Journal cover Journal topic
Geoscientific Model Development An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.240 IF 5.240
  • IF 5-year value: 5.768 IF 5-year
    5.768
  • CiteScore value: 8.9 CiteScore
    8.9
  • SNIP value: 1.713 SNIP 1.713
  • IPP value: 5.53 IPP 5.53
  • SJR value: 3.18 SJR 3.18
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 71 Scimago H
    index 71
  • h5-index value: 51 h5-index 51
Volume 9, issue 9
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3427–3446, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3427-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Experimental...

Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3427–3446, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3427-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Methods for assessment of models 23 Sep 2016

Methods for assessment of models | 23 Sep 2016

The CMIP6 Sea-Ice Model Intercomparison Project (SIMIP): understanding sea ice through climate-model simulations

Dirk Notz et al.

Related authors

Satellite passive microwave sea-ice concentration data set inter-comparison for Arctic summer conditions
Stefan Kern, Thomas Lavergne, Dirk Notz, Leif Toudal Pedersen, and Rasmus Tonboe
The Cryosphere, 14, 2469–2493, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2469-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2469-2020, 2020
Short summary
Satellite passive microwave sea-ice concentration data set intercomparison: closed ice and ship-based observations
Stefan Kern, Thomas Lavergne, Dirk Notz, Leif Toudal Pedersen, Rasmus Tage Tonboe, Roberto Saldo, and Atle MacDonald Sørensen
The Cryosphere, 13, 3261–3307, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-3261-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-3261-2019, 2019
Short summary
Version 2 of the EUMETSAT OSI SAF and ESA CCI sea-ice concentration climate data records
Thomas Lavergne, Atle Macdonald Sørensen, Stefan Kern, Rasmus Tonboe, Dirk Notz, Signe Aaboe, Louisa Bell, Gorm Dybkjær, Steinar Eastwood, Carolina Gabarro, Georg Heygster, Mari Anne Killie, Matilde Brandt Kreiner, John Lavelle, Roberto Saldo, Stein Sandven, and Leif Toudal Pedersen
The Cryosphere, 13, 49–78, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-49-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-49-2019, 2019
Short summary
Statistical indicators of Arctic sea-ice stability – prospects and limitations
Sebastian Bathiany, Bregje van der Bolt, Mark S. Williamson, Timothy M. Lenton, Marten Scheffer, Egbert H. van Nes, and Dirk Notz
The Cryosphere, 10, 1631–1645, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1631-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1631-2016, 2016
Short summary
Advances in understanding and parameterization of small-scale physical processes in the marine Arctic climate system: a review
T. Vihma, R. Pirazzini, I. Fer, I. A. Renfrew, J. Sedlar, M. Tjernström, C. Lüpkes, T. Nygård, D. Notz, J. Weiss, D. Marsan, B. Cheng, G. Birnbaum, S. Gerland, D. Chechin, and J. C. Gascard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9403–9450, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9403-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9403-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Cryosphere
Description and validation of the ice-sheet model Yelmo (version 1.0)
Alexander Robinson, Jorge Alvarez-Solas, Marisa Montoya, Heiko Goelzer, Ralf Greve, and Catherine Ritz
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2805–2823, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2805-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2805-2020, 2020
Short summary
Evaluating integrated surface/subsurface permafrost thermal hydrology models in ATS (v0.88) against observations from a polygonal tundra site
Ahmad Jan, Ethan T. Coon, and Scott L. Painter
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2259–2276, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2259-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2259-2020, 2020
Short summary
Extended enthalpy formulations in the ice flow model ISSM version 4.17: discontinuous conductivity and anisotropic SUPG
Martin Rückamp, Angelika Humbert, Thomas Kleiner, Mathieu Morlighem, and Helene Seroussi
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-78,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-78, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
SICOPOLIS-AD v1: an open-source adjoint modeling framework for ice sheet simulation enabled by the algorithmic differentiation tool OpenAD
Liz C. Logan, Sri Hari Krishna Narayanan, Ralf Greve, and Patrick Heimbach
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1845–1864, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1845-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1845-2020, 2020
Short summary
On the calculation of normalized viscous–plastic sea ice stresses
Jean-François Lemieux and Frédéric Dupont
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1763–1769, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1763-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1763-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Armour, K. C. and Bitz, C. M.: Observed and projected trends in Antarctic sea ice, vol. 13 of US Clivar Variations, 12–19, 2015.
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016.
Gagné, M.-E., Gillett, N. P., and Fyfe, J. C.: Observed and simulated changes in Antarctic sea ice extent over the past 50 years, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 2014GL062231, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062231, 2015.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The large-scale evolution of sea ice is both an indicator and a driver of climate changes. Hence, a realistic simulation of sea ice is key for a realistic simulation of the climate system of our planet. To assess and to improve the realism of sea-ice simulations, we present here a new protocol for climate-model output that allows for an in-depth analysis of the simulated evolution of sea ice.
The large-scale evolution of sea ice is both an indicator and a driver of climate changes....
Citation