Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3185-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3185-2021
Development and technical paper
 | 
03 Jun 2021
Development and technical paper |  | 03 Jun 2021

A nested multi-scale system implemented in the large-eddy simulation model PALM model system 6.0

Antti Hellsten, Klaus Ketelsen, Matthias Sühring, Mikko Auvinen, Björn Maronga, Christoph Knigge, Fotios Barmpas, Georgios Tsegas, Nicolas Moussiopoulos, and Siegfried Raasch

Related authors

Sensitivity of spatial aerosol particle distributions to the boundary conditions in the PALM model system 6.0
Mona Kurppa, Pontus Roldin, Jani Strömberg, Anna Balling, Sasu Karttunen, Heino Kuuluvainen, Jarkko V. Niemi, Liisa Pirjola, Topi Rönkkö, Hilkka Timonen, Antti Hellsten, and Leena Järvi
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5663–5685, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5663-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5663-2020, 2020
Short summary
Overview of the PALM model system 6.0
Björn Maronga, Sabine Banzhaf, Cornelia Burmeister, Thomas Esch, Renate Forkel, Dominik Fröhlich, Vladimir Fuka, Katrin Frieda Gehrke, Jan Geletič, Sebastian Giersch, Tobias Gronemeier, Günter Groß, Wieke Heldens, Antti Hellsten, Fabian Hoffmann, Atsushi Inagaki, Eckhard Kadasch, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Klaus Ketelsen, Basit Ali Khan, Christoph Knigge, Helge Knoop, Pavel Krč, Mona Kurppa, Halim Maamari, Andreas Matzarakis, Matthias Mauder, Matthias Pallasch, Dirk Pavlik, Jens Pfafferott, Jaroslav Resler, Sascha Rissmann, Emmanuele Russo, Mohamed Salim, Michael Schrempf, Johannes Schwenkel, Gunther Seckmeyer, Sebastian Schubert, Matthias Sühring, Robert von Tils, Lukas Vollmer, Simon Ward, Björn Witha, Hauke Wurps, Julian Zeidler, and Siegfried Raasch
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1335–1372, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1335-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1335-2020, 2020
Short summary
Implementation of the sectional aerosol module SALSA2.0 into the PALM model system 6.0: model development and first evaluation
Mona Kurppa, Antti Hellsten, Pontus Roldin, Harri Kokkola, Juha Tonttila, Mikko Auvinen, Christoph Kent, Prashant Kumar, Björn Maronga, and Leena Järvi
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1403–1422, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1403-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1403-2019, 2019
Short summary
Numerical framework for the computation of urban flux footprints employing large-eddy simulation and Lagrangian stochastic modeling
Mikko Auvinen, Leena Järvi, Antti Hellsten, Üllar Rannik, and Timo Vesala
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4187–4205, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4187-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4187-2017, 2017
Short summary
Aerosol–landscape–cloud interaction: signatures of topography effect on cloud droplet formation
Sami Romakkaniemi, Zubair Maalick, Antti Hellsten, Antti Ruuskanen, Olli Väisänen, Irshad Ahmad, Juha Tonttila, Santtu Mikkonen, Mika Komppula, and Thomas Kühn
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7955–7964, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7955-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7955-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical methods
A computationally efficient parameterization of aerosol, cloud and precipitation pH for application at global and regional scale (EQSAM4Clim-v12)
Swen Metzger, Samuel Rémy, Jason E. Williams, Vincent Huijnen, and Johannes Flemming
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5009–5021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5009-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5009-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing the benefits of approximately exact step sizes for Picard and Newton solver in simulating ice flow (FEniCS-full-Stokes v.1.3.2)
Niko Schmidt, Angelika Humbert, and Thomas Slawig
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4943–4959, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4943-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4943-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing effects of climate and technology uncertainties in large natural resource allocation problems
Jevgenijs Steinbuks, Yongyang Cai, Jonas Jaegermeyr, and Thomas W. Hertel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4791–4819, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4791-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4791-2024, 2024
Short summary
VISIR-2: ship weather routing in Python
Gianandrea Mannarini, Mario Leonardo Salinas, Lorenzo Carelli, Nicola Petacco, and Josip Orović
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4355–4382, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4355-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4355-2024, 2024
Short summary
Incremental analysis update (IAU) in the Model for Prediction Across Scales coupled with the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (MPAS–JEDI 2.0.0)
Soyoung Ha, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Ivette Hernández Baños, William C. Skamarock, and Michael G. Duda
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4199–4211, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahmad, N. H., Inagaki, A., Kanda, M., Onodera, N., and Aoki, T.: Large-eddy simulation of the gust index in an urban area using the lattice Boltzmann method, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 163, 447–467, 2017. a
Aidun, C. K. and Clausen, J. R.: Lattice-Boltzmann method for complex flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 42, 439–472, 2010. a
Auvinen, M., Boi, S., Hellsten, A., Tanhuanpää, T., and Järvi, L.: Study of Realistic Urban Boundary Layer Turbulence with High-Resolution Large-Eddy Simulation, Atmosphere, 11, 201, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020201, 2020a. a, b, c
Auvinen, M., Karttunen, S., and Kurppa, M.: P4UL: Pre- and Post-Processing Python Library for Urban LES Simulations, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4005687, 2020b. a
Bou-Zeid, E., Overney, J., Rogers, B. D., and Parlange, M. B.: The Effects of Building Representation and Clustering in Large-Eddy Simulations of Flows in Urban Canopies, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 132, 415–436, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9410-6, 2009. a
Download
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation (LES) of the urban atmospheric boundary layer involves a large separation of turbulent scales, leading to prohibitive computational costs. An online LES–LES nesting scheme is implemented into the PALM model system 6.0 to overcome this problem. Test results show that the accuracy within the high-resolution nest domains approach the non-nested high-resolution reference results. The nesting can reduce the CPU by time up to 80 % compared to the fine-resolution reference runs.