Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 19–34, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-19-2017

Special issue: Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Experimental...

Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 19–34, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-19-2017

Methods for assessment of models 02 Jan 2017

Methods for assessment of models | 02 Jan 2017

CPMIP: measurements of real computational performance of Earth system models in CMIP6

Venkatramani Balaji et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 3,748 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,263 1,333 152 3,748 208 205
  • HTML: 2,263
  • PDF: 1,333
  • XML: 152
  • Total: 3,748
  • BibTeX: 208
  • EndNote: 205
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Aug 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Aug 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,458 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,435 with geography defined and 23 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 16 Jun 2021
Download
Short summary
Climate models are among the most computationally expensive scientific applications in the world. We present a set of measures of computational performance that can be used to compare models that are independent of underlying hardware and the model formulation. They are easy to collect and reflect performance actually achieved in practice. We are preparing a systematic effort to collect these metrics for the world's climate models during CMIP6, the next Climate Model Intercomparison Project.