Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-553-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-553-2017
Model description paper
 | 
06 Feb 2017
Model description paper |  | 06 Feb 2017

r.avaflow v1, an advanced open-source computational framework for the propagation and interaction of two-phase mass flows

Martin Mergili, Jan-Thomas Fischer, Julia Krenn, and Shiva P. Pudasaini

Related authors

Exploring implications of input parameter uncertainties on GLOF modelling results using the state-of-the-art modelling code, r.avaflow
Sonam Rinzin, Stuart Dunning, Rachel Carr, Ashim Sattar, and Martin Mergili
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1819,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1819, 2024
Short summary
Progress and challenges in glacial lake outburst flood research (2017–2021): a research community perspective
Adam Emmer, Simon K. Allen, Mark Carey, Holger Frey, Christian Huggel, Oliver Korup, Martin Mergili, Ashim Sattar, Georg Veh, Thomas Y. Chen, Simon J. Cook, Mariana Correas-Gonzalez, Soumik Das, Alejandro Diaz Moreno, Fabian Drenkhan, Melanie Fischer, Walter W. Immerzeel, Eñaut Izagirre, Ramesh Chandra Joshi, Ioannis Kougkoulos, Riamsara Kuyakanon Knapp, Dongfeng Li, Ulfat Majeed, Stephanie Matti, Holly Moulton, Faezeh Nick, Valentine Piroton, Irfan Rashid, Masoom Reza, Anderson Ribeiro de Figueiredo, Christian Riveros, Finu Shrestha, Milan Shrestha, Jakob Steiner, Noah Walker-Crawford, Joanne L. Wood, and Jacob C. Yde
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3041–3061, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3041-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3041-2022, 2022
Short summary
Geographic-information-system-based topographic reconstruction and geomechanical modelling of the Köfels rockslide
Christian Zangerl, Annemarie Schneeberger, Georg Steiner, and Martin Mergili
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2461–2483, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2461-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2461-2021, 2021
Short summary
The 2020 glacial lake outburst flood at Jinwuco, Tibet: causes, impacts, and implications for hazard and risk assessment
Guoxiong Zheng, Martin Mergili, Adam Emmer, Simon Allen, Anming Bao, Hao Guo, and Markus Stoffel
The Cryosphere, 15, 3159–3180, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3159-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Probabilistic landslide susceptibility analysis in tropical mountainous terrain using the physically based r.slope.stability model
Johnnatan Palacio Cordoba, Martin Mergili, and Edier Aristizábal
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 815–829, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-815-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-815-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
Development and performance of a high-resolution surface wave and storm surge forecast model: application to a large lake
Laura L. Swatridge, Ryan P. Mulligan, Leon Boegman, and Shiliang Shan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7751–7766, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7751-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7751-2024, 2024
Short summary
Deep dive into hydrologic simulations at global scale: harnessing the power of deep learning and physics-informed differentiable models (δHBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Jens de Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Yoshihide Wada, Jiangtao Liu, Ming Pan, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7181–7198, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024, 2024
Short summary
PyEt v1.3.1: a Python package for the estimation of potential evapotranspiration
Matevž Vremec, Raoul A. Collenteur, and Steffen Birk
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7083–7103, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, 2024
Short summary
Prediction of hysteretic matric potential dynamics using artificial intelligence: application of autoencoder neural networks
Nedal Aqel, Lea Reusser, Stephan Margreth, Andrea Carminati, and Peter Lehmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6949–6966, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024, 2024
Short summary
Regionalization in global hydrological models and its impact on runoff simulations: a case study using WaterGAP3 (v 1.0.0)
Jenny Kupzig, Nina Kupzig, and Martina Flörke
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6819–6846, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6819-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6819-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aaron, J., Hungr, O., and McDougall, S.: Development of a systematic approach to calibrate equivalent fluid runout models, in: Landslides and Engineered Slopes. Experience, Theory and Practice, Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Landslides, Napoli, Italy, 12–19 June 2016, edited by: Aversa, S., Cascini, L., Picarelli, L., and Scavia, C., CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Leiden, 285–293, 2016.
Armanini, A., Fraccarollo, L., and Rosatti, G.: Two-dimensional simulation of debris flows in erodible channels, Comput. Geosci., 35, 993–1006, 2009.
Berger, C., McArdell, B. W., and Schlunegger, F.: Sediment transfer patterns at the Illgraben catchment, Switzerland: Implications for the time scales of debris flow activities, Geomorphology, 125, 421–432, 2011.
Berger, M. J., George, D. L., LeVeque, R. J., and Mandli, K. T.: The GeoClaw software for depth-averaged flows with adaptive refinement, Adv. Water Res., 34, 1195–1206, 2011.
Chen, H., Crosta, G. B., and Lee, C. F.: Erosional effects on runout of fast landslides, debris flows and avalanches: A numerical investigation, Geotechnique, 56, 305–322, 2006.
Download
Short summary
r.avaflow represents a GIS-based, multi-functional open-source tool for the simulation of debris flows, rock avalanches, snow avalanches, or two-phase (solid and fluid) process chains. It further facilitates parameter studies and validation of the simulation results against observed patterns. r.avaflow shall inform strategies to reduce the risks related to the interaction of mass flow processes with society.