Articles | Volume 5, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-869-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-869-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
26 Jun 2012
Model description paper |
| 26 Jun 2012
Land surface Verification Toolkit (LVT) – a generalized framework for land surface model evaluation
S. V. Kumar
Science Applications International Corporation, Beltsville, MD, USA
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
C. D. Peters-Lidard
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
J. Santanello
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
K. Harrison
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, College Park, MD, USA
Y. Liu
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, College Park, MD, USA
M. Shaw
Science Applications International Corporation, Beltsville, MD, USA
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Air Force Weather Agency, Offutt, NE, USA
Related subject area
Hydrology
STORM v.2: A simple, stochastic rainfall model for exploring the impacts of climate and climate change at and near the land surface in gauged watersheds
Fluvial flood inundation and socio-economic impact model based on open data
RoGeR v3.0.5 – a process-based hydrological toolbox model in Python
Coupling a large-scale glacier and hydrological model (OGGM v1.5.3 and CWatM V1.08) – towards an improved representation of mountain water resources in global assessments
An open-source refactoring of the Canadian Small Lakes Model for estimates of evaporation from medium-sized reservoirs
EvalHyd v0.1.2: a polyglot tool for the evaluation of deterministic and probabilistic streamflow predictions
Modelling water quantity and quality for integrated water cycle management with the Water Systems Integrated Modelling framework (WSIMOD) software
HGS-PDAF (version 1.0): a modular data assimilation framework for an integrated surface and subsurface hydrological model
Wflow_sbm v0.7.3, a spatially distributed hydrological model: from global data to local applications
Reservoir Assessment Tool version 3.0: a scalable and user-friendly software platform to mobilize the global water management community
HydroFATE (v1): a high-resolution contaminant fate model for the global river system
PyEt v1.3.1: a Python package for the estimation of potential evapotranspiration
Regionalization and its impact on global runoff simulations: A case study using the global hydrological model WaterGAP3 (v 1.0.0)
Validation of a new global irrigation scheme in the land surface model ORCHIDEE v2.2
Prediction of Hysteretic Matric Potential Dynamics Using Artificial Intelligence: Application of Autoencoder Neural Networks
Generalized drought index: A novel multi-scale daily approach for drought assessment
GPEP v1.0: the Geospatial Probabilistic Estimation Package to support Earth science applications
GEMS v1.0: Generalizable Empirical Model of Snow Accumulation and Melt, based on daily snow mass changes in response to climate and topographic drivers
mesas.py v1.0: a flexible Python package for modeling solute transport and transit times using StorAge Selection functions
rSHUD v2.0: advancing the Simulator for Hydrologic Unstructured Domains and unstructured hydrological modeling in the R environment
GLOBGM v1.0: a parallel implementation of a 30 arcsec PCR-GLOBWB-MODFLOW global-scale groundwater model
Development of inter-grid-cell lateral unsaturated and saturated flow model in the E3SM Land Model (v2.0)
pyESDv1.0.1: an open-source Python framework for empirical-statistical downscaling of climate information
Development and performance of a high-resolution surface wave and storm surge forecast model (COASTLINES-LO): Application to a large lake
Representing the impact of Rhizophora mangroves on flow in a hydrodynamic model (COAWST_rh v1.0): the importance of three-dimensional root system structures
Dynamically weighted ensemble of geoscientific models via automated machine-learning-based classification
Deep Dive into Global Hydrologic Simulations: Harnessing the Power of Deep Learning and Physics-informed Differentiable Models (δHBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)
Enhancing the representation of water management in global hydrological models
NEOPRENE v1.0.1: a Python library for generating spatial rainfall based on the Neyman–Scott process
Uncertainty estimation for a new exponential-filter-based long-term root-zone soil moisture dataset from Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) surface observations
Validating the Nernst–Planck transport model under reaction-driven flow conditions using RetroPy v1.0
DynQual v1.0: a high-resolution global surface water quality model
Data space inversion for efficient uncertainty quantification using an integrated surface and sub-surface hydrologic model
Simulation of crop yield using the global hydrological model H08 (crp.v1)
How is a global sensitivity analysis of a catchment-scale, distributed pesticide transfer model performed? Application to the PESHMELBA model
iHydroSlide3D v1.0: an advanced hydrological–geotechnical model for hydrological simulation and three-dimensional landslide prediction
GEB v0.1: a large-scale agent-based socio-hydrological model – simulating 10 million individual farming households in a fully distributed hydrological model
Tracing and visualisation of contributing water sources in the LISFLOOD-FP model of flood inundation (within CAESAR-Lisflood version 1.9j-WS)
Continental-scale evaluation of a fully distributed coupled land surface and groundwater model, ParFlow-CLM (v3.6.0), over Europe
Evaluating a global soil moisture dataset from a multitask model (GSM3 v1.0) with potential applications for crop threats
SERGHEI (SERGHEI-SWE) v1.0: a performance-portable high-performance parallel-computing shallow-water solver for hydrology and environmental hydraulics
A simple, efficient, mass-conservative approach to solving Richards' equation (openRE, v1.0)
Customized deep learning for precipitation bias correction and downscaling
Implementation and sensitivity analysis of the Dam-Reservoir OPeration model (DROP v1.0) over Spain
Regional coupled surface–subsurface hydrological model fitting based on a spatially distributed minimalist reduction of frequency domain discharge data
Operational water forecast ability of the HRRR-iSnobal combination: an evaluation to adapt into production environments
Prediction of algal blooms via data-driven machine learning models: an evaluation using data from a well-monitored mesotrophic lake
UniFHy v0.1.1: a community modelling framework for the terrestrial water cycle in Python
Basin-scale gyres and mesoscale eddies in large lakes: a novel procedure for their detection and characterization, assessed in Lake Geneva
SIMO v1.0: simplified model of the vertical temperature profile in a small, warm, monomictic lake
Manuel F. Rios Gaona, Katerina Michaelides, and Michael Bliss Singer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5387–5412, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5387-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5387-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
STORM v.2 (short for STOchastic Rainfall Model version 2.0) is an open-source and user-friendly modelling framework for simulating rainfall fields over a basin. It also allows simulating the impact of plausible climate change either on the total seasonal rainfall or the storm’s maximum intensity.
Lukas Riedel, Thomas Röösli, Thomas Vogt, and David N. Bresch
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5291–5308, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5291-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5291-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
River floods are among the most devastating natural hazards. We propose a flood model with a statistical approach based on openly available data. The model is integrated in a framework for estimating impacts of physical hazards. Although the model only agrees moderately with satellite-detected flood extents, we show that it can be used for forecasting the magnitude of flood events in terms of socio-economic impacts and for comparing these with past events.
Robin Schwemmle, Hannes Leistert, Andreas Steinbrich, and Markus Weiler
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5249–5262, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5249-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The new process-based hydrological toolbox model, RoGeR (https://roger.readthedocs.io/), can be used to estimate the components of the hydrological cycle and the related travel times of pollutants through parts of the hydrological cycle. These estimations may contribute to effective water resources management. This paper presents the toolbox concept and provides a simple example of providing estimations to water resources management.
Sarah Hanus, Lilian Schuster, Peter Burek, Fabien Maussion, Yoshihide Wada, and Daniel Viviroli
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5123–5144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5123-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5123-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a coupling of the large-scale glacier model OGGM and the hydrological model CWatM. Projected future increase in discharge is less strong while future decrease in discharge is stronger when glacier runoff is explicitly included in the large-scale hydrological model. This is because glacier runoff is projected to decrease in nearly all basins. We conclude that an improved glacier representation can prevent underestimating future discharge changes in large river basins.
M. Graham Clark and Sean K. Carey
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4911–4922, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4911-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4911-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides validation of the Canadian Small Lakes Model (CSLM) for estimating evaporation rates from reservoirs and a refactoring of the original FORTRAN code into MATLAB and Python, which are now stored in GitHub repositories. Here we provide direct observations of the surface energy exchange obtained with an eddy covariance system to validate the CSLM. There was good agreement between observations and estimations except under specific atmospheric conditions when evaporation is low.
Thibault Hallouin, François Bourgin, Charles Perrin, Maria-Helena Ramos, and Vazken Andréassian
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4561–4578, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4561-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4561-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The evaluation of the quality of hydrological model outputs against streamflow observations is widespread in the hydrological literature. In order to improve on the reproducibility of published studies, a new evaluation tool dedicated to hydrological applications is presented. It is open source and usable in a variety of programming languages to make it as accessible as possible to the community. Thus, authors and readers alike can use the same tool to produce and reproduce the results.
Barnaby Dobson, Leyang Liu, and Ana Mijic
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4495–4513, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4495-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Water management is challenging when models don't capture the entire water cycle. We propose that using integrated models facilitates management and improves understanding. We introduce a software tool designed for this task. We discuss its foundation, how it simulates water system components and their interactions, and its customisation. We provide a flexible way to represent water systems, and we hope it will inspire more research and practical applications for sustainable water management.
Qi Tang, Hugo Delottier, Wolfgang Kurtz, Lars Nerger, Oliver S. Schilling, and Philip Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3559–3578, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3559-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3559-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a new data assimilation framework by coupling an integrated hydrological model HydroGeoSphere with the data assimilation software PDAF. Compared to existing hydrological data assimilation systems, the advantage of our newly developed framework lies in its consideration of the physically based model; its large selection of different assimilation algorithms; and its modularity with respect to the combination of different types of observations, states and parameters.
Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, Martijn Visser, Joost Buitink, Ruben O. Imhoff, Hélène Boisgontier, Laurène Bouaziz, Dirk Eilander, Mark Hegnauer, Corine ten Velden, and Bobby Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3199–3234, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present the wflow_sbm distributed hydrological model, recently released by Deltares, as part of the Wflow.jl open-source modelling framework in the programming language Julia. Wflow_sbm has a fast runtime, making it suitable for large-scale modelling. Wflow_sbm models can be set a priori for any catchment with the Python tool HydroMT-Wflow based on globally available datasets, which results in satisfactory to good performance (without much tuning). We show this for a number of specific cases.
Sanchit Minocha, Faisal Hossain, Pritam Das, Sarath Suresh, Shahzaib Khan, George Darkwah, Hyongki Lee, Stefano Galelli, Konstantinos Andreadis, and Perry Oddo
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3137–3156, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3137-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3137-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Reservoir Assessment Tool (RAT) merges satellite data with hydrological models, enabling robust estimation of reservoir parameters like inflow, outflow, surface area, and storage changes around the world. Version 3.0 of RAT lowers the barrier of entry for new users and achieves scalability and computational efficiency. RAT 3.0 also facilitates open-source development of functions for continuous improvement to mobilize and empower the global water management community.
Heloisa Ehalt Macedo, Bernhard Lehner, Jim Nicell, and Günther Grill
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2877–2899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Treated and untreated wastewaters are sources of contaminants of emerging concern. HydroFATE, a new global model, estimates their concentrations in surface waters, identifying streams that are most at risk and guiding monitoring/mitigation efforts to safeguard aquatic ecosystems and human health. Model predictions were validated against field measurements of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole, with predicted concentrations exceeding ecological thresholds in more than 400 000 km of rivers worldwide.
Matevž Vremec, Raoul Collenteur, and Steffen Birk
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-63, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-63, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Geoscientists commonly use various Potential EvapoTranpiration (PET) formulas for environmental studies, which can be prone to errors and sensitive to climate change. PyEt, a tested and open-source Python package, simplifies the application of 20 PET methods for both time series and gridded data, ensuring accurate and consistent PET estimations suitable for a wide range of environmental applications.
Jenny Kupzig, Nina Kupzig, and Martina Floerke
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-47, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-47, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Valid simulation results from global hydrological models (GHM) are essential, e.g., to studying climate change impacts. Regionalization is a necessary step, to adapt GHM to ungauged basins to enable such valid simulations. In this study, we highlight the impact of regionalization on global simulations by using different regionalization methods. Applying two valid regionalization strategies globally we’ve found that the “outflow to the ocean” changed in the range of inter-model differences.
Pedro Felipe Arboleda-Obando, Agnès Ducharne, Zun Yin, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2141–2164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We show a new irrigation scheme included in the ORCHIDEE land surface model. The new irrigation scheme restrains irrigation due to water shortage, includes water adduction, and represents environmental limits and facilities to access water, due to representing infrastructure in a simple way. Our results show that the new irrigation scheme helps simulate acceptable land surface conditions and fluxes in irrigated areas, even if there are difficulties due to shortcomings and limited information.
Nedal Aqel, Lea Reusser, Stephan Margreth, Andrea Carminati, and Peter Lehmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-407, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-407, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The soil water potential (SWP) determines various soil water processes. Because it cannot be measured directly by remote sensing techniques, it is often deduced from volumetric water content (VWC) information. However, under dynamic field conditions, the relationship between SWP and VWC is highly ambiguous due to different factors that cannot be modeled with the classical approach. Applying a deep neural network with an autoencoder enables the prediction of SWP.
João Careto, Rita Cardoso, Ana Russo, Daniela Lima, and Pedro Soares
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-9, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-9, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, a new drought index is proposed, which not only is able to identify the same events but also can improve the results obtained from other established drought indices. The index is empirically based and is extremely straightforward to compute. It is as well, a daily drought index with the ability to not only assess flash droughts but also events at longer aggregation scales, such as the traditional monthly indices.
Guoqiang Tang, Andrew W. Wood, Andrew J. Newman, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon Michael Papalexiou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1153–1173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ensemble geophysical datasets are crucial for understanding uncertainties and supporting probabilistic estimation/prediction. However, open-access tools for creating these datasets are limited. We have developed the Python-based Geospatial Probabilistic Estimation Package (GPEP). Through several experiments, we demonstrate GPEP's ability to estimate precipitation, temperature, and snow water equivalent. GPEP will be a useful tool to support uncertainty analysis in Earth science applications.
Atabek Umirbekov, Richard Essery, and Daniel Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 911–929, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a parsimonious snow model which simulates snow mass without the need for extensive calibration. The model is based on a machine learning algorithm that has been trained on diverse set of daily observations of snow accumulation or melt, along with corresponding climate and topography data. We validated the model using in situ data from numerous new locations. The model provides a promising solution for accurate snow mass estimation across regions where in situ data are limited.
Ciaran J. Harman and Esther Xu Fei
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 477–495, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-477-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Over the last 10 years, scientists have developed StorAge Selection: a new way of modeling how material is transported through complex systems. Here, we present some new, easy-to-use, flexible, and very accurate code for implementing this method. We show that, in cases where we know exactly what the answer should be, our code gets the right answer. We also show that our code is closer than some other codes to the right answer in an important way: it conserves mass.
Lele Shu, Paul Ullrich, Xianhong Meng, Christopher Duffy, Hao Chen, and Zhaoguo Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 497–527, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-497-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-497-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our team developed rSHUD v2.0, a toolkit that simplifies the use of the SHUD, a model simulating water movement in the environment. We demonstrated its effectiveness in two watersheds, one in the USA and one in China. The toolkit also facilitated the creation of the Global Hydrological Data Cloud, a platform for automatic data processing and model deployment, marking a significant advancement in hydrological research.
Jarno Verkaik, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Gualbert H. P. Oude Essink, Hai Xiang Lin, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 275–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-275-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-275-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the parallel PCR-GLOBWB global-scale groundwater model at 30 arcsec resolution (~1 km at the Equator). Named GLOBGM v1.0, this model is a follow-up of the 5 arcmin (~10 km) model, aiming for a higher-resolution simulation of worldwide fresh groundwater reserves under climate change and excessive pumping. For a long transient simulation using a parallel prototype of MODFLOW 6, we show that our implementation is efficient for a relatively low number of processor cores.
Han Qiu, Gautam Bisht, Lingcheng Li, Dalei Hao, and Donghui Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 143–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed and validated an inter-grid-cell lateral groundwater flow model for both saturated and unsaturated zone in the ELMv2.0 framework. The developed model was benchmarked against PFLOTRAN, a 3D subsurface flow and transport model and showed comparable performance with PFLOTRAN. The developed model was also applied to the Little Washita experimental watershed. The spatial pattern of simulated groundwater table depth agreed well with the global groundwater table benchmark dataset.
Daniel Boateng and Sebastian G. Mutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6479–6514, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6479-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6479-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present an open-source Python framework for performing empirical-statistical downscaling of climate information, such as precipitation. The user-friendly package comprises all the downscaling cycles including data preparation, model selection, training, and evaluation, designed in an efficient and flexible manner, allowing for quick and reproducible downscaling products. The framework would contribute to climate change impact assessments by generating accurate high-resolution climate data.
Laura L. Swatridge, Ryan P. Mulligan, Leon Boegman, and Shiliang Shan
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-151, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
We develop an operational forecast system, COATLINES-LO, that can simulate water levels and surface waves in Lake Ontario driven by forecasts of wind speeds and pressure fields from an atmospheric model. The model requires a relatively small computational demand and results compare well with near real-time observations, as well as with results from other existing forecast systems. Results show that with shorter forecast lengths, storm surge and waves predictions can improve in accuracy.
Masaya Yoshikai, Takashi Nakamura, Eugene C. Herrera, Rempei Suwa, Rene Rollon, Raghab Ray, Keita Furukawa, and Kazuo Nadaoka
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5847–5863, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5847-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5847-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Due to complex root system structures, representing the impacts of Rhizophora mangroves on flow in hydrodynamic models has been challenging. This study presents a new drag and turbulence model that leverages an empirical model for root systems. The model can be applied without rigorous measurements of root structures and showed high performance in flow simulations; this may provide a better understanding of hydrodynamics and related transport processes in Rhizophora mangrove forests.
Hao Chen, Tiejun Wang, Yonggen Zhang, Yun Bai, and Xi Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5685–5701, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5685-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5685-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Effectively assembling multiple models for approaching a benchmark solution remains a long-standing issue for various geoscience domains. We here propose an automated machine learning-assisted ensemble framework (AutoML-Ens) that attempts to resolve this challenge. Results demonstrate the great potential of AutoML-Ens for improving estimations due to its two unique features, i.e., assigning dynamic weights for candidate models and taking full advantage of AutoML-assisted workflow.
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Jens de Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Yoshihide Wada, Jiangtao Liu, Ming Pan, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-190, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-190, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate hydrological modeling is vital to characterizing water cycle responses to climate change. For the first time at this scale, we use differentiable physics-informed machine learning hydrologic models to simulate rainfall-runoff processes for 3753 basins around the world and compare them with purely data-driven and traditional approaches. This sets a benchmark for hydrologic estimates around the world and builds foundations for improving global hydrologic simulations.
Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Fuqiang Tian, Thomas Wild, Mengqi Zhao, Sean Turner, A. F. M. Kamal Chowdhury, Chris R. Vernon, Hongchang Hu, Yuan Zhuang, Mohamad Hejazi, and Hong-Yi Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5449–5472, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5449-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5449-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Most existing global hydrologic models do not explicitly represent hydropower reservoirs. We are introducing a new water management module to Xanthos that distinguishes between the operational characteristics of irrigation, hydropower, and flood control reservoirs. We show that this explicit representation of hydropower reservoirs can lead to a significantly more realistic simulation of reservoir storage and releases in over 44 % of the hydropower reservoirs included in this study.
Javier Diez-Sierra, Salvador Navas, and Manuel del Jesus
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5035–5048, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5035-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5035-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
NEOPRENE is an open-source, freely available library allowing scientists and practitioners to generate synthetic time series and maps of rainfall. These outputs will help to explore plausible events that were never observed in the past but may occur in the near future and to generate possible future events under climate change conditions. The paper shows how to use the library to downscale daily precipitation and how to use synthetic generation to improve our characterization of extreme events.
Adam Pasik, Alexander Gruber, Wolfgang Preimesberger, Domenico De Santis, and Wouter Dorigo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4957–4976, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4957-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4957-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We apply the exponential filter (EF) method to satellite soil moisture retrievals to estimate the water content in the unobserved root zone globally from 2002–2020. Quality assessment against an independent dataset shows satisfactory results. Error characterization is carried out using the standard uncertainty propagation law and empirically estimated values of EF model structural uncertainty and parameter uncertainty. This is followed by analysis of temporal uncertainty variations.
Po-Wei Huang, Bernd Flemisch, Chao-Zhong Qin, Martin O. Saar, and Anozie Ebigbo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4767–4791, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4767-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4767-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Water in natural environments consists of many ions. Ions are electrically charged and exert electric forces on each other. We discuss whether the electric forces are relevant in describing mixing and reaction processes in natural environments. By comparing our computer simulations to lab experiments in literature, we show that the electric interactions between ions can play an essential role in mixing and reaction processes, in which case they should not be neglected in numerical modeling.
Edward R. Jones, Marc F. P. Bierkens, Niko Wanders, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Ludovicus P. H. van Beek, and Michelle T. H. van Vliet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4481–4500, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
DynQual is a new high-resolution global water quality model for simulating total dissolved solids, biological oxygen demand and fecal coliform as indicators of salinity, organic pollution and pathogen pollution, respectively. Output data from DynQual can supplement the observational record of water quality data, which is highly fragmented across space and time, and has the potential to inform assessments in a broad range of fields including ecological, human health and water scarcity studies.
Hugo Delottier, John Doherty, and Philip Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4213–4231, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4213-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4213-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Long run times are usually a barrier to the quantification and reduction of predictive uncertainty with complex hydrological models. Data space inversion (DSI) provides an alternative and highly model-run-efficient method for uncertainty quantification. This paper demonstrates DSI's ability to robustly quantify predictive uncertainty and extend the methodology to provide practical metrics that can guide data acquisition and analysis to achieve goals of decision-support modelling.
Zhipin Ai and Naota Hanasaki
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3275–3290, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3275-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3275-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Simultaneously simulating food production and the requirements and availability of water resources in a spatially explicit manner within a single framework remains challenging on a global scale. Here, we successfully enhanced the global hydrological model H08 that considers human water use and management to simulate the yields of four major staple crops: maize, wheat, rice, and soybean. Our improved model will be beneficial for advancing global food–water nexus studies in the future.
Emilie Rouzies, Claire Lauvernet, Bruno Sudret, and Arthur Vidard
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3137–3163, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3137-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3137-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Water and pesticide transfer models are complex and should be simplified to be used in decision support. Indeed, these models simulate many spatial processes in interaction, involving a large number of parameters. Sensitivity analysis allows us to select the most influential input parameters, but it has to be adapted to spatial modelling. This study will identify relevant methods that can be transposed to any hydrological and water quality model and improve the fate of pesticide knowledge.
Guoding Chen, Ke Zhang, Sheng Wang, Yi Xia, and Lijun Chao
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2915–2937, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2915-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2915-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we developed a novel modeling system called iHydroSlide3D v1.0 by coupling a modified a 3D landslide model with a distributed hydrology model. The model is able to apply flexibly different simulating resolutions for hydrological and slope stability submodules and gain a high computational efficiency through parallel computation. The test results in the Yuehe River basin, China, show a good predicative capability for cascading flood–landslide events.
Jens A. de Bruijn, Mikhail Smilovic, Peter Burek, Luca Guillaumot, Yoshihide Wada, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2437–2454, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2437-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2437-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a computer simulation model of the hydrological system and human system, which can simulate the behaviour of individual farmers and their interactions with the water system at basin scale to assess how the systems have evolved and are projected to evolve in the future. For example, we can simulate the effect of subsidies provided on investment in adaptation measures and subsequent effects in the hydrological system, such as a lowering of the groundwater table or reservoir level.
Matthew D. Wilson and Thomas J. Coulthard
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2415–2436, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2415-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2415-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
During flooding, the sources of water that inundate a location can influence impacts such as pollution. However, methods to trace water sources in flood events are currently only available in complex, computationally expensive hydraulic models. We propose a simplified method which can be added to efficient, reduced-complexity model codes, enabling an improved understanding of flood dynamics and its impacts. We demonstrate its application for three sites at a range of spatial and temporal scales.
Bibi S. Naz, Wendy Sharples, Yueling Ma, Klaus Goergen, and Stefan Kollet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1617–1639, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
It is challenging to apply a high-resolution integrated land surface and groundwater model over large spatial scales. In this paper, we demonstrate the application of such a model over a pan-European domain at 3 km resolution and perform an extensive evaluation of simulated water states and fluxes by comparing with in situ and satellite data. This study can serve as a benchmark and baseline for future studies of climate change impact projections and for hydrological forecasting.
Jiangtao Liu, David Hughes, Farshid Rahmani, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1553–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Under-monitored regions like Africa need high-quality soil moisture predictions to help with food production, but it is not clear if soil moisture processes are similar enough around the world for data-driven models to maintain accuracy. We present a deep-learning-based soil moisture model that learns from both in situ data and satellite data and performs better than satellite products at the global scale. These results help us apply our model globally while better understanding its limitations.
Daniel Caviedes-Voullième, Mario Morales-Hernández, Matthew R. Norman, and Ilhan Özgen-Xian
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 977–1008, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the SERGHEI framework and a solver for shallow-water problems. Such models, often used for surface flow and flood modelling, are computationally intense. In recent years the trends to increase computational power have changed, requiring models to adapt to new hardware and new software paradigms. SERGHEI addresses these challenges, allowing surface flow simulation to be enabled on the newest and upcoming consumer hardware and supercomputers very efficiently.
Andrew M. Ireson, Raymond J. Spiteri, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon A. Mathias
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 659–677, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Richards' equation (RE) is used to describe the movement and storage of water in a soil profile and is a component of many hydrological and earth-system models. Solving RE numerically is challenging due to the non-linearities in the properties. Here, we present a simple but effective and mass-conservative solution to solving RE, which is ideal for teaching/learning purposes but also useful in prototype models that are used to explore alternative process representations.
Fang Wang, Di Tian, and Mark Carroll
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 535–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-535-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Gridded precipitation datasets suffer from biases and coarse resolutions. We developed a customized deep learning (DL) model to bias-correct and downscale gridded precipitation data using radar observations. The results showed that the customized DL model can generate improved precipitation at fine resolutions where regular DL and statistical methods experience challenges. The new model can be used to improve precipitation estimates, especially for capturing extremes at smaller scales.
Malak Sadki, Simon Munier, Aaron Boone, and Sophie Ricci
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 427–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-427-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Predicting water resource evolution is a key challenge for the coming century.
Anthropogenic impacts on water resources, and particularly the effects of dams and reservoirs on river flows, are still poorly known and generally neglected in global hydrological studies. A parameterized reservoir model is reproduced to compute monthly releases in Spanish anthropized river basins. For global application, an exhaustive sensitivity analysis of the model parameters is performed on flows and volumes.
Nicolas Flipo, Nicolas Gallois, and Jonathan Schuite
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 353–381, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-353-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-353-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A new approach is proposed to fit hydrological or land surface models, which suffer from large uncertainties in terms of water partitioning between fast runoff and slow infiltration from small watersheds to regional or continental river basins. It is based on the analysis of hydrosystem behavior in the frequency domain, which serves as a basis for estimating water flows in the time domain with a physically based model. It opens the way to significant breakthroughs in hydrological modeling.
Joachim Meyer, John Horel, Patrick Kormos, Andrew Hedrick, Ernesto Trujillo, and S. McKenzie Skiles
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 233–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Freshwater resupply from seasonal snow in the mountains is changing. Current water prediction methods from snow rely on historical data excluding the change and can lead to errors. This work presented and evaluated an alternative snow-physics-based approach. The results in a test watershed were promising, and future improvements were identified. Adaptation to current forecast environments would improve resilience to the seasonal snow changes and helps ensure the accuracy of resupply forecasts.
Shuqi Lin, Donald C. Pierson, and Jorrit P. Mesman
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 35–46, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-35-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-35-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The risks brought by the proliferation of algal blooms motivate the improvement of bloom forecasting tools, but algal blooms are complexly controlled and difficult to predict. Given rapid growth of monitoring data and advances in computation, machine learning offers an alternative prediction methodology. This study tested various machine learning workflows in a dimictic mesotrophic lake and gave promising predictions of the seasonal variations and the timing of algal blooms.
Thibault Hallouin, Richard J. Ellis, Douglas B. Clark, Simon J. Dadson, Andrew G. Hughes, Bryan N. Lawrence, Grenville M. S. Lister, and Jan Polcher
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 9177–9196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9177-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9177-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A new framework for modelling the water cycle in the land system has been implemented. It considers the hydrological cycle as three interconnected components, bringing flexibility in the choice of the physical processes and their spatio-temporal resolutions. It is designed to foster collaborations between land surface, hydrological, and groundwater modelling communities to develop the next-generation of land system models for integration in Earth system models.
Seyed Mahmood Hamze-Ziabari, Ulrich Lemmin, Frédéric Soulignac, Mehrshad Foroughan, and David Andrew Barry
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8785–8807, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8785-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8785-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A procedure combining numerical simulations, remote sensing, and statistical analyses is developed to detect large-scale current systems in large lakes. By applying this novel procedure in Lake Geneva, strategies for detailed transect field studies of the gyres and eddies were developed. Unambiguous field evidence of 3D gyre/eddy structures in full agreement with predictions confirmed the robustness of the proposed procedure.
Kristina Šarović, Melita Burić, and Zvjezdana B. Klaić
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8349–8375, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8349-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8349-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a simple 1-D model for the prediction of the vertical temperature profiles in small, warm lakes. The model uses routinely measured meteorological variables as well as UVB radiation and yearly mean temperature data. It can be used for the assessment of the onset and duration of lake stratification periods when water temperature data are unavailable, which can be useful for various lake studies performed in other scientific fields, such as biology, geochemistry, and sedimentology.
Cited articles
Abramowitz, G., Leuning, R., Clark, M., and Pitman, A.: Evaluating the performance of land surface models, J. Climate, 21, 5468–5481, 2008.
Barlage, M., Chen, F., Tewari, M., Ikeda, K., Gochis, D., Dudhia, J., Rasmussen, R., Livneh, B., Ek, M., and Mitchell, M.: Noah Land Surface Model modifications to improve snowpack prediction in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D22101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013470, 2010.
Barrett, A.: National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center Snow Data Assimilation System (\uppercase{SNODAS}) products at \uppercase{NSIDC}, Tech. rep., National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO, digital Media, 2003.
Bloschl, G.: Scaling issues in snow hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 13, 2149–2175, 1999.
Blöschl, G. and Sivapalan, M.: Scale issues in hydrological modeling, Hydrol. Process., 9, 251–290, 1995.
Blyth, E., Gash, J., Lloyd, A., Pryor, M., Weedon, G., and Shuttleworth, J.: Evaluating the \uppercase{JULES} model energy fluxes using the \uppercase{FLUXNET} data, J. Hydrometeor., 11, 509–519, 2010.
Blyth, E., Clark, D. B., Ellis, R., Huntingford, C., Los, S., Pryor, M., Best, M., and Sitch, S.: A comprehensive set of benchmark tests for a land surface model of simultaneous fluxes of water and carbon at both the global and seasonal scale, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 255–269, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-255-2011, 2011.
Brown, R. and Brasnett, B.: Canadian Meteorological Center (\uppercase{CMC}) daily snow analysis data, Tech. rep., National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO, digital Media, 2010.
Brown, B., Gotway, J., Bullock, R., Gilleland, E., Fowler, T., Ahijevych, D., and Jensen, T.: The Model Evaluation Tools (\uppercase{MET}): Community tools for forecast evaluation, in: 25th Conf. on International Interactive Information and Processing Systems (IIPS) for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, Amer. Metero. Soc., Phoenix, AZ, 2009.
Brown, J., Demargne, J., Seo, D.-J., and Liu, Y.: The \uppercase{E}nsemble \uppercase{V}erification \uppercase{S}ystem (\uppercase{EVS}): a software tool for verifying ensemble foreasts of hydrometeorological and hydrologic variables at discrete locations, Environ. Model. Software, 25, 854–872, 2010.
Casati, B., Ross, G., and Stephenson, D. B.: A new intensity- scale approach for the verification of spatial precipitation forecasts, Meteor. Appl., 11, 141–154, 2004.
Chen, F., Mitchell, K., Schaake, J., Xue, Y., Pan, H., Koren, V., Duan, Y., Ek, M., and Betts, A.: Modeling of land-surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with \uppercase{FIFE} observations, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 7251–7268, 1996.
Dai, Y., Zeng, X., Dickinson, R., Baker, I., Bonan, G., Bosilovich, M., Denning, S., Dirmeyer, P., Houser, P., Niu, G., Oleson, K., Schlosser, A., and Yang, Z.-L.: The common land model (\textsc{CLM}), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1013–1023, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-8-1013, 2003.
Decyk, V. K., Norton, C. D., and Szymanski, B. K.: How to express \uppercase{C++} concepts in \uppercase{F}ortran 90, Scientific Programming, 6, 363–390, 1997.
Derber, J., Parrish, D., and Lord, S.: The new global operational analysis system at the \textsc{N}ational \textsc{M}eteorological \textsc{C}enter, Weather Forecast., 6, 538–547, 1991.
de Rosnay, P., Boone, A., Beljaars, A., and Polcher, J.: \uppercase{AMMA} Land surface intercomparison projects, \uppercase{GEWEX N}ews, 16, 10–11, 2006.
Dirmeyer, P., Gao, X., Zhao, M., Guo, Z., Oki, T., and Hanasaki, N.: \uppercase{GSWP-2}: Multimodel analysis and implications for our perception of the land surface, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 1381–1397, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-10-1381, 2006.
Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V., Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8851, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296, 2003.
Entekhabi, D., Asrar, G., Betts, A., Beven, K., Bras, R., Duffy, C., Dunne, T., Koster, R., Lettenmaier, D., McLaughlin, D., Shuttleworth, W., van Genuchten, M., Wei, M.-Y., and Wood, E.: An agenda for land surface hydrology research and a call for the second international hydrological decade, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2043–2058, 1999.
Entekhabi, D., Reichle, R., Koster, R., and Crow, W.: Performance Metrics for Soil Moisture Retrievals and Application Requirements, J. Hydrometeor., 11, 832–840, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JHM1223.1, 2010.
Erickson, T. A., Williams, M. W., and Winstral, A.: Persistence of topographic controls on the spatial distribution of snow in rugged mountain terrain, Colorado, United States, Water Resour. Res., 41, W04014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002973, 2005.
Fennessey, M. and Shukla, J.: Impact of initial soil wetness on seasonal atmospheric prediction, J. Climate, 12, 3167–3180, 1999.
Foster, J., Hall, D., Eylander, J., Riggs, G., Nghiem, S., Tedesco, M., Kim, E., Montesano, P., Kelly, R., Casey, K. A., and Choudhury, B.: A blended global snow product using visible, passive microwave and scatterometer satellite data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 5, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160903548013, 2011.
Friend, A. and Kiang, N.: Land surface model development for the \uppercase{GISS GCM}: Effects of improved canopy physiology on simulated climate, J. Climate, 18, 2883–2902, 2005.
Gelb, A.: Applied Optimal Estimation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1974.
Grayson, R. and Bloschl, G.: Spatial patterns in catchment hydrology: Observations and modeling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
Gulden, L., Rosero, E., Yang, Z.-L., Wagener, T., and Niu, G.-Y.: Model performance, model robustness, and model fitness scores: A new method for identifying good land surface models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L11404, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033721, 2008.
Gupta, V., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Wood, E.: Scale problems in Hydrology, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.
Gupta, H., Wagener, T., and Liu, Y.: Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3802–3813, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6989, 2008.
Gupta, H., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K., and Martinez, G.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and \uppercase{NSE} performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modeling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
Hall, D., Riggs, G., and Salomonson, V.: \textsc{MODIS/T}erra snow cover daily L3 Global 500 m Grid V005, Tech. rep., National Snow and Ice Data Center, Colorado, USA, digital media, 2006.
Harrison, K., Kumar, S., Peters-Lidard, C., and Santanello, J.: Quantifying soil moisture modeling uncertainty with remote sensing observations using Bayesian inference techniques, Water Resour. Res., under review, 2012.
Heim, R. J.: A review of twentieth century drought indices used in the United States, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1149–1165, 2002.
Henderson-Sellers, A., Pitman, A., Love, P., Irannejad, P., and Chen, T.: The project for Intercomparison of land surface parameterization schemes (\uppercase{PILPS}): Phases 2 and 3, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 76, 489–503, 1995.
Higgins, R., Janowiak, J., and Yao, Y.-P.: A gridded hourly precipitation database for the United States (1963–1993)., Tech. rep., NCEP Climate Prediction Center Atlas 1, 46 pp., 1996.
Hill, C., DeLuca, C., Balaji, V., Suarez, M., and da Silva, A.: The Architecture of the Earth System Modeling Framework, Comput. Sci. Eng., 6, 18–28, 2004.
Jiminez, C., Prigent, C., Mueller, B., Seneviratne, S., McCabe, M., Wood, E., Rossow, W., Balsamo, G., Betts, A., Dirmeyer, P., Fisher, J., Jung, M., Kanamitsu, M., Reichle, R., Reichstein, M., Rodell, M., Sheffield, J., Tu, K., and Wang, K.: Global intercomparison of 12 land surface heat flux estimates, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D02102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014545, 2011.
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., and Bondeau, A.: Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model, Biogeosciences, 6, 2001–2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2001-2009, 2009.
Kato, H., Rodell, M., Beyrich, F., Cleugh, H., van Gorsel, E., Liu, H., and Meyers, T.: Sensitivity of land surface simulations to model physics, land characteristics, and forcings at four \uppercase{CEOP} sites, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85A, 187–204, 2007.
Koren, V., Schaake, J., Mitchell, K., Duan, Q.-Y., and Chen, F.: A parameterization of snowpack and frozen ground intended for NCEP weather and climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 19569–19585, 1999.
Koster, R., Suarez, M., Liu, P., Jambor, U., Berg, A., Kistler, M., Reichle, R., Rodell, M., and Famiglietti, J.: Realistic initialization of land surface states: Impacts on subseasonal forecast skill, J. Hydrometeor., 5, 1049–1063, 2004.
Koster, R., Guo, Z., Dirmeyer, P., Yang, R., Mitchell, K., and Puma, M.: On the nature of soil moisture in land surface models, J. Climate, 22, 4322–4335, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2832.1, 2009.
Kumar, S., Peters-Lidard, C., Tian, T., Houser, P., Geiger, J., Olden, S., Lighty, L., Eastman, J., Doty, B., Dirmeyer, P., Adams, J., Mitchell, K., Wood, E., and Sheffield, J.: Land information system: An interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling, Environ. Model. Software, 21, 1402–1415, 2006.
Kumar, S., Peters-Lidard, C., Eastman, J. L., and Tao, W.-K.: An integrated high resolution hydrometeorological modeling testbed using LIS and WRF, Environ. Model. Software, 23, 169–181, 2007.
Kumar, S., Peters-Lidard, C., Tian, Y., Reichle, R. H., Alonge, C., Geiger, J., Eylander, J., and Houser, P.: An integrated hydrologic modeling and data assimilation framework enabled by the Land Information System (LIS), IEEE Computer, 41, 52–59, https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2008.511, 2008{a}.
Kumar, S., Reichle, R., Peters-Lidard, C., Koster, R., Zhan, X., Crow, W., Eylander, J., and Houser, P.: A land surface data assimilation framework using the Land Information System: Description and Applications, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1419–1432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.01.013, 2008{b}.
Kumar, S. V., Reichle, R. H., Harrison, K. W., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Yatheendradas, S., and Santanello, J. A.: A comparison of methods for a priori bias correction in soil moisture data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 48, W03515, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010261, 2012.
Lange, H.: Are ecosystems dynamical systems?, International Journal of computing anticipatory systems, 3, 169–186, 1999.
Lawrence, D., Oleson, K., Flanner, M., Thornton, P., Swenson, S., Lawrence, P., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K., Bonan, G., and Slater, A.: Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sys., 3, M03001, https://doi.org/10.1029/JAMES.2011.3.1, 2011.
Liu, Q., Reichle, R., Bindlish, R., Cosh, M., Crow, W., de Jeu, R., De Lannoy, G., Huffman, G., and Jackson, T.: The contributions of precipitation and soil moisture observations to the skill of soil moisture estimates in land data assimilation system, J. Hydrometeor., 12, 5, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-10.05000.1, 2011{a}.
Liu, Y., Brown, J., Demargne, J., and Seo, D.-J.: A wavelet-based approach to assessing timing errors in hydrologic predictions, J. Hydrol., 397, 210–224, 2011{b}.
Lohmann, D., Mitchell, K., Houser, P., Wood, E., Schaake, J., Robock, A., Cosgrove, B., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Higgins, W., Pinker, R., and Tarpley, J.: Streamflow and water balance intercomparisons of four land surface models in the North American Land Data Assimilation System project, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07S91, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003517, 2004.
Mitchell, K., Lohmann, D., Houser, P., Wood, E., Schaake, J., Robock, A., Cosgrove, B., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Higgins, R., Pinker, R., Tarpley, J., Lettenmaier, D., Marshall, C., Entin, J., Pan, M., Shi, W., Koren, V., Meng, J., Ramsay, B., and Bailey, A.: The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07S90, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003823, 2004.
Mo, K., Long, L., Xia, Y., Yang, S., Schemm, J., and Ek, M.: Drought indices based on the climate forecast system reanalysis and ensemble \uppercase{NLDAS}, J. Hydrometeor., 12, 181–205, 2011.
Moore, B., Bertone, S., Mitchell, K., Rice, P., and Neill, R.: A worldwide near-real time diagnostic agrometeorological model, in: 20th AMS Conf. Ag and Forest Meteorology, 7–11, 1990.
Mu, Q., Heinsch, F., Zhao, M., and Running, S.: Development of a Global evapotranspiration algorithm based on \uppercase{MODIS} and global meteorology data, Remote Sens. Environ., 111, 519–536, 2007.
Murphy, A. and Winkler, R.: Diagnostic verification of probability forecasts, Int. J. Forecast., 7, 435–455, 1992.
Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Mitchell, K., Chen, F., Ek, M., Barlage, M., Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Xia, Y.-L.: The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-\uppercase{MP}): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139, 2011.
Njoku, E., Jackson, T., Lakshmi, V., Chan, T., and Nghiem, S.: Soil moisture retrieval from \uppercase{AMSR-E}, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41, 215–229, 2003.
NRC: Assessment of Hydrologic and Hydrometeorological Operations and Services, Tech. rep., National Academy Press, 1996.
Owe, M., de Jeu, R., and Holmes, T.: Multi-sensor historical climatology of satellite-derived global land surface moisture, J. Geophys. Res., 13, F01002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000769, 2008.
Pachepsky, Y., Guber, A., Jacques, D., Simunek, J., van Genuchten, M., Nicholson, T., and Cady, R.: Information content and complexity of simulated soil water fluxes, Geoderma, 253–266, 2006.
Pan, F., Pachepsky, Y., Andrey, G., and Hill, R.: Information and Complexity Measures Applied to Observed and Simulated Soil Moisture Time Series, Hydrol. Sci. J., 56, 1027–1039, 2011.
Pan, M., Ming, J., Sheffield, J., Wood, E., Mitchell, K., Houser, P., Schaake, J., Robock, A., Lohmann, D., Cosgrove, B., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Higgins, R., Pinker, R., and Tarpley, J.: Snow process modeling in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (\uppercase{NLDAS}): 2. Evaluation of model simulated snow water equivalent, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8850, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003994, 2003.
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Houser, P. R., Tian, Y., Kumar, S. V., Geiger, J., Olden, S., Lighty, L., Eastman, J. L., Doty, B., Dirmeyer, P., Adams, J., Mitchell, K., Wood, E., and Sheffield, J.: High-performance Earth System modeling with \uppercase{NASA/GSFC}'s Land Information System, Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering, 3, 157–165, 2007.
Peters-Lidard, C., Mocko, D., Garcia, M., Santanello, J., Tischler, M., and Moran, M. S.: Role of precipitation uncertainty in the estimation of hydrologic soil properties using remotely sensed soil moisture in a semiarid environment, Water Resour. Res., 44, W05S18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR005884, 2008.
Peters-Lidard, C., Kumar, S., Mocko, D., and Tian, Y.: Estimating evapotranspiration with Land Data Assimilation Systems, Hydrol. Process., 25, 3979–3992, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8387, 2011.
Pitman, A. and Henderson-Sellers, A.: Recent progress and results from the Project for the Intercomparison of Land surface Parameterization Schemes, J. Hydrol., 212–213, 128–135, 1998.
Pulliainen, J.: Mapping of snow water equivalent and snow depth in boreal and subarctic zones by assimilating space-borne microwave radiometer data and ground-based observations, Remote Sens. Environ., 101, 257–269, 2006.
Randerson, J., Hoffman, F., Thornton, P., Mahowald, N., Lindsay, K., Lee, Y.-H., Nevison, C., Doney, S., Bonan, G., Stockli, R., Covey, C., Running, S., and Fung, I.: Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate-carbon models, Global Change Biol., 15, 2462–2484, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01912.x, 2009.
Raupach, M., Rayner, P., Barrett, D., DeFries, R., Heimann, M., Ojima, D., Quegan, S., and Schmullius, C.: Model-data synthesis in terrestrial carbon observation: methods, data requirements and data uncertainty specifications, Global Change Biol., 11, 378–397, 2005.
Reichle, R. and Crow, W.: Comparison of adaptive filtering techniques for land surface data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W08423, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006883, 2008.
Reichle, R. and Koster, R.: Land data assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Assessing model error parameters using innovations, in: Developments in Water Science – Computational Methods in Water Resources, edited by: Hassanizadeh, S., Schotting, R., Gray, W., and Pinder, G., 47, Elsevier, New York, 1387–1394, 2002.
Reichle, R., Koster, R., Liu, P., Mahanama, S., Njoku, E., and Owe, M.: Comparison and assimilation of global soil moisture retrievals from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System (\uppercase{AMSR-E}) and the Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (\uppercase{SMMR}), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D09108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008033, 2007.
Reichle, R., Crow, W., and Keppenne, C.: An adaptive ensemble Kalman Filter for soil moisture data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03423, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006357, 2008.
Robock, A., Luo, L., Wood, E., Wen, F., Mitchell, K., Houser, P., Schaake, J., Lohmann, D., Cosgrove, B., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Higgins, R., Pinker, R., Tarpley, J., Basara, J., and Crawford, K.: Evaluation of the North American Land Data Assimilation System over the southern Great Plains during the warm season, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8846, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003245, 2003.
Rodell, M., Famiglietti, J., Chen, J., Seneviratne, S., Viterbo, P., Holl, S., and Wilson, C.: Basin scale estimates of evapotranspiration using \uppercase{GRACE} and other observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L20504, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020873, 2004{a}.
Rodell, M., Houser, P. R., Jambor, U., Gottschalck, J., Mitchell, K., Meng., C.-J., Arsenault, K., Cosgrove, B., Radakovich, J., Bosilovich, M., Entin, J. K., Walker, J. P., Lohmann, D., and Toll, D.: The \uppercase{G}lobal \uppercase{L}and \uppercase{D}ata \uppercase{A}ssimilation \uppercase{S}ystem, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 85, 381–394, 2004{b}.
Rosenzweig, C., Tubiello, F., Goldberg, R., Mills, E., and Bloomfield, J.: Increased crop damage in the \uppercase{US} from excess precipitation under climate change, Global Environ. Chang., 12, 197–202, 2002.
Rossow, W. and Schiffer, R.: \uppercase{ISCCP} cloud data products, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 72, 2–20, 1991.
Santanello, J., Peters-Lidard, C., Garcia, M., Mocko, D., Tischler, M., Moran, M., and Thoma, D.: Using remotely-sensed estimates of soil moisture to infer soil texture and hydraulic properties across a semi-arid watershed, Remote Sens. Environ., 110, 79–97, 2007.
Santanello, J., Peters-Lidard, C., Kumar, S., Alonge, C., and Tao, W.-K.: A Modeling and Observational Framework for Diagnosing local land-atmosphere coupling on diurnal time scales, J. Hydrometeor., 10, 577–599, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JHM1066.1, 2009.
Santanello, J., Peters-Lidard, C., and Kumar, S.: Diagnosing the Sensitivity of Local Land-Atmosphere Coupling via the Soil Moisture-Boundary Layer Interaction, J. Hydrometeor., 12, 766–786, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-10-05014.1, 2011.
Seyfried, M. and Wilcox, B.: Scale and the nature of spatial variability: Field examples having implications for hydrologic modeling, Water Resour. Res., 31, 173–184, 1995.
Sheffield, J., Pan, M., Wood, E., Mitchell, K., Houser, P., Schaake, J., Robock, A., Lohmann, D., Cosgrove, B., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Higgins, R., Pinker, R., Tarpley, J., and Ramsay, B.: Snow process modeling in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (\uppercase{NLDAS}): 1. Evaluation of model-simulated snow cover extent, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8849, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003274, 2003.
Sivapalan, M. and Kalma, J.: Scale problems in hydrology: Contributions of the Robertson Workshop, Hydrol. Process., 9, 243–250, 1995.
Stanski, H., Wilson, L., and Burrows, W.: Survey of common verification methods in meteorology, Tech. report 8,\uppercase{WMO/TD} 35, WMO World Weather Watch, 114 pp., 1989.
Trujillo, E., Ramirez, J., and Elder, K.: Scaling properties and spatial organization of snow depth fields in sub-alpine forest and alpine tundra, Hydrol. Process., 23, 1575–1590, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7270, 2009.
van den Hurk, B., Best, M., Dirmeyer, P., Pitman, A., Polcher, J., and Santanello, J.: Over a decade of \uppercase{GLASS} has accelerated land surface model development, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1593–1600, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00007.1, 2011.
Wackerbauer, R., Witt, A., Atmanspacher, H., Kurths, J., and Scheingraber, H.: Comparative classification of complexity measures, Solitons Fractals, 4, 133–173, 1994.
Wealands, S., Grayson, R., and Walker, J.: Quantitative comparison of spatial fields for hydrological model assessment – some promising approaches, Adv. Water Resour., 28, 15–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.10.001, 2005.
Williams, M., Richardson, A. D., Reichstein, M., Stoy, P. C., Peylin, P., Verbeeck, H., Carvalhais, N., Jung, M., Hollinger, D. Y., Kattge, J., Leuning, R., Luo, Y., Tomelleri, E., Trudinger, C. M., and Wang, Y.-P.: Improving land surface models with FLUXNET data, Biogeosciences, 6, 1341–1359, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1341-2009, 2009.
Wood, E., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., and Band, L.: Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling, J. Hydrol., 102, 29–47, 1988.
Wood, E., Sivapalan, M., and Beven, K.: Similarity and scale in catchment storm response, Rev. Geophys., 28, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG028i001p00001, 1990.
Xia, Y., Mitchell, K., Ek, M., Cosgrove, B., Sheffield, J., Luo, L., Alonge, C., Wei, H., Meng, J., Livneh, B., Duan, Y., and Lohmann, D.: Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for North-American Land Data Assimilation System Project Phase-2, Part 2: Validation of model-simulated streamflow, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D03109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016051, 2012{a}.
Xia, Y., Mitchell, K., Ek, M., Sheffield, J., Wood, E., Cosgrove, B., Luo, L., Alonge, C., Wei, H., Meng, J., Livneh, B., Lettenmaier, D., Koren, V., Duan, Y. K. M., and Fan, Y.: Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System Project Phase 2 (NLDAS-2), Part 1: Comparison Analysis and Application of Model Products, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D03110, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016048, 2012{b}.
Xie, P. and Arkin, P.: Global precipitation: A 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2539–2558, 1997.
