297 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Comparative analysis of μ(I) and Voellmy-type grain flow rheologies in geophysical mass flows: insights from theoretical and real case studies Y. Zhuang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1901-2025
2. Debris‐flow entrainment modelling under climate change: Considering antecedent moisture conditions along the flow path A. Könz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5868
3. Dynamic response of submarine obstacles to two-phase landslide and tsunami impact on reservoirs J. Kafle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-019-02457-0
4. Strategies to improve the explanatory power of a dynamic slope stability model by enhancing land cover parameterisation and model complexity E. Schmaltz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4570
5. Assessment of dam function deterioration due to landslide-debris flows: numerical modeling based on vegetation distribution scenarios S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1216096
6. Formation and Hazard Analysis of Landslide Damming Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data W. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194691
7. Advances in the simulation of debris flow erosion: The case study of the Rio Gere (Italy) event of the 4th August 2017 T. Baggio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107664
8. Glacial lake outburst flood hazard under current and future conditions: worst-case scenarios in a transboundary Himalayan basin S. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3765-2022
9. A landscape scale model to predict post-fire debris flow impact zones T. Keeble et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109175
10. OpenFOAM-avalanche 2312: depth-integrated models beyond dense-flow avalanches M. Rauter & J. Kowalski https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6545-2024
11. Numerical simulation of debris-flow behavior based on the SPH method incorporating the Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou rheology model Z. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.04.013
12. Introduction of avalanche dynamics simulator "faSavageHutterFOAM" T. TANABE & H. SHIMIZU https://doi.org/10.5331/seppyo.84.4_297
13. A Case Study of the Debris Flows Event in the Chalk Cliffs Basin, Colorado, USA: Numerical Simulations Based on a Multi-Phase Flow Model M. Naqvi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17030406
14. Experimental investigation on dynamics and flow resistance of granular-fluid flows C. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108693
15. Basin-scale inventory and exposure assessment of hanging glaciers, Central Himalaya N. Krishnan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-026-00205-8
16. New rulers for estimating the magnitude of catastrophic debris flows T. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06795-8
17. Brief communication: An ice-debris avalanche in the Nupchu Valley, Kanchenjunga Conservation Area, eastern Nepal A. Byers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-711-2024
18. The 2020 glacial lake outburst flood process chain at Lake Salkantaycocha (Cordillera Vilcabamba, Peru) O. Vilca et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01670-0
19. Rheology of rock–ice avalanche in a periodic chute flow Z. Sun & Z. Dong https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0265711
20. A general analytical model for superelevation in landslide S. Pudasaini & M. Jaboyedoff https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01333-1
21. Solutions to a two-phase mass flow model with generalized drag S. Ghosh Hajra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2024.104860
22. Lake volume and potential hazards of moraine-dammed glacial lakes – a case study of Bienong Co, southeastern Tibetan Plateau H. Duan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-591-2023
23. Sensitivity analysis and calibration of a dynamic physically based slope stability model T. Zieher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-971-2017
24. Dynamic process analysis of the Baige landslide by the combination of DEM and long-period seismic waves H. An et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01595-0
25. 2014 Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: Landslide runout analysis — current practice and challenges S. McDougall https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0104
26. Progress and challenges in glacial lake outburst flood research (2017–2021): a research community perspective A. Emmer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3041-2022
27. Implications of landslide runout modeling for vulnerability assessment: Benchmarking from a case study in the andean region M. Alvarez Jaimes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105920
28. Advancing the predictive capability of landslide simulations using the high-resolution three-dimensional Material Point Method Z. Huo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.109107
29. Assessment of Debris-Flow Erosion and Deposit Areas by Morphometric Analysis and a GIS-Based Simplified Procedure: A Case Study of Paupisi in the Southern Apennines G. Grelle et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082382
30. Preliminary analysis of the mechanism in the July 16, 2022 Gaojiashan cascading hazard: a landslide-induced debris flow in Southwest China T. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-024-03790-y
31. Numerical assessment of the impeding effect of check dams in the Hongchun debris flow gully, Sichuan Province, China W. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01755-5
32. Depth-Integrated Two-Phase Modeling of Two Real Cases: A Comparison between r.avaflow and GeoFlow-SPH Codes S. Mousavi Tayebi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125751
33. The grain size distribution and composition of the Touzhai rock avalanche deposit in Yunnan, China Z. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.01.007
34. A rockfall-induced glacial lake outburst flood, Upper Barun Valley, Nepal A. Byers et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1079-9
35. Debris flow modelling and hazard assessment for a glacier area: a case study in Barsem, Tajikistan K. Yılmaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05654-8
36. Physical vulnerability curve construction and quantitative risk assessment of a typhoon-triggered debris flow via numerical simulation: A case study of Zhejiang Province, SE China T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02218-8
37. Reconstructing glacial lake outburst floods in the Poiqu River basin, central Himalaya X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109063
38. Multi-metric optimization of Mohr–Coulomb parameters in SPH granular flow simulation D. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.109127
39. Significance of boulder shape, shoreline configuration and pre‐transport setting for the transport of boulders by tsunamis J. Oetjen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4870
40. Uncertainty evaluation of the debris flow impact considering spatially varying basal friction and solid concentration H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111283
41. Best-fit Assessment for Models (BAM): an open-source Python-based statistical tool for assessing the performance of numerical models in volcanology F. Garin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-026-01983-9
42. The 2020 glacial lake outburst flood at Jinwuco, Tibet: causes, impacts, and implications for hazard and risk assessment G. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3159-2021
43. AscDAMs 2.0: advanced SLAM-and-UAV-based channel detection and mapping system F. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-026-00381-9
44. Non-Monotonic Relationships between Return Periods of Precipitation Surface Hazard Intensity B. van den Bout et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091348
45. The role of discontinuities in the susceptibility, development, and runout of rock avalanches: a review H. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01868-w
46. A mathematical study on the influence of particle concentration in the dynamics of drag and associated landslide motion B. Dangol et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S179396232550045X
47. Challenges and Responses in the Mechanisms and Prediction of Strong-earthquake-triggered Geological Hazards X. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.3724/BNSFC-2025-0040
48. Computationally-feasible uncertainty quantification in model-based landslide risk assessment A. Yildiz et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1032438
49. Modelling the long-term geomorphic response to check dam failures in an alpine channel with CAESAR-Lisflood J. Ramirez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2022.04.005
50. Characterisation and multiphase flow modelling of a rock avalanche turned into a supraglacial debris flow: Insights from Mt Job, British Columbia, Canada J. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.70308
51. A depth-averaged SPH-FV landslide dynamic model for evaluating hazard zones Y. Wu & Z. Yang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106210
52. Green selective retention infrastructures for debris avalanche mitigation S. Cuomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108730
53. Artificial Intelligence for Learning 2D Debris-Flow Dynamics: Application of Fourier Neural Operators and Synthetic Data to a Case Study in Central Italy M. Secchi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15050759
54. Scenario Simulation of Glacier Collapse in the Amnye Machen Mountains, Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15070254
55. Deposition characteristics of debris flows in a lateral flume considering upstream entrainment H. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107960
56. GLOF hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and risk assessment of potentially dangerous glacial lakes in the Bhutan Himalaya S. Rinzin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129311
57. Amplified Risks of the Yarlung Zangbo–Brahmaputra River to Glacier Hazard Chains due to Multi-Hazard Transformation R. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.002
58. Performance and limits of a shallow-water model for landslide-generated tsunamis: from laboratory experiments to simulations of flank collapses at Montagne Pelée (Martinique) P. Poulain et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac482
59. Growing Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Risks in Ghizer District: A Karakoram Anomaly Region Y. Mazhar et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3522950
60. Impact force to a rigid obstruction from a granular mass sliding down a smooth incline A. Ahmadipur & T. Qiu https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0727-5
61. Run-out simulation of rock avalanches using a depth-averaged model considering the distance and velocity related frictional weakening effect J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02440-4
62. Simulation of debris flow-barrier interaction using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics and coupled Eulerian Lagrangian methods S. Sha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2022.103864
63. The Parraguirre ice–rock avalanche 1987, semi-arid Andes, Chile – a holistic revision J. Fürst et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3559-2025
64. Emulator-based global sensitivity analysis for flow-like landslide run-out models H. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01690-w
65. Dual-method assessment of runout distance for channel-type waste dump failures based on energy conservation screening model and depth-integrated continuum simulation H. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.70425/rml.202601.34
66. Debris flow and debris flood hazard assessment in mountain catchments T. Baggio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108338
67. Experimental Analysis of Granular Flow Behavior for Sustainable Landslide Risk Management and Community Resilience D. Roman Quintero et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210236
68. Prediction of movement trajectories and surge disaster-affected areas following instability and failure of a large, high-positioned, loess‒mudstone interface landslide S. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-026-05043-6
69. A fully analytical model for virtual mass force in mixture flows S. Pudasaini https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.01.005
70. Deposition characteristics of a large avalanche revealed by UAV–based photogrammetry and ground snow surveys: The 2021 Mt. Nodanishoji Avalanche case T. KATSUSHIMA et al. https://doi.org/10.5331/bgr.25A02
71. Multiscale analysis of surface roughness for the improvement of natural hazard modelling N. Brožová et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3539-2021
72. Risk assessment of a glacial lake with abruptly slowing expansion, Jiongpu, Southeastern Tibet T. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109471
73. The influence of temporal and spatial variations on phase separation in debris flow deposition F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1119-5
74. Landslide dynamics with energy loss in internal shearing S. Pudasaini & M. Mergili https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02424-4
75. A comprehensive approach to predicting low-angle glacier detachment-induced river damming: Insights from the Zelunglung Glacier Z. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.11.013
76. Simplified simulation of rock avalanches and subsequent debris flows with a single thin-layer model: Application to the Prêcheur river (Martinique, Lesser Antilles) M. Peruzzetto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106457
77. Process Chain of a Potential Transboundary Glacial Lake Outburst Flood at Qiangzongke Co, Southwestern Tibet, China, Using Multi-Source Data and Hydrodynamic Modeling M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-026-00733-x
78. A numerical model for cascading glacier mass flow analysis (GMFA): Erosion-deposition dynamics, phase changes, and multi-hazard chain transformations R. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.02.010
79. Flow-induced erosion process modeling: A review of influencing parameters and CFD-DEM methods M. Rahimi-Larki et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2025.121618
80. Probability indication maps for avalanche runout for decision support in daily traffic rout risk management J. Glaus et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-6087-2026
81. Erosion Process of Multiple Debris Flow Surges Caused by Check Dam Removal: An Experimental Study X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030688
82. Effect of viscosity changes on the motion of debris flow by considering entrainment W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2020.1744746
83. Initiation and Flow Conditions of Contemporary Flows in Martian Gullies T. de Haas et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JE005899
84. A unified multi-phase debris flow erosion model featuring phase-specific shear stress for internal mechanics and quantifying fine-solid effects K. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108976
85. Moment Approximations and Model Cascades for Shallow Flow J. Kowalski & M. Torrilhon https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2017-0263
86. Quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulations S. Mead et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2447-2021
87. Simulating Debris Flow and Levee Formation in the 2D Shallow Flow Model D‐Claw: Channelized and Unconfined Flow R. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002590
88. An overview of debris-flow mathematical modelling M. Trujillo-Vela et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104135
89. Integrating machine learning and numerical methods for enhanced landslide susceptibility and hazard mapping in the Bhotekoshi watershed, central Nepal B. Gurung et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-025-9951-2
90. Analytical solutions to a nonlinear diffusion–advection equation S. Pudasaini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-018-1042-6
91. Landslide susceptibility mapping with r.landslide: A free open-source GIS-integrated tool based on Artificial Neural Networks L. Bragagnolo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104565
92. A Case Study and Numerical Modeling of Post-Wildfire Debris Flows in Montecito, California D. K. C. et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16091285
93. Dynamics of different drags in two-phase mass flows and their influence on the landslide motion, tsunami generation and flow-obstacle interaction B. Dangol & J. Kafle https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2026.204497
94. Keynote lecture. Towards reliability-management for debris flow risk assessment J. Kowalski et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341505013
95. Extension of Iber for Simulating Non–Newtonian Shallow Flows: Mine-Tailings Spill Propagation Modelling M. Sanz-Ramos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16142039
96. Development of a mathematical model for submarine granular flows P. Si et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5030349
97. Comparisons of Dynamic Landslide Models on GIS Platforms Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12063093
98. A generalized quasi two-phase bulk mixture model for mass flow P. Pokhrel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.12.003
99. Multi-Source Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Hazard Assessment and Mapping for Huaraz, Cordillera Blanca, Peru H. Frey et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00210
100. Formation, breaching and flood consequences of a landslide dam near Bujumbura, Burundi L. Nibigira et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1867-2018
101. Three-dimensional experimental analysis of landslide-generated impulse waves in narrow reservoirs with variable local water depths C. Ke et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02523-w
102. Experimental study of viscous debris flow characteristics in drainage channel with oblique symmetrical sills T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.024
103. Characteristics and changes of glacial lakes and outburst floods G. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00554-w
104. Coupled Snow Cover and Avalanche Dynamics Simulations to Evaluate Wet Snow Avalanche Activity N. Wever et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004515
105. Quantitative assessment of the GLOF risk along China-Nepal transboundary basins by integrating remote sensing, machine learning, and hydrodynamic model M. Gouli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105231
106. Comparison of hazard mapping methods for an uncertainty input ─Monte Carlo, Latin Hypercube Sampling & Polynomial Chaos Quadrature─ T. TANABE https://doi.org/10.5331/seppyo.84.4_309
107. Numerical analysis of debris flow erosion in the mountainous areas affected by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake using a depth-averaged two-phase model H. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05669-1
108. Modelling of debris flows and flash floods propagation: a case study from Italian Alps L. Cascini et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2020.1756418
109. Fluidization and snow cover effects in rock-ice-snow avalanches: Lessons from Piz Cengalo, Fluchthorn, and Piz Scerscen events Y. Zhuang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107456
110. Dynamics of an outburst flood originating from a small and high-altitude glacier in the Arid Andes of Chile P. Iribarren Anacona et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3376-y
111. Numerical Modeling of the June 17, 2017 Landslide and Tsunami Events in Karrat Fjord, West Greenland A. Paris et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02123-5
112. Experimental investigation and numerical modeling of substrate erosion and entrainment in rock avalanches S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.12.030
113. GIS tools for preliminary debris-flow assessment at regional scale M. Cavalli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4573-y
114. Multi-Mesh-Scale Approximation of Thin Geophysical Mass Flows on Complex Topographies Y. Tai et al. https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2019-0184
115. The landslide velocity S. Pudasaini & M. Krautblatter https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-165-2022
116. The mechanisms of high mobility of a glacial debris flow using the Pudasaini-Mergili multi-phase modeling T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107186
117. MinVoellmy v1: a lightweight model for simulating rapid mass movements based on a modified Voellmy rheology S. Hergarten https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-781-2024
118. An extended quasi two-phase mass flow model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.07.008
119. A conceptual model for glacial lake bathymetric distribution T. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5137-2023
120. Towards a model for structured mass movements: the OpenLISEM hazard model 2.0a B. van den Bout et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1841-2021
121. Flow resistance variability in debris flows: evaluating equations, critical stress, and scaling from high-resolution field data T. Schöffl et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02611-x
122. Mitigating future glacial lake outburst floods in the Himalaya X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.11.024
123. Dynamic characteristics of residual debris flows and response mechanisms of check dam in Baima Gully along the Jiumian Expressway E. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-025-0108-0
124. Event Reconstruction and Hydroclimatic–Cryospheric Context of the 2018 Badswat Debris Flow–River Blockage, Pakistan M. Khattak et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18192440
125. Modelling combined flow-like mass movements: the case study of an Italian Alps catchment with protection works S. Cuomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04268-1
126. Modeling Potential Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Process Chains and Effects From Artificial Lake‐Level Lowering at Gepang Gath Lake, Indian Himalaya A. Sattar et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JF006826
127. Coupled CFD-DEM model for the direct numerical simulation of sediment bed erosion by viscous shear flow H. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.003
128. The mudflow disaster at Villa Santa Lucía in Chilean Patagonia: understandings and insights derived from numerical simulation and postevent field surveys M. Somos-Valenzuela et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2319-2020
129. Simulating the effect of check dam collapse in a debris-flow channel T. Baggio & V. D'Agostino https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151660
130. Reconstructing the Snow Avalanche of Coll de Pal 2018 (SE Pyrenees) M. Sanz-Ramos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards2030011
131. Understanding the 2004 glacier detachment in the Amney Machen Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau, via multi-phase modeling T. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01989-2
132. Novel mechanical-dynamical aspects with native Nepalese complex granular slides S. Pudasaini et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0234639
133. Bayesian analysis of the impact of rainfall data product on simulated slope failure for North Carolina locations S. Yatheendradas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-018-9804-y
134. Towards automatic delineation of landslide source and runout K. Bhuyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107866
135. PyDebrisFlow2D: A 2D Conservative Python Multiphysics Solver for Variable-Density Debris Flows with Voellmy Resistance, Bed Exchange, and Grain Size Segregation M. Secchi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app162110593
136. South Lhonak Lake Disaster in Sikkim, India: Impact Analysis Using Optical Imagery, SBAS-InSAR and Numerical Simulation P. Roy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-025-02192-1
137. Evolution of stony debris flows in laboratory experiments I. Baselt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107431
138. Integration of Morris and GLUE methods for improving massflow-based debris flow simulation H. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07289-x
139. Integrating experimental and numerical approaches to simulate viscous debris flows using an HBP-SPH framework N. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01603-0
140. High mobility of rock-ice avalanches: Insights from small flume tests of gravel-ice mixtures Q. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105260
141. INTERCOMPARISON OF LANDSLIDE OCCURRENCE AND BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS METHODS FOR TSUNAMI EVALUATION M. KOBA et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejj.23-17029
142. SPH numerical modelling of landslide movements as coupled two-phase flows with a new solution for the interaction term S. Tayyebi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2022.06.002
143. Effects of defense-structure system for bridge piers on two-phase debris flow wakes Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01296-5
144. SCoMHA: a framework to analyse process-level sediment connectivity in multi-hazard events M. Ishmam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08149-y
145. Numerical Modelling and Sensitivity Analysis of the Pitztal Valley Debris Flow Event M. Naqvi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13120378
146. The Sikkim flood of October 2023: Drivers, causes, and impacts of a multihazard cascade A. Sattar et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ads2659
147. Impact force of a surge of water and sediments mixtures against slit check dams G. Rossi & A. Armanini https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.124
148. Three-dimensional and real-scale modeling of flow regimes in dense snow avalanches X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01692-8
149. Numerical Modelling of Debris Flows for Simulation-Based Decision Support: An Indian Perspective M. Abraham et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-024-00988-5
150. An approach to revealing landslide reactivation mechanisms through integration of remote sensing, field data, and numerical modeling Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.109142
151. Numerical Simulation of the Erosion Effect Caused by the Impact of High-Velocity Landslide C. Qiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2864271
152. Probabilistic hazard modelling of rain-triggered lahars S. Mead & C. Magill https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-017-0060-y
153. Modelling reconstruction and boulder size-frequency distribution of a young (<5 Myr) landslide located in Simud Vallis floor, Mars M. Pajola et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114850
154. Insights on Multistage Rock Avalanche Behavior From Runout Modeling Constrained by Seismic Inversions A. Mitchell et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023444
155. Impact of variation of size of the initial release mass in the dynamics of landslide generated tsunami J. Kafle et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793962322500556
156. High Mountain Asia hydropower systems threatened by climate-driven landscape instability D. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00953-y
157. Physics-Informed Residual Convolutional Network Model for Depth-Averaged Landslide Dynamics Y. Wu & Z. Yang https://doi.org/10.3390/app16136637
158. Stream function - vorticity formulation of mixture mass flow P. Pokhrel & S. Pudasaini https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2019.103317
159. Synthesis of hydrothermal alteration, rock mechanics and geophysical mapping to constrain failure and debris avalanche hazards at Mt. Ruapehu (New Zealand) G. Kereszturi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2021.1885048
160. Research Progress of Initial Mechanism on Debris Flow and Related Discrimination Methods: A Review J. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.629567
161. Landslide tsunamis: exploring momentum transfer to waves generated by a range of materials with different mobility impacting water G. Bullard et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02126-3
162. Martian gullies: a comprehensive review of observations, mechanisms and insights from Earth analogues S. Conway et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP467.14
163. Challenges Assessing Rock Slope Stability Using the Strength Reduction Method with the Hoek–Brown Criterion on the Example of Vals (Tyrol/Austria) M. Illeditsch et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12070255
164. Inverse analysis of granular flows using differentiable graph neural network simulator Y. Choi & K. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106374
165. Earth pressure profiles in unsaturated soils under transient flow S. Shahrokhabadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105218
166. r.avaflow v4, a multi-purpose landslide simulation framework M. Mergili et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-9879-2025
167. A Numerical Based Approach to Calculate Ore Dilution Rates Using Rolling Resistance Model and Upside-Down Drop Shape Theory H. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02180-6
168. DebrisInterMixing-2.3: a finite volume solver for three-dimensional debris-flow simulations with two calibration parameters – Part 2: Model validation with experiments A. von Boetticher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3963-2017
169. A Perspective of Surge Dynamics in Natural Debris Flows Through Pulse‐Doppler Radar Observations T. Schöffl et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JF007171
170. A Multi‐Phase Mass Flow Model S. Pudasaini & M. Mergili https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005204
171. A rockslide-induced debris flow caused the catastrophic 2024 Wayanad disaster in Kerala, India P. Roy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02484-0
172. Bayesian active learning for parameter calibration of landslide run-out models H. Zhao & J. Kowalski https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01857-z
173. Debris flow event on Osorno volcano, Chile, during summer 2017: new interpretations for chain processes in the southern Andes I. Fustos-Toribio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3015-2021
174. Debris-Flow Impact on Piers with Different Cross-Sectional Shapes Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001656
175. Reconstruction of the 1941 GLOF process chain at Lake Palcacocha (Cordillera Blanca, Peru) M. Mergili et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-93-2020
176. Bayesian Inference in Snow Avalanche Simulation with r.avaflow J. Fischer et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10050191
177. Calibration and parameterization of the two-phase debris flow model r.avaflow using 72 large-scale flume experiments K. Boie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2026.110576
178. Deposition morphology in large-scale laboratory stony debris flows I. Baselt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107992
179. Estimating weakening on hillslopes caused by strong earthquakes C. Xi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01256-3
180. Combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling M. Mergili et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01222-7
181. Composition and slope controls on runout hazard in mine overburden dump debris flows: flume experiments and dimensionless flow regime analysis A. Tiwari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-026-05057-0
182. Debris Flow Analyst (DA): A debris flow model considering kinematic uncertainties and using a GIS platform Y. Wu & H. Lan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105877
183. Sensitivity and Calibration of Three‐Dimensional SPH Formulations in Large‐Scale Landslide Modeling S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024583
184. Numerical modelling of the long runout character of 2015 Shenzhen landslide with a general two-phase mass flow model C. Qiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1329-z
185. Debris flow enlargement from entrainment: A case study for comparison of three entrainment models P. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105581
186. Dispersion in Shallow Moment Equations U. Scholz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42967-023-00325-2
187. Model test on the entrainment phenomenon and energy conversion mechanism of flow-like landslides H. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.023
188. Time and path prediction of landslides using InSAR and flow model P. Roy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.112899
189. Mechanism analysis and numerical simulation of the Zhongchuan loess earthflow induced by the M 6.2 Jishishan earthquake in Gansu, China W. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107828
190. Dynamics of avalanche-generated impulse waves: three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations and sensitivity analysis R. Chisolm & D. McKinney https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1373-2018
191. Modeling the Slump-Type Landslide Tsunamis Part I: Developing a Three-Dimensional Bingham-Type Landslide Model T. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186501
192. An integrated method for rapid estimation of the valley incision by debris flows Z. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.007
193. Transferability of a calibrated numerical model of rock avalanche run‐out: Application to 20 rock avalanches on the Nuussuaq Peninsula, West Greenland J. Benjamin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4469
194. AscDAMs: advanced SLAM-based channel detection and mapping system T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3075-2024
195. Análisis de eventos torrenciales en el Valle de Aburrá, en los años 2010 – 2011 con la herramienta r.avaflow T. Grisales-Ospina et al. https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-16-4-10
196. Towards a predictive multi-phase model for alpine mass movements and process cascades A. Cicoira et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106866
197. Open AR-Sandbox: A haptic interface for geoscience education and outreach F. Wellmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02455.1
198. Variable hydrograph inputs for a numerical debris-flow runout model A. Mitchell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1627-2022
199. Joint influences of topographical and flow conditions on debris-flow erosion and deposition: insights from the 2020 Heixiluo event in the Dadu River Basin K. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2025-0206
200. Flow-Py v1.0: a customizable, open-source simulation tool to estimate runout and intensity of gravitational mass flows C. D'Amboise et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2423-2022
201. Physically based modeling of co-seismic landslide, debris flow, and flood cascade B. van den Bout et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3183-2022
202. Reconstructing the Chongbaxia Tsho glacial lake outburst flood in the Eastern Himalaya: Evolution, process and impacts Y. Nie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107393
203. Numerical Modeling and a Parametric Study of Various Mass Flows Based on a Multi-Phase Computational Framework M. Naqvi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics2030025
204. Can big data and random forests improve avalanche runout estimation compared to simple linear regression? H. Toft et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103844
205. Insights into small landslides inducing major disasters in the Wumeng Mountain area from the Liangshui landslide Q. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02414-6
206. Numerical investigation on the landslide dam formation in landslide-river interaction H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107118
207. Análisis de eventos torrenciales en el Valle de Aburrá, en los años 2010 – 2011 con la herramienta r.avaflow T. Grisales-Ospina et al. https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2025-04-03
208. Modelling of mobility of Rissa landslide and following tsunami Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104388
209. New insights on the 2020 Jinwuco glacial lake outburst flood: considering ice content within the moraine dam H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2026.2649567
210. On analytical solutions of a two-phase mass flow model S. Ghosh Hajra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2017.09.009
211. The impact of terrain model source and resolution on snow avalanche modeling A. Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2673-2022
212. Digital Animation of Powder-Snow Avalanches F. Nascimento et al. https://doi.org/10.1145/3730862
213. Probabilistic landslide susceptibility analysis in tropical mountainous terrain using the physically based r.slope.stability model J. Palacio Cordoba et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-815-2020
214. Mass Movement Hazard and Exposure in the Himalaya S. Dubey et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003253
215. Review of moraine dam failure mechanism R. Neupane et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2019.1652210
216. Measurement of the effective dynamic viscosity of soil-rock mixture J. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105782
217. Landslide-induced debris flows and its investigation using r.avaflow: A case study from Kotrupi, India N. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02315-1
218. Comparison of two 2-D numerical models for snow avalanche simulation M. Martini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165221
219. A multi-scale approach for deterministic analysis of landslide triggering and mass flow mechanism at Kaliasaur (Rudraprayag) A. Sajwan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02151-2
220. Analysis of landslide process in parts of basaltic terrain in Western Ghats, India using remote sensing, electrical resistivity tomography and flow modeling N. Jain et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43538-026-00860-5
221. Rock characteristics and dynamic fragmentation process of the 2018 Daanshan rockslide in Beijing, China T. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-022-7447-x
222. An Analytical Solution for the Run-Out of Submarine Debris Flows Y. Rui & M. Yin https://doi.org/10.1080/01490419.2019.1583146
223. Impacts and prospective hazard analysis of rainfall-triggered lahars on St Vincent 2021–22 J. Phillips et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP539-2022-313
224. An experimental method for measuring the rheological behavior of slurry suspensions C. Tranquilino et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2025-0062
225. LARMSU: A semi-empirical landslide runout model based on slope units J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108964
226. Full-Flowfield Inversion of Debris-Flow Dynamics: A Global–Local Optimization Framework for Model Parameter Estimation from Final Accumulation Fields M. Secchi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16090378
227. A progressive entrainment runout model for debris flow analysis and its application C. Kang & D. Chan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.09.003
228. Combining seismic signal dynamic inversion and numerical modeling improves landslide process reconstruction Y. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-1233-2022
229. Solitary wave overtopping at granular dams L. Huber et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2017.1356757
230. How well can we simulate complex hydro‐geomorphic process chains? The 2012 multi‐lake outburst flood in the Santa Cruz Valley (Cordillera Blanca, Perú) M. Mergili et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4318
231. Modelling debris flood propagation in scarce data terrain, case study in the Colombian Andes F. Cardona et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2025.105660
232. Assessment of Potential Landslide Scenarios Using Morphometry, Geomorphological Constraints, and Run-Out Analysis: A Case Study from Central Apennines (Italy) G. Paglia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112109
233. Integrated Dynamic Model for Numerical Modeling of Complex Landslides: From Progressive Sliding to Rapid Avalanche C. Qiao & C. Wang https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312610
234. Numerical simulation of the propagation process of a rapid flow-like landslide considering bed entrainment: A case study P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105287
235. Computational experiments on the 1962 and 1970 landslide events at Huascarán (Peru) with r.avaflow: Lessons learned for predictive mass flow simulations M. Mergili et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.08.032
236. The 26 August 2026 Chhochen Khola ice-rock avalanche–debris flow cascade on the Nepal–China border: Dynamics, numerical computation, and causes H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-026-1482-y
237. The 2024 cascading glacial lake outburst flood in the Thame Valley of Everest region, Nepal: process, impacts and implications N. Khadka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4131-2026
238. Debris flow risk assessment via numerical simulation: a case study in Northeast China L. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02545-4
239. Changing post-landslide cascade hazard intensity due to increasing temperature: a process-based simulation of the 2021 Melamchi disaster in Nepal O. Dhakal et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-026-00398-0
240. Channel flow simulation of a mixture with a full-dimensional generalized quasi two-phase model K. Khattri & S. Pudasaini https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2019.03.014
241. A full description of generalized drag in mixture mass flows S. Pudasaini https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105429
242. Prognostics of forest recovery with r.recovery GRASS-GIS module: an open-source forest growth simulation model based on the diffusive-logistic equation L. Richit et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.002
243. Cluster landslides and associated damage in the Dima Hasao district of Assam, India due to heavy rainfall in May 2022 P. Roy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01977-6
244. GIS-driven multi-phase simulation framework for assessing rainfall-triggered landslides using SPH-FDM techniques A. Sajwan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-025-01015-x
245. How Ice Particles Increase Mobility of Rock‐Ice Avalanches: Insights From Chute Flows Simulation of Granular Rock‐Ice Mixtures by Discrete Element Method Z. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JF007115
246. A Simple Method of Mapping Landslides Runout Zones Considering Kinematic Uncertainties J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030668
247. Debris-flow generated tsunamis and their dependence on debris-flow dynamics S. de Lange et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103623
248. Evolution of a Potentially Dangerous Glacial Lake on the Kanchenjunga Glacier, Nepal, Predictive Flood Models, and Prospective Community Response A. Byers et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17101457
249. Anomalous Alpine fans: from the genesis to the present hazard E. De Finis et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0894-8
250. faSavageHutterFOAM 1.0: depth-integrated simulation of dense snow avalanches on natural terrain with OpenFOAM M. Rauter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2923-2018
251. Transient wave activity in snow avalanches is controlled by entrainment and topography X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01157-x
252. AvaFrame com1DFA (v1.3): a thickness-integrated computational avalanche module – theory, numerics, and testing M. Tonnel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7013-2023
253. Centrifuge Study on the Submarine Mudflows Y. Rui & M. Yin https://doi.org/10.1080/01490419.2018.1561562
254. Morphometric analysis of debris flow hazard and risk assessment in the mountain terrains of northern Pakistan using remote sensing and field data N. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01807-y
255. Application of Explicit-MPS method for snow avalanche simulation Y. SAITO https://doi.org/10.5331/seppyo.84.4_263
256. Sustainability Nexus AID: landslides and land subsidence M. Motagh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-024-00549-7
257. A two-point three-phase resolved coupling framework for modeling boulder-laden debris flows Y. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.06.021
258. Ice Avalanche-Triggered Glacier Lake Outburst Flood: Hazard Assessment at Jiongpuco, Southeastern Tibet S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17142102
259. Coupled limit equilibrium/depth-averaged approach for debris flow hazard assessment: the 2012 Te Maari avalanche J. Vicente & S. Mead https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.25.00702
260. A dynamic earthflow model S. Pudasaini & M. Mergili https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.107959
261. Modelling the pre- and post-failure behaviour of faulted rock slopes based on the particle finite element method with a damage mechanics model L. Wang & Q. Lei https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105057
262. Failure analysis and flow dynamic modeling using a new slow-flow functionality: the 2022 Jiaokou (China) tailings dam breach C. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02146-z
263. Distribution-agnostic landslide hazard modelling via Graph Transformers G. Belvederesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106231
264. Numerical investigation of large-slope planar failure considering entrainment effects: New insights into the 2009 JWS event Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107901
265. Probabilistic model for assessing human risk from cascading landslide hazards: a case study of the Baige landslide S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2025.2507290
266. Exploring implications of input parameter uncertainties in glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) modelling results using the modelling code r.avaflow S. Rinzin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1841-2025
267. The Changing Ecology of a High Himalayan Valley: Challenges to the Sustainable Development of the Kanchenjunga Conservation Area, Eastern Nepal A. Byers et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062434
268. Physical process-based runout modeling and hazard assessment of catastrophic debris flow using SPH incorporated with ArcGIS: A case study of the Hongchun gully H. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106052
269. The State of Remote Sensing Capabilities of Cascading Hazards Over High Mountain Asia D. Kirschbaum et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00197
270. Himalayan hazard cascades – modern and medieval outburst floods in Pokhara, Nepal M. Fischer et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5539
271. Back calculation of the 2017 Piz Cengalo–Bondo landslide cascade with r.avaflow: what we can do and what we can learn M. Mergili et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-505-2020
272. Rock avalanche runout prediction using stochastic analysis of a regional dataset A. Mitchell et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01331-3
273. Sturzprozesse ausgehend von Felsböschungen: Abschätzung der Reichweite mithilfe numerischer Modelle A. Preh https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.201900075
274. Risk assessment on the stability of barrier dam induced by Caijiaba landslide, SW China K. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02729-5
275. Mapping release and propagation areas of permafrost-related rock slope failures in the French Alps: A new methodological approach at regional scale M. Cathala et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.109032
276. Simulation des écoulements gravitaires avec les modèles d’écoulement en couche mince : état de l’art et exemple d’application aux coulées de débris de la Rivière du Prêcheur (Martinique, Petites Antilles) M. Peruzzetto et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/2023020
277. Simulation of runout behavior of submarine debris flows over regional natural terrain considering material softening Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2021.2020942
278. A two-layer numerical model for simulating the frontal plowing phenomenon of flow-like landslides W. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105168
279. Modeling the glacial lake outburst flood process chain in the Nepal Himalaya: reassessing Imja Tsho's hazard J. Lala et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3721-2018
280. Small outbursts into big disasters: Earthquakes exacerbate climate-driven cascade processes of the glacial lakes failure in the Himalayas N. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108539
281. Modeling the landslide-generated debris flow from formation to propagation and run-out by considering the effect of vegetation W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01478-4
282. Dynamic analysis of the multi-staged ice–rock debris avalanche in the Langtang valley triggered by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal K. Gnyawali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105440
283. Particle and front tracking in experimental and computational avalanche dynamics M. Neuhauser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4185-2025
284. Solid-liquid interaction caused by minor wetting in gravel-ice mixtures: A key factor for the mobility of rock-ice avalanches Y. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106072
285. INSPIRE standards as a framework for artificial intelligence applications: a landslide example G. Roberti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3455-2020
286. An Enhanced Framework to Quantify the Shape of Impulse Waves Using Asymmetry G. Bullard et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014167
287. Rainfall-induced runoff and debris flows: modelling the Cervinara 1999 cascade flow-like mass movements S. Cuomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04283-2
288. Interaction of two-phase debris flow with obstacles P. Kattel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.05.023
289. Multi‐Model Comparison of Computed Debris Flow Runout for the 9 January 2018 Montecito, California Post‐Wildfire Event K. Barnhart et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006245
290. A 3D Two-Phase Landslide Dynamical Model on GIS Platform A. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020564
291. A multiphase virtual mass model for debris flow P. Kattel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103638
292. A massive rock and ice avalanche caused the 2021 disaster at Chamoli, Indian Himalaya D. Shugar et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh4455
293. Numerical simulation of rainfall-induced debris flow in the Hongchun gully based on the coupling of the LHT model and the Pudasaini model H. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05956-5
294. A Multiphase Flow Transformation Model for Analysing Debris Flow Dynamics D. Apriani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2026.06.004
295. 2D Runout Modelling of Hillslope Debris Flows, Based on Well-Documented Events in Switzerland F. Zimmermann et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10020070
296. A massive lateral moraine collapse triggered the 2023 South Lhonak Lake outburst flood, Sikkim Himalayas T. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02358-x
297. Classic, modern, and physics-based rheological laws for geophysical granular flows in a landslide hazard chain M. Kamali Zarch et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105204