Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6257–6272, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6257-2021
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6257–6272, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6257-2021
Development and technical paper
18 Oct 2021
Development and technical paper | 18 Oct 2021

RHEA v1.0: Enabling fully coupled simulations with hydro-geomechanical heterogeneity

José M. Bastías Espejo​​​​​​​ et al.

Related authors

In-situ estimation of subsurface hydro-geomechanical properties using the groundwater response to Earth and atmospheric tides
Timothy C. McMillan, Martin S. Andersen, Wendy A. Timms, and Gabriel C. Rau
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-359,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-359, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Mechanical and hydraulic properties of the excavation damaged zone (EDZ) in the Opalinus Clay of the Mont Terri rock laboratory, Switzerland
Sina Hale, Xavier Ries, David Jaeggi, and Philipp Blum
Solid Earth, 12, 1581–1600, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1581-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1581-2021, 2021
Short summary
Groundwater fauna in an urban area – natural or affected?
Fabien Koch, Kathrin Menberg, Svenja Schweikert, Cornelia Spengler, Hans Jürgen Hahn, and Philipp Blum
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3053–3070, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3053-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3053-2021, 2021
Short summary
Simulating permeability reduction by clay mineral nanopores in a tight sandstone by combining computer X-ray microtomography and focussed ion beam scanning electron microscopy imaging
Arne Jacob, Markus Peltz, Sina Hale, Frieder Enzmann, Olga Moravcova, Laurence N. Warr, Georg Grathoff, Philipp Blum, and Michael Kersten
Solid Earth, 12, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1-2021, 2021
Short summary
Technical note: Disentangling the groundwater response to Earth and atmospheric tides to improve subsurface characterisation
Gabriel C. Rau, Mark O. Cuthbert, R. Ian Acworth, and Philipp Blum
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 6033–6046, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-6033-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-6033-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Solid Earth
Towards automatic finite-element methods for geodynamics via Firedrake
D. Rhodri Davies, Stephan C. Kramer, Sia Ghelichkhan, and Angus Gibson
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5127–5166, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5127-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5127-2022, 2022
Short summary
MagmaFOAM-1.0: a modular framework for the simulation of magmatic systems
Federico Brogi, Simone Colucci, Jacopo Matrone, Chiara Paola Montagna, Mattia De' Michieli Vitturi, and Paolo Papale
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3773–3796, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3773-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3773-2022, 2022
Short summary
DeepISMNet: Three-Dimensional Implicit Structural Modeling with Convolutional Neural Network
Zhengfa Bi, Xinming Wu, Zhaoliang Li, Dekuan Chang, and Xueshan Yong
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-117,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-117, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
A global, spherical finite-element model for post-seismic deformation using Abaqus
Grace A. Nield, Matt A. King, Rebekka Steffen, and Bas Blank
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2489–2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2489-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2489-2022, 2022
Short summary
SMAUG v1.0 – a user-friendly muon simulator for the imaging of geological objects in 3-D
Alessandro Lechmann, David Mair, Akitaka Ariga, Tomoko Ariga, Antonio Ereditato, Ryuichi Nishiyama, Ciro Pistillo, Paola Scampoli, Mykhailo Vladymyrov, and Fritz Schlunegger
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2441–2473, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2441-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2441-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahmed, E., Jaffré, J., and Roberts, J. E.: A reduced fracture model for two-phase flow with different rock types, Math. Comput. Simulat., 137, 49–70, 2017. a
Alexander, J.: A discussion on the use of analogues for reservoir geology, Geol. Soc. SP, 69, 175–194, 1993. a
Alnæs, M., Blechta, J., Hake, J., Johansson, A., Kehlet, B., Logg, A., Richardson, C., Ring, J., Rognes, M. E., and Wells, G. N.: The FEniCS project version 1.5, Archive of Numerical Software, 3, Heidelberg, Germany, available at: https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/ans/article/view/20553 (last access: 13 October 2021), 2015. a
Atkinson, B. K.: Fracture mechanics of rock, Elsevier, London, UK, 2015. a
Balay, S., Abhyankar, S., Adams, M., Brown, J., Brune, P., Buschelman, K., Dalcin, L., Dener, A., Eijkhout, V., and Gropp, W.: PETSc users manual, Argonne National Laboratory, Chicago, USA, available at: https://publications.anl.gov/anlpubs/2016/05/127241.pdf (last access: 13 October 2021), 2019. a
Download
Short summary
The hydraulic and mechanical properties of the subsurface are inherently heterogeneous. RHEA is a simulator that can perform couple hydro-geomechanical processes in heterogeneous porous media with steep gradients. RHEA is able to fully integrate spatial heterogeneity, allowing allocation of distributed hydraulic and geomechanical properties at mesh element level. RHEA is a valuable tool that can simulate problems considering realistic heterogeneity inherent to geologic formations.