Articles | Volume 14, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1899-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1899-2021
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
09 Apr 2021
Methods for assessment of models |  | 09 Apr 2021

Analytical solutions for mantle flow in cylindrical and spherical shells

Stephan C. Kramer, D. Rhodri Davies, and Cian R. Wilson

Related authors

Automatic adjoint-based inversion schemes for geodynamics: Reconstructing the evolution of Earth’s mantle in space and time
Siavash Ghelichkhan, Angus Gibson, D. Rhodri Davies, Stephan C. Kramer, and David A. Ham
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2683,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2683, 2023
Short summary
Towards automatic finite-element methods for geodynamics via Firedrake
D. Rhodri Davies, Stephan C. Kramer, Sia Ghelichkhan, and Angus Gibson
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5127–5166, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5127-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5127-2022, 2022
Short summary
Thetis coastal ocean model: discontinuous Galerkin discretization for the three-dimensional hydrostatic equations
Tuomas Kärnä, Stephan C. Kramer, Lawrence Mitchell, David A. Ham, Matthew D. Piggott, and António M. Baptista
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4359–4382, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4359-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4359-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Solid Earth
REHEATFUNQ (REgional HEAT-Flow Uncertainty and aNomaly Quantification) 2.0.1: a model for regional aggregate heat flow distributions and anomaly quantification
Malte Jörn Ziebarth and Sebastian von Specht
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2783–2828, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2783-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2783-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new temperature–photoperiod coupled phenology module in LPJ-GUESS model v4.1: optimizing estimation of terrestrial carbon and water processes
Shouzhi Chen, Yongshuo H. Fu, Mingwei Li, Zitong Jia, Yishuo Cui, and Jing Tang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2509–2523, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2509-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2509-2024, 2024
Short summary
High-precision 1′ × 1′ bathymetric model of Philippine Sea inversed from marine gravity anomalies
Dechao An, Jinyun Guo, Xiaotao Chang, Zhenming Wang, Yongjun Jia, Xin Liu, Valery Bondur, and Heping Sun
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2039–2052, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2039-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2039-2024, 2024
Short summary
Deciphering past earthquakes from the probabilistic modeling of paleoseismic records – the Paleoseismic EArthquake CHronologies code (PEACH, version 1)
Octavi Gómez-Novell, Bruno Pace, Francesco Visini, Joanna Faure Walker, and Oona Scotti
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7339–7355, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7339-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7339-2023, 2023
Short summary
Benchmarking the accuracy of higher order particle methods in geodynamic models of transient flow
Rene Gassmöller, Juliane Dannberg, Wolfgang Bangerth, Elbridge Gerry Puckett, and Cedric Thieulot
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2765,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2765, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Backus, G.: Poloidal and toroidal fields in geomagnetic field modeling, Rev. Geophys., 24, 75–109, 1986. a, b
Balay, S., Gropp, W. D., McInnes, L. C., and Smith, B. F.: Efficient management of parallelism in object-oriented numerical software libraries, in: Modern software tools for scientific computing, Birkhauser, Boston Inc., 163–202, 1997. a
Baumgardner, J. R.: Three-dimensional treatment of convective flow in the Earth's mantle, J. Stat. Phys., 39, 501–511, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01008348, 1985. a
Bernardi, C.: Optimal finite-element interpolation on curved domains, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 26, 1212–1240, 1989. a
Blankenbach, B., Busse, F., Christensen, U., Cserepes, L., Gunkel, D., Hansen, U., Harder, H., Jarvis, G., Koch, M., Marquart, G., Moore, D., Olson, P., Schmeling, H., and Schnaubelt, T.: A benchmark comparison for mantle convection codes, Geophys. J. Int., 98, 23–38, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1989.tb05511.x, 1989. a
Download
Short summary
Computational models of Earth's mantle require rigorous verification and validation. Analytical solutions of the underlying Stokes equations provide a method to verify that these equations are accurately solved for. However, their derivation in spherical and cylindrical shell domains with physically relevant boundary conditions is involved. This paper provides a number of solutions. They are provided in a Python package (Assess) and their use is demonstrated in a convergence study with Fluidity.