Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
Development and technical paper 16 Jan 2017
Development and technical paper | 16 Jan 2017
A high-fidelity multiresolution digital elevation model for Earth systems
Xinqiao Duan et al.
No articles found.
X. Zuo, F. Yang, Y. Liang, Z. Gang, F. Su, H. Zhu, and L. Li
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-1-2020, 351–359,
F. Su, Y. Liang, Z. Gang, X. Zuo, F. Yang, H. Zhu, and L. Li
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 289–296,
Wei Hu, Lin Li, Chao Wu, Hang Zhang, and Haihong Zhu
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 1, 124,
Lina Huang, Yanfang Liu, and Shen Ying
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 1, 127,
Shen Ying, Chengpeng Li, Weiyang Li, Naibin Chen, and Zhigang Zhao
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 1, 422,
D. Li, L. Li, M. Zhou, and X. Zuo
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4, 351–358,
Related subject area
Earth and Space Science InformaticsClimateNet: an expert-labeled open dataset and deep learning architecture for enabling high-precision analyses of extreme weatherA spatiotemporal weighted regression model (STWR v1.0) for analyzing local nonstationarity in space and timeA new end-to-end workflow for the Community Earth System Model (version 2.0) for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6)HyLands 1.0: a hybrid landscape evolution model to simulate the impact of landslides and landslide-derived sediment on landscape evolutionUsing SHAP to interpret XGBoost predictions of grassland degradation in Xilingol, ChinaComparative analysis of atmospheric radiative transfer models using the Atmospheric Look-up table Generator (ALG) toolbox (version 2.0)Fast domain-aware neural network emulation of a planetary boundary layer parameterization in a numerical weather forecast modelCurrent status on the need for improved accessibility to climate change modelsVISIR-1.b: ocean surface gravity waves and currents for energy-efficient navigationTopological data analysis and machine learning for recognizing atmospheric river patterns in large climate datasetsGlobal hydro-climatic biomes identified via multitask learningA run control framework to streamline profiling, porting, and tuning simulation runs and provenance tracking of geoscientific applicationsAn improved logistic regression model based on a spatially weighted technique (ILRBSWT v1.0) and its application to mineral prospectivity mappingHigh-performance software framework for the calculation of satellite-to-satellite data matchups (MMS version 1.2)A data model of the Climate and Forecast metadata conventions (CF-1.6) with a software implementation (cf-python v2.1)Reverse engineering model structures for soil and ecosystem respiration: the potential of gene expression programmingCPMIP: measurements of real computational performance of Earth system models in CMIP6Automatic delineation of geomorphological slope units with r.slopeunits v1.0 and their optimization for landslide susceptibility modelingCommunity Intercomparison Suite (CIS) v1.4.0: a tool for intercomparing models and observationsAsynchronous communication in spectral-element and discontinuous Galerkin methods for atmospheric dynamics – a case study using the High-Order Methods Modeling Environment (HOMME-homme_dg_branch)GO2OGS 1.0: a versatile workflow to integrate complex geological information with fault data into numerical simulation modelsAn open and extensible framework for spatially explicit land use change modelling: the lulcc R packagePlant functional type classification for earth system models: results from the European Space Agency's Land Cover Climate Change InitiativeNon-singular spherical harmonic expressions of geomagnetic vector and gradient tensor fields in the local north-oriented reference frameAn approach to enhance pnetCDF performance in environmental modeling applicationsA strategy for GIS-based 3-D slope stability modelling over large areasAn approach to computing direction relations between separated object groupsImproving computational efficiency in large linear inverse problems: an example from carbon dioxide flux estimationCoupling technologies for Earth System ModellingQuality assessment concept of the World Data Center for Climate and its application to CMIP5 dataA web service based tool to plan atmospheric research flightsAutomated continuous verification for numerical simulation
Prabhat, Karthik Kashinath, Mayur Mudigonda, Sol Kim, Lukas Kapp-Schwoerer, Andre Graubner, Ege Karaismailoglu, Leo von Kleist, Thorsten Kurth, Annette Greiner, Ankur Mahesh, Kevin Yang, Colby Lewis, Jiayi Chen, Andrew Lou, Sathyavat Chandran, Ben Toms, Will Chapman, Katherine Dagon, Christine A. Shields, Travis O'Brien, Michael Wehner, and William Collins
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 107–124,Short summary
Detecting extreme weather events is a crucial step in understanding how they change due to climate change. Deep learning (DL) is remarkable at pattern recognition; however, it works best only when labeled datasets are available. We create
ClimateNet– an expert-labeled curated dataset – to train a DL model for detecting weather events and predicting changes in extreme precipitation. This work paves the way for DL-based automated, high-fidelity, and highly precise analytics of climate data.
Xiang Que, Xiaogang Ma, Chao Ma, and Qiyu Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6149–6164,Short summary
This paper presents a spatiotemporal weighted regression (STWR) model for exploring nonstationary spatiotemporal processes in nature and socioeconomics. A value change rate is introduced in the temporal kernel, which presents significant model fitting and accuracy in both simulated and real-world data. STWR fully incorporates observed data in the past and outperforms geographic temporal weighted regression (GTWR) and geographic weighted regression (GWR) models in several experiments.
Sheri Mickelson, Alice Bertini, Gary Strand, Kevin Paul, Eric Nienhouse, John Dennis, and Mariana Vertenstein
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5567–5581,Short summary
Every generation of MIP exercises introduces new layers of complexity and an exponential growth in the amount of data requested. CMIP6 required us to develop a new tool chain and forced us to change our methodologies. The new methods discussed in this paper provided us with an 18 times faster speedup over our existing methods. This allowed us to meet our deadlines and we were able to publish more than half a million data sets on the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) for the CMIP6 project.
Benjamin Campforts, Charles M. Shobe, Philippe Steer, Matthias Vanmaercke, Dimitri Lague, and Jean Braun
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3863–3886,Short summary
Landslides shape the Earth’s surface and are a dominant source of terrestrial sediment. Rivers, then, act as conveyor belts evacuating landslide-produced sediment. Understanding the interaction among rivers and landslides is important to predict the Earth’s surface response to past and future environmental changes and for mitigating natural hazards. We develop HyLands, a new numerical model that provides a toolbox to explore how landslides and rivers interact over several timescales.
Batunacun, Ralf Wieland, Tobia Lakes, and Claas Nendel
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss.,
Revised manuscript accepted for GMDShort summary
XGBoost can provide alternative insights that conventional land-use models are unable to generate. SHAP can interpret the results of the purely data-driven approach. XGBoost achieved similar and robust simulation results. SHAP values were useful for analysing the complex relationship between the different drivers of grassland degradation.
Jorge Vicent, Jochem Verrelst, Neus Sabater, Luis Alonso, Juan Pablo Rivera-Caicedo, Luca Martino, Jordi Muñoz-Marí, and José Moreno
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1945–1957,Short summary
The modeling of light propagation through the atmosphere is key to process satellite images and to understand atmospheric processes. However, existing atmospheric models can be complex to use in practical applications. Here we aim at providing a new software tool to facilitate using advanced models and to generate large databases of simulated data. As a test case, we use this tool to analyze differences between several atmospheric models, showing the capabilities of this open-source tool.
Jiali Wang, Prasanna Balaprakash, and Rao Kotamarthi
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4261–4274,Short summary
Parameterizations are frequently used in models representing physical phenomena and are often the computationally expensive portions of the code. Using model output from simulations performed using a weather model, we train deep neural networks to provide an accurate alternative to a physics-based parameterization. We demonstrate that a domain-aware deep neural network can successfully simulate the entire diurnal cycle of the boundary layer physics and the results are transferable.
Juan Antonio Añel, Michael García-Rodríguez, and Javier Rodeiro
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss.,
Revised manuscript accepted for GMDShort summary
This work shows that it continues to be hard, if not impossible, to obtain some of the most used climate models worldwide. We reach this conclusion through a systematic study and encourage all the development teams and research centres to make public the models that they use to produce scientific results.
Gianandrea Mannarini and Lorenzo Carelli
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3449–3480,Short summary
The VISIR ship-routing model is updated in order to deal with ocean currents. The optimal tracks we computed through VISIR in the Atlantic ocean show great seasonal and regional variability, following a variable influence of surface gravity waves and currents. We assess how these tracks contribute to voyage energy-efficiency gains through a standard indicator (EEOI) of the International Maritime Organization. Also, the new model features are validated against an exact analytical benchmark.
Grzegorz Muszynski, Karthik Kashinath, Vitaliy Kurlin, Michael Wehner, and Prabhat
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 613–628,Short summary
We present the automated method for recognizing atmospheric rivers in climate data, i.e., climate model output and reanalysis product. The method is based on topological data analysis and machine learning, both of which are powerful tools that the climate science community often does not use. An advantage of the proposed method is that it is free of selection of subjective threshold conditions on a physical variable. This method is also suitable for rapidly analyzing large amounts of data.
Christina Papagiannopoulou, Diego G. Miralles, Matthias Demuzere, Niko E. C. Verhoest, and Willem Waegeman
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4139–4153,Short summary
Common global land cover and climate classifications are based on vegetation–climatic characteristics derived from observational data, ignoring the interaction between the local climate and biome. Here, we model the interplay between vegetation and local climate by discovering spatial relationships among different locations. The resulting global
hydro-climatic biomescorrespond to regions of coherent climate–vegetation interactions that agree well with traditional global land cover maps.
Wendy Sharples, Ilya Zhukov, Markus Geimer, Klaus Goergen, Sebastian Luehrs, Thomas Breuer, Bibi Naz, Ketan Kulkarni, Slavko Brdar, and Stefan Kollet
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2875–2895,Short summary
Next-generation geoscientific models are based on complex model implementations and workflows. Next-generation HPC systems require new programming paradigms and code optimization. In order to meet the challenge of running complex simulations on new massively parallel HPC systems, we developed a run control framework that facilitates code portability, code profiling, and provenance tracking to reduce both the duration and the cost of code migration and development, while ensuring reproducibility.
Daojun Zhang, Na Ren, and Xianhui Hou
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2525–2539,Short summary
Geographically weighted regression is a widely used method to deal with spatial heterogeneity, which is common in geostatistics. However, most existing software does not support logistic regression and cannot deal with missing data, which exist extensively in mineral prospectivity mapping. This work generalized logistic regression to spatial statistics based on a spatially weighted technique. The new model also supports an anisotropic local window, which is another innovative point.
Thomas Block, Sabine Embacher, Christopher J. Merchant, and Craig Donlon
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2419–2427,Short summary
For calibration and validation purposes it is necessary to detect simultaneous data acquisitions from different spaceborne platforms. We present an algorithm and a software system which implements a general approach to resolve this problem. The multisensor matchup system (MMS) can detect simultaneous acquisitions in a large dataset (> 100 TB) and extract data for matching locations for further analysis. The MMS implements a flexible software infrastructure and allows for high parallelization.
David Hassell, Jonathan Gregory, Jon Blower, Bryan N. Lawrence, and Karl E. Taylor
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4619–4646,Short summary
We present a formal data model for version 1.6 of the CF (Climate and Forecast) metadata conventions that provide a description of the physical meaning of geoscientific data and their spatial and temporal properties. We describe the CF conventions and how they lead to our CF data model, and compare it other data models for storing data and metadata. We present cf-python version 2.1: a software implementation of the CF data model capable of manipulating any CF-compliant dataset.
Iulia Ilie, Peter Dittrich, Nuno Carvalhais, Martin Jung, Andreas Heinemeyer, Mirco Migliavacca, James I. L. Morison, Sebastian Sippel, Jens-Arne Subke, Matthew Wilkinson, and Miguel D. Mahecha
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3519–3545,Short summary
Accurate representation of land-atmosphere carbon fluxes is essential for future climate projections, although some of the responses of CO2 fluxes to climate often remain uncertain. The increase in available data allows for new approaches in their modelling. We automatically developed models for ecosystem and soil carbon respiration using a machine learning approach. When compared with established respiration models, we found that they are better in prediction as well as offering new insights.
Venkatramani Balaji, Eric Maisonnave, Niki Zadeh, Bryan N. Lawrence, Joachim Biercamp, Uwe Fladrich, Giovanni Aloisio, Rusty Benson, Arnaud Caubel, Jeffrey Durachta, Marie-Alice Foujols, Grenville Lister, Silvia Mocavero, Seth Underwood, and Garrett Wright
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 19–34,Short summary
Climate models are among the most computationally expensive scientific applications in the world. We present a set of measures of computational performance that can be used to compare models that are independent of underlying hardware and the model formulation. They are easy to collect and reflect performance actually achieved in practice. We are preparing a systematic effort to collect these metrics for the world's climate models during CMIP6, the next Climate Model Intercomparison Project.
Massimiliano Alvioli, Ivan Marchesini, Paola Reichenbach, Mauro Rossi, Francesca Ardizzone, Federica Fiorucci, and Fausto Guzzetti
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3975–3991,Short summary
Slope units are morphological mapping units bounded by drainage and divide lines that maximize within-unit homogeneity and between-unit heterogeneity. We use r.slopeunits, a software for the automatic delination of slope units. We outline an objective procedure to optimize the software input parameters for landslide susceptibility (LS) zonation. Optimization is achieved by maximizing an objective function that simultaneously evaluates terrain aspect segmentation quality and LS model performance.
Duncan Watson-Parris, Nick Schutgens, Nicholas Cook, Zak Kipling, Philip Kershaw, Edward Gryspeerdt, Bryan Lawrence, and Philip Stier
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3093–3110,Short summary
In this paper we describe CIS, a new command line tool for the easy visualization, analysis and comparison of a wide variety of gridded and ungridded data sets used in Earth sciences. Users can now use a single tool to not only view plots of satellite, aircraft, station or model data, but also bring them onto the same spatio-temporal sampling. This allows robust, quantitative comparisons to be made easily. CIS is an open-source project and welcomes input from the community.
Benjamin F. Jamroz and Robert Klöfkorn
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2881–2892,Short summary
The scalability of computational applications on current and next-generation supercomputers is increasingly limited by the cost of inter-process communication. We implement communication hiding data exchange in the High-Order Methods Modeling Environment (HOMME) for the time integration of the hydrostatic fluid equations using both the spectral-element and discontinuous Galerkin methods. The presented approach produces significant performance and scalability gains in large-scale simulations.
T. Fischer, D. Naumov, S. Sattler, O. Kolditz, and M. Walther
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3681–3694,Short summary
We present a workflow to convert geological models into the open-source VTU format for usage in numerical simulation models. Tackling relevant scientific questions or engineering tasks often involves multidisciplinary approaches. Conversion workflows are needed between the diverse tools of the various disciplines. Our approach offers an open-source, platform-independent, robust, and comprehensible method that is potentially useful for a multitude of similar environmental studies.
S. Moulds, W. Buytaert, and A. Mijic
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3215–3229,Short summary
The contribution of lulcc is to provide a free and open-source framework for land use change modelling. The software, which is provided as an R package, addresses problems associated with the current paradigm of closed-source, specialised land use change modelling software which disrupt the scientific process. It is an attempt to move the discipline towards open and transparent science and to ensure land use change models are accessible to scientists working across the geosciences.
B. Poulter, N. MacBean, A. Hartley, I. Khlystova, O. Arino, R. Betts, S. Bontemps, M. Boettcher, C. Brockmann, P. Defourny, S. Hagemann, M. Herold, G. Kirches, C. Lamarche, D. Lederer, C. Ottlé, M. Peters, and P. Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2315–2328,Short summary
Land cover is an essential variable in earth system models and determines conditions driving biogeochemical, energy and water exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere. A methodology is presented for mapping plant functional types used in global vegetation models from a updated land cover classification system and open-source conversion tool, resulting from a consultative process among map producers and modelers engaged in the European Space Agency’s Land Cover Climate Change Initiative.
J. Du, C. Chen, V. Lesur, and L. Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1979–1990,
D. C. Wong, C. E. Yang, J. S. Fu, K. Wong, and Y. Gao
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1033–1046,
M. Mergili, I. Marchesini, M. Alvioli, M. Metz, B. Schneider-Muntau, M. Rossi, and F. Guzzetti
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2969–2982,Short summary
The article deals with strategies to (i) reduce computation time and to (ii) appropriately account for uncertain input parameters when applying an open source GIS sliding surface model to estimate landslide susceptibility for a 90km² study area in central Italy. For (i), the area is split into a large number of tiles, enabling the exploitation of multi-processor computing environments. For (ii), the model is run with various parameter combinations to compute the slope failure probability.
H. Yan, Z. Wang, and J. Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1591–1599,
V. Yadav and A. M. Michalak
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 583–590,
S. Valcke, V. Balaji, A. Craig, C. DeLuca, R. Dunlap, R. W. Ford, R. Jacob, J. Larson, R. O'Kuinghttons, G. D. Riley, and M. Vertenstein
Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1589–1596,
M. Stockhause, H. Höck, F. Toussaint, and M. Lautenschlager
Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1023–1032,
M. Rautenhaus, G. Bauer, and A. Dörnbrack
Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 55–71,
P. E. Farrell, M. D. Piggott, G. J. Gorman, D. A. Ham, C. R. Wilson, and T. M. Bond
Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 435–449,
Aguilar, F. J., Agüera, F., Aguilar, M. A., and Carvajal, F.: Effects of Terrain Morphology, Sampling Density, and Interpolation Methods on Grid DEM Accuracy, Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S., 71, 805–816, https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.71.7.805, 2005.
Ai, T. and Li, J.: A DEM generalization by minor valley branch detection and grid filling, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 65, 198–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.11.001, 2010.
Banchoff, T.: Critical points and curvature for embedded polyhedra, J. Differ. Geom., 77, 475–485, https://doi.org/10.2307/2317380, 1967.
Bates, P. D.: Integrating remote sensing data with flood inundation models: how far have we got?, Hydrol. Proc., 26, 2515–2521, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9374, 2012.
Bilskie, M. V. and Hagen, S. C.: Topographic accuracy assessment of bare earth lidar-derived unstructured meshes, Adv. Water Resour., 52, 165–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.003, 2013.
Bilskie, M. V., Coggin, D., Hagen, S. C., and Medeiros, S. C.: Terrain-driven unstructured mesh development through semi-automatic vertical feature extraction, Adv. Water Resour., 86, 102–118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.020, 2015.
Brioude, J., Angevine, W. M., McKeen, S. A., and Hsie, E.-Y.: Numerical uncertainty at mesoscale in a Lagrangian model in complex terrain, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1127–1136, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1127-2012, 2012.
Budd, C. J., Russell, R. D., and Walsh, E.: The geometry of r-adaptive meshes generated using optimal transport methods, J. Comput. Phys., 282, 113–137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.11.007, 2015.
Cabello, S., Fort, M., and Sellarès, J. A.: Higher-order Voronoi diagrams on triangulated surfaces, Inform. Process. Lett., 109, 440–445, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2009.01.001, 2009.
Cea, L. and Bladé, E.: A simple and efficient unstructured finite volume scheme for solving the shallow water equations in overland flow applications, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5464–5486, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016547, 2015.
Chen, C. and Li, Y.: An orthogonal least-square-based method for DEM generalization, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 27, 154–167, https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.674136, 2012.
Chen, C., Li, Y., and Yue, T.: Surface modeling of DEMs based on a sequential adjustment method, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 27, 1272–1291, https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.704037, 2012.
Chen, C., Yan, C., Cao, X., Guo, J., and Dai, H.: A greedy-based multiquadric method for LiDAR-derived ground data reduction, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 102, 110–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.01.012, 2015.
Chen, Y. and Zhou, Q.: A scale-adaptive DEM for multi-scale terrain analysis, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 27, 1329–1348, https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.739690, 2012.
Cohen-Steiner, D., Alliez, P., and Desbrun, M.: Variational shape approximation, ACM Trans. Graph., 23, 905–914, https://doi.org/10.1145/1186562.1015817, 2004.
Du, Q., Faber, V., and Gunzburger, M.: Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations: Applications and Algorithms, SIAM Review, 41, 637–676, https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144599352836, 1999.
Du, Q., Gunzburger, M. D., and Ju, L.: Constrained Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations for Surfaces, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24, 1488–1506, https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827501391576, 2003.
Du, Q., Max, G., and Ju, L.: Advances in Studies and Applications of Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations, Numer. Math. Theor. Meth. Appl., 3, 119–142, https://doi.org/10.4208/nmtma.2010.32s.1, 2010.
Fiddes, J. and Gruber, S.: TopoSCALE v.1.0: downscaling gridded climate data in complex terrain, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 387–405, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-387-2014, 2014.
Florinsky, I. and Pankratov, A.: Digital terrain modeling with the Chebyshev polynomials, arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.03960, 2015.
Glover, R. W.: Influence of Spatial Resolution and Treatment of Orography on GCM Estimates of the Surface Mass Balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet, J. Climate, 12, 551–563, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0551:IOSRAT>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Guba, O., Taylor, M. A., Ullrich, P. A., Overfelt, J. R., and Levy, M. N.: The spectral element method (SEM) on variable-resolution grids: evaluating grid sensitivity and resolution-aware numerical viscosity, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2803–2816, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2803-2014, 2014.
Guilbert, E., Gaffuri, J., and Jenny, B.: Terrain Generalisation, in: Abstracting Geographic Information in a Data Rich World, edited by: Burghardt, D., Duchêne, C., and Mackaness, W., Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, Springer International Publishing, 2014.
Hand, E.: Deep magma chambers seen beneath Mount St. Helens, available at http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/11/deep-magma-chambers-seen-beneath-mount-st-helens, 2015.
Heckbert, P. S. and Garland, M.: Survey of polygonal surface simplification algorithms, DTIC Document, 1997.
Hughes, J. K., Ross, A. N., Vosper, S. B., Lock, A. P., and Jemmett-Smith, B. C.: Assessment of valley cold pools and clouds in a very high-resolution numerical weather prediction model, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3105–3117, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3105-2015, 2015.
Hunter, N. M., Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., and Wilson, M. D.: Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review, Geomorphology, 90, 208–225, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021, 2007.
Jenny, B., Jenny, H., and Hurni, L.: Terrain Generalization with Multi-scale Pyramids Constrained by Curvature, Cartogr. Geogr. Inform., 38, 110–116, https://doi.org/10.1559/15230406382110, 2011.
Jiménez, P. A. and Dudhia, J.: On the Ability of the WRF Model to Reproduce the Surface Wind Direction over Complex Terrain, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 52, 1610–1617, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-0266.1, 2013.
Ke, Y., Leung, L. R., Huang, M., Coleman, A. M., Li, H., and Wigmosta, M. S.: Development of high resolution land surface parameters for the Community Land Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1341–1362, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1341-2012, 2012.
Kennelly, P. J.: Terrain maps displaying hill-shading with curvature, Geomorphology, 102, 567–577, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.05.046, 2008.
Kesserwani, G. and Liang, Q.: Dynamically adaptive grid based discontinuous Galerkin shallow water model, Adv. Water Resour., 37, 23–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.11.006, 2012.
Kim, B., Sanders, B. F., Schubert, J. E., and Famiglietti, J. S.: Mesh type tradeoffs in 2D hydrodynamic modeling of flooding with a Godunov-based flow solver, Adv. Water Resour., 68, 42–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.02.013, 2014.
Kimmel, R. and Sethian, J. A.: Computing geodesic paths on manifolds, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 8431–8435, 1998.
Kumar, S. V., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Santanello, J., Harrison, K., Liu, Y., and Shaw, M.: Land surface Verification Toolkit (LVT) – a generalized framework for land surface model evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 869–886, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-869-2012, 2012.
Lee, J. A. Y.: Comparison of existing methods for building triangular irregular network, models of terrain from grid digital elevation models, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst., 5, 267–285, https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799108927855, 1991.
Leempoel, K., Parisod, C., Geiser, C., Daprà, L., Vittoz, P., and Joost, S.: Very high-resolution digital elevation models: are multi-scale derived variables ecologically relevant?, Method. Ecol. Evol., 6, 1373–1383, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12427, 2015.
Lloyd, S.: Least squares quantization in PCM, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 28, 129–137, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489, 1982.
Meyer, M., Desbrun, M., Schröder, P., and Barr, A.: Discrete Differential-Geometry Operators for Triangulated 2-Manifolds, in: Visualization and Mathematics III, edited by: Hege, H.-C. and Polthier, K., Mathematics and Visualization, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05105-4_2, 2003.
Milnor, J. W.: Morse theory, Princeton university press, 1963.
Mitášová, H. and Hofierka, J.: Interpolation by regularized spline with tension: II. Application to terrain modeling and surface geometry analysis, Math. Geol., 25, 657–669, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00893172, 1993.
Nikolos, I. K. and Delis, A. I.: An unstructured node-centered finite volume scheme for shallow water flows with wet/dry fronts over complex topography, Comput. Method. Appl. M, 198, 3723–3750, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2009.08.006, 2009.
Nunalee, C. G., Horváth, Á., and Basu, S.: High-resolution numerical modeling of mesoscale island wakes and sensitivity to static topographic relief data, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2645–2653, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2645-2015, 2015.
Pan, H., Choi, Y.-K., Liu, Y., Hu, W., Du, Q., Polthier, K., Zhang, C., and Wang, W.: Robust modeling of constant mean curvature surfaces, ACM Trans. Graph., 31, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1145/2185520.2185581, 2012.
Ringler, T., Ju, L., and Gunzburger, M.: A multiresolution method for climate system modeling: application of spherical centroidal Voronoi tessellations, Ocean Dynam., 58, 475–498, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-008-0157-2, 2008.
Ringler, T. D., Jacobsen, D., Gunzburger, M., Ju, L., Duda, M., and Skamarock, W.: Exploring a Multiresolution Modeling Approach within the Shallow-Water Equations, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3348–3368, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05049.1, 2011.
Schneider, B.: Extraction of Hierarchical Surface Networks from Bilinear Surface Patches, Geogr. Anal., 37, 244–263, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.2005.00638.x, 2005.
Shi, W. Z., Li, Q. Q., and Zhu, C. Q.: Estimating the propagation error of DEM from higher-order interpolation algorithms, Int. J. Remote Sens., 26, 3069–3084, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500057905, 2005.
Tarolli, P.: High-resolution topography for understanding Earth surface processes: Opportunities and challenges, Geomorphology, 216, 295–312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.03.008, 2014.
Valette, S. and Chassery, J.-M.: Approximated Centroidal Voronoi Diagrams for Uniform Polygonal Mesh Coarsening, Comput. Graph. Forum, 23, 381–389, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2004.00769.x, 2004.
Valette, S., Chassery, J. M., and Prost, R.: Generic Remeshing of 3D Triangular Meshes with Metric-Dependent Discrete Voronoi Diagrams, IEEE T. Vis. Comput. Gr., 14, 369–381, https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70430, 2008.
Weibel, R.: Models and Experiments for Adaptive Computer-Assisted Terrain Generalization, Cartogr. Geogr. Inform., 19, 133–153, https://doi.org/10.1559/152304092783762317, 1992.
Weller, H., Weller, H. G., and Fournier, A.: Voronoi, Delaunay, and Block-Structured Mesh Refinement for Solution of the Shallow-Water Equations on the Sphere, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 4208–4224, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2917.1, 2009.
Weller, H., Browne, P., Budd, C., and Cullen, M.: Mesh adaptation on the sphere using optimal transport and the numerical solution of a Monge–Ampère type equation, J. Comput. Phys., 308, 102–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.12.018, 2016.
Wilby, R. L. and Wigley, T. M. L.: Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations, Prog. Phys. Geog., 21, 530–548, https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339702100403, 1997.
Wilson, J. P.: Digital terrain modeling, Geomorphology, 137, 107–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.012, 2012.
Wilson, J. P. and Gallant, J. C.: Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications, in: Digital Terrain Analysis, Wiley, New York, 2000.
Zakšek, K. and Podobnikar, T.: An effective DEM generalization with basic GIS operations, 8th ICA WORKSHOP on Generalisation and Multiple Representation, A Coruńa, Spain, 7–8 July, 2005.
Zarzycki, C. M., Jablonowski, C., and Taylor, M. A.: Using Variable-Resolution Meshes to Model Tropical Cyclones in the Community Atmosphere Model, Mon. Weather Review, 142, 1221–1239, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00179.1, 2014.
Zhou, Q. and Chen, Y.: Generalization of DEM for terrain analysis using a compound method, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 66, 38–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.08.005, 2011.
This article proposes an optimized transformation for topographic datasets. The resulting topographic grid exhibits good surface approximation and quasi-uniform high-quality. Both features of the processed topography build a concrete base from which improved endogenous or exogenous parameters can be derived, and makes it suitable for Earth and environmental simulations.
This article proposes an optimized transformation for topographic datasets. The resulting...