Articles | Volume 15, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5667-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5667-2022
Model description paper
 | 
21 Jul 2022
Model description paper |  | 21 Jul 2022

Benchmarking the vertically integrated ice-sheet model IMAU-ICE (version 2.0)

Constantijn J. Berends, Heiko Goelzer, Thomas J. Reerink, Lennert B. Stap, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal

Related authors

Present-day mass loss rates are a precursor for West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse
Tim van den Akker, William H. Lipscomb, Gunter R. Leguy, Jorjo Bernales, Constantijn Berends, Willem Jan van de Berg, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-851,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-851, 2024
Short summary
The Utrecht Finite Volume Ice-Sheet Model (UFEMISM version 2.0) – part 1: description and idealised experiments
Constantijn J. Berends, Victor Azizi, Jorge Bernales, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-5,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-5, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Miocene Antarctic Ice Sheet area adapts significantly faster than volume to CO2-induced climate change
Lennert B. Stap, Constantijn J. Berends, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Clim. Past, 20, 257–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-257-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-20-257-2024, 2024
Short summary
Late Pleistocene glacial terminations accelerated by proglacial lakes
Meike Scherrenberg, Constantijn Berends, and Roderik van de Wal
Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2023-42,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2023-42, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for CP
Short summary
Compensating errors in inversions for subglacial bed roughness: same steady state, different dynamic response
Constantijn J. Berends, Roderik S. W. van de Wal, Tim van den Akker, and William H. Lipscomb
The Cryosphere, 17, 1585–1600, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1585-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1585-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
Refactoring the EVP solver for improved performance – a case study based on CICE v6.5
Till Andreas Soya Rasmussen, Jacob Poulsen, Mads Hvid Ribergaard, Ruchira Sasanka, Anthony P. Craig, Elizabeth Clare Hunke, and Stefan Rethmeier
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-40,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-40, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
A novel numerical implementation for the surface energy budget of melting snowpacks and glaciers
Kévin Fourteau, Julien Brondex, Fanny Brun, and Marie Dumont
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1903–1929, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1903-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1903-2024, 2024
Short summary
SnowPappus v1.0, a blowing-snow model for large-scale applications of the Crocus snow scheme
Matthieu Baron, Ange Haddjeri, Matthieu Lafaysse, Louis Le Toumelin, Vincent Vionnet, and Mathieu Fructus
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1297–1326, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1297-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1297-2024, 2024
Short summary
OpenFOAM-avalanche 2312: Depth-integrated Models Beyond Dense Flow Avalanches
Matthias Rauter and Julia Kowalski
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-210,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-210, 2024
Short summary
A stochastic parameterization of ice sheet surface mass balance for the Stochastic Ice-Sheet and Sea-Level System Model (StISSM v1.0)
Lizz Ultee, Alexander A. Robel, and Stefano Castruccio
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1041–1057, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1041-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1041-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abe-Ouchi, A., Saito, F., Kawamura, K., Raymo, M. E., Okuno, J., Takahashi, K., and Blatter, H.: Insolation-driven 100,000-year glacial cycles and hysteresis of ice-sheet volume, Nature Letters 500, 190–194, 2013. 
Asay-Davis, X. S., Cornford, S. L., Durand, G., Galton-Fenzi, B. K., Gladstone, R. M., Gudmundsson, G. H., Hattermann, T., Holland, D. M., Holland, D., Holland, P. R., Martin, D. F., Mathiot, P., Pattyn, F., and Seroussi, H.: Experimental design for three interrelated marine ice sheet and ocean model intercomparison projects: MISMIP v. 3 (MISMIP +), ISOMIP v. 2 (ISOMIP +) and MISOMIP v. 1 (MISOMIP1), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2471–2497, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2471-2016, 2016. 
Bereiter, B., Eggleston, S., Schmitt, J., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Stocker, T. F., Fischer, H., Kipfstuhl, S., and Chappellaz, J.: Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 542–549, 2015. 
Berends, C. J., de Boer, B., and van de Wal, R. S. W.: Application of HadCM3@Bristolv1.0 simulations of paleoclimate as forcing for an ice-sheet model, ANICE2.1: set-up and benchmark experiments, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4657–4675, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4657-2018, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
The rate at which marine ice sheets such as the West Antarctic ice sheet will retreat in a warming climate and ocean is still uncertain. Numerical ice-sheet models, which solve the physical equations that describe the way glaciers and ice sheets deform and flow, have been substantially improved in recent years. Here we present the results of several years of work on IMAU-ICE, an ice-sheet model of intermediate complexity, which can be used to study ice sheets of both the past and the future.