Articles | Volume 17, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2877-2024
Model description paper
 | Highlight paper
 | 
16 Apr 2024
Model description paper | Highlight paper |  | 16 Apr 2024

HydroFATE (v1): a high-resolution contaminant fate model for the global river system

Heloisa Ehalt Macedo, Bernhard Lehner, Jim Nicell, and Günther Grill

Related authors

Distribution and characteristics of wastewater treatment plants within the global river network
Heloisa Ehalt Macedo, Bernhard Lehner, Jim Nicell, Günther Grill, Jing Li, Antonio Limtong, and Ranish Shakya
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 559–577, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-559-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-559-2022, 2022
Short summary
Using GRACE in a streamflow recession to determine drainable water storage in the Mississippi River basin
Heloisa Ehalt Macedo, Ralph Edward Beighley, Cédric H. David, and John T. Reager
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3269–3277, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3269-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3269-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
Development and performance of a high-resolution surface wave and storm surge forecast model: application to a large lake
Laura L. Swatridge, Ryan P. Mulligan, Leon Boegman, and Shiliang Shan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7751–7766, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7751-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7751-2024, 2024
Short summary
Deep dive into hydrologic simulations at global scale: harnessing the power of deep learning and physics-informed differentiable models (δHBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Jens de Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Yoshihide Wada, Jiangtao Liu, Ming Pan, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7181–7198, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024, 2024
Short summary
PyEt v1.3.1: a Python package for the estimation of potential evapotranspiration
Matevž Vremec, Raoul A. Collenteur, and Steffen Birk
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7083–7103, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, 2024
Short summary
Prediction of hysteretic matric potential dynamics using artificial intelligence: application of autoencoder neural networks
Nedal Aqel, Lea Reusser, Stephan Margreth, Andrea Carminati, and Peter Lehmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6949–6966, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024, 2024
Short summary
Regionalization in global hydrological models and its impact on runoff simulations: a case study using WaterGAP3 (v 1.0.0)
Jenny Kupzig, Nina Kupzig, and Martina Flörke
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6819–6846, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6819-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6819-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aldekoa, J., Medici, C., Osorio, V., Pérez, S., Marcé, R., Barceló, D., and Francés, F.: Modelling the emerging pollutant diclofenac with the GREAT-ER model: Application to the Llobregat River Basin, J. Hazard. Mater., 263, 207–213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.057, 2013. 
Aldekoa, J., Marcé, R., and Francés, F.: Fate and Degradation of Emerging Contaminants in Rivers: Review of Existing Models, in: Emerging Contaminants in River Ecosystems: Occurrence and Effects Under Multiple Stress Conditions, edited by: Petrovic, M., Sabater, S., Elosegi, A., and Barceló, D., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 159–193, https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2015_5017, 2016. 
Anderson, P. D., D'Aco, V. J., Shanahan, P., Chapra, S. C., Buzby, M. E., Cunningham, V. L., DuPlessie, B. M., Hayes, E. P., Mastrocco, F. J., Parke, N. J., Rader, J. C., Samuelian, J. H., and Schwab, B. W.: Screening Analysis of Human Pharmaceutical Compounds in U.S. Surface Waters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 838–849, https://doi.org/10.1021/es034430b, 2004. 
Archundia, D., Boithias, L., Duwig, C., Morel, M. C., Flores Aviles, G., and Martins, J. M. F.: Environmental fate and ecotoxicological risk of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole across the Katari catchment (Bolivian Altiplano): Application of the GREAT-ER model, Sci. Total Environ., 622–623, 1046–1055, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.026, 2018. 
Aydin, S., Aydin, M. E., Ulvi, A., and Kilic, H.: Antibiotics in hospital effluents: occurrence, contribution to urban wastewater, removal in a wastewater treatment plant, and environmental risk assessment, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 26, 544–558, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3563-0, 2019. 
Download
Executive editor
This paper is significant for both the geoscience community and the general public. For geoscientists, the novel HydroFATE model provides an innovative tool to estimate and track the presence of household and pharmaceutical contaminants in the world's river systems, aiding in global pollution studies and environmental planning. For the public and media, it highlights the widespread issue of water contamination from commonly used substances, illustrating their potential impacts on environmental and public health. HydroFATE can inform decision-making across sectors - from water testing prioritization by local governments to ecological considerations by pharmaceutical companies, making it a compelling narrative for the media. The antibiotic sulfamethoxazole's use as a test case further links this work to global health discussions on antibiotic resistance.
Short summary
Treated and untreated wastewaters are sources of contaminants of emerging concern. HydroFATE, a new global model, estimates their concentrations in surface waters, identifying streams that are most at risk and guiding monitoring/mitigation efforts to safeguard aquatic ecosystems and human health. Model predictions were validated against field measurements of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole, with predicted concentrations exceeding ecological thresholds in more than 400 000 km of rivers worldwide.