Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 821–842, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-821-2021
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 821–842, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-821-2021

Model description paper 05 Feb 2021

Model description paper | 05 Feb 2021

Shyft v4.8: a framework for uncertainty assessment and distributed hydrologic modeling for operational hydrology

John F. Burkhart et al.

Related authors

Coupled machine learning and the limits of acceptability approach applied in parameter identification for a distributed hydrological model
Aynom T. Teweldebrhan, Thomas V. Schuler, John F. Burkhart, and Morten Hjorth-Jensen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4641–4658, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4641-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4641-2020, 2020
The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 10.4
Ignacio Pisso, Espen Sollum, Henrik Grythe, Nina I. Kristiansen, Massimo Cassiani, Sabine Eckhardt, Delia Arnold, Don Morton, Rona L. Thompson, Christine D. Groot Zwaaftink, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Harald Sodemann, Leopold Haimberger, Stephan Henne, Dominik Brunner, John F. Burkhart, Anne Fouilloux, Jerome Brioude, Anne Philipp, Petra Seibert, and Andreas Stohl
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4955–4997, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4955-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4955-2019, 2019
Short summary
Simulations of black carbon (BC) aerosol impact over Hindu Kush Himalayan sites: validation, sources, and implications on glacier runoff
Sauvik Santra, Shubha Verma, Koji Fujita, Indrajit Chakraborty, Olivier Boucher, Toshihiko Takemura, John F. Burkhart, Felix Matt, and Mukesh Sharma
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2441–2460, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2441-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2441-2019, 2019
Short summary
Parameter uncertainty analysis for an operational hydrological model using residual-based and limits of acceptability approaches
Aynom T. Teweldebrhan, John F. Burkhart, and Thomas V. Schuler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5021–5039, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5021-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5021-2018, 2018
Modelling hydrologic impacts of light absorbing aerosol deposition on snow at the catchment scale
Felix N. Matt, John F. Burkhart, and Joni-Pekka Pietikäinen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 179–201, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-179-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-179-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
A distributed simple dynamical systems approach (dS2 v1.0) for computationally efficient hydrological modelling at high spatio-temporal resolution
Joost Buitink, Lieke A. Melsen, James W. Kirchner, and Adriaan J. Teuling
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6093–6110, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6093-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6093-2020, 2020
Short summary
Simulating second-generation herbaceous bioenergy crop yield using the global hydrological model H08 (v.bio1)
Zhipin Ai, Naota Hanasaki, Vera Heck, Tomoko Hasegawa, and Shinichiro Fujimori
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6077–6092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6077-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6077-2020, 2020
Short summary
KLT-IV v1.0: image velocimetry software for use with fixed and mobile platforms
Matthew T. Perks
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6111–6130, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6111-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6111-2020, 2020
Short summary
Parametrization of lakes water dynamics in the ISBA-CTRIP land surface system (SURFEX v8.1)
Thibault Guinaldo, Simon Munier, Patrick Le Moigne, Aaron Boone, Bertrand Decharme, Margarita Choulga, and Delphine J. Leroux
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-296,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-296, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Simulating human impacts on global water resources using VIC-5
Bram Droppers, Wietse H. P. Franssen, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Bart Nijssen, and Fulco Ludwig
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5029–5052, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5029-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5029-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Abramowitz, G.: Towards a public, standardized, diagnostic benchmarking system for land surface models, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 819–827, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-819-2012, 2012. a
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227, 1989. a
Andersson, E. and Thépaut, J.: ECMWF's 4D-Var data assimilation system – the genesis and ten years in operations, ECMWF Newslett., 115, 8–12, https://doi.org/10.21957/wnmguimihe, 2008. a
Anghileri, D., Voisin, N., Castelletti, A., Pianosi, F., Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Value of long-term streamflow forecasts to reservoir operations for water supply in snow-dominated river catchments, Water Resour. Res., 52, 4209–4225, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017864, 2016. a, b
Anghileri, D., Monhart, S., Zhou, C., Bogner, K., Castelletti, A., Burlando, P., and Zappa, M.: The Value of Subseasonal Hydrometeorological Forecasts to Hydropower Operations: How Much Does Preprocessing Matter?, Water Resour. Res., 55, 10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025280, 2019. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
We present a new hydrologic modeling framework for interactive development of inflow forecasts for hydropower production planning and other operational environments (e.g., flood forecasting). The software provides a Python user interface with an application programming interface (API) for a computationally optimized C++ model engine, giving end users extensive control over the model configuration in real time during a simulation. This provides for extensive experimentation with configuration.