Articles | Volume 13, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5799-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5799-2020
Development and technical paper
 | 
26 Nov 2020
Development and technical paper |  | 26 Nov 2020

Necessary conditions for algorithmic tuning of weather prediction models using OpenIFS as an example

Lauri Tuppi, Pirkka Ollinaho, Madeleine Ekblom, Vladimir Shemyakin, and Heikki Järvinen

Related authors

Coupling a weather model directly to GNSS orbit determination – case studies with OpenIFS
Angel Navarro Trastoy, Sebastian Strasser, Lauri Tuppi, Maksym Vasiuta, Markku Poutanen, Torsten Mayer-Gürr, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2763–2771, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2763-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2763-2022, 2022
Short summary
Ensemble prediction using a new dataset of ECMWF initial states – OpenEnsemble 1.0
Pirkka Ollinaho, Glenn D. Carver, Simon T. K. Lang, Lauri Tuppi, Madeleine Ekblom, and Heikki Järvinen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2143–2160, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2143-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2143-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical methods
VISIR-2: ship weather routing in Python
Gianandrea Mannarini, Mario Leonardo Salinas, Lorenzo Carelli, Nicola Petacco, and Josip Orović
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4355–4382, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4355-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4355-2024, 2024
Short summary
Incremental analysis update (IAU) in the Model for Prediction Across Scales coupled with the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (MPAS–JEDI 2.0.0)
Soyoung Ha, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Ivette Hernández Baños, William C. Skamarock, and Michael G. Duda
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4199–4211, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Decision-making strategies implemented in SolFinder 1.0 to identify eco-efficient aircraft trajectories: application study in AirTraf 3.0
Federica Castino, Feijia Yin, Volker Grewe, Hiroshi Yamashita, Sigrun Matthes, Simone Dietmüller, Sabine Baumann, Manuel Soler, Abolfazl Simorgh, Maximilian Mendiguchia Meuser, Florian Linke, and Benjamin Lührs
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4031–4052, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4031-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4031-2024, 2024
Short summary
Developing meshing workflows in Gmsh v4.11 for the geologic uncertainty assessment of high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage
Ali Dashti, Jens C. Grimmer, Christophe Geuzaine, Florian Bauer, and Thomas Kohl
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3467–3485, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3467-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3467-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development and preliminary validation of a land surface image assimilation system based on the Common Land Model
Wangbin Shen, Zhaohui Lin, Zhengkun Qin, and Juan Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3447–3465, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3447-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3447-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Annan, J. D., Lunt, D. J., Hargreaves, J. C., and Valdes, P. J.: Parameter estimation in an atmospheric GCM using the Ensemble Kalman Filter, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 12, 363–371, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-12-363-2005, 2005. a
Bechtold, P., Köhler, M., Jung, T., Doblas-Reyes, F., Leutbecher, M., Rodwell, M. J., Vitart, F., and Balsamo, G.: Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time-scales, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1337–1351, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.289, 2008. a
Chakraborty, U. K.: Advances in Differential Evolution, vol. 143, Springer, Verlag, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68830-3, 2008. a, b, c
ECMWF: IFS documentation. Part IV: Physical processes, CY40R1, available at: https://www.ecmwf.int/sites/default/files/elibrary/2014/9204-part-iv-physical-processes.pdf (last access: 19 November 2020), 2014. a, b
ECMWF: Changes in ECMWF model, available at: https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/documentation-and-support/changes-ecmwf-model (last access: 19 November 2020), 2019. a
Download
Short summary
This paper presents general guidelines on how to utilise computer algorithms efficiently in order to tune weather models so that they would produce better forecasts. The main conclusions are that the computer algorithms work most efficiently with a suitable cost function, certain forecast length and ensemble size. We expect that our results will facilitate the use of algorithmic methods in the tuning of weather models.