Articles | Volume 15, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2197-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2197-2022
Model experiment description paper
 | 
16 Mar 2022
Model experiment description paper |  | 16 Mar 2022

Effects of dimensionality on the performance of hydrodynamic models for stratified lakes and reservoirs

Mayra Ishikawa, Wendy Gonzalez, Orides Golyjeswski, Gabriela Sales, J. Andreza Rigotti, Tobias Bleninger, Michael Mannich, and Andreas Lorke

Related authors

A Fast-Response Automated Gas Equilibrator (FaRAGE) for continuous in situ measurement of CH4 and CO2 dissolved in water
Shangbin Xiao, Liu Liu, Wei Wang, Andreas Lorke, Jason Woodhouse, and Hans-Peter Grossart
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3871–3880, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3871-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3871-2020, 2020
Short summary
Diel and seasonal variability of methane emissions from a shallow and eutrophic pond
Wenli Zhang, Shangbin Xiao, Heng Xie, Jia Liu, Dan Lei, and Andreas Lorke
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-178,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-178, 2020
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Multimodel simulation of vertical gas transfer in a temperate lake
Sofya Guseva, Tobias Bleninger, Klaus Jöhnk, Bruna Arcie Polli, Zeli Tan, Wim Thiery, Qianlai Zhuang, James Anthony Rusak, Huaxia Yao, Andreas Lorke, and Victor Stepanenko
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 697–715, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-697-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-697-2020, 2020
Short summary
Regional-scale lateral carbon transport and CO2 evasion in temperate stream catchments
Katrin Magin, Celia Somlai-Haase, Ralf B. Schäfer, and Andreas Lorke
Biogeosciences, 14, 5003–5014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5003-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-5003-2017, 2017
Short summary
Technical note: drifting versus anchored flux chambers for measuring greenhouse gas emissions from running waters
A. Lorke, P. Bodmer, C. Noss, Z. Alshboul, M. Koschorreck, C. Somlai-Haase, D. Bastviken, S. Flury, D. F. McGinnis, A. Maeck, D. Müller, and K. Premke
Biogeosciences, 12, 7013–7024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7013-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7013-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
Continental-scale evaluation of a fully distributed coupled land surface and groundwater model, ParFlow-CLM (v3.6.0), over Europe
Bibi S. Naz, Wendy Sharples, Yueling Ma, Klaus Goergen, and Stefan Kollet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1617–1639, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluating a global soil moisture dataset from a multitask model (GSM3 v1.0) with potential applications for crop threats
Jiangtao Liu, David Hughes, Farshid Rahmani, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1553–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1553-2023, 2023
Short summary
SERGHEI (SERGHEI-SWE) v1.0: a performance-portable high-performance parallel-computing shallow-water solver for hydrology and environmental hydraulics
Daniel Caviedes-Voullième, Mario Morales-Hernández, Matthew R. Norman, and Ilhan Özgen-Xian
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 977–1008, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-977-2023, 2023
Short summary
A simple, efficient, mass-conservative approach to solving Richards' equation (openRE, v1.0)
Andrew M. Ireson, Raymond J. Spiteri, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon A. Mathias
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 659–677, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-659-2023, 2023
Short summary
Customized deep learning for precipitation bias correction and downscaling
Fang Wang, Di Tian, and Mark Carroll
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 535–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-535-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Download
Short summary
Reservoir hydrodynamics is often described in numerical models differing in dimensionality. 1D and 2D models assume homogeneity along the unresolved dimension. We compare the performance of models with 1 to 3 dimensions. All models presented reasonable results for seasonal temperature dynamics. Neglecting longitudinal transport resulted in the largest deviations in temperature. Flow velocity could only be reproduced by the 3D model. Results support the selection of models and their assessment.