations in modal space, J. Comput. Phys., 408, 109307, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109307, 2020.
Yamada, K., Katagiri, T., Takizawa, H., Minami, K., Yokokawa, M., Nagai, T., and Ogino, M.: Preconditioner auto-tuning using deep learning for sparse iterative algorithms, in: 2018 Sixth International Symposium on Computing and Networking Workshops (CANDARW), 257–262, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109307, 2018.
Yang, C., Yang, X., and Xiao, X.: Data-driven projection method in fluid simulation, Comput. Animat. Virt. W., 27, 415–424, https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.1695, 2016.
Yeo, K., Grullon, D. E., Sun, F. K., Boning, D. S., and Kalagnanam, J. R.: Variational inference formulation for a model-free simulation of a dynamical system with unknown parameters by a recurrent neural network, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 43, A1305–A1335, https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1323151, 2021.
Yuan, Z., Zhou, X., and Yang, T.: Hetero-convlstm: A deep learning approach to traffic accident prediction on heterogeneous spatio-temporal data, in: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 984–992, https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3219922, 2018.
Yuval, J. and O'Gorman, P. A.: Stable machine-learning parameterization of subgrid processes for climate modeling at a range of resolutions, Nat. Commun., 11, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17142-3, 2020.
Yuval, J., O'Gorman, P. A., and Hill, C. N.: Use of neural networks for stable, accurate and physically consistent parameterization of subgrid atmospheric processes with good performance at reduced precision, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091363, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091363, 2021.
Zagoruyko, S., and Komodakis, N.: Wide residual networks, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.07146, 23 May 2016.
Zanna, L. and Bolton, T.: Data-driven equation discovery of ocean mesoscale closures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088376, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088376, 2020.
Zhang, N., Zhou, X., Kang, M., Hu, B. G., Heuvelink, E., and Marcelis, L. F.: Machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival, AOB Plants, 15, plac061, https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plac061, 2023.
Zhao, W. L., Gentine, P., Reichstein, M., Zhang, Y., Zhou, S., Wen, Y., Lin, C., Li, X., and Qiu, G. Y.: Physics-constrained machine learning of evapotranspiration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 14496–14507, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085291, 2019.
Zhong, X., Ma, Z., Yao, Y., Xu, L., Wu, Y., and Wang, Z.: WRF–ML v1.0: a bridge between WRF v4.3 and machine learning parameterizations and its application to atmospheric radiative transfer, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 199–209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-199-2023, 2023.
Zhou, L., Lin, S. J., Chen, J. H., Harris, L. M., Chen, X., and Rees, S. L.: Toward convective-scale prediction within the next generation global prediction system, B Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 1225–1243, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0246.1, 2019.
Editorial statement
Machine Learning is a rapidly expanding technique in the field of weather and climate modelling. This paper takes stock of the state of the field at the present time, and will be invaluable to participants across the field and beyond who wish to understand the impact of Machine Learning on the field, its limitations, and current scope.
Machine Learning is a rapidly expanding technique in the field of weather and climate modelling....
Short summary
Machine learning (ML) is an increasingly popular tool in the field of weather and climate modelling. While ML has been used in this space for a long time, it is only recently that ML approaches have become competitive with more traditional methods. In this review, we have summarized the use of ML in weather and climate modelling over time; provided an overview of key ML concepts, methodologies, and terms; and suggested promising avenues for further research.
Machine learning (ML) is an increasingly popular tool in the field of weather and climate...
