Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-19-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-19-2017
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
02 Jan 2017
Methods for assessment of models |  | 02 Jan 2017

CPMIP: measurements of real computational performance of Earth system models in CMIP6

Venkatramani Balaji, Eric Maisonnave, Niki Zadeh, Bryan N. Lawrence, Joachim Biercamp, Uwe Fladrich, Giovanni Aloisio, Rusty Benson, Arnaud Caubel, Jeffrey Durachta, Marie-Alice Foujols, Grenville Lister, Silvia Mocavero, Seth Underwood, and Garrett Wright

Viewed

Total article views: 7,029 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,517 2,279 233 7,029 299 273
  • HTML: 4,517
  • PDF: 2,279
  • XML: 233
  • Total: 7,029
  • BibTeX: 299
  • EndNote: 273
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Aug 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Aug 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,029 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,524 with geography defined and 505 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 15 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Climate models are among the most computationally expensive scientific applications in the world. We present a set of measures of computational performance that can be used to compare models that are independent of underlying hardware and the model formulation. They are easy to collect and reflect performance actually achieved in practice. We are preparing a systematic effort to collect these metrics for the world's climate models during CMIP6, the next Climate Model Intercomparison Project.