Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-553-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-553-2017
Model description paper
 | 
06 Feb 2017
Model description paper |  | 06 Feb 2017

r.avaflow v1, an advanced open-source computational framework for the propagation and interaction of two-phase mass flows

Martin Mergili, Jan-Thomas Fischer, Julia Krenn, and Shiva P. Pudasaini

Related authors

r.avaflow v4, a multi-purpose landslide simulation framework
Martin Mergili, Hanna Pfeffer, Andreas Kellerer-Pirklbauer, Christian Zangerl, and Shiva Prasad Pudasaini
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-213,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-213, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
The Parraguirre ice-rock avalanche 1987, semi-arid Andes, Chile – A holistic revision
Johannes Jakob Fürst, David Farías-Barahona, Thomas Bruckner, Lucia Scaff, Martin Mergili, Santiago Montserrat, and Humberto Peña
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3103,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3103, 2025
Short summary
Exploring implications of input parameter uncertainties on GLOF modelling results using the state-of-the-art modelling code, r.avaflow
Sonam Rinzin, Stuart Dunning, Rachel Carr, Ashim Sattar, and Martin Mergili
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1819,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1819, 2024
Short summary
Progress and challenges in glacial lake outburst flood research (2017–2021): a research community perspective
Adam Emmer, Simon K. Allen, Mark Carey, Holger Frey, Christian Huggel, Oliver Korup, Martin Mergili, Ashim Sattar, Georg Veh, Thomas Y. Chen, Simon J. Cook, Mariana Correas-Gonzalez, Soumik Das, Alejandro Diaz Moreno, Fabian Drenkhan, Melanie Fischer, Walter W. Immerzeel, Eñaut Izagirre, Ramesh Chandra Joshi, Ioannis Kougkoulos, Riamsara Kuyakanon Knapp, Dongfeng Li, Ulfat Majeed, Stephanie Matti, Holly Moulton, Faezeh Nick, Valentine Piroton, Irfan Rashid, Masoom Reza, Anderson Ribeiro de Figueiredo, Christian Riveros, Finu Shrestha, Milan Shrestha, Jakob Steiner, Noah Walker-Crawford, Joanne L. Wood, and Jacob C. Yde
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3041–3061, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3041-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3041-2022, 2022
Short summary
Geographic-information-system-based topographic reconstruction and geomechanical modelling of the Köfels rockslide
Christian Zangerl, Annemarie Schneeberger, Georg Steiner, and Martin Mergili
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2461–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2461-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2461-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
Graphical representation of global water models
Hannes Müller Schmied, Simon Newland Gosling, Marlo Garnsworthy, Laura Müller, Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Atiq Kainan Ahmed, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Julien Boulange, Peter Burek, Jinfeng Chang, He Chen, Lukas Gudmundsson, Manolis Grillakis, Luca Guillaumot, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Rohini Kumar, Guoyong Leng, Junguo Liu, Xingcai Liu, Inga Menke, Vimal Mishra, Yadu Pokhrel, Oldrich Rakovec, Luis Samaniego, Yusuke Satoh, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Mikhail Smilovic, Tobias Stacke, Edwin Sutanudjaja, Wim Thiery, Athanasios Tsilimigkras, Yoshihide Wada, Niko Wanders, and Tokuta Yokohata
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2409–2425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2409-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2409-2025, 2025
Short summary
LM4-SHARC v1.0: resolving the catchment-scale soil–hillslope aquifer–river continuum for the GFDL Earth system modeling framework
Minki Hong, Nathaniel Chaney, Sergey Malyshev, Enrico Zorzetto, Anthony Preucil, and Elena Shevliakova
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2275–2301, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2275-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2275-2025, 2025
Short summary
Selecting a conceptual hydrological model using Bayes' factors computed with replica-exchange Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and thermodynamic integration
Damian N. Mingo, Remko Nijzink, Christophe Ley, and Jack S. Hale
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1709–1736, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1709-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1709-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Water Table Model (WTM) (v2.0.1): coupled groundwater and dynamic lake modelling
Kerry L. Callaghan, Andrew D. Wickert, Richard Barnes, and Jacqueline Austermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1463–1486, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1463-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1463-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modelling rainfall with a Bartlett–Lewis process: pyBL (v1.0.0), a Python software package and an application with short records
Chi-Ling Wei, Pei-Chun Chen, Chien-Yu Tseng, Ting-Yu Dai, Yun-Ting Ho, Ching-Chun Chou, Christian Onof, and Li-Pen Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1357–1373, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1357-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1357-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Aaron, J., Hungr, O., and McDougall, S.: Development of a systematic approach to calibrate equivalent fluid runout models, in: Landslides and Engineered Slopes. Experience, Theory and Practice, Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Landslides, Napoli, Italy, 12–19 June 2016, edited by: Aversa, S., Cascini, L., Picarelli, L., and Scavia, C., CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Leiden, 285–293, 2016.
Armanini, A., Fraccarollo, L., and Rosatti, G.: Two-dimensional simulation of debris flows in erodible channels, Comput. Geosci., 35, 993–1006, 2009.
Berger, C., McArdell, B. W., and Schlunegger, F.: Sediment transfer patterns at the Illgraben catchment, Switzerland: Implications for the time scales of debris flow activities, Geomorphology, 125, 421–432, 2011.
Berger, M. J., George, D. L., LeVeque, R. J., and Mandli, K. T.: The GeoClaw software for depth-averaged flows with adaptive refinement, Adv. Water Res., 34, 1195–1206, 2011.
Chen, H., Crosta, G. B., and Lee, C. F.: Erosional effects on runout of fast landslides, debris flows and avalanches: A numerical investigation, Geotechnique, 56, 305–322, 2006.
Download
Short summary
r.avaflow represents a GIS-based, multi-functional open-source tool for the simulation of debris flows, rock avalanches, snow avalanches, or two-phase (solid and fluid) process chains. It further facilitates parameter studies and validation of the simulation results against observed patterns. r.avaflow shall inform strategies to reduce the risks related to the interaction of mass flow processes with society.
Share