Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2541–2562, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2541-2018
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2541–2562, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2541-2018
Model description paper
29 Jun 2018
Model description paper | 29 Jun 2018

Geodynamic diagnostics, scientific visualisation and StagLab 3.0

Fabio Crameri

Related authors

101 geodynamic modelling: how to design, interpret, and communicate numerical studies of the solid Earth
Iris van Zelst, Fabio Crameri, Adina E. Pusok, Anne Glerum, Juliane Dannberg, and Cedric Thieulot
Solid Earth, 13, 583–637, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-583-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-583-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Solid Earth
Towards automatic finite-element methods for geodynamics via Firedrake
D. Rhodri Davies, Stephan C. Kramer, Sia Ghelichkhan, and Angus Gibson
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5127–5166, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5127-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5127-2022, 2022
Short summary
MagmaFOAM-1.0: a modular framework for the simulation of magmatic systems
Federico Brogi, Simone Colucci, Jacopo Matrone, Chiara Paola Montagna, Mattia De' Michieli Vitturi, and Paolo Papale
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3773–3796, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3773-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3773-2022, 2022
Short summary
DeepISMNet: Three-Dimensional Implicit Structural Modeling with Convolutional Neural Network
Zhengfa Bi, Xinming Wu, Zhaoliang Li, Dekuan Chang, and Xueshan Yong
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-117,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-117, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
A global, spherical finite-element model for post-seismic deformation using Abaqus
Grace A. Nield, Matt A. King, Rebekka Steffen, and Bas Blank
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2489–2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2489-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2489-2022, 2022
Short summary
SMAUG v1.0 – a user-friendly muon simulator for the imaging of geological objects in 3-D
Alessandro Lechmann, David Mair, Akitaka Ariga, Tomoko Ariga, Antonio Ereditato, Ryuichi Nishiyama, Ciro Pistillo, Paola Scampoli, Mykhailo Vladymyrov, and Fritz Schlunegger
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2441–2473, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2441-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2441-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Borland, D. and Ii, R. M. T.: Rainbow Color Map (Still) Considered Harmful, IEEE Comput. Graph., 27, 14–17, 2007.
Buffett, B. A.: Plate force due to bending at subduction zones, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 111, b09405, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004295, 2006.
Capitanio, F., Morra, G., and Goes, S.: Dynamic models of downgoing plate-buoyancy driven subduction: Subduction motions and energy dissipation, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 262, 284–297, 2007.
Chandrasekhar, S.: Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability, International Series of Monographs on Physics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1961.
Coltice, N., Gérault, M., and Ulvrová, M.: A mantle convection perspective on global tectonics, Earth-Sci. Rev., 165, 120–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.11.006, 2017.
Download
Short summary
Firstly, this study acts as a compilation of key geodynamic diagnostics and describes how to automatise them for a more efficient scientific procedure. Secondly, it outlines today's key pitfalls of scientific visualisation and provides means to circumvent them with, for example, a novel set of fully scientific colour maps. Thirdly, it introduces StagLab 3.0, a software that applies such fully automated diagnostics and state-of-the-art visualisation in the blink of an eye.