Articles | Volume 17, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024
Model description paper
 | 
18 Sep 2024
Model description paper |  | 18 Sep 2024

Prediction of hysteretic matric potential dynamics using artificial intelligence: application of autoencoder neural networks

Nedal Aqel, Lea Reusser, Stephan Margreth, Andrea Carminati, and Peter Lehmann

Related authors

Glide-snow avalanches: a mechanical, threshold-based release area model
Amelie Fees, Alec van Herwijnen, Michael Lombardo, Jürg Schweizer, and Peter Lehmann
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3387–3400, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3387-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3387-2024, 2024
Short summary
The source, quantity, and spatial distribution of interfacial water during glide-snow avalanche release: experimental evidence from field monitoring
Amelie Fees, Michael Lombardo, Alec van Herwijnen, Peter Lehmann, and Jürg Schweizer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2485,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2485, 2024
Short summary
Hydro-pedotransfer functions: a roadmap for future development
Tobias Karl David Weber, Lutz Weihermüller, Attila Nemes, Michel Bechtold, Aurore Degré, Efstathios Diamantopoulos, Simone Fatichi, Vilim Filipović, Surya Gupta, Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Daniel R. Hirmas, Conrad Jackisch, Quirijn de Jong van Lier, John Koestel, Peter Lehmann, Toby R. Marthews, Budiman Minasny, Holger Pagel, Martine van der Ploeg, Shahab Aldin Shojaeezadeh, Simon Fiil Svane, Brigitta Szabó, Harry Vereecken, Anne Verhoef, Michael Young, Yijian Zeng, Yonggen Zhang, and Sara Bonetti
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3391–3433, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impact of topography on in situ soil wetness measurements for regional landslide early warning – a case study from the Swiss Alpine Foreland
Adrian Wicki, Peter Lehmann, Christian Hauck, and Manfred Stähli
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1059–1077, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1059-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1059-2023, 2023
Short summary
Simulated or measured soil moisture: which one is adding more value to regional landslide early warning?
Adrian Wicki, Per-Erik Jansson, Peter Lehmann, Christian Hauck, and Manfred Stähli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4585–4610, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4585-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4585-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
Deep dive into hydrologic simulations at global scale: harnessing the power of deep learning and physics-informed differentiable models (δHBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Jens de Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Yoshihide Wada, Jiangtao Liu, Ming Pan, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7181–7198, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024, 2024
Short summary
PyEt v1.3.1: a Python package for the estimation of potential evapotranspiration
Matevž Vremec, Raoul A. Collenteur, and Steffen Birk
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7083–7103, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, 2024
Short summary
Regionalization in global hydrological models and its impact on runoff simulations: a case study using WaterGAP3 (v 1.0.0)
Jenny Kupzig, Nina Kupzig, and Martina Flörke
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6819–6846, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6819-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6819-2024, 2024
Short summary
STORM v.2: A simple, stochastic rainfall model for exploring the impacts of climate and climate change at and near the land surface in gauged watersheds
Manuel F. Rios Gaona, Katerina Michaelides, and Michael Bliss Singer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5387–5412, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5387-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5387-2024, 2024
Short summary
Fluvial flood inundation and socio-economic impact model based on open data
Lukas Riedel, Thomas Röösli, Thomas Vogt, and David N. Bresch
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5291–5308, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5291-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5291-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Achieng, K. O.: Modelling of soil moisture retention curve using machine learning techniques: Artificial and deep neural networks vs support vector regression models, Comput. Geosci., 133, 104320, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2019.104320, 2019. 
Aqel, N.: Prediction of Hysteretic Matric Potential Dynamics Using Artificial Intelligence: Application of Autoencoder Neural Networks-Dataset, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10600669, 2024a. 
Aqel, N.: Prediction of Hysteretic Matric Potential Dynamics Using Artificial Intelligence: Application of Autoencoder Neural Networks – python codes. Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10602397, 2024b. 
Aqel, N.: Prediction of Hysteretic Matric Potential Dynamics Using Artificial Intelligence: Application of Autoencoder Neural Networks – Autoencoder part, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10605108, 2024c. 
Basile, A., Bonfante, A., Coppola, A., De Mascellis, R., Falanga Bolognesi, S., Terribile, F., and Manna, P.: How does PTF Interpret Soil Heterogeneity? A Stochastic Approach Applied to a Case Study on Maize in Northern Italy, Water (Basel), 11, 275, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020275, 2019. 
Download
Short summary
The soil water potential (SWP) determines various soil water processes. Since remote sensing techniques cannot measure it directly, it is often deduced from volumetric water content (VWC) information. However, under dynamic field conditions, the relationship between SWP and VWC is highly ambiguous due to different factors that cannot be modeled with the classical approach. Applying a deep neural network with an autoencoder enables the prediction of the dynamic SWP.