Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4253-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4253-2020
Model evaluation paper
 | 
15 Sep 2020
Model evaluation paper |  | 15 Sep 2020

ML-SWAN-v1: a hybrid machine learning framework for the concentration prediction and discovery of transport pathways of surface water nutrients

Benya Wang, Matthew R. Hipsey, and Carolyn Oldham

Related authors

Climate change overtakes coastal engineering as the dominant driver of hydrological change in a large shallow lagoon
Peisheng Huang, Karl Hennig, Jatin Kala, Julia Andrys, and Matthew R. Hipsey
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5673–5697, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5673-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5673-2020, 2020
Short summary
Surface water as a cause of land degradation from dryland salinity
J. Nikolaus Callow, Matthew R. Hipsey, and Ryan I. J. Vogwill
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 717–734, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-717-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-717-2020, 2020
Short summary
A General Lake Model (GLM 3.0) for linking with high-frequency sensor data from the Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network (GLEON)
Matthew R. Hipsey, Louise C. Bruce, Casper Boon, Brendan Busch, Cayelan C. Carey, David P. Hamilton, Paul C. Hanson, Jordan S. Read, Eduardo de Sousa, Michael Weber, and Luke A. Winslow
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 473–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-473-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-473-2019, 2019
Short summary
Adaptation tipping points of urban wetlands under a drying climate
Amar V. V. Nanda, Leah Beesley, Luca Locatelli, Berry Gersonius, Matthew R. Hipsey, and Anas Ghadouani
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-307,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-307, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
A prototype framework for models of socio-hydrology: identification of key feedback loops and parameterisation approach
Y. Elshafei, M. Sivapalan, M. Tonts, and M. R. Hipsey
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2141–2166, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2141-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2141-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Hydrology
The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2e: description and evaluation of modifications and new features
Hannes Müller Schmied, Tim Trautmann, Sebastian Ackermann, Denise Cáceres, Martina Flörke, Helena Gerdener, Ellen Kynast, Thedini Asali Peiris, Leonie Schiebener, Maike Schumacher, and Petra Döll
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8817–8852, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8817-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8817-2024, 2024
Short summary
Generalised drought index: a novel multi-scale daily approach for drought assessment
João António Martins Careto, Rita Margarida Cardoso, Ana Russo, Daniela Catarina André Lima, and Pedro Miguel Matos Soares
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8115–8139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8115-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8115-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development and performance of a high-resolution surface wave and storm surge forecast model: application to a large lake
Laura L. Swatridge, Ryan P. Mulligan, Leon Boegman, and Shiliang Shan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7751–7766, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7751-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7751-2024, 2024
Short summary
Deep dive into hydrologic simulations at global scale: harnessing the power of deep learning and physics-informed differentiable models (δHBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Jens de Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Yoshihide Wada, Jiangtao Liu, Ming Pan, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7181–7198, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024, 2024
Short summary
PyEt v1.3.1: a Python package for the estimation of potential evapotranspiration
Matevž Vremec, Raoul A. Collenteur, and Steffen Birk
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7083–7103, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, R., Arafat, Y., Eate, V., Grace, M. R., Saffarpour, S., Weatherley, A. J., and Western, A. W.: A catchment study of sources and sinks of nutrients and sediments in south-east Australia, J. Hydrol., 515, 166–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.034, 2014. 
Álvarez-Cabria, M., Barquín, J., and Peñas, F. J.: Modelling the spatial and seasonal variability of water quality for entire river networks: Relationships with natural and anthropogenic factors, Sci. Total Environ., 545–546, 152–162, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.109, 2016. 
Barron, O., Donn, M., Furby, S., Chia, J., and Johnstone, C.: Groundwater contribution to nutrient export from the Ellen Brook catchment, available at: http://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/waterforahealthycountry/2009/wfhc-groundwater-Ellen-Brook-catchment.pdf (last access: 9 September 2020), 2009. 
Belgiu, M. and Drăgu, L.: Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 114, 24–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011, 2016. 
Download
Short summary
Surface water nutrients are essential to manage water quality, but it is hard to analyse trends. We developed a hybrid model and compared with other models for the prediction of six different nutrients. Our results showed that the hybrid model had significantly higher accuracy and lower prediction uncertainty for almost all nutrient species. The hybrid model provides a flexible method to combine data of varied resolution and quality and is accurate for the prediction of nutrient concentrations.