Articles | Volume 16, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5305-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5305-2023
Development and technical paper
 | 
15 Sep 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 15 Sep 2023

A parallel implementation of the confined–unconfined aquifer system model for subglacial hydrology: design, verification, and performance analysis (CUAS-MPI v0.1.0)

Yannic Fischler, Thomas Kleiner, Christian Bischof, Jeremie Schmiedel, Roiy Sayag, Raban Emunds, Lennart Frederik Oestreich, and Angelika Humbert

Related authors

A scalability study of the Ice-sheet and Sea-level System Model (ISSM, version 4.18)
Yannic Fischler, Martin Rückamp, Christian Bischof, Vadym Aizinger, Mathieu Morlighem, and Angelika Humbert
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3753–3771, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3753-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3753-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
Universal differential equations for glacier ice flow modelling
Jordi Bolibar, Facundo Sapienza, Fabien Maussion, Redouane Lguensat, Bert Wouters, and Fernando Pérez
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6671–6687, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6671-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6671-2023, 2023
Short summary
A new model for supraglacial hydrology evolution and drainage for the Greenland Ice Sheet (SHED v1.0)
Prateek Gantayat, Alison F. Banwell, Amber A. Leeson, James M. Lea, Dorthe Petersen, Noel Gourmelen, and Xavier Fettweis
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5803–5823, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5803-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5803-2023, 2023
Short summary
Modeling sensitivities of thermally and hydraulically driven ice stream surge cycling
Kevin Hank, Lev Tarasov, and Elisa Mantelli
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5627–5652, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5627-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5627-2023, 2023
Short summary
Automatic snow type classification of snow micropenetrometer profiles with machine learning algorithms
Julia Kaltenborn, Amy R. Macfarlane, Viviane Clay, and Martin Schneebeli
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4521–4550, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023, 2023
Short summary
An empirical model to calculate snow depth from daily snow water equivalent: SWE2HS 1.0
Johannes Aschauer, Adrien Michel, Tobias Jonas, and Christoph Marty
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4063–4081, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4063-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4063-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahlstrøm, A. P., Mottram, R., Nielsen, C., Reeh, N., and Andersen, S. B.: Evaluation of the future hydropower potential at Paakitsoq, Ilulissat, West Greenland, Tech. Rep. 31, GEUS, https://doi.org/10.22008/gpub/27154, 2009. a
Amestoy, P., Duff, I. S., Koster, J., and L'Excellent, J.-Y.: A Fully Asynchronous Multifrontal Solver Using Distributed Dynamic Scheduling, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. A., 23, 15–41, 2001. a
Amestoy, P., Buttari, A., L'Excellent, J.-Y., and Mary, T.: Performance and Scalability of the Block Low-Rank Multifrontal Factorization on Multicore Architectures, ACM T. Math. Software, 45, 2:1–2:26, 2019. a
Arnold, N. and Sharp, M.: Flow variability in the Scandinavian ice sheet: modelling the coupling between ice sheet flow and hydrology, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 21, 485–502, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00059-2, 2002. a
Aschwanden, A., Fahnestock, M. A., and Truffer, M.: Complex Greenland outlet glacier flow captured, Nat. Commun., 7, 10524, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10524, 2016. a, b
Download
Short summary
Water underneath ice sheets affects the motion of glaciers. This study presents a newly developed code, CUAS-MPI, that simulates subglacial hydrology. It is designed for supercomputers and is hence a parallelized code. We measure the performance of this code for simulations of the entire Greenland Ice Sheet and find that the code works efficiently. Moreover, we validated the code to ensure the correctness of the solution. CUAS-MPI opens new possibilities for simulations of ice sheet hydrology.