Articles | Volume 15, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3773-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3773-2022
Model description paper
 | 
10 May 2022
Model description paper |  | 10 May 2022

MagmaFOAM-1.0: a modular framework for the simulation of magmatic systems

Federico Brogi, Simone Colucci, Jacopo Matrone, Chiara Paola Montagna, Mattia De' Michieli Vitturi, and Paolo Papale

Related subject area

Solid Earth
Addressing challenges in uncertainty quantification. The case of geohazard assessments
Ibsen Chivata Cardenas, Terje Aven, and Roger Flage
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-210,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-210, 2022
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
DeepISMNet: three-dimensional implicit structural modeling with convolutional neural network
Zhengfa Bi, Xinming Wu, Zhaoliang Li, Dekuan Chang, and Xueshan Yong
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6841–6861, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6841-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6841-2022, 2022
Short summary
Towards automatic finite-element methods for geodynamics via Firedrake
D. Rhodri Davies, Stephan C. Kramer, Sia Ghelichkhan, and Angus Gibson
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5127–5166, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5127-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5127-2022, 2022
Short summary
A global, spherical finite-element model for post-seismic deformation using Abaqus
Grace A. Nield, Matt A. King, Rebekka Steffen, and Bas Blank
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2489–2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2489-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2489-2022, 2022
Short summary
SMAUG v1.0 – a user-friendly muon simulator for the imaging of geological objects in 3-D
Alessandro Lechmann, David Mair, Akitaka Ariga, Tomoko Ariga, Antonio Ereditato, Ryuichi Nishiyama, Ciro Pistillo, Paola Scampoli, Mykhailo Vladymyrov, and Fritz Schlunegger
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2441–2473, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2441-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2441-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Annen, C., Blundy, J. D., and Sparks, R. S. J.: The Genesis of Intermediate and Silicic Magmas in Deep Crustal Hot Zones, J. Petrol., 47, 505–539, https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egi084, 2006. a
Aulisa, E., Manservisi, S., and Scardovelli, R.: A mixed markers and volume-of-fluid method for the reconstruction and advection of interfaces in two-phase and free-boundary flows, J. Computat. Phys., 188, 611–639, 2003. a
Bachmann, O. and Bergantz, G. W.: Rejuvenation of the Fish Canyon magma body: A window into the evolution of large-volume silicic magma systems, Geology, 31, 789–792, 2003. a
Bagagli, M., Montagna, C. P., Papale, P., and Longo, A.: Signature of magmatic processes in strainmeter records at Campi Flegrei (Italy), Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 718–725, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071875, 2017. a, b
Baker, D. R., Freda, C., Brooker, R. A., and Scarlato, P.: Volatile diffusion in silicate melts and its effects on melt inclusions, Ann. Geophys., 48, 699–717, 2005. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
Computer simulations play a fundamental role in understanding volcanic phenomena. The growing complexity of these simulations requires the development of flexible computational tools that can easily switch between sub-models and solution techniques as well as optimizations. MagmaFOAM is a newly developed library that allows for maximum flexibility for solving multiphase volcanic flows and promotes collaborative work for in-house and community model development, testing, and comparison.