Articles | Volume 15, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2197-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2197-2022
Model experiment description paper
 | 
16 Mar 2022
Model experiment description paper |  | 16 Mar 2022

Effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirs

Mayra Ishikawa, Wendy Gonzalez, Orides Golyjeswski, Gabriela Sales, J. Andreza Rigotti, Tobias Bleninger, Michael Mannich, and Andreas Lorke

Related authors

Temporal dynamics and environmental controls of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes measured by the eddy covariance method over a boreal river
Aki Vähä, Timo Vesala, Sofya Guseva, Anders Lindroth, Andreas Lorke, Sally MacIntyre, and Ivan Mammarella
Biogeosciences, 22, 1651–1671, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1651-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1651-2025, 2025
Short summary
A Fast-Response Automated Gas Equilibrator (FaRAGE) for continuous in situ measurement of CH4 and CO2 dissolved in water
Shangbin Xiao, Liu Liu, Wei Wang, Andreas Lorke, Jason Woodhouse, and Hans-Peter Grossart
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3871–3880, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3871-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3871-2020, 2020
Short summary
Diel and seasonal variability of methane emissions from a shallow and eutrophic pond
Wenli Zhang, Shangbin Xiao, Heng Xie, Jia Liu, Dan Lei, and Andreas Lorke
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-178,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-178, 2020
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Multimodel simulation of vertical gas transfer in a temperate lake
Sofya Guseva, Tobias Bleninger, Klaus Jöhnk, Bruna Arcie Polli, Zeli Tan, Wim Thiery, Qianlai Zhuang, James Anthony Rusak, Huaxia Yao, Andreas Lorke, and Victor Stepanenko
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 697–715, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-697-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-697-2020, 2020
Short summary
Regional-scale lateral carbon transport and CO2 evasion in temperate stream catchments
Katrin Magin, Celia Somlai-Haase, Ralf B. Schäfer, and Andreas Lorke
Biogeosciences, 14, 5003–5014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5003-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5003-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
Selecting a conceptual hydrological model using Bayes' factors computed with replica-exchange Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and thermodynamic integration
Damian N. Mingo, Remko Nijzink, Christophe Ley, and Jack S. Hale
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1709–1736, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1709-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1709-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Water Table Model (WTM) (v2.0.1): coupled groundwater and dynamic lake modelling
Kerry L. Callaghan, Andrew D. Wickert, Richard Barnes, and Jacqueline Austermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1463–1486, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1463-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1463-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modelling rainfall with a Bartlett–Lewis process: pyBL (v1.0.0), a Python software package and an application with short records
Chi-Ling Wei, Pei-Chun Chen, Chien-Yu Tseng, Ting-Yu Dai, Yun-Ting Ho, Ching-Chun Chou, Christian Onof, and Li-Pen Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1357–1373, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1357-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1357-2025, 2025
Short summary
Virtual Joint Field Campaign: a framework of synthetic landscapes to assess multiscale measurement methods of water storage
Till Francke, Cosimo Brogi, Alby Duarte Rocha, Michael Förster, Maik Heistermann, Markus Köhli, Daniel Rasche, Marvin Reich, Paul Schattan, Lena Scheiffele, and Martin Schrön
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 819–842, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-819-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-819-2025, 2025
Short summary
SERGHEI v2.0: introducing a performance-portable, high-performance, three-dimensional variably saturated subsurface flow solver (SERGHEI-RE)
Zhi Li, Gregor Rickert, Na Zheng, Zhibo Zhang, Ilhan Özgen-Xian, and Daniel Caviedes-Voullième
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 547–562, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-547-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-547-2025, 2025
Short summary
Download
Short summary
Reservoir hydrodynamics is often described in numerical models differing in dimensionality. 1D and 2D models assume homogeneity along the unresolved dimension. We compare the performance of models with 1 to 3 dimensions. All models presented reasonable results for seasonal temperature dynamics. Neglecting longitudinal transport resulted in the largest deviations in temperature. Flow velocity could only be reproduced by the 3D model. Results support the selection of models and their assessment.
Share