Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2541-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2541-2018
Model description paper
 | 
29 Jun 2018
Model description paper |  | 29 Jun 2018

Geodynamic diagnostics, scientific visualisation and StagLab 3.0

Fabio Crameri

Related authors

Cautionary remarks on the planetary boundary visualisation
Miguel D. Mahecha, Guido Kraemer, and Fabio Crameri
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1153–1159, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1153-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
101 geodynamic modelling: how to design, interpret, and communicate numerical studies of the solid Earth
Iris van Zelst, Fabio Crameri, Adina E. Pusok, Anne Glerum, Juliane Dannberg, and Cedric Thieulot
Solid Earth, 13, 583–637, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-583-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-583-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Solid Earth
GEOMAPLEARN 1.2: detecting structures from geological maps with machine learning – the case of geological folds
David Oakley, Christelle Loiselet, Thierry Coowar, Vincent Labbe, and Jean-Paul Callot
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 939–960, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-939-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-939-2025, 2025
Short summary
Accelerated pseudo-transient method for elastic, viscoelastic, and coupled hydromechanical problems with applications
Yury Alkhimenkov and Yury Y. Podladchikov
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 563–583, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-563-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-563-2025, 2025
Short summary
Reconciling surface deflections from simulations of global mantle convection
Conor P. B. O'Malley, Gareth G. Roberts, James Panton, Fred D. Richards, J. Huw Davies, Victoria M. Fernandes, and Sia Ghelichkhan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 9023–9049, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-9023-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-9023-2024, 2024
Short summary
Three-dimensional analytical solution of self-potential from regularly polarized bodies in a layered seafloor model
Pengfei Zhang, Yi-an Cui, Jing Xie, Youjun Guo, Jianxin Liu, and Jieran Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8521–8533, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8521-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8521-2024, 2024
Short summary
A fast surrogate model for 3D Earth glacial isostatic adjustment using Tensorflow (v2.8.0) artificial neural networks
Ryan Love, Glenn A. Milne, Parviz Ajourlou, Soran Parang, Lev Tarasov, and Konstantin Latychev
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8535–8551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8535-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8535-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Borland, D. and Ii, R. M. T.: Rainbow Color Map (Still) Considered Harmful, IEEE Comput. Graph., 27, 14–17, 2007.
Buffett, B. A.: Plate force due to bending at subduction zones, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 111, b09405, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004295, 2006.
Capitanio, F., Morra, G., and Goes, S.: Dynamic models of downgoing plate-buoyancy driven subduction: Subduction motions and energy dissipation, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 262, 284–297, 2007.
Chandrasekhar, S.: Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability, International Series of Monographs on Physics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1961.
Coltice, N., Gérault, M., and Ulvrová, M.: A mantle convection perspective on global tectonics, Earth-Sci. Rev., 165, 120–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.11.006, 2017.
Download
Short summary
Firstly, this study acts as a compilation of key geodynamic diagnostics and describes how to automatise them for a more efficient scientific procedure. Secondly, it outlines today's key pitfalls of scientific visualisation and provides means to circumvent them with, for example, a novel set of fully scientific colour maps. Thirdly, it introduces StagLab 3.0, a software that applies such fully automated diagnostics and state-of-the-art visualisation in the blink of an eye.
Share