Articles | Volume 8, issue 6
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1729–1746, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1729-2015
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1729–1746, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1729-2015
Model experiment description paper
 | Highlight paper
11 Jun 2015
Model experiment description paper  | Highlight paper | 11 Jun 2015

A large-scale simulation model to assess karstic groundwater recharge over Europe and the Mediterranean

A. Hartmann et al.

Related authors

Karst spring recession and classification: efficient, automated methods for both fast- and slow-flow components
Tunde Olarinoye, Tom Gleeson, and Andreas Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5431–5447, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5431-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5431-2022, 2022
Short summary
Pitfalls and a feasible solution for using KGE as an informal likelihood function in MCMC methods: DREAM(ZS) as an example
Yan Liu, Jaime Fernández-Ortega, Matías Mudarra, and Andreas Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5341–5355, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5341-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5341-2022, 2022
Short summary
Estimating karst groundwater recharge from soil moisture observations – A new method tested at the Swabian Alb, Southwest Germany
Romane Berthelin, Tunde Olarinoye, Michael Rinderer, Matías Mudarra, Dominic Demand, Mirjam Scheller, and Andreas Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-291,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-291, 2022
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Using LSTM to monitor continuous discharge indirectly with electrical conductivity observations
Yong Chang, Benjamin Mewes, and Andreas Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-77,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-77, 2022
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
GMD perspective: The quest to improve the evaluation of groundwater representation in continental- to global-scale models
Tom Gleeson, Thorsten Wagener, Petra Döll, Samuel C. Zipper, Charles West, Yoshihide Wada, Richard Taylor, Bridget Scanlon, Rafael Rosolem, Shams Rahman, Nurudeen Oshinlaja, Reed Maxwell, Min-Hui Lo, Hyungjun Kim, Mary Hill, Andreas Hartmann, Graham Fogg, James S. Famiglietti, Agnès Ducharne, Inge de Graaf, Mark Cuthbert, Laura Condon, Etienne Bresciani, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7545–7571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
Basin-scale gyres and mesoscale eddies in large lakes: a novel procedure for their detection and characterization, assessed in Lake Geneva
Seyed Mahmood Hamze-Ziabari, Ulrich Lemmin, Frédéric Soulignac, Mehrshad Foroughan, and David Andrew Barry
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8785–8807, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8785-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8785-2022, 2022
Short summary
SIMO v1.0: simplified model of the vertical temperature profile in a small, warm, monomictic lake
Kristina Šarović, Melita Burić, and Zvjezdana B. Klaić
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8349–8375, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8349-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8349-2022, 2022
Short summary
Thermal modeling of three lakes within the continuous permafrost zone in Alaska using the LAKE 2.0 model
Jason A. Clark, Elchin E. Jafarov, Ken D. Tape, Benjamin M. Jones, and Victor Stepanenko
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7421–7448, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7421-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7421-2022, 2022
Short summary
Water balance model (WBM) v.1.0.0: a scalable gridded global hydrologic model with water-tracking functionality
Danielle S. Grogan, Shan Zuidema, Alex Prusevich, Wilfred M. Wollheim, Stanley Glidden, and Richard B. Lammers
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7287–7323, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7287-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7287-2022, 2022
Short summary
Coupling a large-scale hydrological model (CWatM v1.1) with a high-resolution groundwater flow model (MODFLOW 6) to assess the impact of irrigation at regional scale
Luca Guillaumot, Mikhail Smilovic, Peter Burek, Jens de Bruijn, Peter Greve, Taher Kahil, and Yoshihide Wada
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7099–7120, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7099-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7099-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Allocca, V., Manna, F., and De Vita, P.: Estimating annual groundwater recharge coefficient for karst aquifers of the southern Apennines (Italy), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 803–817, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-803-2014, 2014.
Andreo, B., Vías, J., Durán, J., Jiménez, P., López-Geta, J., and Carrasco, F.: Methodology for groundwater recharge assessment in carbonate aquifers: application to pilot sites in southern Spain, Hydrogeol. J., 16, 911–925, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-008-0274-5, 2008.
Aquilina, L., Ladouche, B., and Doerfliger, N.: Water storage and transfer in the epikarst of karstic systems during high flow periods, J. Hydrol., 327, 472–485, 2006.
Arnell, N. W.: Relative effects of multi-decadal climatic variability and changes in the mean and variability of climate due to global warming?: future streamflows in Britain, J. Hydrol., 270, 195–213, 2003.
Aydin, H., Ekmekci, M., and Soylu, M. E.: Characterization and conceptualization of a relict karst aquifer (bilecik , turkey) karakterizacija in konceptualizacija reliktnega, Acta carsologica, 42, 75–92, 2013.
Download
Short summary
We present a new approach to assess karstic groundwater recharge over Europe and the Mediterranean. Cluster analysis is used to subdivide all karst regions into four typical karst landscapes and to simulate karst recharge with a process-based karst model. We estimate its parameters by a combination of a priori information and observations of soil moisture and evapotranspiration. Independent observations of recharge that present large-scale models significantly under-estimate karstic recharge.