Bergström, S.: Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments, Tech. Rep. 7, Hydrology, ISSN 0347-7827, 1976. a
Beskos, A., Pillai, N., Roberts, G., Sanz-Serna, J.-M., and Stuart, A.: Optimal Tuning of the Hybrid Monte Carlo Algorithm, Bernoulli, 19, 1501–1534,
https://doi.org/10.3150/12-BEJ414, 2013.
a
Brunetti, C., Linde, N., and Vrugt, J. A.: Bayesian Model Selection in Hydrogeophysics: Application to Conceptual Subsurface Models of the South Oyster Bacterial Transport Site, Virginia, USA, Adv. Water Resour., 102, 127–141,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.02.006, 2017.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Brunetti, C., Bianchi, M., Pirot, G., and Linde, N.: Hydrogeological Model Selection Among Complex Spatial Priors, Water Resour. Res., 55, 6729–6753,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024840, 2019.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R.: Information and Likelihood Theory: A Basis for Model Selection and Inference, in: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, edited by: Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R., pp. 49–97, Springer, New York, NY, ISBN 978-0-387-22456-5,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-22456-5_2, 2002a.
a
Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. (Eds.): Information and Likelihood Theory: A Basis for Model Selection and Inference, Springer New York, New York, NY, 49–97, ISBN 978-0-387-22456-5,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-22456-5_2, 2002b.
a
Calderhead, B. and Girolami, M.: Estimating Bayes Factors via Thermodynamic Integration and Population MCMC, Comput. Stat. Data An., 53, 4028–4045,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.07.025, 2009.
a,
b,
c,
d
Cao, T., Zeng, X., Wu, J., Wang, D., Sun, Y., Zhu, X., Lin, J., and Long, Y.: Groundwater Contaminant Source Identification via Bayesian Model Selection and Uncertainty Quantification, Hydrogeol. J., 27, 2907–2918,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-02055-3, 2019.
a
Cappé, O., Guillin, A., Marin, J. M., and Robert, C. P.: Population Monte Carlo, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 13, 907–929,
https://doi.org/10.1198/106186004X12803, 2004.
a
Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., and Riddell, A.:
Stan : A Probabilistic Programming Language, J. Stat. Softw., 76, 1–32,
https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01, 2017.
a
Casella, G., Girón, F. J., Martínez, M. L., and Moreno, E.: Consistency of Bayesian Procedures for Variable Selection, Ann. Stat., 37, 1207–1228,
https://doi.org/10.1214/08-AOS606, 2009.
a
Chen, M.-H., Shao, Q.-M., and Ibrahim, J. G.: Estimating Ratios of Normalizing Constants, in: Monte Carlo Methods in Bayesian Computation, edited by: Chen, M.-H., Shao, Q.-M., and Ibrahim, J. G., Springer New York, 124–190, ISBN 978-1-4612-1276-8,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1276-8_5, 2000.
a
Chen, R. T. Q., Rubanova, Y., Bettencourt, J., and Duvenaud, D.: Neural Ordinary Differential Equations, in: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by: Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Grauman, K., and Cesa-Bianchi, N., Curran Associates, Inc., 6572–6583,
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3327757.3327764 (last access: 24 February 2025), 2018. a
Cheng, Q.-B., Chen, X., Xu, C.-Y., Reinhardt-Imjela, C., and Schulte, A.: Improvement and comparison of likelihood functions for model calibration and parameter uncertainty analysis within a Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme, J. Hydrol., 519, 2202–2214,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.008, 2014.
a
Dillon, J. V., Langmore, I., Tran, D., Brevdo, E., Vasudevan, S., Moore, D., Patton, B., Alemi, A., Hoffman, M., and Saurous, R. A.: TensorFlow Distributions, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1711.10604, 2017.
a,
b
Duane, S., Kennedy, A., Pendleton, B. J., and Roweth, D.: Hybrid Monte Carlo, Phys. Lett. B, 195, 216–222,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X, 1987.
a,
b
Earl, D. J. and Deem, M. W.: Parallel Tempering: Theory, Applications, and New Perspectives, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 7, 3910,
https://doi.org/10.1039/b509983h, 2005.
a
Elsheikh, A. H., Wheeler, M. F., and Hoteit, I.: Hybrid Nested Sampling Algorithm for Bayesian Model Selection Applied to Inverse Subsurface Flow Problems, J. Comput. Phys., 258, 319–337,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.10.001, 2014.
a
Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P., and Bridges, M.: MultiNest: An Efficient and Robust Bayesian Inference Tool for Cosmology and Particle Physics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 398, 1601–1614,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14548.x, 2009.
a,
b,
c
Gelman, A.: Two Simple Examples for Understanding Posterior P-Values Whose Distributions Are Far from Uniform, Electron. J. Stat., 7, 2595–2602,
https://doi.org/10.1214/13-EJS854, 2013.
a
Gelman, A. and Meng, X.-L.: Simulating Normalizing Constants: From Importance Sampling to Bridge Sampling to Path Sampling, Stati. Sci., 13, 163–185,
https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1028905934, 1998.
a,
b,
c
Gelman, A., Meng, X.-L., and Stern, H.: Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies, Stat. Sin., 6, 733–760,
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24306036 (last access: 7 November 2023), 1996a.
a,
b
Gelman, A., Roberts, G. O., and Gilks, W. R.: Efficient Metropolis jumping rules, in: Bayesian Statistics 5: Proceedings of the Fifth Valencia International Meeting, edited by: Bernardo, J. M., Berger, J. O., Dawid, A. P., and Smith, A. F. M., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 599–608,
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198523567.003.0038, 1996b.
a
Gelman, A., Vehtari, A., Simpson, D., Margossian, C. C., Carpenter, B., Yao, Y., Kennedy, L., Gabry, J., Bürkner, P.-C., and Modrák, M.: Bayesian Workflow, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2011.01808, 2020.
a
Geweke, J.: Evaluating the Accuracy of Sampling-Based Approaches to the Calculation of Posterior Moments, in: Bayesian Statistics 4: Proceedings of the Fourth Valencia International Meeting, Dedicated to the memory of Morris H. DeGroot, 1931–1989, edited by: Bernardo, J. M., Berger, J. O., Dawid, P., and Smith, A. F. M., Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-852266-9,
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198522669.003.0010, 1992.
a
Geyer, C. J.: Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood, Interface Foundation of North America,
https://hdl.handle.net/11299/58440 (last access: 8 August 2023), 1991. a
Geyer, C. J.: Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo, Stat. Sci., 7, 473–483,
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2246094 (last access: 8 August 2023), 1992. a
Xu, H., Song, S., Li, J., and Guo, T.: Hybrid model for daily runoff interval predictions based on Bayesian inference, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 68, 62–75,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2145201, 2023.
a
Hjort, N. L., Dahl, F. A., and Steinbakk, G. H.: Post-Processing Posterior Predictive
p Values, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 101, 1157–1174,
https://doi.org/10.1198/016214505000001393, 2006.
a,
b,
c
Hoffman, M. D. and Gelman, A.: The No-U-Turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1593–1623, 2014.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Hug, S., Schmidl, D., Li, W. B., Greiter, M. B., and Theis, F. J.: Bayesian model selection methods and their application to biological ODE systems, in: Uncertainty in Biology, Springer, 243–268,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21296-8_10, 2016.
a
Hung, H. M. J., O'Neill, R. T., Bauer, P., and Kohne, K.: The Behavior of the P-Value When the Alternative Hypothesis Is True, Biometrics, 53, 11,
https://doi.org/10.2307/2533093, 1997.
a
Höge, M., Guthke, A., and Nowak, W.: The hydrologist’s guide to Bayesian model selection, averaging and combination, J. Hydrol., 572, 96–107,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.072, 2019.
a
Höge, M., Scheidegger, A., Baity-Jesi, M., Albert, C., and Fenicia, F.: Improving hydrologic models for predictions and process understanding using neural ODEs, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5085–5102,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5085-2022, 2022.
a
Iba, Y.: Population Monte Carlo algorithms, Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 16, 279–286, 2000. a
Jansen, K. F., Teuling, A. J., Craig, J. R., Dal Molin, M., Knoben, W. J. M., Parajka, J., Vis, M., and Melsen, L. A.: Mimicry of a Conceptual Hydrological Model (HBV): What's in a Name?, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029143,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029143, 2021.
a
Kavetski, D. and Clark, M. P.: Numerical Troubles in Conceptual Hydrology: Approximations, Absurdities and Impact on Hypothesis Testing, Hydrol. Process., 25, 661–670,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7899, 2011.
a
Kelly, J., Bettencourt, J., Johnson, M. J., and Duvenaud, D. K.: Learning differential equations that are easy to solve, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by: Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M., and Lin, H., Curran Associates, Inc., 33, 4370–4380,
https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/2e255d2d6bf9bb33030246d31f1a79ca-Paper.pdf (last access: 11 July 2023), 2020.
a,
b
Kendall, W. S., Liang, F., and Wang, J.-S.: Markov chain Monte Carlo: innovations and applications, vol. 7, World Scientific,
https://doi.org/10.1142/5904, 2005.
a
Kidger, P.: On Neural Differential Equations, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford,
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:af32d844-df84-4fdc-824d-44bebc3d7aa9 (last access: 24 February 2025), 2021.
a,
b
Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E., and Woods, R. A.: Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4323–4331,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019, 2019.
a
Krapu, C. and Borsuk, M.: A Differentiable Hydrology Approach for Modeling With Time-Varying Parameters, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR031377,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031377, 2022.
a
Laloy, E. and Vrugt, J. A.: High-Dimensional Posterior Exploration of Hydrologic Models Using Multiple-Try DREAM
(ZS) and High-Performance Computing, Water Resour. Res., 48, W01526,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010608, 2012.
a
Lenk, P. J. and DeSarbo, W. S.: Bayesian Inference for Finite Mixtures of Generalized Linear Models with Random Effects, Psychometrika, 65, 93–119,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294188, 2000.
a
Liu, P., Elshall, A. S., Ye, M., Beerli, P., Zeng, X., Lu, D., and Tao, Y.: Evaluating Marginal Likelihood with Thermodynamic Integration Method and Comparison with Several Other Numerical Methods, Water Resour. Res., 52, 734–758,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016718, 2016.
a,
b,
c
Liu, S., She, D., Zhang, L., and Xia, J.: An improved Approximate Bayesian Computation approach for high-dimensional posterior exploration of hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-414, in review, 2023.
a
Liu, Y., Fernández-Ortega, J., Mudarra, M., and Hartmann, A.: Pitfalls and a feasible solution for using KGE as an informal likelihood function in MCMC methods: DREAM
(ZS) as an example, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5341–5355,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5341-2022, 2022.
a
Llorente, F., Martino, L., Delgado, D., and López-Santiago, J.: Marginal Likelihood Computation for Model Selection and Hypothesis Testing: An Extensive Review, SIAM Rev., 65, 3–58,
https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1310849, 2023.
a
MacKay, D. J.: Information theory, inference and learning algorithms, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9780521642989, 2003. a
Margossian, C. C.: A review of automatic differentiation and its efficient implementation, WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 9, e1305,
https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1305, 2019.
a
Marshall, L., Nott, D., and Sharma, A.: Hydrological Model Selection: A Bayesian Alternative, Water Resour. Res., 41, W10422,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003719, 2005.
a,
b,
c
Meng, X.-L. and Wong, W. H.: Simulating ratios of normalizing constants via a simple identity: a theoretical exploration, Stat. Sin., 6, 831–860,
https://www3.stat.sinica.edu.tw/statistica/j6n4/j6n43/j6n43.htm (last access: 11 November 2020), 1996. a
Miasojedow, B., Moulines, E., and Vihola, M.: An Adaptive Parallel Tempering Algorithm, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 22, 649–664,
https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2013.778779, 2013.
a
Miles, P.: Pymcmcstat: A Python Package for Bayesian Inference Using Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis, J. Open Source Softw.e, 4, 1417,
https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01417, 2019.
a
Nott, D. J., Marshall, L., and Brown, J.: Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) and approximate Bayesian computation: What's the connection?, Water Resour. Res., 48, W12602,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011128, 2012.
a
Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: Uncertainty and Multiple Objective Calibration in Regional Water Balance Modelling: Case Study in 320 Austrian Catchments, Hydrol. Process., 21, 435–446,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6253, 2007.
a
Rackauckas, C., Ma, Y., Martensen, J., Warner, C., Zubov, K., Supekar, R., Skinner, D., Ramadhan, A., and Edelman, A.: Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learning, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2001.04385, 2020.
a
Radford, M. N.: MCMC Using Hamiltonian Dynamics, in: Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, CRC Press, ISBN 978-1-4200-7942-5,
https://doi.org/10.1201/b10905-7, 2011.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Salvatier, J., Wiecki, T. V., and Fonnesbeck, C.: Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3, PeerJ Comput. Sci., 2, e55,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.55, 2016.
a
Shafii, M., Tolson, B., and Matott, L. S.: Uncertainty-Based Multi-Criteria Calibration of Rainfall-Runoff Models: A Comparative Study, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 28, 1493–1510,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0855-x, 2014.
a
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., and Van Der Linde, A.: Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser.-B, 64, 583–639,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353, 2002.
a,
b
Thijssen, B., Dijkstra, T. M. H., Heskes, T., and Wessels, L. F. A.: BCM: Toolkit for Bayesian Analysis of Computational Models Using Samplers, BMC Syst. Biol., 10, 100,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12918-016-0339-3, 2016.
a
Trotter, L., Knoben, W. J. M., Fowler, K. J. A., Saft, M., and Peel, M. C.: Modular Assessment of Rainfall–Runoff Models Toolbox (MARRMoT) v2.1: an object-oriented implementation of 47 established hydrological models for improved speed and readability, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6359–6369,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6359-2022, 2022.
a
Varrette, S., Cartiaux, H., Peter, S., Kieffer, E., Valette, T., and Olloh, A.: Management of an Academic HPC & Research Computing Facility: The ULHPC Experience 2.0, in: Proc. of the 6th ACM High Performance Computing and Cluster Technologies Conf. (HPCCT 2022), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), Fuzhou, China, ISBN 978-1-4503-9664-6,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3560442.3560445, 2022.
a
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., and Gabry, J.: Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC, Stat. Comput., 27, 1413–1432,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4, 2017.
a
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., and Bürkner, P.-C.: Rank-Normalization, Folding, and Localization: An Improved
for Assessing Convergence of MCMC (with Discussion), Bayesian Anal., 16, 667–718,
https://doi.org/10.1214/20-BA1221, 2021.
a
Volpi, E., Schoups, G., Firmani, G., and Vrugt, J. A.: Sworn Testimony of the Model Evidence: Gaussian Mixture Importance (GAME) Sampling, Water Resour. Res., 53, 6133–6158,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020167, 2017.
a,
b,
c
Vousden, W. D., Farr, W. M., and Mandel, I.: Dynamic Temperature Selection for Parallel Tempering in Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 455, 1919–1937,
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2422, 2016.
a
Vrugt, J. A., Ter Braak, C. J. F., Clark, M. P., Hyman, J. M., and Robinson, B. A.: Treatment of Input Uncertainty in Hydrologic Modeling: Doing Hydrology Backward with Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B09,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006720, 2008.
a
Watanabe, S. and Opper, M.: Asymptotic Equivalence of Bayes Cross Validation and Widely Applicable Information Criterion in Singular Learning Theory, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 116, 3571–3594,
https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume11/watanabe10a/watanabe10a.pdf (last access: 10 July 2024), 2010.
a,
b
Xifara, T., Sherlock, C., Livingstone, S., Byrne, S., and Girolami, M.: Langevin diffusions and the Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm, Stat. Probabil. Lett., 91, 14–19,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2014.04.002, 2014.
a,
b
Zhang, J., Vrugt, J. A., Shi, X., Lin, G., Wu, L., and Zeng, L.: Improving Simulation Efficiency of MCMC for Inverse Modeling of Hydrologic Systems With a Kalman-Inspired Proposal Distribution, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR02547,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025474, 2020.
a
Zheng, Y. and Han, F.: Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Uncertainty Analysis for Watershed Water Quality Modeling and Management, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 30, 293–308,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1091-8, 2016.
a
