Articles | Volume 18, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2275-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2275-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
14 Apr 2025
Model description paper |
| 14 Apr 2025
| 14 Apr 2025
LM4-SHARC v1.0: resolving the catchment-scale soil–hillslope aquifer–river continuum for the GFDL Earth system modeling framework
Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
Nathaniel Chaney
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
Sergey Malyshev
NOAA OAR Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA
Enrico Zorzetto
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, USA
Anthony Preucil
NOAA OAR Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA
Elena Shevliakova
NOAA OAR Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Colin Jones, Isaline Bossert, Donovan P. Dennis, Hazel Jeffery, Chris D. Jones, Torben Koenigk, Sina Loriani, Benjamin Sanderson, Roland Séférian, Klaus Wyser, Shuting Yang, Manabu Abe, Sebastian Bathiany, Pascale Braconnot, Victor Brovkin, Friedrich A. Burger, Patrica Cadule, Frederic S. Castruccio, Gokhan Danabasoglu, Andrea Dittus, Jonathan F. Donges, Friederike Fröb, Thomas Frölicher, Goran Georgievski, Chuncheng Guo, Aixue Hu, Peter Lawrence, Paul Lerner, José Licón-Saláiz, Bette Otto-Bliesner, Anastasia Romanou, Elena Shevliakova, Yona Silvy, Didier Swingedouw, Jerry Tjiputra, Jeremy Walton, Andy Wiltshire, Ricarda Winkelmann, Richard Wood, Tokuta Yokohata, and Tilo Ziehn
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3604, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3604, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a new Earth system model experiment protocol to help researchers understand how Earth might respond to positive, zero, and negative carbon emissions. This protocol enables different models to be compared following similar warming and cooling rates. Researchers use the models to explore how the Earth reacts to different climate futures, including the risk of tipping points being exceeded and whether changes can be reversed. The results will support improved long-term climate policy.
Amali A. Amali, Clemens Schwingshackl, Akihiko Ito, Alina Barbu, Christine Delire, Daniele Peano, David M. Lawrence, David Wårlind, Eddy Robertson, Edouard L. Davin, Elena Shevliakova, Ian N. Harman, Nicolas Vuichard, Paul A. Miller, Peter J. Lawrence, Tilo Ziehn, Tomohiro Hajima, Victor Brovkin, Yanwu Zhang, Vivek K. Arora, and Julia Pongratz
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 803–840, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-803-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-803-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explored the impact of anthropogenic land-use change (LUC) on climate dynamics, focusing on biogeophysical (BGP) and biogeochemical (BGC) effects using data from the Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). We found that LUC-induced carbon emissions contribute to a BGC warming of 0.21 °C, with BGC effects dominating globally over BGP effects, which show regional variability. Our findings highlight discrepancies in model simulations and emphasize the need for improved representations of LUC processes.
Enrico Zorzetto, Paul Ginoux, Sergey Malyshev, and Elena Shevliakova
The Cryosphere, 19, 1313–1334, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1313-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1313-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Light-absorbing particle (LAP) deposition on snow leads to a darkening of the snow surface and can thus accelerate snow melt. Understanding the extent to which different types of LAPs contribute to snow melt is important to both predict changes in water availability and improve global climate model predictions. Here, we extend a recently developed snow model to account for the deposition of LAPs in the snowpack and evaluate the effect of snow darkening on accelerating snow melt.
Tomohiro Hajima, Michio Kawamiya, Akihiko Ito, Kaoru Tachiiri, Chris D. Jones, Vivek Arora, Victor Brovkin, Roland Séférian, Spencer Liddicoat, Pierre Friedlingstein, and Elena Shevliakova
Biogeosciences, 22, 1447–1473, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1447-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1447-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study analyzes atmospheric CO2 concentrations and global carbon budgets simulated by multiple Earth system models, using several types of simulations (CO2 concentration- and emission-driven experiments). We successfully identified problems with regard to the global carbon budget in each model. We also found urgent issues with regard to land use change CO2 emissions that should be solved in the latest generation of models.
Wouter J. M. Knoben, Kasra Keshavarz, Laura Torres-Rojas, Cyril Thébault, Nathaniel W. Chaney, Alain Pietroniro, and Martyn P. Clark
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-893, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-893, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Many existing data sets for hydrologic analysis tend treat catchments as single, spatially homogeneous units, focus on daily data and typically do not support more complex models. This paper introduces a data set that goes beyond this setup by: (1) providing data at higher spatial and temporal resolution, (2) specifically considering the data requirements of all common hydrologic model types, (3) using statistical summaries of the data aimed at quantifying spatial and temporal heterogeneity.
Daniel Guyumus, Laura Torres-Rojas, Luiz Bacelar, Chengcheng Xu, and Nathaniel Chaney
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-563, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-563, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores a new tiling scheme within the HydroBlocks Land Surface Model to represent local, regional and intermediate subsurface flow. Using high-resolution environmental data, the scheme defines parameterized flow units, enabling water and energy flux simulations. Compared against a benchmark simulation, the multiscale scheme demonstrates strong agreement in spatial mean, standard deviation, and temporal variability, showcasing its potential for large-scale hydrological simulation.
Gab Abramowitz, Anna Ukkola, Sanaa Hobeichi, Jon Cranko Page, Mathew Lipson, Martin G. De Kauwe, Samuel Green, Claire Brenner, Jonathan Frame, Grey Nearing, Martyn Clark, Martin Best, Peter Anthoni, Gabriele Arduini, Souhail Boussetta, Silvia Caldararu, Kyeungwoo Cho, Matthias Cuntz, David Fairbairn, Craig R. Ferguson, Hyungjun Kim, Yeonjoo Kim, Jürgen Knauer, David Lawrence, Xiangzhong Luo, Sergey Malyshev, Tomoko Nitta, Jerome Ogee, Keith Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Phillipe Peylin, Patricia de Rosnay, Heather Rumbold, Bob Su, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, Yunfei Wang, and Yijian Zeng
Biogeosciences, 21, 5517–5538, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper evaluates land models – computer-based models that simulate ecosystem dynamics; land carbon, water, and energy cycles; and the role of land in the climate system. It uses machine learning and AI approaches to show that, despite the complexity of land models, they do not perform nearly as well as they could given the amount of information they are provided with about the prediction problem.
Rachael Lau, Carolina Seguí, Tyler Waterman, Nathaniel Chaney, and Manolis Veveakis
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3651–3661, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3651-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3651-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This work examines the use of interferometric synthetic-aperture radar (InSAR) alongside in situ borehole measurements to assess the stability of deep-seated landslides for the case study of El Forn (Andorra). Comparing InSAR with borehole data suggests a key trade-off between accuracy and precision for various InSAR resolutions. Spatial interpolation with InSAR informed how many remote observations are necessary to lower error in a remote sensing re-creation of ground motion over the landslide.
Enrico Zorzetto, Sergey Malyshev, Paul Ginoux, and Elena Shevliakova
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7219–7244, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7219-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We describe a new snow scheme developed for use in global climate models, which simulates the interactions of snowpack with vegetation, atmosphere, and soil. We test the new snow model over a set of sites where in situ observations are available. We find that when compared to a simpler snow model, this model improves predictions of seasonal snow and of soil temperature under the snowpack, important variables for simulating both the hydrological cycle and the global climate system.
Minjin Lee, Charles A. Stock, John P. Dunne, and Elena Shevliakova
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5191–5224, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5191-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5191-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Modeling global freshwater solid and nutrient loads, in both magnitude and form, is imperative for understanding emerging eutrophication problems. Such efforts, however, have been challenged by the difficulty of balancing details of freshwater biogeochemical processes with limited knowledge, input, and validation datasets. Here we develop a global freshwater model that resolves intertwined algae, solid, and nutrient dynamics and provide performance assessment against measurement-based estimates.
Kirsten L. Findell, Zun Yin, Eunkyo Seo, Paul A. Dirmeyer, Nathan P. Arnold, Nathaniel Chaney, Megan D. Fowler, Meng Huang, David M. Lawrence, Po-Lun Ma, and Joseph A. Santanello Jr.
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1869–1883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We outline a request for sub-daily data to accurately capture the process-level connections between land states, surface fluxes, and the boundary layer response. This high-frequency model output will allow for more direct comparison with observational field campaigns on process-relevant timescales, enable demonstration of inter-model spread in land–atmosphere coupling processes, and aid in targeted identification of sources of deficiencies and opportunities for improvement of the models.
Luiz Bacelar, Arezoo ReifeeiNasab, Nathaniel Chaney, and Ana Barros
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2088, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2088, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The study explores a computationally efficient probabilistic precipitation forecast approach to generate multiple flood scenarios. It reveals the limitations in predicting flash floods accurately and the need for advanced ensemble methodologies to combine different sources of precipitation forecasts. It highlights the scale-dependency of flood predictions at higher spatial resolutions, shedding light on the relationship between river hydraulics and flood propagation in the river network.
Patricia Lawston-Parker, Joseph A. Santanello Jr., and Nathaniel W. Chaney
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2787–2805, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2787-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2787-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Irrigation has been shown to impact weather and climate, but it has only recently been considered in prediction models. Prescribing where (globally) irrigation takes place is important to accurately simulate its impacts on temperature, humidity, and precipitation. Here, we evaluated three different irrigation maps in a weather model and found that the extent and intensity of irrigated areas and their boundaries are important drivers of weather impacts resulting from human practices.
Enrico Zorzetto, Sergey Malyshev, Nathaniel Chaney, David Paynter, Raymond Menzel, and Elena Shevliakova
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1937–1960, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1937-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1937-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we develop a methodology to model the spatial distribution of solar radiation received by land over mountainous terrain. The approach is designed to be used in Earth system models, where coarse grid cells hinder the description of fine-scale land–atmosphere interactions. We adopt a clustering algorithm to partition the land domain into a set of homogeneous sub-grid
tiles, and for each tile we evaluate solar radiation received by land based on terrain properties.
Zun Yin, Kirsten L. Findell, Paul Dirmeyer, Elena Shevliakova, Sergey Malyshev, Khaled Ghannam, Nina Raoult, and Zhihong Tan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 861–872, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-861-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-861-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Land–atmosphere (L–A) interactions typically focus on daytime processes connecting the land state with the overlying atmospheric boundary layer. However, much prior L–A work used monthly or daily means due to the lack of daytime-only data products. Here we show that monthly smoothing can significantly obscure the L–A coupling signal, and including nighttime information can mute or mask the daytime processes of interest. We propose diagnosing L–A coupling within models or archiving subdaily data.
Meng Huang, Po-Lun Ma, Nathaniel W. Chaney, Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Megan D. Fowler, Vincent E. Larson, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6371–6384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6371-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6371-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The land surface in one grid cell may be diverse in character. This study uses an explicit way to account for that subgrid diversity in a state-of-the-art Earth system model (ESM) and explores its implications for the overlying atmosphere. We find that the shallow clouds are increased significantly with the land surface diversity. Our work highlights the importance of accurately representing the land surface and its interaction with the atmosphere in next-generation ESMs.
Nathaniel W. Chaney, Laura Torres-Rojas, Noemi Vergopolan, and Colby K. Fisher
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6813–6832, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6813-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6813-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Although there have been significant advances in river routing and sub-grid heterogeneity (i.e., tiling) schemes in Earth system models over the past decades, there has yet to be a concerted effort to couple these two concepts. This paper aims to bridge this gap through the development of a two-way coupling between tiling schemes and river networks in the HydroBlocks land surface model. The scheme is implemented and tested over a 1 arc degree domain in Oklahoma, United States.
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Sergey Malyshev, Isabel Martínez Cano, Stephen W. Pacala, Elena Shevliakova, Thomas A. Bytnerowicz, and Duncan N. L. Menge
Biogeosciences, 18, 4143–4183, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4143-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4143-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Representing biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is an important challenge for land models. We present a novel representation of BNF and updated nitrogen cycling in a land model. It includes a representation of asymbiotic BNF by soil microbes and the competitive dynamics between nitrogen-fixing and non-fixing plants. It improves estimations of major carbon and nitrogen pools and fluxes and their temporal dynamics in comparison to previous representations of BNF in land models.
Noemi Vergopolan, Sitian Xiong, Lyndon Estes, Niko Wanders, Nathaniel W. Chaney, Eric F. Wood, Megan Konar, Kelly Caylor, Hylke E. Beck, Nicolas Gatti, Tom Evans, and Justin Sheffield
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1827–1847, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1827-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1827-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Drought monitoring and yield prediction often rely on coarse-scale hydroclimate data or (infrequent) vegetation indexes that do not always indicate the conditions farmers face in the field. Consequently, decision-making based on these indices can often be disconnected from the farmer reality. Our study focuses on smallholder farming systems in data-sparse developing countries, and it shows how field-scale soil moisture can leverage and improve crop yield prediction and drought impact assessment.
George C. Hurtt, Louise Chini, Ritvik Sahajpal, Steve Frolking, Benjamin L. Bodirsky, Katherine Calvin, Jonathan C. Doelman, Justin Fisk, Shinichiro Fujimori, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Tomoko Hasegawa, Peter Havlik, Andreas Heinimann, Florian Humpenöder, Johan Jungclaus, Jed O. Kaplan, Jennifer Kennedy, Tamás Krisztin, David Lawrence, Peter Lawrence, Lei Ma, Ole Mertz, Julia Pongratz, Alexander Popp, Benjamin Poulter, Keywan Riahi, Elena Shevliakova, Elke Stehfest, Peter Thornton, Francesco N. Tubiello, Detlef P. van Vuuren, and Xin Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5425–5464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
To estimate the effects of human land use activities on the carbon–climate system, a new set of global gridded land use forcing datasets was developed to link historical land use data to eight future scenarios in a standard format required by climate models. This new generation of land use harmonization (LUH2) includes updated inputs, higher spatial resolution, more detailed land use transitions, and the addition of important agricultural management layers; it will be used for CMIP6 simulations.
Cited articles
Andreae, M. O., Artaxo, P., Brandao, C., Carswell, F. E., Ciccioli, P., Da Costa, A., Culf, A. D., Esteves, J., Gash, J. H., and Grace, J.: Biogeochemical cycling of carbon, water, energy, trace gases, and aerosols in Amazonia: The LBA-EUSTACH experiments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, LBA33-31–LBA33-25, 2002.
Bales, R., Stacy, E., Safeeq, M., Meng, X., Meadows, M., Oroza, C., Conklin, M., Glaser, S., and Wagenbrenner, J.: Spatially distributed water-balance and meteorological data from the rain–snow transition, southern Sierra Nevada, California, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 1795–1805, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1795-2018, 2018.
Baratelli, F., Flipo, N., Rivière, A., and Biancamaria, S.: Retrieving river baseflow from SWOT spaceborne mission, Remote Sens. Environ., 218, 44–54, 2018.
Baroni, G., Schalge, B., Rakovec, O., Kumar, R., Schüler, L., Samaniego, L., Simmer, C., and Attinger, S.: A Comprehensive Distributed Hydrological Modeling Intercomparison to Support Process Representation and Data Collection Strategies, Water Resour. Res., 55, 990–1010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023941, 2019.
Bart, R. and Hope, A.: Inter-seasonal variability in baseflow recession rates: The role of aquifer antecedent storage in central California watersheds, J. Hydrol., 519, 205–213, 2014.
Basha, H. A.: Traveling wave solution of the Boussinesq equation for groundwater flow in horizontal aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 49, 1668–1679, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20168, 2013.
Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Clark, D., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R., Ménard, C., Edwards, J., Hendry, M., Porson, A., and Gedney, N.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: energy and water fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 677–699, 2011.
Beven, K. J. and Kirkby, M. J.: A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/Un modèle à base physique de zone d'appel variable de l'hydrologie du bassin versant, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 24, 43–69, 1979.
Bisht, G., Huang, M., Zhou, T., Chen, X., Dai, H., Hammond, G. E., Riley, W. J., Downs, J. L., Liu, Y., and Zachara, J. M.: Coupling a three-dimensional subsurface flow and transport model with a land surface model to simulate stream–aquifer–land interactions (CP v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4539–4562, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4539-2017, 2017.
Blyth, E. M., Arora, V. K., Clark, D. B., Dadson, S. J., De Kauwe, M. G., Lawrence, D. M., Melton, J. R., Pongratz, J., Turton, R. H., Yoshimura, K., and Yuan, H.: Advances in Land Surface Modelling, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 7, 45–71, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-021-00171-5, 2021.
Boussinesq, J.: Sur le de' bit, en temps de se' cheresse, d'une source alimente' e par une nappe d'eaux d'infiltration, CR Hebd Acad. Sci., 136, 1511–1517, 1903.
Brutsaert, W.: The unit response of groundwater outflow from a hillslope, Water Resour. Res., 30, 2759–2763, https://doi.org/10.1029/94wr01396, 1994.
Brutsaert, W. and Lopez, J. P.: Basin-scale geohydrologic drought flow features of riparian aquifers in the Southern Great Plains, Water Resour. Res., 34, 233–240, https://doi.org/10.1029/97wr03068, 1998.
Brutsaert, W. and Nieber, J. L.: Regionalized drought flow hydrographs from a mature glaciated plateau, Water Resour. Res., 13, 637–643, https://doi.org/10.1029/wr013i003p00637, 1977.
Cai, H., Shi, H., Liu, S., and Babovic, V.: Impacts of regional characteristics on improving the accuracy of groundwater level prediction using machine learning: The case of central eastern continental United States, J. Hydrol.: Reg. Stud., 37, 100930, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100930, 2021.
Campoy, A., Ducharne, A., Cheruy, F., Hourdin, F., Polcher, J., and Dupont, J.: Response of land surface fluxes and precipitation to different soil bottom hydrological conditions in a general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 10725–10739, 2013.
Chaney, N. W., Metcalfe, P., and Wood, E. F.: HydroBlocks: a field-scale resolving land surface model for application over continental extents, Hydrol. Process., 30, 3543–3559, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10891, 2016.
Chaney, N. W., Van Huijgevoort, M. H. J., Shevliakova, E., Malyshev, S., Milly, P. C. D., Gauthier, P. P. G., and Sulman, B. N.: Harnessing big data to rethink land heterogeneity in Earth system models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3311–3330, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3311-2018, 2018.
Chaney, N. W., Torres-Rojas, L., Vergopolan, N., and Fisher, C. K.: HydroBlocks v0.2: enabling a field-scale two-way coupling between the land surface and river networks in Earth system models, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6813–6832, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6813-2021, 2021.
Chen, X. and Hu, Q.: Groundwater influences on soil moisture and surface evaporation, J. Hydrol., 297, 285–300, 2004.
Cheng, S., Cheng, L., Liu, P., Qin, S., Zhang, L., Xu, C. Y., Xiong, L., Liu, L., and Xia, J.: An Analytical Baseflow Coefficient Curve for Depicting the Spatial Variability of Mean Annual Catchment Baseflow, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029529, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020wr029529, 2021.
Clark, M. P., Rupp, D. E., Woods, R. A., Tromp-Van Meerveld, H. J., Peters, N. E., and Freer, J. E.: Consistency between hydrological models and field observations: linking processes at the hillslope scale to hydrological responses at the watershed scale, Hydrol. Process., 23, 311–319, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7154, 2009.
Clark, M. P., Fan, Y., Lawrence, D. M., Adam, J. C., Bolster, D., Gochis, D. J., Hooper, R. P., Kumar, M., Leung, L. R., Mackay, D. S., Maxwell, R. M., Shen, C. P., Swenson, S. C., and Zeng, X. B.: Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in Earth System Models, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5929–5956, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr017096, 2015.
De Rosnay, P., Polcher, J. D., Bruen, M., and Laval, K.: Impact of a physically based soil water flow and soil-plant interaction representation for modeling large-scale land surface processes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACL3-1–ACL3-19, 2002.
De St Venant, B.: Theorie du mouvement non-permanent des eaux avec application aux crues des rivers et a l'introduntion des Marees dans leur lit, Academic de Sci. Comptes Redus, 73, 148–154, 1871.
Delworth, T. L., Cooke, W. F., Adcroft, A., Bushuk, M., Chen, J. H., Dunne, K. A., Ginoux, P., Gudgel, R., Hallberg, R. W., and Harris, L.: SPEAR: The next generation GFDL modeling system for seasonal to multidecadal prediction and projection, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001895, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001895, 2020.
Dunne, J. P., Horowitz, L., Adcroft, A., Ginoux, P., Held, I., John, J., Krasting, J. P., Malyshev, S., Naik, V., and Paulot, F.: The GFDL Earth System Model version 4.1 (GFDL-ESM 4.1): Overall coupled model description and simulation characteristics, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS002015, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002015, 2020.
Dupuit, J.: Etudes theoriques et pratiques sur le mouvement des eaux dans les canaux decouverts et a travers les terrains permeables avec des considerations relatives au regime des grandes eaux, au debouche a leur donner et a la marche des alluvions dans les rivieres a fond mobile, Dunod, https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_NDK90LcYwhEC/page/n149/mode/2up (last access: 14 March 2024), 1863.
Fan, Y.: Groundwater in the Earth's critical zone: Relevance to large-scale patterns and processes, Water Resour. Res., 51, 3052–3069, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr017037, 2015.
Fan, Y. and Miguez-Macho, G.: A simple hydrologic framework for simulating wetlands in climate and earth system models, Clim. Dynam., 37, 253–278, 2011.
Fan, Y., Miguez-Macho, G., Weaver, C. P., Walko, R., and Robock, A.: Incorporating water table dynamics in climate modeling: 1. Water table observations and equilibrium water table simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D10125, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008111, 2007.
Fan, Y., Clark, M., Lawrence, D. M., Swenson, S., Band, L. E., Brantley, S. L., Brooks, P. D., Dietrich, W. E., Flores, A., Grant, G., Kirchner, J. W., Mackay, D. S., McDonnell, J. J., Milly, P. C. D., Sullivan, P. L., Tague, C., Ajami, H., Chaney, N., Hartmann, A., Hazenberg, P., McNamara, J., Pelletier, J., Perket, J., Rouholahnejad-Freund, E., Wagener, T., Zeng, X., Beighley, E., Buzan, J., Huang, M., Livneh, B., Mohanty, B. P., Nijssen, B., Safeeq, M., Shen, C., Verseveld, W., Volk, J., and Yamazaki, D.: Hillslope Hydrology in Global Change Research and Earth System Modeling, Water Resour. Res., 55, 1737–1772, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023903, 2019.
Forchheimer, P.: Uber die ergiebigkeit von brummen, Anlagen und Sickerschlitzen, Zeitsch. Archit. Ing. Ver., Hannover, 32, 539–563, 1986.
Gentine, P., Green, J. K., Guérin, M., Humphrey, V., Seneviratne, S. I., Zhang, Y., and Zhou, S.: Coupling between the terrestrial carbon and water cycles – a review, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 083003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab22d6, 2019.
Gleeson, T., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Porkka, M., Zipper, S. C., Jaramillo, F., Gerten, D., Fetzer, I., Cornell, S. E., Piemontese, L., Gordon, L. J., Rockström, J., Oki, T., Sivapalan, M., Wada, Y., Brauman, K. A., Flörke, M., Bierkens, M. F. P., Lehner, B., Keys, P., Kummu, M., Wagener, T., Dadson, S., Troy, T. J., Steffen, W., Falkenmark, M., and Famiglietti, J. S.: Illuminating water cycle modifications and Earth system resilience in the Anthropocene, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR024957, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr024957, 2020.
Gochis, D. J., Barlage, M., Dugger, A., FitzGerald, K., Karsten, L., McAllister, M., McCreight, J., Mills, J., RafieeiNasab, A., Read, L., Sampson, K., Yates, D., and Yu, W.: The NCAR WRF-Hydro Modeling System Technical Description (Version 5.2), National Center for Atmospheric Research, https://ral.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/docs/water/wrf-hydro-v511-technical-description.pdf (last access: 1 May 2024), 2021.
Gómez-Hernández, J. J. and Gorelick, S. M.: Effective groundwater model parameter values: Influence of spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity, leakance, and recharge, Water Resour. Res., 25, 405–419, 1989.
Heath, R. C.: Basic ground-water hydrology, US Geological Survey, https://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/2220/report.pdf (last access: 22 April 2024), 2004.
Hong, M. and Mohanty, B.: A new method for effective parameterization of catchment-scale aquifer through event-scale recession analysis, Adv. Water Resour., 174, 104408, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104408, 2023a.
Hong, M. and Mohanty, B. P.: Representing Bidirectional Hydraulic Continuum Between the Stream and Hillslope in the National Water Model for Improved Streamflow Prediction, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 15, e2022MS003325, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ms003325, 2023b.
Hong, M., Chaney, N., Malyshev, S., and Shevliakova, E.: LM4-SHARC v1.0: Resolving the Catchment-scale Soil-Hillslope Aquifer-River Continuum for the GFDL Earth System Modeling Framework, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13750071, 2024.
Hornberger, G. M. and Remson, I.: A moving boundary model of a one-dimensional saturated-unsaturated, transient porous flow system, Water Resour. Res., 6, 898–905, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR006i003p00898, 1970.
Hunsaker, C. T., Whitaker, T. W., and Bales, R. C.: Snowmelt Runoff and Water Yield Along Elevation and Temperature Gradients in California's Southern Sierra Nevada1, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 48, 667–678, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00641.x, 2012.
Jachens, E. R., Rupp, D. E., Roques, C., and Selker, J. S.: Recession analysis revisited: impacts of climate on parameter estimation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1159–1170, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1159-2020, 2020.
Jepsen, S. M., Harmon, T. C., Meadows, M. W., and Hunsaker, C. T.: Hydrogeologic influence on changes in snowmelt runoff with climate warming: Numerical experiments on a mid-elevation catchment in the Sierra Nevada, USA, J. Hydrol., 533, 332–342, 2016.
Jing, M., Heße, F., Kumar, R., Kolditz, O., Kalbacher, T., and Attinger, S.: Influence of input and parameter uncertainty on the prediction of catchment-scale groundwater travel time distributions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 23, 171–190, 2019.
Karlsen, R. H., Bishop, K., Grabs, T., Ottosson-Löfvenius, M., Laudon, H., and Seibert, J.: The role of landscape properties, storage and evapotranspiration on variability in streamflow recessions in a boreal catchment, J. Hydrol., 570, 315–328, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.065, 2019.
Kirchner, J. W.: Catchments as simple dynamical systems: Catchment characterization, rainfall–runoff modeling, and doing hydrology backward, Water Resour. Res., 45, W02429, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr006912, 2009.
Kollet, S. J. and Maxwell, R. M.: Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 945–958, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.006, 2006.
Kollet, S. J. and Maxwell, R. M.: Capturing the influence of groundwater dynamics on land surface processes using an integrated, distributed watershed model, Water Resour. Res., 44, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006004, 2008.
Kratzert, F., Nearing, G., Addor, N., Erickson, T., Gauch, M., Gilon, O., Gudmundsson, L., Hassidim, A., Klotz, D., Nevo, S., Shalev, G., and Matias, Y.: Caravan – A global community dataset for large-sample hydrology, Sci. Data, 10, 61, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-01975-w, 2023.
Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E., Swenson, S. C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X., Yang, Z. L., Levis, S., and Sakaguchi, K.: Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 3, M03001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045, 2011.
Lawrence, D. M., Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Oleson, K. W., Swenson, S. C., Bonan, G., Collier, N., Ghimire, B., Kampenhout, L., Kennedy, D., Kluzek, E., Lawrence, P. J., Li, F., Li, H., Lombardozzi, D., Riley, W. J., Sacks, W. J., Shi, M., Vertenstein, M., Wieder, W. R., Xu, C., Ali, A. A., Badger, A. M., Bisht, G., Broeke, M., Brunke, M. A., Burns, S. P., Buzan, J., Clark, M., Craig, A., Dahlin, K., Drewniak, B., Fisher, J. B., Flanner, M., Fox, A. M., Gentine, P., Hoffman, F., Keppel-Aleks, G., Knox, R., Kumar, S., Lenaerts, J., Leung, L. R., Lipscomb, W. H., Lu, Y., Pandey, A., Pelletier, J. D., Perket, J., Randerson, J. T., Ricciuto, D. M., Sanderson, B. M., Slater, A., Subin, Z. M., Tang, J., Thomas, R. Q., Val Martin, M., and Zeng, X.: The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 4245–4287, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ms001583, 2019.
Leung, L. R., Huang, M., Qian, Y., and Liang, X.: Climate–soil–vegetation control on groundwater table dynamics and its feedbacks in a climate model, Clim. Dynam., 36, 57–81, 2011.
Li, D., Andreadis, K. M., Margulis, S. A., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A Data Assimilation Framework for Generating Space–Time Continuous Daily SWOT River Discharge Data Products, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026999, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr026999, 2020.
Li, H. and Ameli, A.: A statistical approach for identifying factors governing streamflow recession behaviour, Hydrol. Process., 36, e14718, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14718, 2022.
Li, H., Wigmosta, M. S., Wu, H., Huang, M., Ke, Y., Coleman, A. M., and Leung, L. R.: A physically based runoff routing model for land surface and earth system models, J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 808–828, 2013.
Liang, X., Xie, Z. H., and Huang, M. Y.: A new parameterization for surface and groundwater interactions and its impact on water budgets with the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) land surface model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8613, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003090, 2003.
Manning, R.: On the flow of water in open channels and pipes, Transactions of the Institution of Civil Engineers of Ireland, 20, 161–207, 1891.
Maxwell, R. M. and Kollet, S. J.: Interdependence of groundwater dynamics and land-energy feedbacks under climate change, Nat. Geosci., 1, 665–669, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo315, 2008.
Maxwell, R. M., Chow, F. K., and Kollet, S. J.: The groundwater–land-surface–atmosphere connection: Soil moisture effects on the atmospheric boundary layer in fully-coupled simulations, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 2447–2466, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.05.018, 2007.
Maxwell, R. M., Lundquist, J. K., Mirocha, J. D., Smith, S. G., Woodward, C. S., and Tompson, A. F. B.: Development of a Coupled Groundwater–Atmosphere Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 96–116, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010mwr3392.1, 2011.
Maxwell, R. M., Condon, L. E., and Kollet, S. J.: A high-resolution simulation of groundwater and surface water over most of the continental US with the integrated hydrologic model ParFlow v3, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 923–937, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-923-2015, 2015.
McCabe, M., Wood, E. F., Wójcik, R., Pan, M., Sheffield, J., Gao, H., and Su, H.: Hydrological consistency using multi-sensor remote sensing data for water and energy cycle studies, Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 430–444, 2008.
Miguez-Macho, G. and Fan, Y.: The role of groundwater in the Amazon water cycle: 1. Influence on seasonal streamflow, flooding and wetlands, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D15113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017539, 2012.
Miguez-Macho, G., Fan, Y., Weaver, C. P., Walko, R., and Robock, A.: Incorporating water table dynamics in climate modeling: 2. Formulation, validation, and soil moisture simulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D13108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd008112, 2007.
Milly, P. C., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Stouffer, R. J.: Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?, Science, 319, 573–574, 2008.
Milly, P. C. D., Malyshev, S. L., Shevliakova, E., Dunne, K. A., Findell, K. L., Gleeson, T., Liang, Z., Phillipps, P., Stouffer, R. J., and Swenson, S.: An Enhanced Model of Land Water and Energy for Global Hydrologic and Earth-System Studies, J. Hydrometeorol., 15, 1739–1761, https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-13-0162.1, 2014.
Mu, Q., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Evolution of hydrological and carbon cycles under a changing climate, Hydrol. Process., 25, 4093–4102, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8367, 2011.
Newman, A. J., Clark, M. P., Winstral, A., Marks, D., and Seyfried, M.: The Use of Similarity Concepts to Represent Subgrid Variability in Land Surface Models: Case Study in a Snowmelt-Dominated Watershed, J. Hydrometeorol., 15, 1717–1738, https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-13-038.1, 2014.
Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M., Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Xia, Y.: The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015139, 2011.
Oleson, K. W., Lawrence, D. M., Bonan, G. B., Drewniak, B., Huang, M., Koven, C. D., Levis, S., Li, F., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Swenson, S. C., and Thornton, P. E.: Technical Description of version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM), NCAR Earth System Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RR1W7M, 2013.
Ouyang, L., Liu, S., Ye, J., Liu, Z., Sheng, F., Wang, R., and Lu, Z.: Quantitative assessment of surface runoff and base flow response to multiple factors in Pengchongjian small watershed, Forests, 9, 553, https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090553, 2018.
Pappenberger, F., Dutra, E., Wetterhall, F., and Cloke, H. L.: Deriving global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods through a physical model cascade, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 16, 4143–4156, 2012.
Pauritsch, M., Birk, S., Wagner, T., Hergarten, S., and Winkler, G.: Analytical approximations of discharge recessions for steeply sloping aquifers in alpine catchments, Water Resour. Res., 51, 8729–8740, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr017749, 2015.
Poggio, L., de Sousa, L. M., Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kempen, B., Ribeiro, E., and Rossiter, D.: SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty, SOIL, 7, 217–240, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-217-2021, 2021.
Pokhrel, Y. N., Fan, Y., Miguez-Macho, G., Yeh, P. J. F., and Han, S.-C.: The role of groundwater in the Amazon water cycle: 3. Influence on terrestrial water storage computations and comparison with GRACE, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 3233–3244, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50335, 2013.
Rupp, D. E. and Selker, J. S.: On the use of the Boussinesq equation for interpreting recession hydrographs from sloping aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 42, W12421, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006wr005080, 2006.
Safeeq, M. and Hunsaker, C. T.: Characterizing Runoff and Water Yield for Headwater Catchments in the Southern Sierra Nevada, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 52, 1327–1346, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12457, 2016.
Shangguan, W., Dai, Y., Duan, Q., Liu, B., and Yuan, H.: A global soil data set for earth system modeling, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 249–263, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013ms000293, 2014.
Shen, C. P. and Phanikumar, M. S.: A process-based, distributed hydrologic model based on a large-scale method for surface-subsurface coupling, Adv. Water Resour., 33, 1524–1541, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.09.002, 2010.
Shevliakova, E., Malyshev, S., Martinez-Cano, I., Milly, P. C. D., Pacala, S. W., Ginoux, P., Dunne, K. A., Dunne, J. P., Dupuis, C., Findell, K. L., Ghannam, K., Horowitz, L. W., Knutson, T. R., Krasting, J. P., Naik, V., Phillipps, P., Zadeh, N., Yu, Y., Zeng, F., and Zeng, Y.: The Land Component LM4.1 of the GFDL Earth System Model ESM4.1: Model Description and Characteristics of Land Surface Climate and Carbon Cycling in the Historical Simulation, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 16, e2023MS003922, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023ms003922, 2024.
Sivapalan, M.: Pattern, process and function: elements of a unified theory of hydrology at the catchment scale, Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences, Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1002/0470848944.hsa012, 2006.
Strack, O. D. L.: A Dupuit-Forchheimer Model for three-dimensional flow with variable density, Water Resour. Res., 31, 3007–3017, https://doi.org/10.1029/95wr02254, 1995.
Strelkoff, T.: Numerical solution of Saint-Venant equations, J. Hydraul. Div., 96, 223–252, 1970.
Subin, Z. M., Milly, P. C. D., Sulman, B. N., Malyshev, S., and Shevliakova, E.: Resolving terrestrial ecosystem processes along a subgrid topographic gradient for an earth-system model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 11, 8443–8492, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-11-8443-2014, 2014.
Sujud, L. H. and Jaafar, H. H.: A global dynamic runoff application and dataset based on the assimilation of GPM, SMAP, and GCN250 curve number datasets, Sci. Data, 9, 706, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01834-0, 2022.
Szilagyi, J. and Parlange, M. B.: Baseflow separation based on analytical solutions of the Boussinesq equation, J. Hydrol., 204, 251–260, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00132-7, 1998.
Szilagyi, J., Parlange, M. B., and Albertson, J. D.: Recession flow analysis for aquifer parameter determination, Water Resour. Res., 34, 1851–1857, https://doi.org/10.1029/98wr01009, 1998.
Takata, K., Emori, S., and Watanabe, T.: Development of the minimal advanced treatments of surface interaction and runoff, Global Planet. Change, 38, 209–222, 2003.
Tashie, A., Pavelsky, T., and Band, L. E.: An Empirical Reevaluation of Streamflow Recession Analysis at the Continental Scale, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR025448, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr025448, 2020.
Tashie, A., Pavelsky, T., Band, L., and Topp, S.: Watershed-Scale Effective Hydraulic Properties of the Continental United States, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002440, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ms002440, 2021.
Troch, P. A., De Troch, F. P., and Brutsaert, W.: Effective water table depth to describe initial conditions prior to storm rainfall in humid regions, Water Resour. Res., 29, 427–434, https://doi.org/10.1029/92wr02087, 1993.
Troch, P. A., Berne, A., Bogaart, P., Harman, C., Hilberts, A. G. J., Lyon, S. W., Paniconi, C., Pauwels, V. R. N., Rupp, D. E., Selker, J. S., Teuling, A. J., Uijlenhoet, R., and Verhoest, N. E. C.: The importance of hydraulic groundwater theory in catchment hydrology: The legacy of Wilfried Brutsaert and Jean-Yves Parlange, Water Resour. Res., 49, 5099–5116, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20407, 2013.
Trotter, L., Saft, M., Peel, M. C., and Fowler, K. J.: Recession constants are non-stationary: Impacts of multi-annual drought on catchment recession behaviour and storage dynamics, J. Hydrol., 630, 130707, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130707, 2024.
USGS: 3D Elevation Program 1-Meter Resolution Digital Elevation Model [data set], https://apps.nationalmap.gov/downloader/ (last access: 1 September 2023), 2019.
Vannier, O., Braud, I., and Anquetin, S.: Regional estimation of catchment-scale soil properties by means of streamflow recession analysis for use in distributed hydrological models, Hydrol. Process., 28, 6276–6291, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10101, 2014.
Wongchuig-Correa, S., de Paiva, R. C. D., Biancamaria, S., and Collischonn, W.: Assimilation of future SWOT-based river elevations, surface extent observations and discharge estimations into uncertain global hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 590, 125473, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125473, 2020.
Xu, B., Ye, M., Dong, S., Dai, Z., and Pei, Y.: A new model for simulating spring discharge recession and estimating effective porosity of karst aquifers, J. Hydrol., 562, 609–622, 2018.
Xu, Z., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., and Feldman, D.: Sensitivities of subgrid-scale physics schemes, meteorological forcing, and topographic radiation in atmosphere-through-bedrock integrated process models: a case study in the Upper Colorado River basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1771–1789, 2023.
Yeh, P. J. F. and Eltahir, E. A. B.: Representation of Water Table Dynamics in a Land Surface Scheme. Part I: Model Development, J. Climate, 18, 1861–1880, https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli3330.1, 2005.
Zecharias, Y. B. and Brutsaert, W.: Recession characteristics of groundwater outflow and base flow from mountainous watersheds, Water Resour. Res., 24, 1651–1658, 1988.
Zeng, Y., Xie, Z., Yu, Y., Liu, S., Wang, L., Jia, B., Qin, P., and Chen, Y.: Ecohydrological effects of stream–aquifer water interaction: a case study of the Heihe River basin, northwestern China, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2333–2352, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2333-2016, 2016.
Zhao, M., Golaz, J. C., Held, I., Guo, H., Balaji, V., Benson, R., Chen, J. H., Chen, X., Donner, L., and Dunne, J.: The GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM4, 0/LM4, 0:2, Model description, sensitivity studies, and tuning strategies, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 735–769, 2018.
Zorzetto, E., Malyshev, S., Chaney, N., Paynter, D., Menzel, R., and Shevliakova, E.: Effects of complex terrain on the shortwave radiative balance: a sub-grid-scale parameterization for the GFDL Earth System Model version 4.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1937–1960, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1937-2023, 2023.
Short summary
This study shows the significance of groundwater in resolving the coupled terrestrial water–energy cycle. LM4-SHARC (soil–hillslope aquifer–river continuum) describes the hillslope groundwater using its emergent properties, yielding noticeable improvements in soil moisture/temperature and groundwater discharge predictions. The implications of groundwater-mediated hydrologic interactions between hillslopes and streams need further exploration in the Earth system modeling community.
This study shows the significance of groundwater in resolving the coupled terrestrial...
