164 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Evolution of stony debris flows in laboratory experiments I. Baselt et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107431
2. High mobility of rock-ice avalanches: Insights from small flume tests of gravel-ice mixtures Q. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105260
3. Dynamic response of submarine obstacles to two-phase landslide and tsunami impact on reservoirs J. Kafle et al. 10.1007/s00707-019-02457-0
4. SPH numerical modelling of landslide movements as coupled two-phase flows with a new solution for the interaction term S. Tayyebi et al. 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2022.06.002
5. Strategies to improve the explanatory power of a dynamic slope stability model by enhancing land cover parameterisation and model complexity E. Schmaltz et al. 10.1002/esp.4570
6. Effects of defense-structure system for bridge piers on two-phase debris flow wakes Z. Chen et al. 10.1007/s11440-021-01296-5
7. Assessment of dam function deterioration due to landslide-debris flows: numerical modeling based on vegetation distribution scenarios S. Lee et al. 10.3389/feart.2023.1216096
8. Advances in the simulation of debris flow erosion: The case study of the Rio Gere (Italy) event of the 4th August 2017 T. Baggio et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107664
9. Glacial lake outburst flood hazard under current and future conditions: worst-case scenarios in a transboundary Himalayan basin S. Allen et al. 10.5194/nhess-22-3765-2022
10. Impact force of a surge of water and sediments mixtures against slit check dams G. Rossi & A. Armanini 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.124
11. Three-dimensional and real-scale modeling of flow regimes in dense snow avalanches X. Li et al. 10.1007/s10346-021-01692-8
12. Numerical simulation of debris-flow behavior based on the SPH method incorporating the Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou rheology model Z. Han et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.04.013
13. Introduction of avalanche dynamics simulator "faSavageHutterFOAM" T. TANABE & H. SHIMIZU 10.5331/seppyo.84.4_297
14. Numerical Simulation of the Erosion Effect Caused by the Impact of High-Velocity Landslide C. Qiao et al. 10.1155/2022/2864271
15. Probabilistic hazard modelling of rain-triggered lahars S. Mead & C. Magill 10.1186/s13617-017-0060-y
16. Modelling reconstruction and boulder size-frequency distribution of a young (<5 Myr) landslide located in Simud Vallis floor, Mars M. Pajola et al. 10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114850
17. Insights on Multistage Rock Avalanche Behavior From Runout Modeling Constrained by Seismic Inversions A. Mitchell et al. 10.1029/2021JB023444
18. Impact of variation of size of the initial release mass in the dynamics of landslide generated tsunami J. Kafle et al. 10.1142/S1793962322500556
19. High Mountain Asia hydropower systems threatened by climate-driven landscape instability D. Li et al. 10.1038/s41561-022-00953-y
20. Stream function - vorticity formulation of mixture mass flow P. Pokhrel & S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2019.103317
21. Synthesis of hydrothermal alteration, rock mechanics and geophysical mapping to constrain failure and debris avalanche hazards at Mt. Ruapehu (New Zealand) G. Kereszturi et al. 10.1080/00288306.2021.1885048
22. Research Progress of Initial Mechanism on Debris Flow and Related Discrimination Methods: A Review J. Du et al. 10.3389/feart.2021.629567
23. Martian gullies: a comprehensive review of observations, mechanisms and insights from Earth analogues S. Conway et al. 10.1144/SP467.14
24. Challenges Assessing Rock Slope Stability Using the Strength Reduction Method with the Hoek–Brown Criterion on the Example of Vals (Tyrol/Austria) M. Illeditsch et al. 10.3390/geosciences12070255
25. Earth pressure profiles in unsaturated soils under transient flow S. Shahrokhabadi et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105218
26. The 2020 glacial lake outburst flood process chain at Lake Salkantaycocha (Cordillera Vilcabamba, Peru) O. Vilca et al. 10.1007/s10346-021-01670-0
27. A Numerical Based Approach to Calculate Ore Dilution Rates Using Rolling Resistance Model and Upside-Down Drop Shape Theory H. Sun et al. 10.1007/s00603-020-02180-6
28. DebrisInterMixing-2.3: a finite volume solver for three-dimensional debris-flow simulations with two calibration parameters – Part 2: Model validation with experiments A. von Boetticher et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-3963-2017
29. A general analytical model for superelevation in landslide S. Pudasaini & M. Jaboyedoff 10.1007/s10346-019-01333-1
30. A Multi‐Phase Mass Flow Model S. Pudasaini & M. Mergili 10.1029/2019JF005204
31. Bayesian active learning for parameter calibration of landslide run-out models H. Zhao & J. Kowalski 10.1007/s10346-022-01857-z
32. Lake volume and potential hazards of moraine-dammed glacial lakes – a case study of Bienong Co, southeastern Tibetan Plateau H. Duan et al. 10.5194/tc-17-591-2023
33. Debris flow event on Osorno volcano, Chile, during summer 2017: new interpretations for chain processes in the southern Andes I. Fustos-Toribio et al. 10.5194/nhess-21-3015-2021
34. Sensitivity analysis and calibration of a dynamic physically based slope stability model T. Zieher et al. 10.5194/nhess-17-971-2017
35. Dynamic process analysis of the Baige landslide by the combination of DEM and long-period seismic waves H. An et al. 10.1007/s10346-020-01595-0
36. Debris-Flow Impact on Piers with Different Cross-Sectional Shapes Y. Wang et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001656
37. Reconstruction of the 1941 GLOF process chain at Lake Palcacocha (Cordillera Blanca, Peru) M. Mergili et al. 10.5194/hess-24-93-2020
38. 2014 Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: Landslide runout analysis — current practice and challenges S. McDougall 10.1139/cgj-2016-0104
39. Bayesian Inference in Snow Avalanche Simulation with r.avaflow J. Fischer et al. 10.3390/geosciences10050191
40. Progress and challenges in glacial lake outburst flood research (2017–2021): a research community perspective A. Emmer et al. 10.5194/nhess-22-3041-2022
41. Deposition morphology in large-scale laboratory stony debris flows I. Baselt et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107992
42. Assessment of Debris-Flow Erosion and Deposit Areas by Morphometric Analysis and a GIS-Based Simplified Procedure: A Case Study of Paupisi in the Southern Apennines G. Grelle et al. 10.3390/su11082382
43. Numerical assessment of the impeding effect of check dams in the Hongchun debris flow gully, Sichuan Province, China W. Shen et al. 10.1007/s10064-020-01755-5
44. Depth-Integrated Two-Phase Modeling of Two Real Cases: A Comparison between r.avaflow and GeoFlow-SPH Codes S. Mousavi Tayebi et al. 10.3390/app11125751
45. The grain size distribution and composition of the Touzhai rock avalanche deposit in Yunnan, China Z. Ren et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.01.007
46. A rockfall-induced glacial lake outburst flood, Upper Barun Valley, Nepal A. Byers et al. 10.1007/s10346-018-1079-9
47. Combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling M. Mergili et al. 10.1007/s10346-019-01222-7
48. Debris flow modelling and hazard assessment for a glacier area: a case study in Barsem, Tajikistan K. Yılmaz et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05654-8
49. Debris Flow Analyst (DA): A debris flow model considering kinematic uncertainties and using a GIS platform Y. Wu & H. Lan 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105877
50. Sensitivity and Calibration of Three‐Dimensional SPH Formulations in Large‐Scale Landslide Modeling S. Li et al. 10.1029/2022JB024583
51. Significance of boulder shape, shoreline configuration and pre‐transport setting for the transport of boulders by tsunamis J. Oetjen et al. 10.1002/esp.4870
52. Numerical modelling of the long runout character of 2015 Shenzhen landslide with a general two-phase mass flow model C. Qiao et al. 10.1007/s10064-018-1329-z
53. Debris flow enlargement from entrainment: A case study for comparison of three entrainment models P. Shen et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105581
54. The 2020 glacial lake outburst flood at Jinwuco, Tibet: causes, impacts, and implications for hazard and risk assessment G. Zheng et al. 10.5194/tc-15-3159-2021
55. Non-Monotonic Relationships between Return Periods of Precipitation Surface Hazard Intensity B. van den Bout et al. 10.3390/w14091348
56. Model test on the entrainment phenomenon and energy conversion mechanism of flow-like landslides H. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.023
57. Time and path prediction of landslides using InSAR and flow model P. Roy et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2022.112899
58. The role of discontinuities in the susceptibility, development, and runout of rock avalanches: a review H. Lan et al. 10.1007/s10346-022-01868-w
59. Dynamics of avalanche-generated impulse waves: three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations and sensitivity analysis R. Chisolm & D. McKinney 10.5194/nhess-18-1373-2018
60. Modeling the Slump-Type Landslide Tsunamis Part I: Developing a Three-Dimensional Bingham-Type Landslide Model T. Wu et al. 10.3390/app10186501
61. An integrated method for rapid estimation of the valley incision by debris flows Z. Han et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.007
62. Computationally-feasible uncertainty quantification in model-based landslide risk assessment A. Yildiz et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.1032438
63. Transferability of a calibrated numerical model of rock avalanche run‐out: Application to 20 rock avalanches on the Nuussuaq Peninsula, West Greenland J. Benjamin et al. 10.1002/esp.4469
64. Modelling the long-term geomorphic response to check dam failures in an alpine channel with CAESAR-Lisflood J. Ramirez et al. 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2022.04.005
65. Towards a predictive multi-phase model for alpine mass movements and process cascades A. Cicoira et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106866
66. Open AR-Sandbox: A haptic interface for geoscience education and outreach F. Wellmann et al. 10.1130/GES02455.1
67. Variable hydrograph inputs for a numerical debris-flow runout model A. Mitchell et al. 10.5194/nhess-22-1627-2022
68. Flow-Py v1.0: a customizable, open-source simulation tool to estimate runout and intensity of gravitational mass flows C. D'Amboise et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-2423-2022
69. Physically based modeling of co-seismic landslide, debris flow, and flood cascade B. van den Bout et al. 10.5194/nhess-22-3183-2022
70. Reconstructing the Chongbaxia Tsho glacial lake outburst flood in the Eastern Himalaya: Evolution, process and impacts Y. Nie et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107393
71. Deposition characteristics of debris flows in a lateral flume considering upstream entrainment H. Zheng et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107960
72. Numerical Modeling and a Parametric Study of Various Mass Flows Based on a Multi-Phase Computational Framework M. Naqvi et al. 10.3390/geotechnics2030025
73. GLOF hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and risk assessment of potentially dangerous glacial lakes in the Bhutan Himalaya S. Rinzin et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129311
74. Can big data and random forests improve avalanche runout estimation compared to simple linear regression? H. Toft et al. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103844
75. Performance and limits of a shallow-water model for landslide-generated tsunamis: from laboratory experiments to simulations of flank collapses at Montagne Pelée (Martinique) P. Poulain et al. 10.1093/gji/ggac482
76. Impact force to a rigid obstruction from a granular mass sliding down a smooth incline A. Ahmadipur & T. Qiu 10.1007/s11440-018-0727-5
77. Modelling of mobility of Rissa landslide and following tsunami Z. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104388
78. Simulation of debris flow-barrier interaction using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics and coupled Eulerian Lagrangian methods S. Sha et al. 10.1016/j.finel.2022.103864
79. On analytical solutions of a two-phase mass flow model S. Ghosh Hajra et al. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2017.09.009
80. Emulator-based global sensitivity analysis for flow-like landslide run-out models H. Zhao et al. 10.1007/s10346-021-01690-w
81. The impact of terrain model source and resolution on snow avalanche modeling A. Miller et al. 10.5194/nhess-22-2673-2022
82. Probabilistic landslide susceptibility analysis in tropical mountainous terrain using the physically based r.slope.stability model J. Palacio Cordoba et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-815-2020
83. Review of moraine dam failure mechanism R. Neupane et al. 10.1080/19475705.2019.1652210
84. A fully analytical model for virtual mass force in mixture flows S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.01.005
85. Comparison of two 2-D numerical models for snow avalanche simulation M. Martini et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165221
86. Rock characteristics and dynamic fragmentation process of the 2018 Daanshan rockslide in Beijing, China T. Fan et al. 10.1007/s11629-022-7447-x
87. Multiscale analysis of surface roughness for the improvement of natural hazard modelling N. Brožová et al. 10.5194/nhess-21-3539-2021
88. The influence of temporal and spatial variations on phase separation in debris flow deposition F. Wang et al. 10.1007/s10346-018-1119-5
89. An Analytical Solution for the Run-Out of Submarine Debris Flows Y. Rui & M. Yin 10.1080/01490419.2019.1583146
90. A progressive entrainment runout model for debris flow analysis and its application C. Kang & D. Chan 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.09.003
91. Simplified simulation of rock avalanches and subsequent debris flows with a single thin-layer model: Application to the Prêcheur river (Martinique, Lesser Antilles) M. Peruzzetto et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106457
92. Combining seismic signal dynamic inversion and numerical modeling improves landslide process reconstruction Y. Yan et al. 10.5194/esurf-10-1233-2022
93. Solitary wave overtopping at granular dams L. Huber et al. 10.1080/00221686.2017.1356757
94. How well can we simulate complex hydro‐geomorphic process chains? The 2012 multi‐lake outburst flood in the Santa Cruz Valley (Cordillera Blanca, Perú) M. Mergili et al. 10.1002/esp.4318
95. Numerical simulation of the propagation process of a rapid flow-like landslide considering bed entrainment: A case study P. Li et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105287
96. Computational experiments on the 1962 and 1970 landslide events at Huascarán (Peru) with r.avaflow: Lessons learned for predictive mass flow simulations M. Mergili et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.08.032
97. Erosion Process of Multiple Debris Flow Surges Caused by Check Dam Removal: An Experimental Study X. Wang et al. 10.1029/2021WR030688
98. Effect of viscosity changes on the motion of debris flow by considering entrainment W. Liu et al. 10.1080/00221686.2020.1744746
99. Channel flow simulation of a mixture with a full-dimensional generalized quasi two-phase model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.matcom.2019.03.014
100. Initiation and Flow Conditions of Contemporary Flows in Martian Gullies T. de Haas et al. 10.1029/2018JE005899
101. A full description of generalized drag in mixture mass flows S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105429
102. Prognostics of forest recovery with r.recovery GRASS-GIS module: an open-source forest growth simulation model based on the diffusive-logistic equation L. Richit et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.002
103. Cluster landslides and associated damage in the Dima Hasao district of Assam, India due to heavy rainfall in May 2022 P. Roy et al. 10.1007/s10346-022-01977-6
104. Quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulations S. Mead et al. 10.5194/nhess-21-2447-2021
105. How Ice Particles Increase Mobility of Rock‐Ice Avalanches: Insights From Chute Flows Simulation of Granular Rock‐Ice Mixtures by Discrete Element Method Z. Feng et al. 10.1029/2023JF007115
106. Simulating Debris Flow and Levee Formation in the 2D Shallow Flow Model D‐Claw: Channelized and Unconfined Flow R. Jones et al. 10.1029/2022EA002590
107. An overview of debris-flow mathematical modelling M. Trujillo-Vela et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104135
108. Analytical solutions to a nonlinear diffusion–advection equation S. Pudasaini et al. 10.1007/s00033-018-1042-6
109. A Simple Method of Mapping Landslides Runout Zones Considering Kinematic Uncertainties J. Liu et al. 10.3390/rs14030668
110. Landslide susceptibility mapping with r.landslide: A free open-source GIS-integrated tool based on Artificial Neural Networks L. Bragagnolo et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104565
111. Debris-flow generated tsunamis and their dependence on debris-flow dynamics S. de Lange et al. 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103623
112. Anomalous Alpine fans: from the genesis to the present hazard E. De Finis et al. 10.1007/s10346-017-0894-8
113. faSavageHutterFOAM 1.0: depth-integrated simulation of dense snow avalanches on natural terrain with OpenFOAM M. Rauter et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2923-2018
114. Keynote lecture. Towards reliability-management for debris flow risk assessment J. Kowalski et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341505013
115. Development of a mathematical model for submarine granular flows P. Si et al. 10.1063/1.5030349
116. Centrifuge Study on the Submarine Mudflows Y. Rui & M. Yin 10.1080/01490419.2018.1561562
117. Application of Explicit-MPS method for snow avalanche simulation Y. SAITO 10.5331/seppyo.84.4_263
118. Comparisons of Dynamic Landslide Models on GIS Platforms Y. Wu et al. 10.3390/app12063093
119. A generalized quasi two-phase bulk mixture model for mass flow P. Pokhrel et al. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.12.003
120. Multi-Source Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Hazard Assessment and Mapping for Huaraz, Cordillera Blanca, Peru H. Frey et al. 10.3389/feart.2018.00210
121. Formation, breaching and flood consequences of a landslide dam near Bujumbura, Burundi L. Nibigira et al. 10.5194/nhess-18-1867-2018
122. Experimental study of viscous debris flow characteristics in drainage channel with oblique symmetrical sills T. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.024
123. Coupled Snow Cover and Avalanche Dynamics Simulations to Evaluate Wet Snow Avalanche Activity N. Wever et al. 10.1029/2017JF004515
124. Comparison of hazard mapping methods for an uncertainty input ─Monte Carlo, Latin Hypercube Sampling & Polynomial Chaos Quadrature─ T. TANABE 10.5331/seppyo.84.4_309
125. Modelling the pre- and post-failure behaviour of faulted rock slopes based on the particle finite element method with a damage mechanics model L. Wang & Q. Lei 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105057
126. Numerical analysis of debris flow erosion in the mountainous areas affected by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake using a depth-averaged two-phase model H. Cheng et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05669-1
127. Modelling of debris flows and flash floods propagation: a case study from Italian Alps L. Cascini et al. 10.1080/19648189.2020.1756418
128. Dynamics of an outburst flood originating from a small and high-altitude glacier in the Arid Andes of Chile P. Iribarren Anacona et al. 10.1007/s11069-018-3376-y
129. Numerical Modeling of the June 17, 2017 Landslide and Tsunami Events in Karrat Fjord, West Greenland A. Paris et al. 10.1007/s00024-019-02123-5
130. Physical process-based runout modeling and hazard assessment of catastrophic debris flow using SPH incorporated with ArcGIS: A case study of the Hongchun gully H. Cheng et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106052
131. GIS tools for preliminary debris-flow assessment at regional scale M. Cavalli et al. 10.1007/s11629-017-4573-y
132. The State of Remote Sensing Capabilities of Cascading Hazards Over High Mountain Asia D. Kirschbaum et al. 10.3389/feart.2019.00197
133. The landslide velocity S. Pudasaini & M. Krautblatter 10.5194/esurf-10-165-2022
134. Himalayan hazard cascades – modern and medieval outburst floods in Pokhara, Nepal M. Fischer et al. 10.1002/esp.5539
135. Back calculation of the 2017 Piz Cengalo–Bondo landslide cascade with r.avaflow: what we can do and what we can learn M. Mergili et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-505-2020
136. The mechanisms of high mobility of a glacial debris flow using the Pudasaini-Mergili multi-phase modeling T. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107186
137. An extended quasi two-phase mass flow model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.07.008
138. Rock avalanche runout prediction using stochastic analysis of a regional dataset A. Mitchell et al. 10.1007/s10346-019-01331-3
139. Sturzprozesse ausgehend von Felsböschungen: Abschätzung der Reichweite mithilfe numerischer Modelle A. Preh 10.1002/geot.201900075
140. Risk assessment on the stability of barrier dam induced by Caijiaba landslide, SW China K. Song et al. 10.1007/s10064-022-02729-5
141. Simulation of runout behavior of submarine debris flows over regional natural terrain considering material softening Y. Chen et al. 10.1080/1064119X.2021.2020942
142. A two-layer numerical model for simulating the frontal plowing phenomenon of flow-like landslides W. Shen et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105168
143. Towards a model for structured mass movements: the OpenLISEM hazard model 2.0a B. van den Bout et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-1841-2021
144. Modeling the glacial lake outburst flood process chain in the Nepal Himalaya: reassessing Imja Tsho's hazard J. Lala et al. 10.5194/hess-22-3721-2018
145. Small outbursts into big disasters: Earthquakes exacerbate climate-driven cascade processes of the glacial lakes failure in the Himalayas N. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108539
146. Modeling the landslide-generated debris flow from formation to propagation and run-out by considering the effect of vegetation W. Liu et al. 10.1007/s10346-020-01478-4
147. Dynamic analysis of the multi-staged ice–rock debris avalanche in the Langtang valley triggered by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal K. Gnyawali et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105440
148. Solid-liquid interaction caused by minor wetting in gravel-ice mixtures: A key factor for the mobility of rock-ice avalanches Y. Ren et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106072
149. INSPIRE standards as a framework for artificial intelligence applications: a landslide example G. Roberti et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-3455-2020
150. An Enhanced Framework to Quantify the Shape of Impulse Waves Using Asymmetry G. Bullard et al. 10.1029/2018JC014167
151. Modeling Potential Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Process Chains and Effects From Artificial Lake‐Level Lowering at Gepang Gath Lake, Indian Himalaya A. Sattar et al. 10.1029/2022JF006826
152. Interaction of two-phase debris flow with obstacles P. Kattel et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.05.023
153. Multi‐Model Comparison of Computed Debris Flow Runout for the 9 January 2018 Montecito, California Post‐Wildfire Event K. Barnhart et al. 10.1029/2021JF006245
154. A multiphase virtual mass model for debris flow P. Kattel et al. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103638
155. A massive rock and ice avalanche caused the 2021 disaster at Chamoli, Indian Himalaya D. Shugar et al. 10.1126/science.abh4455
156. Coupled CFD-DEM model for the direct numerical simulation of sediment bed erosion by viscous shear flow H. Zheng et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.003
157. The mudflow disaster at Villa Santa Lucía in Chilean Patagonia: understandings and insights derived from numerical simulation and postevent field surveys M. Somos-Valenzuela et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-2319-2020
158. Simulating the effect of check dam collapse in a debris-flow channel T. Baggio & V. D'Agostino 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151660
159. Reconstructing the Snow Avalanche of Coll de Pal 2018 (SE Pyrenees) M. Sanz-Ramos et al. 10.3390/geohazards2030011
160. Understanding the 2004 glacier detachment in the Amney Machen Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau, via multi-phase modeling T. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s10346-022-01989-2
161. Numerical simulation of rainfall-induced debris flow in the Hongchun gully based on the coupling of the LHT model and the Pudasaini model H. Yin et al. 10.1007/s11069-023-05956-5
162. 2D Runout Modelling of Hillslope Debris Flows, Based on Well-Documented Events in Switzerland F. Zimmermann et al. 10.3390/geosciences10020070
163. Bayesian analysis of the impact of rainfall data product on simulated slope failure for North Carolina locations S. Yatheendradas et al. 10.1007/s10596-018-9804-y
164. Modeling of partial dome collapse of La Soufrière of Guadeloupe volcano: implications for hazard assessment and monitoring M. Peruzzetto et al. 10.1038/s41598-019-49507-0