Articles | Volume 8, issue 5
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1299–1313, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1299-2015
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1299–1313, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1299-2015
Model experiment description paper
04 May 2015
Model experiment description paper | 04 May 2015

The terminator "toy" chemistry test: a simple tool to assess errors in transport schemes

P. H. Lauritzen et al.

Related authors

Advancing Precipitation Prediction Using a New Generation Storm-resolving Model Framework – SIMA-MPAS (V1.0): a Case Study over the Western United States
Xingying Huang, Andrew Gettelman, William C. Skamarock, Peter Hjort Lauritzen, Miles Curry, Adam Herrington, John T. Truesdale, and Michael Duda
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-111,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-111, 2022
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Enforcing conservation of axial angular momentum in the atmospheric general circulation model CAM6
Thomas Toniazzo, Mats Bentsen, Cheryl Craig, Brian E. Eaton, Jim Edwards, Steve Goldhaber, Christiane Jablonowski, and Peter H. Lauritzen
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 685–705, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-685-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-685-2020, 2020
Short summary
DCMIP2016: the splitting supercell test case
Colin M. Zarzycki, Christiane Jablonowski, James Kent, Peter H. Lauritzen, Ramachandran Nair, Kevin A. Reed, Paul A. Ullrich, David M. Hall, Mark A. Taylor, Don Dazlich, Ross Heikes, Celal Konor, David Randall, Xi Chen, Lucas Harris, Marco Giorgetta, Daniel Reinert, Christian Kühnlein, Robert Walko, Vivian Lee, Abdessamad Qaddouri, Monique Tanguay, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, Ryuji Yoshida, Sang-Hun Park, Joseph B. Klemp, and William C. Skamarock
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 879–892, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019, 2019
Short summary
DCMIP2016: a review of non-hydrostatic dynamical core design and intercomparison of participating models
Paul A. Ullrich, Christiane Jablonowski, James Kent, Peter H. Lauritzen, Ramachandran Nair, Kevin A. Reed, Colin M. Zarzycki, David M. Hall, Don Dazlich, Ross Heikes, Celal Konor, David Randall, Thomas Dubos, Yann Meurdesoif, Xi Chen, Lucas Harris, Christian Kühnlein, Vivian Lee, Abdessamad Qaddouri, Claude Girard, Marco Giorgetta, Daniel Reinert, Joseph Klemp, Sang-Hun Park, William Skamarock, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, Ryuji Yoshida, Robert Walko, Alex Reinecke, and Kevin Viner
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4477–4509, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4477-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4477-2017, 2017
Short summary
NCAR_Topo (v1.0): NCAR global model topography generation software for unstructured grids
P. H. Lauritzen, J. T. Bacmeister, P. F. Callaghan, and M. A. Taylor
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3975–3986, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3975-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3975-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical methods
Multi-dimensional hydrological–hydraulic model with variational data assimilation for river networks and floodplains
Léo Pujol, Pierre-André Garambois, and Jérôme Monnier
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6085–6113, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6085-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6085-2022, 2022
Short summary
Assessing the robustness and scalability of the accelerated pseudo-transient method
Ludovic Räss, Ivan Utkin, Thibault Duretz, Samuel Omlin, and Yuri Y. Podladchikov
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5757–5786, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5757-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5757-2022, 2022
Short summary
Assessment of stochastic weather forecast of precipitation near European cities, based on analogs of circulation
Meriem Krouma, Pascal Yiou, Céline Déandreis, and Soulivanh Thao
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4941–4958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4941-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4941-2022, 2022
Short summary
University of Warsaw Lagrangian Cloud Model (UWLCM) 2.0: adaptation of a mixed Eulerian–Lagrangian numerical model for heterogeneous computing clusters
Piotr Dziekan and Piotr Zmijewski
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4489–4501, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4489-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4489-2022, 2022
Short summary
Prediction error growth in a more realistic atmospheric toy model with three spatiotemporal scales
Hynek Bednář and Holger Kantz
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4147–4161, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4147-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4147-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, J., Toohey, D., and Brune, W.: Free radicals within the Antarctic vortex: the role of CFCs in Antarctic ozone loss, Science, 251, 39–46, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.251.4989.39, 1991.
Andrews, D. G., Holton, J. R., and Leovy, C. B.: Middle atmosphere dynamics, Academic Press, San Diego, 1987.
Barth, T. and Jespersen, D.: The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes, in: Proc. AIAA 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, 1989.
Blossey, P. N. and Durran, D. R.: Selective monotonicity preservation in scalar advection, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 5160–5183, 2008.
Brasseur, G. and Solomon, S.: Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere, Springer, 3rd Edn., 2005.
Download
Short summary
This test extends the evaluation of transport schemes from prescribed advection of inert scalars to reactive species. It consists of transporting two reacting chlorine-like species in an idealized flow field. The sources/sinks are given by a simple but non-linear toy chemistry that mimics photolysis-driven processes near the solar terminator. As a result, strong gradients in the spatial distribution of the species develop near the edge of the terminator.