Articles | Volume 15, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3161-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3161-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
12 Apr 2022
Model description paper |
| 12 Apr 2022
| 12 Apr 2022
GSTools v1.3: a toolbox for geostatistical modelling in Python
Sebastian Müller
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Computational Hydrosystems, UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Lennart Schüler
Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Department of Computational Hydrosystems, UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
Center for Advanced Systems Understanding (CASUS), Görlitz, Germany
Alraune Zech
Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Department of Computational Hydrosystems, UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
Falk Heße
Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Department of Computational Hydrosystems, UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
Related authors
Sebastian Müller, Martin Lange, Thomas Fischer, Sara König, Matthias Kelbling, Jeisson Javier Leal Rojas, and Stephan Thober
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-144, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents FINAM ("FINAM Is Not A Model"), a new coupling framework written in Python to dynamically link independently developed models. Python, as the ultimate glue language, enables the use of codes from nearly any programming language like Fortran, C++, Rust, and others. FINAM is designed to simplify the integration of various models with minimal effort, as demonstrated through various examples ranging from simple to complex systems.
Falk Heße, Sebastian Müller, and Sabine Attinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 357–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-357-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-357-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we have presented two different advances for the field of subsurface geostatistics. First, we present data of variogram functions from a variety of different locations around the world. Second, we present a series of geostatistical analyses aimed at examining some of the statistical properties of such variogram functions and their relationship to a number of widely used variogram model functions.
Friedrich Boeing, Oldrich Rakovec, Rohini Kumar, Luis Samaniego, Martin Schrön, Anke Hildebrandt, Corinna Rebmann, Stephan Thober, Sebastian Müller, Steffen Zacharias, Heye Bogena, Katrin Schneider, Ralf Kiese, Sabine Attinger, and Andreas Marx
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5137–5161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5137-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5137-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we deliver an evaluation of the second generation operational German drought monitor (https://www.ufz.de/duerremonitor) with a state-of-the-art compilation of observed soil moisture data from 40 locations and four different measurement methods in Germany. We show that the expressed stakeholder needs for higher resolution drought information at the one-kilometer scale can be met and that the agreement of simulated and observed soil moisture dynamics can be moderately improved.
Robert Schweppe, Stephan Thober, Sebastian Müller, Matthias Kelbling, Rohini Kumar, Sabine Attinger, and Luis Samaniego
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 859–882, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-859-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-859-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The recently released multiscale parameter regionalization (MPR) tool enables
environmental modelers to efficiently use extensive datasets for model setups.
It flexibly ingests the datasets using user-defined data–parameter relationships
and rescales parameter fields to given model resolutions. Modern
land surface models especially benefit from MPR through increased transparency and
flexibility in modeling decisions. Thus, MPR empowers more sound and robust
simulations of the Earth system.
Sebastian Müller, Martin Lange, Thomas Fischer, Sara König, Matthias Kelbling, Jeisson Javier Leal Rojas, and Stephan Thober
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-144, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents FINAM ("FINAM Is Not A Model"), a new coupling framework written in Python to dynamically link independently developed models. Python, as the ultimate glue language, enables the use of codes from nearly any programming language like Fortran, C++, Rust, and others. FINAM is designed to simplify the integration of various models with minimal effort, as demonstrated through various examples ranging from simple to complex systems.
Falk Heße, Sebastian Müller, and Sabine Attinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 357–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-357-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-357-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we have presented two different advances for the field of subsurface geostatistics. First, we present data of variogram functions from a variety of different locations around the world. Second, we present a series of geostatistical analyses aimed at examining some of the statistical properties of such variogram functions and their relationship to a number of widely used variogram model functions.
Friedrich Boeing, Oldrich Rakovec, Rohini Kumar, Luis Samaniego, Martin Schrön, Anke Hildebrandt, Corinna Rebmann, Stephan Thober, Sebastian Müller, Steffen Zacharias, Heye Bogena, Katrin Schneider, Ralf Kiese, Sabine Attinger, and Andreas Marx
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5137–5161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5137-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5137-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we deliver an evaluation of the second generation operational German drought monitor (https://www.ufz.de/duerremonitor) with a state-of-the-art compilation of observed soil moisture data from 40 locations and four different measurement methods in Germany. We show that the expressed stakeholder needs for higher resolution drought information at the one-kilometer scale can be met and that the agreement of simulated and observed soil moisture dynamics can be moderately improved.
Adam Mertel, Lennart Schüler, Wildan Abdussalam, Weronika Schlechte-Wełnicz, and Justin M. Calabrese
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 5, 131, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-5-131-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-5-131-2022, 2022
Swamini Khurana, Falk Heße, Anke Hildebrandt, and Martin Thullner
Biogeosciences, 19, 665–688, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-665-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-665-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we concluded that the residence times of solutes and the Damköhler number (Da) of the biogeochemical reactions in the domain are governing factors for evaluating the impact of spatial heterogeneity of the domain on chemical (such as carbon and nitrogen compounds) removal. We thus proposed a relationship to scale this impact governed by Da. This relationship may be applied in larger domains, thereby resulting in more accurate modelling outcomes of nutrient removal in groundwater.
Robert Schweppe, Stephan Thober, Sebastian Müller, Matthias Kelbling, Rohini Kumar, Sabine Attinger, and Luis Samaniego
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 859–882, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-859-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-859-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The recently released multiscale parameter regionalization (MPR) tool enables
environmental modelers to efficiently use extensive datasets for model setups.
It flexibly ingests the datasets using user-defined data–parameter relationships
and rescales parameter fields to given model resolutions. Modern
land surface models especially benefit from MPR through increased transparency and
flexibility in modeling decisions. Thus, MPR empowers more sound and robust
simulations of the Earth system.
Alraune Zech, Peter Dietrich, Sabine Attinger, and Georg Teutsch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1-2021, 2021
Miao Jing, Rohini Kumar, Falk Heße, Stephan Thober, Oldrich Rakovec, Luis Samaniego, and Sabine Attinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1511–1526, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1511-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1511-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the response of regional groundwater system to the climate change under three global warming levels (1.5, 2, and 3 °C) in a central German basin. A comprehensive uncertainty analysis is also presented. This study indicates that the variability of responses increases with the amount of global warming, which might affect the cost of managing the groundwater system.
Miao Jing, Falk Heße, Rohini Kumar, Olaf Kolditz, Thomas Kalbacher, and Sabine Attinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 171–190, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-171-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-171-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated the uncertainty propagation from the inputs (forcings) and parameters to the predictions of groundwater travel time distributions (TTDs) using a fully distributed numerical model (mHM-OGS) and the StorAge Selection (SAS) function. Through detailed numerical and analytical investigations, we emphasize the key role of recharge estimation in the reliable predictions of TTDs and the good interpretability of the SAS function.
Yoram Rubin, Ching-Fu Chang, Jiancong Chen, Karina Cucchi, Bradley Harken, Falk Heße, and Heather Savoy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5675–5695, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5675-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5675-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper addresses questions related to the adoption of stochastic methods in hydrogeology, looking at factors such as environmental regulations, financial incentives, higher education, and the collective feedback loop involving these factors. We show that stochastic hydrogeology's blind spot is in focusing on risk while ignoring uncertainty, to the detriment of its potential clients. The imbalance between the treatments of risk and uncertainty is shown to be common to multiple disciplines.
Miao Jing, Falk Heße, Rohini Kumar, Wenqing Wang, Thomas Fischer, Marc Walther, Matthias Zink, Alraune Zech, Luis Samaniego, Olaf Kolditz, and Sabine Attinger
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1989–2007, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1989-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1989-2018, 2018
Falk Heße, Matthias Zink, Rohini Kumar, Luis Samaniego, and Sabine Attinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 549–570, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-549-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-549-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Travel-time distributions are a comprehensive tool for the characterization of hydrological systems. In our study, we used data that were simulated by virtue of a well-established hydrological model. This gave us a very large yet realistic dataset, both in time and space, from which we could infer the relative impact of different factors on travel-time behavior. These were, in particular, meteorological (precipitation), land surface (land cover, leaf-area index) and subsurface (soil) properties.
Alraune Zech and Sabine Attinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1655–1667, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1655-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1655-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
A new method is presented which allows interpreting pumping test in heterogeneous transmissivity fields. Based on radially dependent transmissivity, the effective well flow solution is derived for two cases: the ensemble mean of pumping tests and the drawdown at an individual heterogeneous transmissivity field. The analytical form of the solution allows inversely estimating the parameters of aquifer heterogeneity (mean, variance, and correlation length) from steady-state pumping test data.
Related subject area
Hydrology
The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2e: description and evaluation of modifications and new features
Generalised drought index: a novel multi-scale daily approach for drought assessment
Development and performance of a high-resolution surface wave and storm surge forecast model: application to a large lake
Deep dive into hydrologic simulations at global scale: harnessing the power of deep learning and physics-informed differentiable models (δHBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)
PyEt v1.3.1: a Python package for the estimation of potential evapotranspiration
Prediction of hysteretic matric potential dynamics using artificial intelligence: application of autoencoder neural networks
Regionalization in global hydrological models and its impact on runoff simulations: a case study using WaterGAP3 (v 1.0.0)
SERGHEI v2.0: introducing a performance-portable, high-performance three-dimensional variably-saturated subsurface flow solver (SERGHEI-RE)
Virtual joint field campaign: a framework of synthetic landscapes to assess multiscale measurement methods of water storage
STORM v.2: A simple, stochastic rainfall model for exploring the impacts of climate and climate change at and near the land surface in gauged watersheds
Fluvial flood inundation and socio-economic impact model based on open data
RoGeR v3.0.5 – a process-based hydrological toolbox model in Python
Coupling a large-scale glacier and hydrological model (OGGM v1.5.3 and CWatM V1.08) – towards an improved representation of mountain water resources in global assessments
An open-source refactoring of the Canadian Small Lakes Model for estimates of evaporation from medium-sized reservoirs
EvalHyd v0.1.2: a polyglot tool for the evaluation of deterministic and probabilistic streamflow predictions
Modelling water quantity and quality for integrated water cycle management with the Water Systems Integrated Modelling framework (WSIMOD) software
HGS-PDAF (version 1.0): a modular data assimilation framework for an integrated surface and subsurface hydrological model
Wflow_sbm v0.7.3, a spatially distributed hydrological model: from global data to local applications
Reservoir Assessment Tool version 3.0: a scalable and user-friendly software platform to mobilize the global water management community
HydroFATE (v1): a high-resolution contaminant fate model for the global river system
Validation of a new global irrigation scheme in the land surface model ORCHIDEE v2.2
GPEP v1.0: the Geospatial Probabilistic Estimation Package to support Earth science applications
GEMS v1.0: Generalizable Empirical Model of Snow Accumulation and Melt, based on daily snow mass changes in response to climate and topographic drivers
mesas.py v1.0: a flexible Python package for modeling solute transport and transit times using StorAge Selection functions
rSHUD v2.0: advancing the Simulator for Hydrologic Unstructured Domains and unstructured hydrological modeling in the R environment
GLOBGM v1.0: a parallel implementation of a 30 arcsec PCR-GLOBWB-MODFLOW global-scale groundwater model
Development of inter-grid-cell lateral unsaturated and saturated flow model in the E3SM Land Model (v2.0)
Selecting a conceptual hydrological model using Bayes' factors computed with Replica Exchange Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Thermodynamic Integration
pyESDv1.0.1: an open-source Python framework for empirical-statistical downscaling of climate information
Representing the impact of Rhizophora mangroves on flow in a hydrodynamic model (COAWST_rh v1.0): the importance of three-dimensional root system structures
Dynamically weighted ensemble of geoscientific models via automated machine-learning-based classification
Enhancing the representation of water management in global hydrological models
NEOPRENE v1.0.1: a Python library for generating spatial rainfall based on the Neyman–Scott process
Uncertainty estimation for a new exponential-filter-based long-term root-zone soil moisture dataset from Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) surface observations
Validating the Nernst–Planck transport model under reaction-driven flow conditions using RetroPy v1.0
DynQual v1.0: a high-resolution global surface water quality model
Data space inversion for efficient uncertainty quantification using an integrated surface and sub-surface hydrologic model
Simulation of crop yield using the global hydrological model H08 (crp.v1)
How is a global sensitivity analysis of a catchment-scale, distributed pesticide transfer model performed? Application to the PESHMELBA model
iHydroSlide3D v1.0: an advanced hydrological–geotechnical model for hydrological simulation and three-dimensional landslide prediction
GEB v0.1: a large-scale agent-based socio-hydrological model – simulating 10 million individual farming households in a fully distributed hydrological model
Tracing and visualisation of contributing water sources in the LISFLOOD-FP model of flood inundation (within CAESAR-Lisflood version 1.9j-WS)
Continental-scale evaluation of a fully distributed coupled land surface and groundwater model, ParFlow-CLM (v3.6.0), over Europe
Evaluating a global soil moisture dataset from a multitask model (GSM3 v1.0) with potential applications for crop threats
SERGHEI (SERGHEI-SWE) v1.0: a performance-portable high-performance parallel-computing shallow-water solver for hydrology and environmental hydraulics
A simple, efficient, mass-conservative approach to solving Richards' equation (openRE, v1.0)
Customized deep learning for precipitation bias correction and downscaling
Implementation and sensitivity analysis of the Dam-Reservoir OPeration model (DROP v1.0) over Spain
Regional coupled surface–subsurface hydrological model fitting based on a spatially distributed minimalist reduction of frequency domain discharge data
Operational water forecast ability of the HRRR-iSnobal combination: an evaluation to adapt into production environments
Hannes Müller Schmied, Tim Trautmann, Sebastian Ackermann, Denise Cáceres, Martina Flörke, Helena Gerdener, Ellen Kynast, Thedini Asali Peiris, Leonie Schiebener, Maike Schumacher, and Petra Döll
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8817–8852, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8817-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8817-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Assessing water availability and water use at the global scale is challenging but essential for a range of purposes. We describe the newest version of the global hydrological model WaterGAP, which has been used for numerous water resource assessments since 1996. We show the effects of new model features, as well as model evaluations, against water abstraction statistics and observed streamflow and water storage anomalies. The publicly available model output for several variants is described.
João António Martins Careto, Rita Margarida Cardoso, Ana Russo, Daniela Catarina André Lima, and Pedro Miguel Matos Soares
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8115–8139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8115-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8115-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study proposes a new daily drought index, the generalised drought index (GDI). The GDI not only identifies the same events as established indices but is also capable of improving their results. The index is empirically based and easy to compute, not requiring fitting the data to a probability distribution. The GDI can detect flash droughts and longer-term events, making it a versatile tool for drought monitoring.
Laura L. Swatridge, Ryan P. Mulligan, Leon Boegman, and Shiliang Shan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7751–7766, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7751-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7751-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We develop an operational forecast system, Coastlines-LO, that can simulate water levels and surface waves in Lake Ontario driven by forecasts of wind speeds and pressure fields from an atmospheric model. The model has relatively low computational requirements, and results compare well with near-real-time observations, as well as with results from other existing forecast systems. Results show that with shorter forecast lengths, storm surge and wave predictions can improve in accuracy.
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Jens de Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Yoshihide Wada, Jiangtao Liu, Ming Pan, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7181–7198, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate hydrologic modeling is vital to characterizing water cycle responses to climate change. For the first time at this scale, we use differentiable physics-informed machine learning hydrologic models to simulate rainfall–runoff processes for 3753 basins around the world and compare them with purely data-driven and traditional modeling approaches. This sets a benchmark for hydrologic estimates around the world and builds foundations for improving global hydrologic simulations.
Matevž Vremec, Raoul A. Collenteur, and Steffen Birk
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7083–7103, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Geoscientists commonly use various potential evapotranpiration (PET) formulas for environmental studies, which can be prone to errors and sensitive to climate change. PyEt, a tested and open-source Python package, simplifies the application of 20 PET methods for both time series and gridded data, ensuring accurate and consistent PET estimations suitable for a wide range of environmental applications.
Nedal Aqel, Lea Reusser, Stephan Margreth, Andrea Carminati, and Peter Lehmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6949–6966, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The soil water potential (SWP) determines various soil water processes. Since remote sensing techniques cannot measure it directly, it is often deduced from volumetric water content (VWC) information. However, under dynamic field conditions, the relationship between SWP and VWC is highly ambiguous due to different factors that cannot be modeled with the classical approach. Applying a deep neural network with an autoencoder enables the prediction of the dynamic SWP.
Jenny Kupzig, Nina Kupzig, and Martina Flörke
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6819–6846, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6819-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6819-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Valid simulation results from global hydrological models (GHMs) are essential, e.g., to studying climate change impacts. Adapting GHMs to ungauged basins requires regionalization, enabling valid simulations. In this study, we highlight the impact of regionalization of GHMs on runoff simulations using an ensemble of regionalization methods for WaterGAP3. We have found that regionalization leads to temporally and spatially varying uncertainty, potentially reaching up to inter-model differences.
Zhi Li, Gregor Rickert, Na Zheng, Zhibo Zhang, Ilhan Özgen-Xian, and Daniel Caviedes-Voullième
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2588, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2588, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce SERGHEI-RE, a 3D subsurface flow simulator with performance-portable parallel computing capabilities. SERGHEI-RE performs effectively on various computational devices, from personal computers to advanced clusters. It allows users to solve flow equations with multiple numerical schemes, making it adaptable to various hydrological scenarios. Testing results show its accuracy and performance, confirming that SERGHEI-RE is a powerful tool for hydrological research.
Till Francke, Cosimo Brogi, Alby Duarte Rocha, Michael Förster, Maik Heistermann, Markus Köhli, Daniel Rasche, Marvin Reich, Paul Schattan, Lena Scheiffele, and Martin Schrön
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-106, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-106, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Multiple methods for measuring soil moisture beyond the point scale exist. Their validation generally hindered by lack of knowing the truth. We propose a virtual framework, in which this truth is fully known and the sensor observations for Cosmic Ray Neutron Sensing, Remote Sensing, and Hydrogravimetry are simulated. This allows the rigourous testing of these virtual sensors to understand their effectiveness and limitations.
Manuel F. Rios Gaona, Katerina Michaelides, and Michael Bliss Singer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5387–5412, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5387-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5387-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
STORM v.2 (short for STOchastic Rainfall Model version 2.0) is an open-source and user-friendly modelling framework for simulating rainfall fields over a basin. It also allows simulating the impact of plausible climate change either on the total seasonal rainfall or the storm’s maximum intensity.
Lukas Riedel, Thomas Röösli, Thomas Vogt, and David N. Bresch
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5291–5308, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5291-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5291-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
River floods are among the most devastating natural hazards. We propose a flood model with a statistical approach based on openly available data. The model is integrated in a framework for estimating impacts of physical hazards. Although the model only agrees moderately with satellite-detected flood extents, we show that it can be used for forecasting the magnitude of flood events in terms of socio-economic impacts and for comparing these with past events.
Robin Schwemmle, Hannes Leistert, Andreas Steinbrich, and Markus Weiler
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5249–5262, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5249-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The new process-based hydrological toolbox model, RoGeR (https://roger.readthedocs.io/), can be used to estimate the components of the hydrological cycle and the related travel times of pollutants through parts of the hydrological cycle. These estimations may contribute to effective water resources management. This paper presents the toolbox concept and provides a simple example of providing estimations to water resources management.
Sarah Hanus, Lilian Schuster, Peter Burek, Fabien Maussion, Yoshihide Wada, and Daniel Viviroli
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5123–5144, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5123-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5123-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a coupling of the large-scale glacier model OGGM and the hydrological model CWatM. Projected future increase in discharge is less strong while future decrease in discharge is stronger when glacier runoff is explicitly included in the large-scale hydrological model. This is because glacier runoff is projected to decrease in nearly all basins. We conclude that an improved glacier representation can prevent underestimating future discharge changes in large river basins.
M. Graham Clark and Sean K. Carey
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4911–4922, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4911-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4911-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides validation of the Canadian Small Lakes Model (CSLM) for estimating evaporation rates from reservoirs and a refactoring of the original FORTRAN code into MATLAB and Python, which are now stored in GitHub repositories. Here we provide direct observations of the surface energy exchange obtained with an eddy covariance system to validate the CSLM. There was good agreement between observations and estimations except under specific atmospheric conditions when evaporation is low.
Thibault Hallouin, François Bourgin, Charles Perrin, Maria-Helena Ramos, and Vazken Andréassian
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4561–4578, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4561-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4561-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The evaluation of the quality of hydrological model outputs against streamflow observations is widespread in the hydrological literature. In order to improve on the reproducibility of published studies, a new evaluation tool dedicated to hydrological applications is presented. It is open source and usable in a variety of programming languages to make it as accessible as possible to the community. Thus, authors and readers alike can use the same tool to produce and reproduce the results.
Barnaby Dobson, Leyang Liu, and Ana Mijic
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4495–4513, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4495-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Water management is challenging when models don't capture the entire water cycle. We propose that using integrated models facilitates management and improves understanding. We introduce a software tool designed for this task. We discuss its foundation, how it simulates water system components and their interactions, and its customisation. We provide a flexible way to represent water systems, and we hope it will inspire more research and practical applications for sustainable water management.
Qi Tang, Hugo Delottier, Wolfgang Kurtz, Lars Nerger, Oliver S. Schilling, and Philip Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3559–3578, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3559-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3559-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a new data assimilation framework by coupling an integrated hydrological model HydroGeoSphere with the data assimilation software PDAF. Compared to existing hydrological data assimilation systems, the advantage of our newly developed framework lies in its consideration of the physically based model; its large selection of different assimilation algorithms; and its modularity with respect to the combination of different types of observations, states and parameters.
Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, Martijn Visser, Joost Buitink, Ruben O. Imhoff, Hélène Boisgontier, Laurène Bouaziz, Dirk Eilander, Mark Hegnauer, Corine ten Velden, and Bobby Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3199–3234, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present the wflow_sbm distributed hydrological model, recently released by Deltares, as part of the Wflow.jl open-source modelling framework in the programming language Julia. Wflow_sbm has a fast runtime, making it suitable for large-scale modelling. Wflow_sbm models can be set a priori for any catchment with the Python tool HydroMT-Wflow based on globally available datasets, which results in satisfactory to good performance (without much tuning). We show this for a number of specific cases.
Sanchit Minocha, Faisal Hossain, Pritam Das, Sarath Suresh, Shahzaib Khan, George Darkwah, Hyongki Lee, Stefano Galelli, Konstantinos Andreadis, and Perry Oddo
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3137–3156, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3137-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3137-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Reservoir Assessment Tool (RAT) merges satellite data with hydrological models, enabling robust estimation of reservoir parameters like inflow, outflow, surface area, and storage changes around the world. Version 3.0 of RAT lowers the barrier of entry for new users and achieves scalability and computational efficiency. RAT 3.0 also facilitates open-source development of functions for continuous improvement to mobilize and empower the global water management community.
Heloisa Ehalt Macedo, Bernhard Lehner, Jim Nicell, and Günther Grill
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2877–2899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Treated and untreated wastewaters are sources of contaminants of emerging concern. HydroFATE, a new global model, estimates their concentrations in surface waters, identifying streams that are most at risk and guiding monitoring/mitigation efforts to safeguard aquatic ecosystems and human health. Model predictions were validated against field measurements of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole, with predicted concentrations exceeding ecological thresholds in more than 400 000 km of rivers worldwide.
Pedro Felipe Arboleda-Obando, Agnès Ducharne, Zun Yin, and Philippe Ciais
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2141–2164, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2141-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We show a new irrigation scheme included in the ORCHIDEE land surface model. The new irrigation scheme restrains irrigation due to water shortage, includes water adduction, and represents environmental limits and facilities to access water, due to representing infrastructure in a simple way. Our results show that the new irrigation scheme helps simulate acceptable land surface conditions and fluxes in irrigated areas, even if there are difficulties due to shortcomings and limited information.
Guoqiang Tang, Andrew W. Wood, Andrew J. Newman, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon Michael Papalexiou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1153–1173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ensemble geophysical datasets are crucial for understanding uncertainties and supporting probabilistic estimation/prediction. However, open-access tools for creating these datasets are limited. We have developed the Python-based Geospatial Probabilistic Estimation Package (GPEP). Through several experiments, we demonstrate GPEP's ability to estimate precipitation, temperature, and snow water equivalent. GPEP will be a useful tool to support uncertainty analysis in Earth science applications.
Atabek Umirbekov, Richard Essery, and Daniel Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 911–929, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-911-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a parsimonious snow model which simulates snow mass without the need for extensive calibration. The model is based on a machine learning algorithm that has been trained on diverse set of daily observations of snow accumulation or melt, along with corresponding climate and topography data. We validated the model using in situ data from numerous new locations. The model provides a promising solution for accurate snow mass estimation across regions where in situ data are limited.
Ciaran J. Harman and Esther Xu Fei
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 477–495, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-477-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Over the last 10 years, scientists have developed StorAge Selection: a new way of modeling how material is transported through complex systems. Here, we present some new, easy-to-use, flexible, and very accurate code for implementing this method. We show that, in cases where we know exactly what the answer should be, our code gets the right answer. We also show that our code is closer than some other codes to the right answer in an important way: it conserves mass.
Lele Shu, Paul Ullrich, Xianhong Meng, Christopher Duffy, Hao Chen, and Zhaoguo Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 497–527, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-497-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-497-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our team developed rSHUD v2.0, a toolkit that simplifies the use of the SHUD, a model simulating water movement in the environment. We demonstrated its effectiveness in two watersheds, one in the USA and one in China. The toolkit also facilitated the creation of the Global Hydrological Data Cloud, a platform for automatic data processing and model deployment, marking a significant advancement in hydrological research.
Jarno Verkaik, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Gualbert H. P. Oude Essink, Hai Xiang Lin, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 275–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-275-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-275-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the parallel PCR-GLOBWB global-scale groundwater model at 30 arcsec resolution (~1 km at the Equator). Named GLOBGM v1.0, this model is a follow-up of the 5 arcmin (~10 km) model, aiming for a higher-resolution simulation of worldwide fresh groundwater reserves under climate change and excessive pumping. For a long transient simulation using a parallel prototype of MODFLOW 6, we show that our implementation is efficient for a relatively low number of processor cores.
Han Qiu, Gautam Bisht, Lingcheng Li, Dalei Hao, and Donghui Xu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 143–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed and validated an inter-grid-cell lateral groundwater flow model for both saturated and unsaturated zone in the ELMv2.0 framework. The developed model was benchmarked against PFLOTRAN, a 3D subsurface flow and transport model and showed comparable performance with PFLOTRAN. The developed model was also applied to the Little Washita experimental watershed. The spatial pattern of simulated groundwater table depth agreed well with the global groundwater table benchmark dataset.
Damian N. Mingo, Remko Nijzink, Christophe Ley, and Jack S. Hale
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2865, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2865, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologists are often faced with selecting amongst a set of competing models with different numbers of parameters and ability to fit available data. The Bayes’ factor is a tool that can be used to compare models, however it is very difficult to compute the Bayes’ factor numerically. In our paper we explore and develop highly efficient algorithms for computing the Bayes’ factor of hydrological systems, which will bring this useful tool for selecting models to everyday hydrological practice.
Daniel Boateng and Sebastian G. Mutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6479–6514, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6479-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6479-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present an open-source Python framework for performing empirical-statistical downscaling of climate information, such as precipitation. The user-friendly package comprises all the downscaling cycles including data preparation, model selection, training, and evaluation, designed in an efficient and flexible manner, allowing for quick and reproducible downscaling products. The framework would contribute to climate change impact assessments by generating accurate high-resolution climate data.
Masaya Yoshikai, Takashi Nakamura, Eugene C. Herrera, Rempei Suwa, Rene Rollon, Raghab Ray, Keita Furukawa, and Kazuo Nadaoka
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5847–5863, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5847-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5847-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Due to complex root system structures, representing the impacts of Rhizophora mangroves on flow in hydrodynamic models has been challenging. This study presents a new drag and turbulence model that leverages an empirical model for root systems. The model can be applied without rigorous measurements of root structures and showed high performance in flow simulations; this may provide a better understanding of hydrodynamics and related transport processes in Rhizophora mangrove forests.
Hao Chen, Tiejun Wang, Yonggen Zhang, Yun Bai, and Xi Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5685–5701, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5685-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5685-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Effectively assembling multiple models for approaching a benchmark solution remains a long-standing issue for various geoscience domains. We here propose an automated machine learning-assisted ensemble framework (AutoML-Ens) that attempts to resolve this challenge. Results demonstrate the great potential of AutoML-Ens for improving estimations due to its two unique features, i.e., assigning dynamic weights for candidate models and taking full advantage of AutoML-assisted workflow.
Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Fuqiang Tian, Thomas Wild, Mengqi Zhao, Sean Turner, A. F. M. Kamal Chowdhury, Chris R. Vernon, Hongchang Hu, Yuan Zhuang, Mohamad Hejazi, and Hong-Yi Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5449–5472, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5449-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5449-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Most existing global hydrologic models do not explicitly represent hydropower reservoirs. We are introducing a new water management module to Xanthos that distinguishes between the operational characteristics of irrigation, hydropower, and flood control reservoirs. We show that this explicit representation of hydropower reservoirs can lead to a significantly more realistic simulation of reservoir storage and releases in over 44 % of the hydropower reservoirs included in this study.
Javier Diez-Sierra, Salvador Navas, and Manuel del Jesus
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5035–5048, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5035-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5035-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
NEOPRENE is an open-source, freely available library allowing scientists and practitioners to generate synthetic time series and maps of rainfall. These outputs will help to explore plausible events that were never observed in the past but may occur in the near future and to generate possible future events under climate change conditions. The paper shows how to use the library to downscale daily precipitation and how to use synthetic generation to improve our characterization of extreme events.
Adam Pasik, Alexander Gruber, Wolfgang Preimesberger, Domenico De Santis, and Wouter Dorigo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4957–4976, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4957-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4957-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We apply the exponential filter (EF) method to satellite soil moisture retrievals to estimate the water content in the unobserved root zone globally from 2002–2020. Quality assessment against an independent dataset shows satisfactory results. Error characterization is carried out using the standard uncertainty propagation law and empirically estimated values of EF model structural uncertainty and parameter uncertainty. This is followed by analysis of temporal uncertainty variations.
Po-Wei Huang, Bernd Flemisch, Chao-Zhong Qin, Martin O. Saar, and Anozie Ebigbo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4767–4791, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4767-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4767-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Water in natural environments consists of many ions. Ions are electrically charged and exert electric forces on each other. We discuss whether the electric forces are relevant in describing mixing and reaction processes in natural environments. By comparing our computer simulations to lab experiments in literature, we show that the electric interactions between ions can play an essential role in mixing and reaction processes, in which case they should not be neglected in numerical modeling.
Edward R. Jones, Marc F. P. Bierkens, Niko Wanders, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Ludovicus P. H. van Beek, and Michelle T. H. van Vliet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4481–4500, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
DynQual is a new high-resolution global water quality model for simulating total dissolved solids, biological oxygen demand and fecal coliform as indicators of salinity, organic pollution and pathogen pollution, respectively. Output data from DynQual can supplement the observational record of water quality data, which is highly fragmented across space and time, and has the potential to inform assessments in a broad range of fields including ecological, human health and water scarcity studies.
Hugo Delottier, John Doherty, and Philip Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4213–4231, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4213-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4213-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Long run times are usually a barrier to the quantification and reduction of predictive uncertainty with complex hydrological models. Data space inversion (DSI) provides an alternative and highly model-run-efficient method for uncertainty quantification. This paper demonstrates DSI's ability to robustly quantify predictive uncertainty and extend the methodology to provide practical metrics that can guide data acquisition and analysis to achieve goals of decision-support modelling.
Zhipin Ai and Naota Hanasaki
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3275–3290, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3275-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3275-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Simultaneously simulating food production and the requirements and availability of water resources in a spatially explicit manner within a single framework remains challenging on a global scale. Here, we successfully enhanced the global hydrological model H08 that considers human water use and management to simulate the yields of four major staple crops: maize, wheat, rice, and soybean. Our improved model will be beneficial for advancing global food–water nexus studies in the future.
Emilie Rouzies, Claire Lauvernet, Bruno Sudret, and Arthur Vidard
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3137–3163, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3137-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3137-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Water and pesticide transfer models are complex and should be simplified to be used in decision support. Indeed, these models simulate many spatial processes in interaction, involving a large number of parameters. Sensitivity analysis allows us to select the most influential input parameters, but it has to be adapted to spatial modelling. This study will identify relevant methods that can be transposed to any hydrological and water quality model and improve the fate of pesticide knowledge.
Guoding Chen, Ke Zhang, Sheng Wang, Yi Xia, and Lijun Chao
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2915–2937, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2915-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2915-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we developed a novel modeling system called iHydroSlide3D v1.0 by coupling a modified a 3D landslide model with a distributed hydrology model. The model is able to apply flexibly different simulating resolutions for hydrological and slope stability submodules and gain a high computational efficiency through parallel computation. The test results in the Yuehe River basin, China, show a good predicative capability for cascading flood–landslide events.
Jens A. de Bruijn, Mikhail Smilovic, Peter Burek, Luca Guillaumot, Yoshihide Wada, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2437–2454, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2437-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2437-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a computer simulation model of the hydrological system and human system, which can simulate the behaviour of individual farmers and their interactions with the water system at basin scale to assess how the systems have evolved and are projected to evolve in the future. For example, we can simulate the effect of subsidies provided on investment in adaptation measures and subsequent effects in the hydrological system, such as a lowering of the groundwater table or reservoir level.
Matthew D. Wilson and Thomas J. Coulthard
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2415–2436, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2415-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2415-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
During flooding, the sources of water that inundate a location can influence impacts such as pollution. However, methods to trace water sources in flood events are currently only available in complex, computationally expensive hydraulic models. We propose a simplified method which can be added to efficient, reduced-complexity model codes, enabling an improved understanding of flood dynamics and its impacts. We demonstrate its application for three sites at a range of spatial and temporal scales.
Bibi S. Naz, Wendy Sharples, Yueling Ma, Klaus Goergen, and Stefan Kollet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1617–1639, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
It is challenging to apply a high-resolution integrated land surface and groundwater model over large spatial scales. In this paper, we demonstrate the application of such a model over a pan-European domain at 3 km resolution and perform an extensive evaluation of simulated water states and fluxes by comparing with in situ and satellite data. This study can serve as a benchmark and baseline for future studies of climate change impact projections and for hydrological forecasting.
Jiangtao Liu, David Hughes, Farshid Rahmani, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1553–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Under-monitored regions like Africa need high-quality soil moisture predictions to help with food production, but it is not clear if soil moisture processes are similar enough around the world for data-driven models to maintain accuracy. We present a deep-learning-based soil moisture model that learns from both in situ data and satellite data and performs better than satellite products at the global scale. These results help us apply our model globally while better understanding its limitations.
Daniel Caviedes-Voullième, Mario Morales-Hernández, Matthew R. Norman, and Ilhan Özgen-Xian
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 977–1008, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the SERGHEI framework and a solver for shallow-water problems. Such models, often used for surface flow and flood modelling, are computationally intense. In recent years the trends to increase computational power have changed, requiring models to adapt to new hardware and new software paradigms. SERGHEI addresses these challenges, allowing surface flow simulation to be enabled on the newest and upcoming consumer hardware and supercomputers very efficiently.
Andrew M. Ireson, Raymond J. Spiteri, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon A. Mathias
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 659–677, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Richards' equation (RE) is used to describe the movement and storage of water in a soil profile and is a component of many hydrological and earth-system models. Solving RE numerically is challenging due to the non-linearities in the properties. Here, we present a simple but effective and mass-conservative solution to solving RE, which is ideal for teaching/learning purposes but also useful in prototype models that are used to explore alternative process representations.
Fang Wang, Di Tian, and Mark Carroll
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 535–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-535-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Gridded precipitation datasets suffer from biases and coarse resolutions. We developed a customized deep learning (DL) model to bias-correct and downscale gridded precipitation data using radar observations. The results showed that the customized DL model can generate improved precipitation at fine resolutions where regular DL and statistical methods experience challenges. The new model can be used to improve precipitation estimates, especially for capturing extremes at smaller scales.
Malak Sadki, Simon Munier, Aaron Boone, and Sophie Ricci
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 427–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-427-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Predicting water resource evolution is a key challenge for the coming century.
Anthropogenic impacts on water resources, and particularly the effects of dams and reservoirs on river flows, are still poorly known and generally neglected in global hydrological studies. A parameterized reservoir model is reproduced to compute monthly releases in Spanish anthropized river basins. For global application, an exhaustive sensitivity analysis of the model parameters is performed on flows and volumes.
Nicolas Flipo, Nicolas Gallois, and Jonathan Schuite
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 353–381, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-353-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-353-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A new approach is proposed to fit hydrological or land surface models, which suffer from large uncertainties in terms of water partitioning between fast runoff and slow infiltration from small watersheds to regional or continental river basins. It is based on the analysis of hydrosystem behavior in the frequency domain, which serves as a basis for estimating water flows in the time domain with a physically based model. It opens the way to significant breakthroughs in hydrological modeling.
Joachim Meyer, John Horel, Patrick Kormos, Andrew Hedrick, Ernesto Trujillo, and S. McKenzie Skiles
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 233–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Freshwater resupply from seasonal snow in the mountains is changing. Current water prediction methods from snow rely on historical data excluding the change and can lead to errors. This work presented and evaluated an alternative snow-physics-based approach. The results in a test watershed were promising, and future improvements were identified. Adaptation to current forecast environments would improve resilience to the seasonal snow changes and helps ensure the accuracy of resupply forecasts.
Cited articles
Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A.: Handbook of mathematical
functions, 10th edn., Dover Publications, New York, ISBN 978-0-486-61272-0, 1972. a
Attinger, S.: Generalized coarse graining procedures for flow in porous media,
Computat. Geosci., 7, 253–273,
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COMG.0000005243.73381.e3, 2003. a
Banerjee, S., Carlin, B. P., and Gelfand, A. E.: Hierarchical Modeling and
Analysis for Spatial Data, 2 edn., Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, https://doi.org/10.1201/b17115,
2014. a
Bayer, P., Huggenberger, P., Renard, P., and Comunian, A.: Three-dimensional
high resolution fluvio-glacial aquifer analog: Part 1: Field study, J.
Hydrol., 405, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.038, 2011. a
Beg, M., Taka, J., Kluyver, T., Konovalov, A., Ragan-Kelley, M., Thiéry,
N. M., and Fangohr, H.: Using Jupyter for Reproducible Scientific
Workflows, in: Computing in Science
Engineering, Computing in Science Engineering, 23, 36–46,
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2021.3052101, 2021. a
Behnel, S., Bradshaw, R., Citro, C., Dalcin, L., Seljebotn, D. S., and Smith,
K.: Cython: The Best of Both Worlds, in: Computing in Science Engineering, Computing in Science
Engineering, 13, 31–39, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2010.118, 2011. a
Bellin, A. and Rubin, Y.: HYDRO_GEN: A spatially distributed random field
generator for correlated properties, Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul., 10,
253–278, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581869,
1996. a
Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R.: An Analysis of Transformations, J.
Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 26, 211–243,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x, 1964. a, b
Brouste, A., Istas, J., and Lambert-Lacroix, S.: On Fractional Gaussian
Random Fields Simulations, J. Stat. Softw., 23, 1–23,
https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v023.i01, 2008. a
Carle, S. F.: T-PROGS: Transition probability geostatistical software,
version 2.1, Tech. Rep., University of California, Davis, http://gmsdocs.aquaveo.com/t-progs.pdf (last access: 31 March 2022), 1999. a
Cecinati, F., Wani, O., and Rico-Ramirez, M. A.: Comparing Approaches to
Deal With Non-Gaussianity of Rainfall Data in Kriging-Based
Radar-Gauge Rainfall Merging, Water Resour. Res., 53,
8999–9018, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020330, 2017. a, b
Chilès, J.-P. and Delfiner, P.: Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial
Uncertainty, second edn., Wiley Series in Probability and
Statistics, edited by: Balding, D. J., Cressie, N. A. C.,
Fitzmaurice, G. M., Goldstein, H., Johnstone, I. M., Molenberghs, G.,
Scott, D. W., Smith, A. F. M., Tsay, R. S., and Weisberg, S., John Wiley & Sons, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118136188, 2012. a, b
Cirpka, O. A. and Valocchi, A. J.: Debates – Stochastic subsurface
hydrology from theory to practice: Does stochastic subsurface hydrology
help solving practical problems of contaminant hydrogeology?, Water Resour.
Res., 52, 9218–9227, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019087, 2016. a
conda-forge community: The conda-forge Project: Community-based Software
Distribution Built on the conda Package Format and Ecosystem,
Zenodo [software], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4774217, 2015. a
Cressie, N. and Wikle, C. K.: Statistics for spatio-temporal data, Wiley
Series in Probability and Statistics, 1st edn., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New
Jersey, ISBN 978-0-471-69274-4, 2011. a
Dagan, G.: Flow and Transport in Porous Formations, 1st edn., Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75015-1, 1989. a
Di Federico, V. and Neuman, S. P.: Scaling of random fields by means of
truncated power variograms and associated spectra, Water Resour. Res.,
33, 1075–1085, https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR00299, 1997. a, b, c
Diggle, P. and Ribeiro, P. J.: Model-based Geostatistics, Springer Series
in Statistics, 1st edn., Springer-Verlag, New York, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48536-2,
2007. a
Eliason, S. R.: Maximum likelihood estimation: Logic and practice, Sage
Publications, 1st edn., Thousand Oaks, CA, US, ISBN 9781506315904, 1993. a
Emery, X.: Testing the correctness of the sequential algorithm for simulating
Gaussian random fields, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk
A., 18, 401–413, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0211-7, 2004. a
Fiori, A., Cvetkovic, V., Dagan, G., Attinger, S., Bellin, A., Dietrich, P.,
Zech, A., and Teutsch, G.: Debates – Stochastic subsurface hydrology from
theory to practice: The relevance of stochastic subsurface hydrology to
practical problems of contaminant transport and remediation. What is
characterization and stochastic theory good for?, Water Resour. Res.,
52, 9228–9234, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017525, 2016. a
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., and Goodman, J.: emcee: The MCMC
Hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 125,
306–312, https://doi.org/10.1086/670067, 2013. a
Goldstein, H.: Classical mechanics, 2nd edn., Addison-Wesley, ISBN 9780201029185, 1980. a
Gong, R., Haslauer, C. P., Chen, Y., and Luo, J.: Analytical relationship
between Gaussian and transformed-Gaussian spatially distributed fields,
Water Resour. Res., 49, 1735–1740, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20143, 2013. a
Goovaerts, P.: Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and
perspectives, Geoderma, 89, 1–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00078-0, 1999. a
Gutzmann, B., Motl, A., Lassahn, D., Kamenshchikov, I., Bachmann, M., and
Schrammel, M.: earthobservations/wetterdienst: v0.18.0, Zenodo [software],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4737739, 2021. a
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P.,
Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R.,
Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A.,
Fernández del Río, J., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., Gérard-Marchant, P.,
Sheppard, K., Reddy, T., Weckesser, W., Abbasi, H., Gohlke, C., and Oliphant,
T. E.: Array programming with NumPy, Nature, 585, 357–362,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2, 2020. a
Heße, F., Prykhodko, V., Schlüter, S., and Attinger, S.: Generating random
fields with a truncated power-law variogram: A comparison of several
numerical methods, Environ. Modell. Softw., 55, 32–48,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.013, 2014. a, b, c
Hohn, M.: Geostatistics and Petroleum Geology, Computer Methods in the
Geosciences, 2 edn., Springer Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4425-4,
1999. a
John, J. A. and Draper, N. R.: An Alternative Family of Transformations,
J. Roy. Stat. Soc. C-App., 29,
190–197, https://doi.org/10.2307/2986305, 1980. a
Kolditz, O., Bauer, S., Bilke, L., Böttcher, N., Delfs, J.-O., Fischer, T.,
Görke, U. J., Kalbacher, T., Kosakowski, G., McDermott, C. I., Park, C. H.,
Radu, F., Rink, K., Shao, H., Shao, H. B., Sun, F., Sun, Y. Y., Singh, A. K.,
Taron, J., Walther, M., Wang, W., Watanabe, N., Wu, Y., Xie, M., Xu, W., and
Zehner, B.: OpenGeoSys: An open-source initiative for numerical
simulation of thermo-hydro-mechanical/chemical (THM/C) processes in
porous media, Environ. Earth Sci., 67, 589–599,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1546-x, 2012. a
Kraichnan, R.: Diffusion by a Random Velocity Field, Phys. Fluids, 13,
22–31, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1692799, 1970. a, b, c
Krige, D. G.: A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on
the Witwatersrand, J. S. Afr. I. Min.
Metall., 52, 119–139, 1951. a
Lantuéjoul, C., Freulon, X., and Renard, D.: Spectral Simulation of
Isotropic Gaussian Random Fields on a Sphere, Math.
Geosci., 51, 999–1020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-019-09799-4, 2019. a
Mälicke, M.: SciKit-GStat 1.0: a SciPy-flavored geostatistical variogram estimation toolbox written in Python, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2505–2532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2505-2022, 2022. a, b
Manly, B. F. J.: Exponential Data Transformations, J. Roy.
Stat. Soc. D-Sta., 25, 37–42,
https://doi.org/10.2307/2988129, 1976. a
Matheron, G.: Traité de géostatistique appliquée, no. 14 in Mémoires du
BRGM, Editions Technip, Tome II: le krigeage, no 24, Editions BRGM, Paris, 1962. a
Mohammadi, H., Riche, R. L., Durrande, N., Touboul, E., and Bay, X.: An
analytic comparison of regularization methods for Gaussian Processes, arXiv [preprint], arXiv:1602.00853, 5 May 2017. a
Monestiez, P., Petrenko, A., Leredde, Y., and Ongari, B.: Geostatistical
analysis of three dimensional current patterns in coastal oceanography:
Application to the gulf of lions (NW mediterranean sea), in: geoENV
IV – Geostatistics for environmental applications, edited by:
Sanchez-Vila, X., Carrera, J., and Gómez-Hernández, J. J., pp. 367–378,
Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2115-1_31, 2004. a
Müller, S.: GeoStat – Examples/gstools-temperature-trend: v1.0, Zenodo [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5159728, 2021. a, b, c
Müller, S. and Schüler, L.: GeoStat – Framework/GSTools: v1.3.5 “Pure
Pink”, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5883346, 2021. a, b
Müller, S. and Zech, A.:
GeoStat – Examples/gstools-connectivity-and-transport: v1.0, Zenodo [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5159578, 2021a. a, b, c
Müller, S. and Zech, A.: GeoStat – Examples/gstools-pumping-test-ensemble:
v1.0, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4891875, 2021b. a, b, c
Müller, S., Zech, A., and Heße, F.: ogs5py: A Python – API for the
OpenGeoSys 5 Scientific Modeling Package, Groundwater, 59, 117–122,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13017, 2020. a, b, c
Müller, S., Heße, F., Attinger, S., and Zech, A.: The extended generalized radial flow model and effective
conductivity for truncated power law variograms, Adv. Water Resour., 156, 104027, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104027,
2021a. a, b
Müller, S., Leven, C., Dietrich, P., Attinger, S., and Zech, A.: How to Find
Aquifer Statistics Utilizing Pumping Tests? Two Field Studies
Using welltestpy, Groundwater, 60, 137–144, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13121,
2021b. a
Murphy, B., Müller, S., and Yurchak, R.: GeoStat-Framework/PyKrige:
v1.6.0, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4661732, 2021. a, b
Murray, S. G. and Poulin, F. J.: hankel: A Python library for performing
simple and accurate Hankel transformations, The Journal of Open Source
Software, 4, 1397, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01397, 2019. a
Neuman, S. P.: Stochastic groundwater models in practice, Stoch.
Env. Res. Risk A., 18, 268–270,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0192-6,
2004. a
Ogata, H.: A Numerical Integration Formula Based on the Bessel
Functions, Publ. Res. I. Math.
Sci., 41, 949–970, https://doi.org/10.2977/prims/1145474602, 2005. a
Pebesma, E. J.: Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package,
Comput. Geosci., 30, 683–691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012,
2004. a
Perkel, J. M.: Why Jupyter is data scientists’ computational notebook of
choice, Nature, 563, 145–146, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07196-1,
2018. a
Pyrcz, M. J. and Deutsch, C. V.: Geostatistical Reservoir Modeling, 2 edn., Oxford
University Press, Oxford, ISBN 978-0199731442, 2014. a
Queiroz, F., Silva, R., Miller, J., Brockhauser, S., and Fangohr, H.: Track 1
Paper: Good Usability Practices in Scientific Software
Development, Figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5331814.v3, 2017. a
Rajaram, H.: Debates – Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to
practice: Introduction, Water Resour. Res., 52, 9215–9217,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020066, 2016. a, b
Rasmussen, C. E. and Williams, C. K. I.: Gaussian Processes for Machine
Learning, 1st edn., The MIT Press, ISBN 9780262256834, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001, 2005. a, b
Remy, N.: S-GeMS: The Stanford Geostatistical Modeling Software:
A Tool for New Algorithms Development, in: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, Geostatistics Banff 2004, 14,
865–871, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3610-1_89, 2005. a, b
Rossi, R. E., Mulla, D. J., Journel, A. G., and Franz, E. H.: Geostatistical
tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence, Ecol.
Monogr., 62, 277–314, https://doi.org/10.2307/2937096, 1992. a
Rubin, Y.: Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology, 1st edn., Oxford University Press, New
York, ISBN 9780195138047, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195138047.001.0001, 2003. a, b, c, d
Rubin, Y., Chen, X., Murakami, H., and Hahn, M.: A Bayesian approach for
inverse modeling, data assimilation, and conditional simulation of spatial
random fields, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10523,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008799, 2010. a
Rubin, Y., Chang, C.-F., Chen, J., Cucchi, K., Harken, B., Heße, F., and Savoy, H.: Stochastic hydrogeology's biggest hurdles analyzed and its big blind spot, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5675–5695, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5675-2018, 2018. a, b
Rudin, W.: Fourier Analysis on Groups, 1st edn., Wiley‐Interscience, John Wiley
& Sons, ISBN 9780470744819, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118165621, 1990. a
Sales, M. H., Souza, C. M., Kyriakidis, P. C., Roberts, D. A., and Vidal, E.:
Improving spatial distribution estimation of forest biomass with
geostatistics: A case study for Rondônia, Brazil, Ecol.
Model., 205, 221–230,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.02.033, 2007. a
Savoy, H., Heße, F., and Rubin, Y.: anchoredDistr: a Package for the
Bayesian Inversion of Geostatistical Parameters with Multi-type and
Multi-scale Data, R Journal, 9, 6–17, https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-034,
2017. a
Schlömer, N., McBain, G. D., Luu, K., christos, Li, T., Hochsteger, M.,
Keilegavlen, E., Ferrándiz, V. M., Barnes, C., Lukeš, V., Dalcin, L.,
Jansen, M., Wagner, N., Gupta, A., Müller, S., Woodsend, B., Andersen, K.,
Schwarz, L., Blechta, J., Christovasilis, I. P., Coutinho, C., Beurle, D.,
ffilotto, Dokken, J. S., blacheref, so1291, Cervone, A., Shrimali, B., Bill,
and Jones, D.: nschloe/meshio: None, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4900671, 2021. a, b
Schüler, L. and Müller, S.: GeoStat – Examples/gstools-herten-example:
v1.0, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5159658, 2021. a, b, c
Schüler, L., Suciu, N., Knabner, P., and Attinger, S.: A time dependent mixing
model to close PDF equations for transport in heterogeneous aquifers,
Adv. Water Resour., 96, 55–67,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.06.012, 2016. a
Schüler, L., Calabrese, J. M., and Attinger, S.: Data driven high resolution
modeling and spatial analyses of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, PLOS
ONE, 16, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254660, 2021. a
Sturges, H. A.: The Choice of a Class Interval, J. Am.
Stat. Assoc., 21, 65–66, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1926.10502161, 1926. a
Sullivan, C. B. and Kaszynski, A. A.: PyVista: 3D plotting and mesh
analysis through a streamlined interface for the Visualization Toolkit
(VTK), Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1450, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01450,
2019. a, b
Uieda, L.: Verde: Processing and gridding spatial data using Green’s
functions, Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 957,
https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00957, 2018.
a
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T.,
Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J.,
van der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N.,
Nelson, A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C. J., Polat, i.,
Feng, Y., Moore, E. W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman,
R., Henriksen, I., Quintero, E. A., Harris, C. R., Archibald, A. M., Ribeiro,
A. H., Pedregosa, F., van Mulbregt, P., and SciPy 1.0 Contributors: SciPy
1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python, Nat.
Methods, 17, 261–272, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2, 2020. a
Vrugt, J. A.: Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM
software package: Theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation,
Environ. Modell. Softw., 75, 273–316,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.013, 2016. a
Wackernagel, H.: Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction with
Applications, 3 edn., Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-540-44142-7,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05294-5, 2003. a, b, c, d
Wendland, H.: Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported
radial functions of minimal degree, Adv. Comput. Math., 4,
389–396, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02123482, 1995. a
Winter, C. L.: Stochastic hydrology: practical alternatives exist, Stoch.
Env. Res. Risk A., 18, 271–273,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0198-0,
2004. a
Yeo, I. and Johnson, R. A.: A new family of power transformations to improve
normality or symmetry, Biometrika, 87, 954–959,
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/87.4.954, 2000. a
Zech, A., Schneider, C. L., and Attinger, S.: The extended Thiem's solution –
Including the impact of heterogeneity, Water Resour. Res., 48,
W10535, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR011852, 2012. a
Zech, A., Müller, S., Mai, J., Heße, F., and Attinger, S.: Extending Theis'
solution: Using transient pumping tests to estimate parameters of aquifer
heterogeneity, Water Resour. Res., 52, 6156–6170,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018509, 2016. a, b, c
Zhang, Y.-K. and Zhang, D.: Forum: The state of stochastic hydrology,
Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 18, 265,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0190-8, 2004. a, b
Zinn, B. and Harvey, C. F.: When good statistical models of aquifer
heterogeneity go bad: A comparison of flow, dispersion, and mass transfer
in connected and multivariate Gaussian hydraulic conductivity fields, Water
Resour. Res., 39, 1051, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR001146, 2003. a, b, c, d
Short summary
The GSTools package provides a Python-based platform for geoostatistical applications. Salient features of GSTools are its random field generation, its kriging capabilities and its versatile covariance model. It is furthermore integrated with other Python packages, like PyKrige, ogs5py or scikit-gstat, and provides interfaces to meshio and PyVista. Four presented workflows showcase the abilities of GSTools.
The GSTools package provides a Python-based platform for geoostatistical applications. Salient...
