Articles | Volume 13, issue 6
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2805–2823, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2805-2020
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2805–2823, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2805-2020
Model description paper
24 Jun 2020
Model description paper | 24 Jun 2020

Description and validation of the ice-sheet model Yelmo (version 1.0)

Alexander Robinson et al.

Related authors

The Earth system model CLIMBER-X v1.0 – Part 1: Climate model description and validation​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Matteo Willeit, Andrey Ganopolski, Alexander Robinson, and Neil R. Edwards
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5905–5948, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5905-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5905-2022, 2022
Short summary
On the periodicity of free oscillations for a finite ice column
Daniel Moreno, Alexander Robinson, Marisa Montoya, and Jorge Alvarez-Solas
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-97,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-97, 2022
Preprint under review for TC
Short summary
A comparison of the stability and performance of depth-integrated ice-dynamics solvers
Alexander Robinson, Daniel Goldberg, and William H. Lipscomb
The Cryosphere, 16, 689–709, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-689-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-689-2022, 2022
Short summary
Modeling the Greenland englacial stratigraphy
Andreas Born and Alexander Robinson
The Cryosphere, 15, 4539–4556, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4539-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4539-2021, 2021
Short summary
Exploring the impact of atmospheric forcing and basal drag on the Antarctic Ice Sheet under Last Glacial Maximum conditions
Javier Blasco, Jorge Alvarez-Solas, Alexander Robinson, and Marisa Montoya
The Cryosphere, 15, 215–231, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-215-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-215-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
Benchmarking the vertically integrated ice-sheet model IMAU-ICE (version 2.0)
Constantijn J. Berends, Heiko Goelzer, Thomas J. Reerink, Lennert B. Stap, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5667–5688, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5667-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5667-2022, 2022
Short summary
SnowClim v1.0: high-resolution snow model and data for the western United States
Abby C. Lute, John Abatzoglou, and Timothy Link
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5045–5071, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5045-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5045-2022, 2022
Short summary
Snow Multidata Mapping and Modeling (S3M) 5.1: a distributed cryospheric model with dry and wet snow, data assimilation, glacier mass balance, and debris-driven melt
Francesco Avanzi, Simone Gabellani, Fabio Delogu, Francesco Silvestro, Edoardo Cremonese, Umberto Morra di Cella, Sara Ratto, and Hervé Stevenin
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4853–4879, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4853-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4853-2022, 2022
Short summary
MPAS-Seaice (v1.0.0): sea-ice dynamics on unstructured Voronoi meshes
Adrian K. Turner, William H. Lipscomb, Elizabeth C. Hunke, Douglas W. Jacobsen​​​​​​​, Nicole Jeffery, Darren Engwirda, Todd D. Ringler, and Jonathan D. Wolfe
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3721–3751, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3721-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3721-2022, 2022
Short summary
Explicitly modelling microtopography in permafrost landscapes in a land surface model (JULES vn5.4_microtopography)
Noah D. Smith, Eleanor J. Burke, Kjetil Schanke Aas, Inge H. J. Althuizen, Julia Boike, Casper Tai Christiansen, Bernd Etzelmüller, Thomas Friborg, Hanna Lee, Heather Rumbold, Rachael H. Turton, Sebastian Westermann, and Sarah E. Chadburn
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3603–3639, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3603-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3603-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Albrecht, T., Martin, M., Haseloff, M., Winkelmann, R., and Levermann, A.: Parameterization for subgrid-scale motion of ice-shelf calving fronts, The Cryosphere, 5, 35–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-35-2011, 2011. a
Albrecht, T., Winkelmann, R., and Levermann, A.: Glacial-cycle simulations of the Antarctic Ice Sheet with the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM) – Part 2: Parameter ensemble analysis, The Cryosphere, 14, 633–656, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-633-2020, 2020. a
Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R.: Computational Design of the Basic Dynamical Processes of the UCLA General Circulation Model, in: General Circulation Models of the Atmosphere, edited by: Chang, J., Vol. 17 of Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, 173–265, Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-460817-7.50009-4, 1977. a
Aschwanden, A., Aðalgeirsdéttir, G., and Khroulev, C.: Hindcasting to measure ice sheet model sensitivity to initial states, The Cryosphere, 7, 1083–1093, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1083-2013, 2013. a, b, c
Brondex, J., Gillet-Chaulet, F., and Gagliardini, O.: Sensitivity of centennial mass loss projections of the Amundsen basin to the friction law, The Cryosphere, 13, 177–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-177-2019, 2019. a, b
Download
Short summary
Here we describe Yelmo v1.0, an intuitive and state-of-the-art hybrid ice sheet model. The model design and physics are described, and benchmark simulations are provided to validate its performance. Yelmo is a versatile ice sheet model that can be applied to a wide variety of problems.