Articles | Volume 18, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1829-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1829-2025
Development and technical paper
 | 
17 Mar 2025
Development and technical paper |  | 17 Mar 2025

Towards deep-learning solutions for classification of automated snow height measurements (CleanSnow v1.0.2)

Jan Svoboda, Marc Ruesch, David Liechti, Corinne Jones, Michele Volpi, Michael Zehnder, and Jürg Schweizer

Related authors

Supershear crack propagation in snow slab avalanche release: new insights from numerical simulations and field measurements
Grégoire Bobillier, Bertil Trottet, Bastian Bergfeld, Ron Simenhois, Alec van Herwijnen, Jürg Schweizer, and Johan Gaume
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2215–2223, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2215-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2215-2025, 2025
Short summary
Data-driven modeling of environmental factors influencing Arctic methanesulfonic acid aerosol concentrations
Jakob Boyd Pernov, William H. Aeberhard, Michele Volpi, Eliza Harris, Benjamin Hohermuth, Sakiko Ishino, Ragnhild B. Skeie, Stephan Henne, Ulas Im, Patricia K. Quinn, Lucia M. Upchurch, and Julia Schmale
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6497–6537, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6497-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6497-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessing the performance and explainability of an avalanche danger forecast model
Cristina Pérez-Guillén, Frank Techel, Michele Volpi, and Alec van Herwijnen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1331–1351, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1331-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1331-2025, 2025
Short summary
The source, quantity, and spatial distribution of interfacial water during glide-snow avalanche release: experimental evidence from field monitoring
Amelie Fees, Michael Lombardo, Alec van Herwijnen, Peter Lehmann, and Jürg Schweizer
The Cryosphere, 19, 1453–1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1453-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1453-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantification of capillary rise dynamics in snow using neutron radiography
Michael Lombardo, Amelie Fees, Anders Kaestner, Alec van Herwijnen, Jürg Schweizer, and Peter Lehmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-304,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-304, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
Computationally efficient subglacial drainage modelling using Gaussian process emulators: GlaDS-GP v1.0
Tim Hill, Derek Bingham, Gwenn E. Flowers, and Matthew J. Hoffman
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4045–4074, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4045-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4045-2025, 2025
Short summary
Anisotropic metric-based mesh adaptation for ice flow modelling in Firedrake
Davor Dundovic, Joseph G. Wallwork, Stephan C. Kramer, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet, Regine Hock, and Matthew D. Piggott
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4023–4044, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4023-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4023-2025, 2025
Short summary
Description and validation of the ice-sheet model Nix v1.0
Daniel Moreno-Parada, Alexander Robinson, Marisa Montoya, and Jorge Alvarez-Solas
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3895–3919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3895-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3895-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Utrecht Finite Volume Ice-Sheet Model (UFEMISM) version 2.0 – Part 1: Description and idealised experiments
Constantijn J. Berends, Victor Azizi, Jorge A. Bernales, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3635–3659, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3635-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3635-2025, 2025
Short summary
A Flexible Snow Model (FSM 2.1.1) including a forest canopy
Richard Essery, Giulia Mazzotti, Sarah Barr, Tobias Jonas, Tristan Quaife, and Nick Rutter
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3583–3605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Avanzi, F., De Michele, C., Ghezzi, A., Jommi, C., and Pepe, M.: A processing-modeling routine to use SNOTEL hourly data in snowpack dynamic models, Adv. Water Resour., 73, 16–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.06.011, 2014. a
Bavay, M. and Egger, T.: MeteoIO 2.4.2: a preprocessing library for meteorological data, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 3135–3151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-3135-2014, 2014. a, b
Blandini, G., Avanzi, F., Gabellani, S., Ponziani, D., Stevenin, H., Ratto, S., Ferraris, L., and Viglione, A.: A random forest approach to quality-checking automatic snow-depth sensor measurements, The Cryosphere, 17, 5317–5333, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5317-2023, 2023. a
Breiman, L.: Random Forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010950718922, 2001. a
Cho, K., van Merriënboer, B., Bahdanau, D., and Bengio, Y.: On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder–Decoder Approaches, in: Proceedings of SSST-8, Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation, Doha, Qatar, 103–111, https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-4012, 2014. a
Download
Short summary
Accurately measuring snow height is key for modeling approaches in climate science, snow hydrology, and avalanche forecasting. Erroneous snow height measurements often occur when snow height is low or changes, for instance during snowfall in summer. We prepare a new benchmark dataset with annotated snow height data and demonstrate how to improve the measurement quality using modern deep-learning approaches. Our approach can be easily implemented in a data pipeline for snow modeling.
Share