Articles | Volume 8, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2447-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2447-2015
Model description paper
 | 
06 Aug 2015
Model description paper |  | 06 Aug 2015

PLUME-MoM 1.0: A new integral model of volcanic plumes based on the method of moments

M. de' Michieli Vitturi, A. Neri, and S. Barsotti

Related authors

Lahar events in the last 2000 years from Vesuvius eruptions – Part 3: Hazard assessment over the Campanian Plain
Laura Sandri, Mattia de' Michieli Vitturi, Antonio Costa, Mauro Antonio Di Vito, Ilaria Rucco, Domenico Maria Doronzo, Marina Bisson, Roberto Gianardi, Sandro de Vita, and Roberto Sulpizio
Solid Earth, 15, 459–476, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-459-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-459-2024, 2024
Short summary
Lahar events in the last 2000 years from Vesuvius eruptions – Part 2: Formulation and validation of a computational model based on a shallow layer approach
Mattia de' Michieli Vitturi, Antonio Costa, Mauro A. Di Vito, Laura Sandri, and Domenico M. Doronzo
Solid Earth, 15, 437–458, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-437-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-437-2024, 2024
Short summary
Lahar events in the last 2000 years from Vesuvius eruptions – Part 1: Distribution and impact on densely inhabited territory estimated from field data analysis
Mauro Antonio Di Vito, Ilaria Rucco, Sandro de Vita, Domenico Maria Doronzo, Marina Bisson, Mattia de' Michieli Vitturi, Mauro Rosi, Laura Sandri, Giovanni Zanchetta, Elena Zanella, and Antonio Costa
Solid Earth, 15, 405–436, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-405-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-405-2024, 2024
Short summary
IMEX_SfloW2D v2: a depth-averaged numerical flow model for volcanic gas–particle flows over complex topographies and water
Mattia de' Michieli Vitturi, Tomaso Esposti Ongaro, and Samantha Engwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6309–6336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6309-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6309-2023, 2023
Short summary
Lava flow hazard modeling during the 2021 Fagradalsfjall eruption, Iceland: applications of MrLavaLoba
Gro B. M. Pedersen, Melissa A. Pfeffer, Sara Barsotti, Simone Tarquini, Mattia de'Michieli Vitturi, Bergrún A. Óladóttir, and Ragnar Heiðar Þrastarson
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3147–3168, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3147-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3147-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Solid Earth
REHEATFUNQ (REgional HEAT-Flow Uncertainty and aNomaly Quantification) 2.0.1: a model for regional aggregate heat flow distributions and anomaly quantification
Malte Jörn Ziebarth and Sebastian von Specht
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2783–2828, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2783-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2783-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new temperature–photoperiod coupled phenology module in LPJ-GUESS model v4.1: optimizing estimation of terrestrial carbon and water processes
Shouzhi Chen, Yongshuo H. Fu, Mingwei Li, Zitong Jia, Yishuo Cui, and Jing Tang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2509–2523, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2509-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2509-2024, 2024
Short summary
High-precision 1′ × 1′ bathymetric model of Philippine Sea inversed from marine gravity anomalies
Dechao An, Jinyun Guo, Xiaotao Chang, Zhenming Wang, Yongjun Jia, Xin Liu, Valery Bondur, and Heping Sun
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2039–2052, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2039-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2039-2024, 2024
Short summary
Deciphering past earthquakes from the probabilistic modeling of paleoseismic records – the Paleoseismic EArthquake CHronologies code (PEACH, version 1)
Octavi Gómez-Novell, Bruno Pace, Francesco Visini, Joanna Faure Walker, and Oona Scotti
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7339–7355, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7339-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7339-2023, 2023
Short summary
Benchmarking the accuracy of higher order particle methods in geodynamic models of transient flow
Rene Gassmöller, Juliane Dannberg, Wolfgang Bangerth, Elbridge Gerry Puckett, and Cedric Thieulot
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2765,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2765, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, B. M., Bauman, L. E., Bohnhoff, W. J., Dalbey, K. R., Ebeida, M. S., Eddy, J. P., Eldred, M. S., Hough, P. D., Hu, K. T., Jakeman, J. D., Swiler, L. P., and Vigil, D. M.: DAKOTA, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis: Version 5.4 User's Manual, Sandia Technical Report SAND2010-2183, (updated April 2013) 2009.
Barsotti, S., Neri, A., and Scire, J.: The VOL-CALPUFF model for atmospheric ash dispersal: 1. Approach and physical formulation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, B03209, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004624, 2008.
Bonadonna, C. and Phillips, J.: Sedimentation from strong volcanic plumes, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 2340, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002034, 2003.
Briggs, G. A.: Plume rise predictions, in: Lectures on Air Pollution and Environmental Impact Analyses, edited by: Hangen, D. A., 59–111, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, USA, 1975.
Bursik, M.: Effect of wind on the rise height of volcanic plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett, 18, 3621–3624, 2001.
Download
Short summary
In this paper a new mathematical model of volcanic plume, named Plume-MoM, is presented. The model is based on the method of moments and it is able to describe the continuous variability in the grain size distribution (GSD) of the pyroclastic mixture ejected at the vent, crucial to characterize the source conditions of ash dispersal models. Results show that the GSD at the top of the plume is similar to that at the base and that plume height is weakly affected by the parameters of the GSD.