Articles | Volume 16, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5685-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5685-2023
Development and technical paper
 | 
12 Oct 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 12 Oct 2023

Dynamically weighted ensemble of geoscientific models via automated machine-learning-based classification

Hao Chen, Tiejun Wang, Yonggen Zhang, Yun Bai, and Xi Chen

Related authors

Hydro-pedotransfer functions: A roadmap for future development
Tobias Karl David Weber, Lutz Weihermüller, Attila Nemes, Michel Bechtold, Aurore Degré, Efstathios Diamantopoulos, Simone Fatichi, Vilim Filipović, Surya Gupta, Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Daniel R. Hirmas, Conrad Jackisch, Quirijn de Jong van Lier, John Koestel, Peter Lehmann, Toby R. Marthews, Budiman Minasny, Holger Pagel, Martine van der Ploeg, Simon Fiil Svane, Brigitta Szabó, Harry Vereecken, Anne Verhoef, Michael Young, Yijian Zeng, Yonggen Zhang, and Sara Bonetti
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1860,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1860, 2023
Short summary
Effects of passive-storage conceptualization on modeling hydrological function and isotope dynamics in the flow system of a cockpit karst landscape
Guangxuan Li, Xi Chen, Zhicai Zhang, Lichun Wang, and Chris Soulsby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5515–5534, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5515-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5515-2022, 2022
Short summary
Combining analytical solutions of Boussinesq equation with the modified Kozeny–Carman equation for estimation of catchment-scale hydrogeological parameters
Man Gao, Xi Chen, and Jintao Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-453,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-453, 2019
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Technical note: An improved Grassberger–Procaccia algorithm for analysis of climate system complexity
Chongli Di, Tiejun Wang, Xiaohua Yang, and Siliang Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5069–5079, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5069-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5069-2018, 2018
Short summary
Feasibility analysis of using inverse modeling for estimating field-scale evapotranspiration in maize and soybean fields from soil water content monitoring networks
Foad Foolad, Trenton E. Franz, Tiejun Wang, Justin Gibson, Ayse Kilic, Richard G. Allen, and Andrew Suyker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1263–1277, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1263-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1263-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
Reservoir Assessment Tool version 3.0: a scalable and user-friendly software platform to mobilize the global water management community
Sanchit Minocha, Faisal Hossain, Pritam Das, Sarath Suresh, Shahzaib Khan, George Darkwah, Hyongki Lee, Stefano Galelli, Konstantinos Andreadis, and Perry Oddo
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3137–3156, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3137-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3137-2024, 2024
Short summary
HydroFATE (v1): a high-resolution contaminant fate model for the global river system
Heloisa Ehalt Macedo, Bernhard Lehner, Jim Nicell, and Günther Grill
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2877–2899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validation of a new global irrigation scheme in the land surface model ORCHIDEE v2.2
Pedro Felipe Arboleda-Obando, Agnès Ducharne, Zun Yin, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2141–2164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024, 2024
Short summary
GPEP v1.0: the Geospatial Probabilistic Estimation Package to support Earth science applications
Guoqiang Tang, Andrew W. Wood, Andrew J. Newman, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon Michael Papalexiou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1153–1173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
GEMS v1.0: Generalizable Empirical Model of Snow Accumulation and Melt, based on daily snow mass changes in response to climate and topographic drivers
Atabek Umirbekov, Richard Essery, and Daniel Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 911–929, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abramowitz, G., Herger, N., Gutmann, E., Hammerling, D., Knutti, R., Leduc, M., Lorenz, R., Pincus, R., and Schmidt, G. A.: ESD Reviews: Model dependence in multi-model climate ensembles: weighting, sub-selection and out-of-sample testing, Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 91–105, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-91-2019, 2019. 
Araújo, M. B. and New, M.: Ensemble forecasting of species distributions, Trends Ecol. Evol., 22, 42–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010, 2007. 
Bai, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, S., Yao, F., and Magliulo, V.: A remote sensing-based two-leaf canopy conductance model: Global optimization and applications in modeling gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration of crops, Remote Sens. Environ., 215, 411–437, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.06.005, 2018. 
Bai, Y., Zhang, S., Bhattarai, N., Mallick, K., Liu, Q., Tang, L., Im, J., Guo, L., and Zhang, J.: On the use of machine learning based ensemble approaches to improve evapotranspiration estimates from croplands across a wide environmental gradient, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 298–299, 108308, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108308, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
Effectively assembling multiple models for approaching a benchmark solution remains a long-standing issue for various geoscience domains. We here propose an automated machine learning-assisted ensemble framework (AutoML-Ens) that attempts to resolve this challenge. Results demonstrate the great potential of AutoML-Ens for improving estimations due to its two unique features, i.e., assigning dynamic weights for candidate models and taking full advantage of AutoML-assisted workflow.