Articles | Volume 11, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2955-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2955-2018
Model description paper
 | 
24 Jul 2018
Model description paper |  | 24 Jul 2018

SHAKTI: Subglacial Hydrology and Kinetic, Transient Interactions v1.0

Aleah Sommers, Harihar Rajaram, and Mathieu Morlighem

Related authors

Intercomparison of surface meltwater routing models for the Greenland ice sheet and influence on subglacial effective pressures
Kang Yang, Aleah Sommers, Lauren C. Andrews, Laurence C. Smith, Xin Lu, Xavier Fettweis, and Manchun Li
The Cryosphere, 14, 3349–3365, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3349-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3349-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
Tuning parameters of a sea ice model using machine learning
Anton Korosov, Yue Ying, and Einar Ólason
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 885–904, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-885-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-885-2025, 2025
Short summary
WRF-Chem simulations of snow nitrate and other physicochemical properties in northern China
Xia Wang, Tao Che, Xueyin Ruan, Shanna Yue, Jing Wang, Chun Zhao, and Lei Geng
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 651–670, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-651-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-651-2025, 2025
Short summary
Clustering simulated snow profiles to form avalanche forecast regions
Simon Horton, Florian Herla, and Pascal Haegeli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 193–209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-193-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-193-2025, 2025
Short summary
SnowQM 1.0: a fast R package for bias-correcting spatial fields of snow water equivalent using quantile mapping
Adrien Michel, Johannes Aschauer, Tobias Jonas, Stefanie Gubler, Sven Kotlarski, and Christoph Marty
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8969–8988, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8969-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8969-2024, 2024
Short summary
Simulation of snow albedo and solar irradiance profile with the Two-streAm Radiative TransfEr in Snow (TARTES) v2.0 model
Ghislain Picard and Quentin Libois
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8927–8953, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8927-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8927-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, R. S., Anderson, S. P., MacGregor, K. R., Waddington, E. D., O'Neel, S., Riihimaki, C. A., and Loso, M. G.: Strong feedbacks between hydrology and sliding of a small alpine glacier, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JF000120, 2004. 
Andresen, C. S., Straneo, F., Ribergaard, M. H., Bjørk, A. A., Andersen, T. J., Kuijpers, A., Nørgaard-Pedersen, N., Kjær, K. H., Schjøth, F., Weckström, K., and Ahlstrøm, A. P.: Rapid response of Helheim Glacier in Greenland to climate variability over the past century, Nat. Geosci., 5, p. 37, 2012. 
Andrews, L. C., Catania, G. A., Hoffman, M. J., Gulley, J. D., Lüthi, M. P., Ryser, C., Hawley, R. L., and Neumann, T. A.: Direct observations of evolving subglacial drainage beneath the Greenland Ice Sheet, Nature, 514, 80–83, 2014. 
Arnold, N. and Sharp, M.: Flow variability in the Scandinavian ice sheet: modelling the coupling between ice sheet flow and hydrology, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 21, 485–502, 2002. 
Bartholomaus, T. C., Anderson, R. S., and Anderson, S. P.: Response of glacier basal motion to transient water storage, Nat. Geosci., 1, 33–37, 2008. 
Download
Short summary
Meltwater drainage beneath glaciers and ice sheets influences how fast they move and is complicated and constantly changing. Most models distinguish between fast and slow drainage with different equations for each system. The SHAKTI model allows for the ice–water drainage arrangement to transition naturally between different types of flow. This model can be used to understand how drainage affects glacier speeds and the associated ice loss to further inform predictions of sea level rise.
Share