Articles | Volume 5, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-869-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-869-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
26 Jun 2012
Model description paper |
| 26 Jun 2012
Land surface Verification Toolkit (LVT) – a generalized framework for land surface model evaluation
S. V. Kumar
Science Applications International Corporation, Beltsville, MD, USA
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
C. D. Peters-Lidard
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
J. Santanello
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
K. Harrison
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, College Park, MD, USA
Y. Liu
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, College Park, MD, USA
M. Shaw
Science Applications International Corporation, Beltsville, MD, USA
Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Air Force Weather Agency, Offutt, NE, USA
Related subject area
Hydrology
SERGHEI (SERGHEI-SWE) v1.0: a performance-portable high-performance parallel-computing shallow-water solver for hydrology and environmental hydraulics
A simple, efficient, mass-conservative approach to solving Richards' equation (openRE, v1.0)
Customized deep learning for precipitation bias correction and downscaling
Implementation and sensitivity analysis of the Dam-Reservoir OPeration model (DROP v1.0) over Spain
Regional coupled surface–subsurface hydrological model fitting based on a spatially distributed minimalist reduction of frequency domain discharge data
Operational water forecast ability of the HRRR-iSnobal combination: an evaluation to adapt into production environments
Prediction of algal blooms via data-driven machine learning models: an evaluation using data from a well-monitored mesotrophic lake
UniFHy v0.1.1: a community modelling framework for the terrestrial water cycle in Python
Basin-scale gyres and mesoscale eddies in large lakes: a novel procedure for their detection and characterization, assessed in Lake Geneva
SIMO v1.0: simplified model of the vertical temperature profile in a small, warm, monomictic lake
Thermal modeling of three lakes within the continuous permafrost zone in Alaska using the LAKE 2.0 model
Water balance model (WBM) v.1.0.0: a scalable gridded global hydrologic model with water-tracking functionality
Evaluating a Global Soil Moisture dataset from a Multitask Model (GSM3 v1.0) for current and emerging threats to crops
Coupling a large-scale hydrological model (CWatM v1.1) with a high-resolution groundwater flow model (MODFLOW 6) to assess the impact of irrigation at regional scale
RavenR v2.1.4: an open-source R package to support flexible hydrologic modelling
Developing a parsimonious canopy model (PCM v1.0) to predict forest gross primary productivity and leaf area index of deciduous broad-leaved forest
Synergy between satellite observations of soil moisture and water storage anomalies for runoff estimation
A physically based distributed karst hydrological model (QMG model-V1.0) for flood simulations
Modular Assessment of Rainfall–Runoff Models Toolbox (MARRMoT) v2.1: an object-oriented implementation of 47 established hydrological models for improved speed and readability
CREST-VEC: a framework towards more accurate and realistic flood simulation across scales
Rad-cGAN v1.0: Radar-based precipitation nowcasting model with conditional generative adversarial networks for multiple dam domains
The eWaterCycle platform for open and FAIR hydrological collaboration
Evaluating the Atibaia River hydrology using JULES6.1
Continental-scale evaluation of a fully distributed coupled land surface and groundwater model ParFlow-CLM (v3.6.0) over Europe
A framework for ensemble modelling of climate change impacts on lakes worldwide: the ISIMIP Lake Sector
CLIMFILL v0.9: a framework for intelligently gap filling Earth observations
Modeling subgrid lake energy balance in ORCHIDEE terrestrial scheme using the FLake lake model
Evaluating a reservoir parametrization in the vector-based global routing model mizuRoute (v2.0.1) for Earth system model coupling
Improved runoff simulations for a highly varying soil depth and complex terrain watershed in the Loess Plateau with the Community Land Model version 5
GSTools v1.3: a toolbox for geostatistical modelling in Python
AI4Water v1.0: an open-source python package for modeling hydrological time series using data-driven methods
Modeling of streamflow in a 30 km long reach spanning 5 years using OpenFOAM 5.x
Tree hydrodynamic modelling of the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum using FETCH3
Effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirs
Computation of backwater effects in surface waters of lowland catchments including control structures – an efficient and re-usable method implemented in the hydrological open-source model Kalypso-NA (4.0)
Inishell 2.0: semantically driven automatic GUI generation for scientific models
Irrigation quality and management determine salinization in Israeli olive orchards
Implementing the Water, HEat and Transport model in GEOframe (WHETGEO-1D v.1.0): algorithms, informatics, design patterns, open science features, and 1D deployment
HydroPy (v1.0): a new global hydrology model written in Python
GMD perspective: The quest to improve the evaluation of groundwater representation in continental- to global-scale models
SELF v1.0: a minimal physical model for predicting time of freeze-up in lakes
POET (v0.1): speedup of many-core parallel reactive transport simulations with fast DHT lookups
Assessment of the ParFlow–CLM CONUS 1.0 integrated hydrologic model: evaluation of hyper-resolution water balance components across the contiguous United States
Cosmic-Ray neutron Sensor PYthon tool (crspy 1.2.1): an open-source tool for the processing of cosmic-ray neutron and soil moisture data
SuperflexPy 1.3.0: an open-source Python framework for building, testing, and improving conceptual hydrological models
DRYP 1.0: a parsimonious hydrological model of DRYland Partitioning of the water balance
HydroBlocks v0.2: enabling a field-scale two-way coupling between the land surface and river networks in Earth system models
GP-SWAT (v1.0): a two-level graph-based parallel simulation tool for the SWAT model
Development of a coupled simulation framework representing the lake and river continuum of mass and energy (TCHOIR v1.0)
Hydrostreamer v1.0 – improved streamflow predictions for local applications from an ensemble of downscaled global runoff products
Daniel Caviedes-Voullième, Mario Morales-Hernández, Matthew R. Norman, and Ilhan Özgen-Xian
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 977–1008, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the SERGHEI framework and a solver for shallow-water problems. Such models, often used for surface flow and flood modelling, are computationally intense. In recent years the trends to increase computational power have changed, requiring models to adapt to new hardware and new software paradigms. SERGHEI addresses these challenges, allowing surface flow simulation to be enabled on the newest and upcoming consumer hardware and supercomputers very efficiently.
Andrew M. Ireson, Raymond J. Spiteri, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon A. Mathias
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 659–677, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Richards' equation (RE) is used to describe the movement and storage of water in a soil profile and is a component of many hydrological and earth-system models. Solving RE numerically is challenging due to the non-linearities in the properties. Here, we present a simple but effective and mass-conservative solution to solving RE, which is ideal for teaching/learning purposes but also useful in prototype models that are used to explore alternative process representations.
Fang Wang, Di Tian, and Mark Carroll
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 535–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-535-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Gridded precipitation datasets suffer from biases and coarse resolutions. We developed a customized deep learning (DL) model to bias-correct and downscale gridded precipitation data using radar observations. The results showed that the customized DL model can generate improved precipitation at fine resolutions where regular DL and statistical methods experience challenges. The new model can be used to improve precipitation estimates, especially for capturing extremes at smaller scales.
Malak Sadki, Simon Munier, Aaron Boone, and Sophie Ricci
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 427–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-427-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Predicting water resource evolution is a key challenge for the coming century.
Anthropogenic impacts on water resources, and particularly the effects of dams and reservoirs on river flows, are still poorly known and generally neglected in global hydrological studies. A parameterized reservoir model is reproduced to compute monthly releases in Spanish anthropized river basins. For global application, an exhaustive sensitivity analysis of the model parameters is performed on flows and volumes.
Nicolas Flipo, Nicolas Gallois, and Jonathan Schuite
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 353–381, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-353-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-353-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A new approach is proposed to fit hydrological or land surface models, which suffer from large uncertainties in terms of water partitioning between fast runoff and slow infiltration from small watersheds to regional or continental river basins. It is based on the analysis of hydrosystem behavior in the frequency domain, which serves as a basis for estimating water flows in the time domain with a physically based model. It opens the way to significant breakthroughs in hydrological modeling.
Joachim Meyer, John Horel, Patrick Kormos, Andrew Hedrick, Ernesto Trujillo, and S. McKenzie Skiles
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 233–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Freshwater resupply from seasonal snow in the mountains is changing. Current water prediction methods from snow rely on historical data excluding the change and can lead to errors. This work presented and evaluated an alternative snow-physics-based approach. The results in a test watershed were promising, and future improvements were identified. Adaptation to current forecast environments would improve resilience to the seasonal snow changes and helps ensure the accuracy of resupply forecasts.
Shuqi Lin, Donald C. Pierson, and Jorrit P. Mesman
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 35–46, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-35-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-35-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The risks brought by the proliferation of algal blooms motivate the improvement of bloom forecasting tools, but algal blooms are complexly controlled and difficult to predict. Given rapid growth of monitoring data and advances in computation, machine learning offers an alternative prediction methodology. This study tested various machine learning workflows in a dimictic mesotrophic lake and gave promising predictions of the seasonal variations and the timing of algal blooms.
Thibault Hallouin, Richard J. Ellis, Douglas B. Clark, Simon J. Dadson, Andrew G. Hughes, Bryan N. Lawrence, Grenville M. S. Lister, and Jan Polcher
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 9177–9196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9177-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9177-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A new framework for modelling the water cycle in the land system has been implemented. It considers the hydrological cycle as three interconnected components, bringing flexibility in the choice of the physical processes and their spatio-temporal resolutions. It is designed to foster collaborations between land surface, hydrological, and groundwater modelling communities to develop the next-generation of land system models for integration in Earth system models.
Seyed Mahmood Hamze-Ziabari, Ulrich Lemmin, Frédéric Soulignac, Mehrshad Foroughan, and David Andrew Barry
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8785–8807, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8785-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8785-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A procedure combining numerical simulations, remote sensing, and statistical analyses is developed to detect large-scale current systems in large lakes. By applying this novel procedure in Lake Geneva, strategies for detailed transect field studies of the gyres and eddies were developed. Unambiguous field evidence of 3D gyre/eddy structures in full agreement with predictions confirmed the robustness of the proposed procedure.
Kristina Šarović, Melita Burić, and Zvjezdana B. Klaić
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8349–8375, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8349-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8349-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a simple 1-D model for the prediction of the vertical temperature profiles in small, warm lakes. The model uses routinely measured meteorological variables as well as UVB radiation and yearly mean temperature data. It can be used for the assessment of the onset and duration of lake stratification periods when water temperature data are unavailable, which can be useful for various lake studies performed in other scientific fields, such as biology, geochemistry, and sedimentology.
Jason A. Clark, Elchin E. Jafarov, Ken D. Tape, Benjamin M. Jones, and Victor Stepanenko
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7421–7448, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7421-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7421-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Lakes in the Arctic are important reservoirs of heat. Under climate warming scenarios, we expect Arctic lakes to warm the surrounding frozen ground. We simulate water temperatures in three Arctic lakes in northern Alaska over several years. Our results show that snow depth and lake ice strongly affect water temperatures during the frozen season and that more heat storage by lakes would enhance thawing of frozen ground.
Danielle S. Grogan, Shan Zuidema, Alex Prusevich, Wilfred M. Wollheim, Stanley Glidden, and Richard B. Lammers
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7287–7323, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7287-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7287-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the University of New Hampshire's water balance model (WBM). This model simulates the land surface components of the global water cycle and includes water extractions for use by humans for agricultural, domestic, and industrial purposes. A new feature is described that permits water source tracking through the water cycle, which has implications for water resource management. This paper was written to describe a long-used model and presents its first open-source version.
Jiangtao Liu, David Hughes, Farshid Rahmani, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-211, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-211, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Under-monitored regions like Africa need high-quality soil moisture predictions to help with food production, but it is not clear if soil moisture processes are similar enough around the world for data-driven models to maintain accuracy. We present a deep-learning-based soil moisture model that learns from both in-situ data and satellite data and performs better than satellite products at the global scale. These results help us apply our model globally while better understanding its limitations.
Luca Guillaumot, Mikhail Smilovic, Peter Burek, Jens de Bruijn, Peter Greve, Taher Kahil, and Yoshihide Wada
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7099–7120, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7099-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7099-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We develop and test the first large-scale hydrological model at regional scale with a very high spatial resolution that includes a water management and groundwater flow model. This study infers the impact of surface and groundwater-based irrigation on groundwater recharge and on evapotranspiration in both irrigated and non-irrigated areas. We argue that water table recorded in boreholes can be used as validation data if water management is well implemented and spatial resolution is ≤ 100 m.
Robert Chlumsky, James R. Craig, Simon G. M. Lin, Sarah Grass, Leland Scantlebury, Genevieve Brown, and Rezgar Arabzadeh
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7017–7030, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7017-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7017-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce the open-source RavenR package, which has been built to support the use of the hydrologic modelling framework Raven. The R package contains many functions that may be useful in each step of the model-building process, including preparing model input files, running the model, and analyzing the outputs. We present six reproducible use cases of the RavenR package for the Liard River basin in Canada to demonstrate how it may be deployed.
Bahar Bahrami, Anke Hildebrandt, Stephan Thober, Corinna Rebmann, Rico Fischer, Luis Samaniego, Oldrich Rakovec, and Rohini Kumar
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6957–6984, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6957-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6957-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Leaf area index (LAI) and gross primary productivity (GPP) are crucial components to carbon cycle, and are closely linked to water cycle in many ways. We develop a Parsimonious Canopy Model (PCM) to simulate GPP and LAI at stand scale, and show its applicability over a diverse range of deciduous broad-leaved forest biomes. With its modular structure, the PCM is able to adapt with existing data requirements, and run in either a stand-alone mode or as an interface linked to hydrologic models.
Stefania Camici, Gabriele Giuliani, Luca Brocca, Christian Massari, Angelica Tarpanelli, Hassan Hashemi Farahani, Nico Sneeuw, Marco Restano, and Jérôme Benveniste
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6935–6956, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6935-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6935-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents an innovative approach, STREAM (SaTellite-based Runoff Evaluation And Mapping), to derive daily river discharge and runoff estimates from satellite observations of soil moisture, precipitation, and terrestrial total water storage anomalies. Potentially useful for multiple operational and scientific applications, the added value of the STREAM approach is the ability to increase knowledge on the natural processes, human activities, and their interactions on the land.
Ji Li, Daoxian Yuan, Fuxi Zhang, Jiao Liu, and Mingguo Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6581–6600, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6581-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6581-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A new karst hydrological model (the QMG model) is developed to simulate and predict the floods in karst trough valley basins. Unlike the complex structure and parameters of current karst groundwater models, this model has a simple double-layered structure with few parameters and decreases the demand for modeling data in karst areas. The flood simulation results based on the QMG model of the Qingmuguan karst trough valley basin are satisfactory, indicating the suitability of the model simulation.
Luca Trotter, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Keirnan J. A. Fowler, Margarita Saft, and Murray C. Peel
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6359–6369, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6359-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6359-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
MARRMoT is a piece of software that emulates 47 common models for hydrological simulations. It can be used to run and calibrate these models within a common environment as well as to easily modify them. We restructured and recoded MARRMoT in order to make the models run faster and to simplify their use, while also providing some new features. This new MARRMoT version runs models on average 3.6 times faster while maintaining very strong consistency in their outputs to the previous version.
Zhi Li, Shang Gao, Mengye Chen, Jonathan Gourley, Naoki Mizukami, and Yang Hong
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6181–6196, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6181-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6181-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Operational streamflow prediction at a continental scale is critical for national water resources management. However, limited computational resources often impede such processes, with streamflow routing being one of the most time-consuming parts. This study presents a recent development of a hydrologic system that incorporates a vector-based routing scheme with a lake module that markedly speeds up streamflow prediction. Moreover, accuracy is improved and flood false alarms are mitigated.
Suyeon Choi and Yeonjoo Kim
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5967–5985, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5967-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5967-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Here we present the cGAN-based precipitation nowcasting model, named Rad-cGAN, trained to predict a radar reflectivity map with a lead time of 10 min. Rad-cGAN showed superior performance at a lead time of up to 90 min compared with the reference models. Furthermore, we demonstrate the successful implementation of the transfer learning strategies using pre-trained Rad-cGAN to develop the models for different dam domains.
Rolf Hut, Niels Drost, Nick van de Giesen, Ben van Werkhoven, Banafsheh Abdollahi, Jerom Aerts, Thomas Albers, Fakhereh Alidoost, Bouwe Andela, Jaro Camphuijsen, Yifat Dzigan, Ronald van Haren, Eric Hutton, Peter Kalverla, Maarten van Meersbergen, Gijs van den Oord, Inti Pelupessy, Stef Smeets, Stefan Verhoeven, Martine de Vos, and Berend Weel
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5371–5390, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5371-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5371-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
With the eWaterCycle platform, we are providing the hydrological community with a platform to conduct their research that is fully compatible with the principles of both open science and FAIR science. The eWatercyle platform gives easy access to well-known hydrological models, big datasets and example experiments. Using eWaterCycle hydrologists can easily compare the results from different models, couple models and do more complex hydrological computational research.
Hsi-Kai Chou, Ana Maria Heuminski de Avila, and Michaela Bray
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5233–5240, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5233-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5233-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface models allow us to understand and investigate the cause and effect of environmental process changes. Therefore, this type of model is increasingly used for hydrological assessments. Here we explore the possibility of this approach using a case study in the Atibaia River basin, which serves as a major water supply for the metropolitan regions of Campinas and São Paulo, Brazil. We evaluated the model performance and use the model to simulate the basin hydrology.
Bibi S. Naz, Wendy Sharples, Yueling Ma, Klaus Goergen, and Stefan Kollet
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-173, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
It is challenging to apply a high-resolution integrated land surface and groundwater model over large spatial scales. In this paper, we demonstrate the application of such a model over a pan-European domain at 3 km resolution and perform an extensive evaluation of simulated water states and fluxes by comparing with in-situ and satellite data. This study can serve as a benchmark and baseline for future studies of climate change impact projections and for hydrological forecasting.
Malgorzata Golub, Wim Thiery, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Inne Vanderkelen, Daniel Mercado-Bettin, R. Iestyn Woolway, Luke Grant, Eleanor Jennings, Benjamin M. Kraemer, Jacob Schewe, Fang Zhao, Katja Frieler, Matthias Mengel, Vasiliy Y. Bogomolov, Damien Bouffard, Marianne Côté, Raoul-Marie Couture, Andrey V. Debolskiy, Bram Droppers, Gideon Gal, Mingyang Guo, Annette B. G. Janssen, Georgiy Kirillin, Robert Ladwig, Madeline Magee, Tadhg Moore, Marjorie Perroud, Sebastiano Piccolroaz, Love Raaman Vinnaa, Martin Schmid, Tom Shatwell, Victor M. Stepanenko, Zeli Tan, Bronwyn Woodward, Huaxia Yao, Rita Adrian, Mathew Allan, Orlane Anneville, Lauri Arvola, Karen Atkins, Leon Boegman, Cayelan Carey, Kyle Christianson, Elvira de Eyto, Curtis DeGasperi, Maria Grechushnikova, Josef Hejzlar, Klaus Joehnk, Ian D. Jones, Alo Laas, Eleanor B. Mackay, Ivan Mammarella, Hampus Markensten, Chris McBride, Deniz Özkundakci, Miguel Potes, Karsten Rinke, Dale Robertson, James A. Rusak, Rui Salgado, Leon van der Linden, Piet Verburg, Danielle Wain, Nicole K. Ward, Sabine Wollrab, and Galina Zdorovennova
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4597–4623, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4597-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4597-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Lakes and reservoirs are warming across the globe. To better understand how lakes are changing and to project their future behavior amidst various sources of uncertainty, simulations with a range of lake models are required. This in turn requires international coordination across different lake modelling teams worldwide. Here we present a protocol for and results from coordinated simulations of climate change impacts on lakes worldwide.
Verena Bessenbacher, Sonia Isabelle Seneviratne, and Lukas Gudmundsson
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4569–4596, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4569-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4569-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Earth observations have many missing values. They are often filled using information from spatial and temporal contexts that mostly ignore information from related observed variables. We propose the gap-filling method CLIMFILL that additionally uses information from related variables. We test CLIMFILL using gap-free reanalysis data of variables related to soil–moisture climate interactions. CLIMFILL creates estimates for the missing values that recover the original dependence structure.
Anthony Bernus and Catherine Ottlé
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4275–4295, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4275-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4275-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The lake model FLake was coupled to the ORCHIDEE land surface model to simulate lake energy balance at global scale with a multi-tile approach. Several simulations were performed with various atmospheric reanalyses and different lake depth parameterizations. The simulated lake surface temperature showed good agreement with observations (RMSEs of the order of 3 °C). We showed the large impact of the atmospheric forcing on lake temperature. We highlighted systematic errors on ice cover phenology.
Inne Vanderkelen, Shervan Gharari, Naoki Mizukami, Martyn P. Clark, David M. Lawrence, Sean Swenson, Yadu Pokhrel, Naota Hanasaki, Ann van Griensven, and Wim Thiery
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4163–4192, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4163-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4163-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Human-controlled reservoirs have a large influence on the global water cycle. However, dam operations are rarely represented in Earth system models. We implement and evaluate a widely used reservoir parametrization in a global river-routing model. Using observations of individual reservoirs, the reservoir scheme outperforms the natural lake scheme. However, both schemes show a similar performance due to biases in runoff timing and magnitude when using simulated runoff.
Jiming Jin, Lei Wang, Jie Yang, Bingcheng Si, and Guo-Yue Niu
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3405–3416, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3405-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3405-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study aimed to improve runoff simulations and explore deep soil hydrological processes for a highly varying soil depth and complex terrain watershed in the Loess Plateau, China. The actual soil depths and river channels were incorporated into the model to better simulate the runoff in this watershed. The soil evaporation scheme was modified to better describe the evaporation processes. Our results showed that the model significantly improved the runoff simulations.
Sebastian Müller, Lennart Schüler, Alraune Zech, and Falk Heße
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3161–3182, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3161-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3161-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The GSTools package provides a Python-based platform for geoostatistical applications. Salient features of GSTools are its random field generation, its kriging capabilities and its versatile covariance model. It is furthermore integrated with other Python packages, like PyKrige, ogs5py or scikit-gstat, and provides interfaces to meshio and PyVista. Four presented workflows showcase the abilities of GSTools.
Ather Abbas, Laurie Boithias, Yakov Pachepsky, Kyunghyun Kim, Jong Ahn Chun, and Kyung Hwa Cho
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3021–3039, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3021-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3021-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The field of artificial intelligence has shown promising results in a wide variety of fields including hydrological modeling. However, developing and testing hydrological models with artificial intelligence techniques require expertise from diverse fields. In this study, we developed an open-source framework based upon the python programming language to simplify the process of the development of hydrological models of time series data using machine learning.
Yunxiang Chen, Jie Bao, Yilin Fang, William A. Perkins, Huiying Ren, Xuehang Song, Zhuoran Duan, Zhangshuan Hou, Xiaoliang He, and Timothy D. Scheibe
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2917–2947, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2917-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2917-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change affects river discharge variations that alter streamflow. By integrating multi-type survey data with a computational fluid dynamics tool, OpenFOAM, we show a workflow that enables accurate and efficient streamflow modeling at 30 km and 5-year scales. The model accuracy for water stage and depth average velocity is −16–9 cm and 0.71–0.83 in terms of mean error and correlation coefficients. This accuracy indicates the model's reliability for evaluating climate impact on rivers.
Marcela Silva, Ashley M. Matheny, Valentijn R. N. Pauwels, Dimetre Triadis, Justine E. Missik, Gil Bohrer, and Edoardo Daly
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2619–2634, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2619-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2619-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Our study introduces FETCH3, a ready-to-use, open-access model that simulates the water fluxes across the soil, roots, and stem. To test the model capabilities, we tested it against exact solutions and a case study. The model presented considerably small errors when compared to the exact solutions and was able to correctly represent transpiration patterns when compared to experimental data. The results show that FETCH3 can correctly simulate above- and below-ground water transport.
Mayra Ishikawa, Wendy Gonzalez, Orides Golyjeswski, Gabriela Sales, J. Andreza Rigotti, Tobias Bleninger, Michael Mannich, and Andreas Lorke
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2197–2220, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2197-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2197-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Reservoir hydrodynamics is often described in numerical models differing in dimensionality. 1D and 2D models assume homogeneity along the unresolved dimension. We compare the performance of models with 1 to 3 dimensions. All models presented reasonable results for seasonal temperature dynamics. Neglecting longitudinal transport resulted in the largest deviations in temperature. Flow velocity could only be reproduced by the 3D model. Results support the selection of models and their assessment.
Sandra Hellmers and Peter Fröhle
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1061–1077, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1061-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1061-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A hydrological method to compute backwater effects in surface water streams and on adjacent lowlands caused by mostly complex flow control systems is presented. It enables transfer of discharges to water levels and calculation of backwater volume routing along streams and lowland areas by balancing water level slopes. The developed, implemented and evaluated method extends the application range of hydrological models significantly for flood-routing simulation in backwater-affected catchments.
Mathias Bavay, Michael Reisecker, Thomas Egger, and Daniela Korhammer
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 365–378, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-365-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-365-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most users struggle with the configuration of numerical models. This can be improved by relying on a GUI, but this requires a significant investment and a specific skill set and does not fit with the daily duties of model developers, leading to major maintenance burdens. Inishell generates a GUI on the fly based on an XML description of the required configuration elements, making maintenance very simple. This concept has been shown to work very well in our context.
Vladimir Mirlas, Yaakov Anker, Asher Aizenkod, and Naftali Goldshleger
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 129–143, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-129-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-129-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Salinization owing to irrigation water quality causes soil degradation and soil fertility reduction that with poor drainage conditions impede plant development and manifest in economic damage. This study provided a soil salting process evaluation procedure through a combination of soil salinity monitoring, field experiments, remote sensing, and unsaturated soil profile saline water movement modeling. The modeling results validated the soil salinization danger from using brackish irrigation.
Niccolò Tubini and Riccardo Rigon
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 75–104, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-75-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-75-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents WHETGEO and its 1D deployment: a new physically based model simulating the water and energy budgets in a soil column. WHETGEO-1D is intended to be the first building block of a new customisable land-surface model that is integrated with process-based hydrology. WHETGEO is developed as an open-source code and is fully integrated into the GEOframe/OMS3 system, allowing the use of the many ancillary tools it provides.
Tobias Stacke and Stefan Hagemann
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7795–7816, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7795-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7795-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
HydroPy is a new version of an established global hydrology model. It was rewritten from scratch and adapted to a modern object-oriented infrastructure to facilitate its future development and application. With this study, we provide a thorough documentation and evaluation of our new model. At the same time, we open our code base and publish the model's source code in a public software repository. In this way, we aim to contribute to increasing transparency and reproducibility in science.
Tom Gleeson, Thorsten Wagener, Petra Döll, Samuel C. Zipper, Charles West, Yoshihide Wada, Richard Taylor, Bridget Scanlon, Rafael Rosolem, Shams Rahman, Nurudeen Oshinlaja, Reed Maxwell, Min-Hui Lo, Hyungjun Kim, Mary Hill, Andreas Hartmann, Graham Fogg, James S. Famiglietti, Agnès Ducharne, Inge de Graaf, Mark Cuthbert, Laura Condon, Etienne Bresciani, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7545–7571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater is increasingly being included in large-scale (continental to global) land surface and hydrologic simulations. However, it is challenging to evaluate these simulations because groundwater is
hiddenunderground and thus hard to measure. We suggest using multiple complementary strategies to assess the performance of a model (
model evaluation).
Marco Toffolon, Luca Cortese, and Damien Bouffard
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7527–7543, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7527-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7527-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The time when lakes freeze varies considerably from year to year. A common way to predict it is to use negative degree days, i.e., the sum of air temperatures below 0 °C, a proxy for the heat lost to the atmosphere. Here, we show that this is insufficient as the mixing of the surface layer induced by wind tends to delay the formation of ice. To do so, we developed a minimal model based on a simplified energy balance, which can be used both for large-scale analyses and short-term predictions.
Marco De Lucia, Michael Kühn, Alexander Lindemann, Max Lübke, and Bettina Schnor
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7391–7409, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7391-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7391-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
POET is a parallel reactive transport simulator which implements a mechanism to store and reuse previous results of geochemical simulations through distributed hash tables. POET parallelizes chemistry using a master/worker design with noncontiguous grid partitions to maximize its efficiency and load balance on shared-memory machines and compute clusters.
Mary M. F. O'Neill, Danielle T. Tijerina, Laura E. Condon, and Reed M. Maxwell
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7223–7254, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7223-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7223-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Modeling the hydrologic cycle at high resolution and at large spatial scales is an incredible opportunity and challenge for hydrologists. In this paper, we present the results of a high-resolution hydrologic simulation configured over the contiguous United States. We discuss simulated water fluxes through groundwater, soil, plants, and over land, and we compare model results to in situ observations and satellite products in order to build confidence and guide future model development.
Daniel Power, Miguel Angel Rico-Ramirez, Sharon Desilets, Darin Desilets, and Rafael Rosolem
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7287–7307, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7287-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7287-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Cosmic-ray neutron sensors estimate root-zone soil moisture at sub-kilometre scales. There are national-scale networks of these sensors across the globe; however, methods for converting neutron signals to soil moisture values are inconsistent. This paper describes our open-source Python tool that processes raw sensor data into soil moisture estimates. The aim is to allow a user to ensure they have a harmonized data set, along with informative metadata, to facilitate both research and teaching.
Marco Dal Molin, Dmitri Kavetski, and Fabrizio Fenicia
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7047–7072, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7047-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7047-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces SuperflexPy, an open-source Python framework for building flexible conceptual hydrological models. SuperflexPy is available as open-source code and can be used by the hydrological community to investigate improved process representations, for model comparison, and for operational work.
E. Andrés Quichimbo, Michael Bliss Singer, Katerina Michaelides, Daniel E. J. Hobley, Rafael Rosolem, and Mark O. Cuthbert
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6893–6917, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6893-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6893-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding and quantifying water partitioning in dryland regions are of key importance to anticipate the future impacts of climate change in water resources and dryland ecosystems. Here, we have developed a simple hydrological model (DRYP) that incorporates the key processes of water partitioning in drylands. DRYP is a modular, versatile, and parsimonious model that can be used to anticipate and plan for climatic and anthropogenic changes to water fluxes and storage in dryland regions.
Nathaniel W. Chaney, Laura Torres-Rojas, Noemi Vergopolan, and Colby K. Fisher
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6813–6832, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6813-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6813-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Although there have been significant advances in river routing and sub-grid heterogeneity (i.e., tiling) schemes in Earth system models over the past decades, there has yet to be a concerted effort to couple these two concepts. This paper aims to bridge this gap through the development of a two-way coupling between tiling schemes and river networks in the HydroBlocks land surface model. The scheme is implemented and tested over a 1 arc degree domain in Oklahoma, United States.
Dejian Zhang, Bingqing Lin, Jiefeng Wu, and Qiaoying Lin
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5915–5925, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5915-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5915-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
GP-SWAT is a two-layer model parallelization tool for a SWAT model based on the graph-parallel Pregel algorithm. It can be employed to perform both individual and iterative model parallelization, endowing it with a range of possible applications and great flexibility in maximizing performance. As a flexible and scalable tool, it can run in diverse environments, ranging from a commodity computer with a Microsoft Windows, Mac or Linux OS to a Spark cluster consisting of a large number of nodes.
Daisuke Tokuda, Hyungjun Kim, Dai Yamazaki, and Taikan Oki
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5669–5693, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5669-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5669-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We developed TCHOIR, a hydrologic simulation framework, to solve fluvial- and thermodynamics of the river–lake continuum. This provides an algorithm for upscaling high-resolution topography as well, which enables the representation of those interactions at the global scale. Validation against in situ and satellite observations shows that the coupled mode outperforms river- or lake-only modes. TCHOIR will contribute to elucidating the role of surface hydrology in Earth’s energy and water cycle.
Marko Kallio, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Vili Virkki, Matti Kummu, and Kirsi Virrantaus
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5155–5181, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5155-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5155-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Different runoff and streamflow products are freely available but may come with unsuitable spatial units. On the other hand, starting a new modelling exercise may require considerable resources. Hydrostreamer improves the usability of existing runoff products, allowing runoff and streamflow estimates at the desired spatial units with minimal data requirements and intuitive workflow. The case study shows that Hydrostreamer performs well compared to benchmark products and observation data.
Cited articles
Abramowitz, G., Leuning, R., Clark, M., and Pitman, A.: Evaluating the performance of land surface models, J. Climate, 21, 5468–5481, 2008.
Barlage, M., Chen, F., Tewari, M., Ikeda, K., Gochis, D., Dudhia, J., Rasmussen, R., Livneh, B., Ek, M., and Mitchell, M.: Noah Land Surface Model modifications to improve snowpack prediction in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D22101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013470, 2010.
Barrett, A.: National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center Snow Data Assimilation System (\uppercase{SNODAS}) products at \uppercase{NSIDC}, Tech. rep., National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO, digital Media, 2003.
Bloschl, G.: Scaling issues in snow hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 13, 2149–2175, 1999.
Blöschl, G. and Sivapalan, M.: Scale issues in hydrological modeling, Hydrol. Process., 9, 251–290, 1995.
Blyth, E., Gash, J., Lloyd, A., Pryor, M., Weedon, G., and Shuttleworth, J.: Evaluating the \uppercase{JULES} model energy fluxes using the \uppercase{FLUXNET} data, J. Hydrometeor., 11, 509–519, 2010.
Blyth, E., Clark, D. B., Ellis, R., Huntingford, C., Los, S., Pryor, M., Best, M., and Sitch, S.: A comprehensive set of benchmark tests for a land surface model of simultaneous fluxes of water and carbon at both the global and seasonal scale, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 255–269, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-255-2011, 2011.
Brown, R. and Brasnett, B.: Canadian Meteorological Center (\uppercase{CMC}) daily snow analysis data, Tech. rep., National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO, digital Media, 2010.
Brown, B., Gotway, J., Bullock, R., Gilleland, E., Fowler, T., Ahijevych, D., and Jensen, T.: The Model Evaluation Tools (\uppercase{MET}): Community tools for forecast evaluation, in: 25th Conf. on International Interactive Information and Processing Systems (IIPS) for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology, Amer. Metero. Soc., Phoenix, AZ, 2009.
Brown, J., Demargne, J., Seo, D.-J., and Liu, Y.: The \uppercase{E}nsemble \uppercase{V}erification \uppercase{S}ystem (\uppercase{EVS}): a software tool for verifying ensemble foreasts of hydrometeorological and hydrologic variables at discrete locations, Environ. Model. Software, 25, 854–872, 2010.
Casati, B., Ross, G., and Stephenson, D. B.: A new intensity- scale approach for the verification of spatial precipitation forecasts, Meteor. Appl., 11, 141–154, 2004.
Chen, F., Mitchell, K., Schaake, J., Xue, Y., Pan, H., Koren, V., Duan, Y., Ek, M., and Betts, A.: Modeling of land-surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with \uppercase{FIFE} observations, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 7251–7268, 1996.
Dai, Y., Zeng, X., Dickinson, R., Baker, I., Bonan, G., Bosilovich, M., Denning, S., Dirmeyer, P., Houser, P., Niu, G., Oleson, K., Schlosser, A., and Yang, Z.-L.: The common land model (\textsc{CLM}), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1013–1023, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-8-1013, 2003.
Decyk, V. K., Norton, C. D., and Szymanski, B. K.: How to express \uppercase{C++} concepts in \uppercase{F}ortran 90, Scientific Programming, 6, 363–390, 1997.
Derber, J., Parrish, D., and Lord, S.: The new global operational analysis system at the \textsc{N}ational \textsc{M}eteorological \textsc{C}enter, Weather Forecast., 6, 538–547, 1991.
de Rosnay, P., Boone, A., Beljaars, A., and Polcher, J.: \uppercase{AMMA} Land surface intercomparison projects, \uppercase{GEWEX N}ews, 16, 10–11, 2006.
Dirmeyer, P., Gao, X., Zhao, M., Guo, Z., Oki, T., and Hanasaki, N.: \uppercase{GSWP-2}: Multimodel analysis and implications for our perception of the land surface, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 1381–1397, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-10-1381, 2006.
Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V., Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8851, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296, 2003.
Entekhabi, D., Asrar, G., Betts, A., Beven, K., Bras, R., Duffy, C., Dunne, T., Koster, R., Lettenmaier, D., McLaughlin, D., Shuttleworth, W., van Genuchten, M., Wei, M.-Y., and Wood, E.: An agenda for land surface hydrology research and a call for the second international hydrological decade, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2043–2058, 1999.
Entekhabi, D., Reichle, R., Koster, R., and Crow, W.: Performance Metrics for Soil Moisture Retrievals and Application Requirements, J. Hydrometeor., 11, 832–840, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JHM1223.1, 2010.
Erickson, T. A., Williams, M. W., and Winstral, A.: Persistence of topographic controls on the spatial distribution of snow in rugged mountain terrain, Colorado, United States, Water Resour. Res., 41, W04014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002973, 2005.
Fennessey, M. and Shukla, J.: Impact of initial soil wetness on seasonal atmospheric prediction, J. Climate, 12, 3167–3180, 1999.
Foster, J., Hall, D., Eylander, J., Riggs, G., Nghiem, S., Tedesco, M., Kim, E., Montesano, P., Kelly, R., Casey, K. A., and Choudhury, B.: A blended global snow product using visible, passive microwave and scatterometer satellite data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 5, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160903548013, 2011.
Friend, A. and Kiang, N.: Land surface model development for the \uppercase{GISS GCM}: Effects of improved canopy physiology on simulated climate, J. Climate, 18, 2883–2902, 2005.
Gelb, A.: Applied Optimal Estimation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1974.
Grayson, R. and Bloschl, G.: Spatial patterns in catchment hydrology: Observations and modeling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
Gulden, L., Rosero, E., Yang, Z.-L., Wagener, T., and Niu, G.-Y.: Model performance, model robustness, and model fitness scores: A new method for identifying good land surface models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L11404, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033721, 2008.
Gupta, V., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Wood, E.: Scale problems in Hydrology, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.
Gupta, H., Wagener, T., and Liu, Y.: Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3802–3813, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6989, 2008.
Gupta, H., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K., and Martinez, G.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and \uppercase{NSE} performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modeling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
Hall, D., Riggs, G., and Salomonson, V.: \textsc{MODIS/T}erra snow cover daily L3 Global 500 m Grid V005, Tech. rep., National Snow and Ice Data Center, Colorado, USA, digital media, 2006.
Harrison, K., Kumar, S., Peters-Lidard, C., and Santanello, J.: Quantifying soil moisture modeling uncertainty with remote sensing observations using Bayesian inference techniques, Water Resour. Res., under review, 2012.
Heim, R. J.: A review of twentieth century drought indices used in the United States, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1149–1165, 2002.
Henderson-Sellers, A., Pitman, A., Love, P., Irannejad, P., and Chen, T.: The project for Intercomparison of land surface parameterization schemes (\uppercase{PILPS}): Phases 2 and 3, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 76, 489–503, 1995.
Higgins, R., Janowiak, J., and Yao, Y.-P.: A gridded hourly precipitation database for the United States (1963–1993)., Tech. rep., NCEP Climate Prediction Center Atlas 1, 46 pp., 1996.
Hill, C., DeLuca, C., Balaji, V., Suarez, M., and da Silva, A.: The Architecture of the Earth System Modeling Framework, Comput. Sci. Eng., 6, 18–28, 2004.
Jiminez, C., Prigent, C., Mueller, B., Seneviratne, S., McCabe, M., Wood, E., Rossow, W., Balsamo, G., Betts, A., Dirmeyer, P., Fisher, J., Jung, M., Kanamitsu, M., Reichle, R., Reichstein, M., Rodell, M., Sheffield, J., Tu, K., and Wang, K.: Global intercomparison of 12 land surface heat flux estimates, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D02102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014545, 2011.
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., and Bondeau, A.: Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model, Biogeosciences, 6, 2001–2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2001-2009, 2009.
Kato, H., Rodell, M., Beyrich, F., Cleugh, H., van Gorsel, E., Liu, H., and Meyers, T.: Sensitivity of land surface simulations to model physics, land characteristics, and forcings at four \uppercase{CEOP} sites, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85A, 187–204, 2007.
Koren, V., Schaake, J., Mitchell, K., Duan, Q.-Y., and Chen, F.: A parameterization of snowpack and frozen ground intended for NCEP weather and climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 19569–19585, 1999.
Koster, R., Suarez, M., Liu, P., Jambor, U., Berg, A., Kistler, M., Reichle, R., Rodell, M., and Famiglietti, J.: Realistic initialization of land surface states: Impacts on subseasonal forecast skill, J. Hydrometeor., 5, 1049–1063, 2004.
Koster, R., Guo, Z., Dirmeyer, P., Yang, R., Mitchell, K., and Puma, M.: On the nature of soil moisture in land surface models, J. Climate, 22, 4322–4335, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2832.1, 2009.
Kumar, S., Peters-Lidard, C., Tian, T., Houser, P., Geiger, J., Olden, S., Lighty, L., Eastman, J., Doty, B., Dirmeyer, P., Adams, J., Mitchell, K., Wood, E., and Sheffield, J.: Land information system: An interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling, Environ. Model. Software, 21, 1402–1415, 2006.
Kumar, S., Peters-Lidard, C., Eastman, J. L., and Tao, W.-K.: An integrated high resolution hydrometeorological modeling testbed using LIS and WRF, Environ. Model. Software, 23, 169–181, 2007.
Kumar, S., Peters-Lidard, C., Tian, Y., Reichle, R. H., Alonge, C., Geiger, J., Eylander, J., and Houser, P.: An integrated hydrologic modeling and data assimilation framework enabled by the Land Information System (LIS), IEEE Computer, 41, 52–59, https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2008.511, 2008{a}.
Kumar, S., Reichle, R., Peters-Lidard, C., Koster, R., Zhan, X., Crow, W., Eylander, J., and Houser, P.: A land surface data assimilation framework using the Land Information System: Description and Applications, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1419–1432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.01.013, 2008{b}.
Kumar, S. V., Reichle, R. H., Harrison, K. W., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Yatheendradas, S., and Santanello, J. A.: A comparison of methods for a priori bias correction in soil moisture data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 48, W03515, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010261, 2012.
Lange, H.: Are ecosystems dynamical systems?, International Journal of computing anticipatory systems, 3, 169–186, 1999.
Lawrence, D., Oleson, K., Flanner, M., Thornton, P., Swenson, S., Lawrence, P., Zeng, X., Yang, Z.-L., Levis, S., Sakaguchi, K., Bonan, G., and Slater, A.: Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sys., 3, M03001, https://doi.org/10.1029/JAMES.2011.3.1, 2011.
Liu, Q., Reichle, R., Bindlish, R., Cosh, M., Crow, W., de Jeu, R., De Lannoy, G., Huffman, G., and Jackson, T.: The contributions of precipitation and soil moisture observations to the skill of soil moisture estimates in land data assimilation system, J. Hydrometeor., 12, 5, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-10.05000.1, 2011{a}.
Liu, Y., Brown, J., Demargne, J., and Seo, D.-J.: A wavelet-based approach to assessing timing errors in hydrologic predictions, J. Hydrol., 397, 210–224, 2011{b}.
Lohmann, D., Mitchell, K., Houser, P., Wood, E., Schaake, J., Robock, A., Cosgrove, B., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Higgins, W., Pinker, R., and Tarpley, J.: Streamflow and water balance intercomparisons of four land surface models in the North American Land Data Assimilation System project, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07S91, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003517, 2004.
Mitchell, K., Lohmann, D., Houser, P., Wood, E., Schaake, J., Robock, A., Cosgrove, B., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Higgins, R., Pinker, R., Tarpley, J., Lettenmaier, D., Marshall, C., Entin, J., Pan, M., Shi, W., Koren, V., Meng, J., Ramsay, B., and Bailey, A.: The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07S90, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003823, 2004.
Mo, K., Long, L., Xia, Y., Yang, S., Schemm, J., and Ek, M.: Drought indices based on the climate forecast system reanalysis and ensemble \uppercase{NLDAS}, J. Hydrometeor., 12, 181–205, 2011.
Moore, B., Bertone, S., Mitchell, K., Rice, P., and Neill, R.: A worldwide near-real time diagnostic agrometeorological model, in: 20th AMS Conf. Ag and Forest Meteorology, 7–11, 1990.
Mu, Q., Heinsch, F., Zhao, M., and Running, S.: Development of a Global evapotranspiration algorithm based on \uppercase{MODIS} and global meteorology data, Remote Sens. Environ., 111, 519–536, 2007.
Murphy, A. and Winkler, R.: Diagnostic verification of probability forecasts, Int. J. Forecast., 7, 435–455, 1992.
Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Mitchell, K., Chen, F., Ek, M., Barlage, M., Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Xia, Y.-L.: The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-\uppercase{MP}): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139, 2011.
Njoku, E., Jackson, T., Lakshmi, V., Chan, T., and Nghiem, S.: Soil moisture retrieval from \uppercase{AMSR-E}, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41, 215–229, 2003.
NRC: Assessment of Hydrologic and Hydrometeorological Operations and Services, Tech. rep., National Academy Press, 1996.
Owe, M., de Jeu, R., and Holmes, T.: Multi-sensor historical climatology of satellite-derived global land surface moisture, J. Geophys. Res., 13, F01002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000769, 2008.
Pachepsky, Y., Guber, A., Jacques, D., Simunek, J., van Genuchten, M., Nicholson, T., and Cady, R.: Information content and complexity of simulated soil water fluxes, Geoderma, 253–266, 2006.
Pan, F., Pachepsky, Y., Andrey, G., and Hill, R.: Information and Complexity Measures Applied to Observed and Simulated Soil Moisture Time Series, Hydrol. Sci. J., 56, 1027–1039, 2011.
Pan, M., Ming, J., Sheffield, J., Wood, E., Mitchell, K., Houser, P., Schaake, J., Robock, A., Lohmann, D., Cosgrove, B., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Higgins, R., Pinker, R., and Tarpley, J.: Snow process modeling in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (\uppercase{NLDAS}): 2. Evaluation of model simulated snow water equivalent, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8850, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003994, 2003.
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Houser, P. R., Tian, Y., Kumar, S. V., Geiger, J., Olden, S., Lighty, L., Eastman, J. L., Doty, B., Dirmeyer, P., Adams, J., Mitchell, K., Wood, E., and Sheffield, J.: High-performance Earth System modeling with \uppercase{NASA/GSFC}'s Land Information System, Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering, 3, 157–165, 2007.
Peters-Lidard, C., Mocko, D., Garcia, M., Santanello, J., Tischler, M., and Moran, M. S.: Role of precipitation uncertainty in the estimation of hydrologic soil properties using remotely sensed soil moisture in a semiarid environment, Water Resour. Res., 44, W05S18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR005884, 2008.
Peters-Lidard, C., Kumar, S., Mocko, D., and Tian, Y.: Estimating evapotranspiration with Land Data Assimilation Systems, Hydrol. Process., 25, 3979–3992, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8387, 2011.
Pitman, A. and Henderson-Sellers, A.: Recent progress and results from the Project for the Intercomparison of Land surface Parameterization Schemes, J. Hydrol., 212–213, 128–135, 1998.
Pulliainen, J.: Mapping of snow water equivalent and snow depth in boreal and subarctic zones by assimilating space-borne microwave radiometer data and ground-based observations, Remote Sens. Environ., 101, 257–269, 2006.
Randerson, J., Hoffman, F., Thornton, P., Mahowald, N., Lindsay, K., Lee, Y.-H., Nevison, C., Doney, S., Bonan, G., Stockli, R., Covey, C., Running, S., and Fung, I.: Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate-carbon models, Global Change Biol., 15, 2462–2484, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01912.x, 2009.
Raupach, M., Rayner, P., Barrett, D., DeFries, R., Heimann, M., Ojima, D., Quegan, S., and Schmullius, C.: Model-data synthesis in terrestrial carbon observation: methods, data requirements and data uncertainty specifications, Global Change Biol., 11, 378–397, 2005.
Reichle, R. and Crow, W.: Comparison of adaptive filtering techniques for land surface data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W08423, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006883, 2008.
Reichle, R. and Koster, R.: Land data assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Assessing model error parameters using innovations, in: Developments in Water Science – Computational Methods in Water Resources, edited by: Hassanizadeh, S., Schotting, R., Gray, W., and Pinder, G., 47, Elsevier, New York, 1387–1394, 2002.
Reichle, R., Koster, R., Liu, P., Mahanama, S., Njoku, E., and Owe, M.: Comparison and assimilation of global soil moisture retrievals from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System (\uppercase{AMSR-E}) and the Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (\uppercase{SMMR}), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D09108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008033, 2007.
Reichle, R., Crow, W., and Keppenne, C.: An adaptive ensemble Kalman Filter for soil moisture data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03423, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006357, 2008.
Robock, A., Luo, L., Wood, E., Wen, F., Mitchell, K., Houser, P., Schaake, J., Lohmann, D., Cosgrove, B., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Higgins, R., Pinker, R., Tarpley, J., Basara, J., and Crawford, K.: Evaluation of the North American Land Data Assimilation System over the southern Great Plains during the warm season, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8846, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003245, 2003.
Rodell, M., Famiglietti, J., Chen, J., Seneviratne, S., Viterbo, P., Holl, S., and Wilson, C.: Basin scale estimates of evapotranspiration using \uppercase{GRACE} and other observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L20504, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020873, 2004{a}.
Rodell, M., Houser, P. R., Jambor, U., Gottschalck, J., Mitchell, K., Meng., C.-J., Arsenault, K., Cosgrove, B., Radakovich, J., Bosilovich, M., Entin, J. K., Walker, J. P., Lohmann, D., and Toll, D.: The \uppercase{G}lobal \uppercase{L}and \uppercase{D}ata \uppercase{A}ssimilation \uppercase{S}ystem, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 85, 381–394, 2004{b}.
Rosenzweig, C., Tubiello, F., Goldberg, R., Mills, E., and Bloomfield, J.: Increased crop damage in the \uppercase{US} from excess precipitation under climate change, Global Environ. Chang., 12, 197–202, 2002.
Rossow, W. and Schiffer, R.: \uppercase{ISCCP} cloud data products, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 72, 2–20, 1991.
Santanello, J., Peters-Lidard, C., Garcia, M., Mocko, D., Tischler, M., Moran, M., and Thoma, D.: Using remotely-sensed estimates of soil moisture to infer soil texture and hydraulic properties across a semi-arid watershed, Remote Sens. Environ., 110, 79–97, 2007.
Santanello, J., Peters-Lidard, C., Kumar, S., Alonge, C., and Tao, W.-K.: A Modeling and Observational Framework for Diagnosing local land-atmosphere coupling on diurnal time scales, J. Hydrometeor., 10, 577–599, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JHM1066.1, 2009.
Santanello, J., Peters-Lidard, C., and Kumar, S.: Diagnosing the Sensitivity of Local Land-Atmosphere Coupling via the Soil Moisture-Boundary Layer Interaction, J. Hydrometeor., 12, 766–786, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-10-05014.1, 2011.
Seyfried, M. and Wilcox, B.: Scale and the nature of spatial variability: Field examples having implications for hydrologic modeling, Water Resour. Res., 31, 173–184, 1995.
Sheffield, J., Pan, M., Wood, E., Mitchell, K., Houser, P., Schaake, J., Robock, A., Lohmann, D., Cosgrove, B., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Higgins, R., Pinker, R., Tarpley, J., and Ramsay, B.: Snow process modeling in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (\uppercase{NLDAS}): 1. Evaluation of model-simulated snow cover extent, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8849, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003274, 2003.
Sivapalan, M. and Kalma, J.: Scale problems in hydrology: Contributions of the Robertson Workshop, Hydrol. Process., 9, 243–250, 1995.
Stanski, H., Wilson, L., and Burrows, W.: Survey of common verification methods in meteorology, Tech. report 8,\uppercase{WMO/TD} 35, WMO World Weather Watch, 114 pp., 1989.
Trujillo, E., Ramirez, J., and Elder, K.: Scaling properties and spatial organization of snow depth fields in sub-alpine forest and alpine tundra, Hydrol. Process., 23, 1575–1590, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7270, 2009.
van den Hurk, B., Best, M., Dirmeyer, P., Pitman, A., Polcher, J., and Santanello, J.: Over a decade of \uppercase{GLASS} has accelerated land surface model development, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1593–1600, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00007.1, 2011.
Wackerbauer, R., Witt, A., Atmanspacher, H., Kurths, J., and Scheingraber, H.: Comparative classification of complexity measures, Solitons Fractals, 4, 133–173, 1994.
Wealands, S., Grayson, R., and Walker, J.: Quantitative comparison of spatial fields for hydrological model assessment – some promising approaches, Adv. Water Resour., 28, 15–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.10.001, 2005.
Williams, M., Richardson, A. D., Reichstein, M., Stoy, P. C., Peylin, P., Verbeeck, H., Carvalhais, N., Jung, M., Hollinger, D. Y., Kattge, J., Leuning, R., Luo, Y., Tomelleri, E., Trudinger, C. M., and Wang, Y.-P.: Improving land surface models with FLUXNET data, Biogeosciences, 6, 1341–1359, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1341-2009, 2009.
Wood, E., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., and Band, L.: Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling, J. Hydrol., 102, 29–47, 1988.
Wood, E., Sivapalan, M., and Beven, K.: Similarity and scale in catchment storm response, Rev. Geophys., 28, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG028i001p00001, 1990.
Xia, Y., Mitchell, K., Ek, M., Cosgrove, B., Sheffield, J., Luo, L., Alonge, C., Wei, H., Meng, J., Livneh, B., Duan, Y., and Lohmann, D.: Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for North-American Land Data Assimilation System Project Phase-2, Part 2: Validation of model-simulated streamflow, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D03109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016051, 2012{a}.
Xia, Y., Mitchell, K., Ek, M., Sheffield, J., Wood, E., Cosgrove, B., Luo, L., Alonge, C., Wei, H., Meng, J., Livneh, B., Lettenmaier, D., Koren, V., Duan, Y. K. M., and Fan, Y.: Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System Project Phase 2 (NLDAS-2), Part 1: Comparison Analysis and Application of Model Products, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D03110, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016048, 2012{b}.
Xie, P. and Arkin, P.: Global precipitation: A 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2539–2558, 1997.
