Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-19-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-19-2017
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
02 Jan 2017
Methods for assessment of models |  | 02 Jan 2017

CPMIP: measurements of real computational performance of Earth system models in CMIP6

Venkatramani Balaji, Eric Maisonnave, Niki Zadeh, Bryan N. Lawrence, Joachim Biercamp, Uwe Fladrich, Giovanni Aloisio, Rusty Benson, Arnaud Caubel, Jeffrey Durachta, Marie-Alice Foujols, Grenville Lister, Silvia Mocavero, Seth Underwood, and Garrett Wright

Related authors

The computational and energy cost of simulation and storage for climate science: lessons from CMIP6
Mario C. Acosta, Sergi Palomas, Stella V. Paronuzzi Ticco, Gladys Utrera, Joachim Biercamp, Pierre-Antoine Bretonniere, Reinhard Budich, Miguel Castrillo, Arnaud Caubel, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Italo Epicoco, Uwe Fladrich, Sylvie Joussaume, Alok Kumar Gupta, Bryan Lawrence, Philippe Le Sager, Grenville Lister, Marie-Pierre Moine, Jean-Christophe Rioual, Sophie Valcke, Niki Zadeh, and Venkatramani Balaji
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3081–3098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3081-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Requirements for a global data infrastructure in support of CMIP6
Venkatramani Balaji, Karl E. Taylor, Martin Juckes, Bryan N. Lawrence, Paul J. Durack, Michael Lautenschlager, Chris Blanton, Luca Cinquini, Sébastien Denvil, Mark Elkington, Francesca Guglielmo, Eric Guilyardi, David Hassell, Slava Kharin, Stefan Kindermann, Sergey Nikonov, Aparna Radhakrishnan, Martina Stockhause, Tobias Weigel, and Dean Williams
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3659–3680, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3659-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3659-2018, 2018
Short summary
Towards improved and more routine Earth system model evaluation in CMIP
Veronika Eyring, Peter J. Gleckler, Christoph Heinze, Ronald J. Stouffer, Karl E. Taylor, V. Balaji, Eric Guilyardi, Sylvie Joussaume, Stephan Kindermann, Bryan N. Lawrence, Gerald A. Meehl, Mattia Righi, and Dean N. Williams
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 813–830, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-813-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-813-2016, 2016
Short summary
Coarse-grained component concurrency in Earth system modeling: parallelizing atmospheric radiative transfer in the GFDL AM3 model using the Flexible Modeling System coupling framework
V. Balaji, Rusty Benson, Bruce Wyman, and Isaac Held
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3605–3616, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3605-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3605-2016, 2016
Short summary
Development and exploitation of a controlled vocabulary in support of climate modelling
M.-P. Moine, S. Valcke, B. N. Lawrence, C. Pascoe, R. W. Ford, A. Alias, V. Balaji, P. Bentley, G. Devine, S. A. Callaghan, and E. Guilyardi
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 479–493, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-479-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-479-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Earth and space science informatics
GNNWR: an open-source package of spatiotemporal intelligent regression methods for modeling spatial and temporal nonstationarity
Ziyu Yin, Jiale Ding, Yi Liu, Ruoxu Wang, Yige Wang, Yijun Chen, Jin Qi, Sensen Wu, and Zhenhong Du
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8455–8468, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8455-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8455-2024, 2024
Short summary
Random forests with spatial proxies for environmental modelling: opportunities and pitfalls
Carles Milà, Marvin Ludwig, Edzer Pebesma, Cathryn Tonne, and Hanna Meyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6007–6033, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6007-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6007-2024, 2024
Short summary
An improved global pressure and zenith wet delay model with optimized vertical correction considering the spatiotemporal variability in multiple height-scale factors
Chunhua Jiang, Xiang Gao, Huizhong Zhu, Shuaimin Wang, Sixuan Liu, Shaoni Chen, and Guangsheng Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5939–5959, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5939-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5939-2024, 2024
Short summary
kNNDM CV: k-fold nearest-neighbour distance matching cross-validation for map accuracy estimation
Jan Linnenbrink, Carles Milà, Marvin Ludwig, and Hanna Meyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5897–5912, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5897-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5897-2024, 2024
Short summary
Remote sensing-based high-resolution mapping of the forest canopy height: some models are useful, but might they be even more if combined?
Nikola Besic, Nicolas Picard, Cédric Vega, Lionel Hertzog, Jean-Pierre Renaud, Fajwel Fogel, Agnès Pellissier-Tanon, Gabriel Destouet, Milena Planells-Rodriguez, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-95,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-95, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexander, K. and Easterbrook, S. M.: The software architecture of climate models: a graphical comparison of CMIP5 and EMICAR5 configurations, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1221–1232, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1221-2015, 2015
André, J.-C., Aloisio, G., Biercamp, J., Budich, R., Joussaume, S., Lawrence, B., and Valcke, S.: High-Performance Computing for Climate Modeling, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, ES97–ES100, 2014.
Attig, N., Gibbon, P., and Lippert, T.: Trends in supercomputing: The European path to exascale, Comput. Phys. Commun., 182, 2041–2046, 2011.
Balaji, V.: Parallel Numerical Kernels for Climate Models, ECMWF Teracomputing Workshop, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 184–200, World Scientific Press, 2001.
Download
Short summary
Climate models are among the most computationally expensive scientific applications in the world. We present a set of measures of computational performance that can be used to compare models that are independent of underlying hardware and the model formulation. They are easy to collect and reflect performance actually achieved in practice. We are preparing a systematic effort to collect these metrics for the world's climate models during CMIP6, the next Climate Model Intercomparison Project.