Articles | Volume 16, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2495-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2495-2023
Development and technical paper
 | 
09 May 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 09 May 2023

ClinoformNet-1.0: stratigraphic forward modeling and deep learning for seismic clinoform delineation

Hui Gao, Xinming Wu, Jinyu Zhang, Xiaoming Sun, and Zhengfa Bi

Related authors

cigFacies: a massive-scale benchmark dataset of seismic facies and its application
Hui Gao, Xinming Wu, Xiaoming Sun, Mingcai Hou, Hang Gao, Guangyu Wang, and Hanlin Sheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 595–609, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-595-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-595-2025, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Solid Earth
Empirical modeling of tropospheric delays with uncertainty
Jungang Wang, Junping Chen, and Yize Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1487–1504, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1487-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1487-2025, 2025
Short summary
CitcomSVE-3.0: a three-dimensional finite-element software package for modeling load-induced deformation and glacial isostatic adjustment for an Earth with a viscoelastic and compressible mantle
Tao Yuan, Shijie Zhong, and Geruo A
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1445–1461, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1445-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1445-2025, 2025
Short summary
NSOAS24: a new global marine gravity model derived from multi-satellite sea surface slopes
Shengjun Zhang, Xu Chen, Runsheng Zhou, and Yongjun Jia
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1221–1239, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1221-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1221-2025, 2025
Short summary
GEOMAPLEARN 1.2: detecting structures from geological maps with machine learning – the case of geological folds
David Oakley, Christelle Loiselet, Thierry Coowar, Vincent Labbe, and Jean-Paul Callot
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 939–960, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-939-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-939-2025, 2025
Short summary
Accelerated pseudo-transient method for elastic, viscoelastic, and coupled hydromechanical problems with applications
Yury Alkhimenkov and Yury Y. Podladchikov
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 563–583, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-563-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-563-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, E. W. and Schlager, W.: Basic types of submarine slope curvature, J. Sediment. Res., 70, 814–828, https://doi.org/10.1306/2DC4093A-0E47-11D7-8643000102C1865D, 2000. a
Araya-Polo, M., Jennings, J., Adler, A., and Dahlke, T.: Deep-learning tomography, The Leading Edge, 37, 58–66, 2018. a
Asquith, D.: Depositional topography and major marine environments, Late Cretaceous, Wyoming, AAPG Bull., 54, 1184–1224, 1970. a
Athy, L. F.: Density, porosity, and compaction of sedimentary rocks, AAPG Bull., 14, 1–24, 1930. a
Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., and Cipolla, R.: Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation, IEEE T. Pattern Anal., 39, 2481–2495, 2017. a, b
Download
Short summary
We propose a workflow to automatically generate synthetic seismic data and corresponding stratigraphic labels (e.g., clinoform facies, relative geologic time, and synchronous horizons) by geological and geophysical forward modeling. Trained with only synthetic datasets, our network works well to accurately and efficiently predict clinoform facies in 2D and 3D field seismic data. Such a workflow can be easily extended for other geological and geophysical scenarios in the future.
Share