Articles | Volume 10, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3913-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3913-2017
Model description paper
 | 
27 Oct 2017
Model description paper |  | 27 Oct 2017

GLOFRIM v1.0 – A globally applicable computational framework for integrated hydrological–hydrodynamic modelling

Jannis M. Hoch, Jeffrey C. Neal, Fedor Baart, Rens van Beek, Hessel C. Winsemius, Paul D. Bates, and Marc F. P. Bierkens

Related authors

On the importance of discharge observation uncertainty when interpreting hydrological model performance
Jerom P. M. Aerts, Jannis M. Hoch, Gemma Coxon, Nick C. van de Giesen, and Rolf W. Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5011–5030, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5011-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Discharge and sediment fluxes along the Amazon river: RDSM model concepts and validation
Safaa Naffaa, Frances F. E. Dunne, Jannis Hoch, Geert Sterk, Steven S. M. de Jong, and Rens L. P. H. van Beek
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-255,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-255, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
A first attempt to model global hydrology at hyper-resolution
Barry van Jaarsveld, Niko Wanders, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Jannis Hoch, Bram Droppers, Joren Janzing, Rens L. P. H. van Beek, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1025,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1025, 2024
Short summary
Hyper-resolution PCR-GLOBWB: opportunities and challenges from refining model spatial resolution to 1 km over the European continent
Jannis M. Hoch, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Niko Wanders, Rens L. P. H. van Beek, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1383–1401, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1383-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1383-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluating the impact of model complexity on flood wave propagation and inundation extent with a hydrologic–hydrodynamic model coupling framework
Jannis M. Hoch, Dirk Eilander, Hiroaki Ikeuchi, Fedor Baart, and Hessel C. Winsemius
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1723–1735, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1723-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1723-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
Generalised drought index: a novel multi-scale daily approach for drought assessment
João António Martins Careto, Rita Margarida Cardoso, Ana Russo, Daniela Catarina André Lima, and Pedro Miguel Matos Soares
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8115–8139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8115-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8115-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development and performance of a high-resolution surface wave and storm surge forecast model: application to a large lake
Laura L. Swatridge, Ryan P. Mulligan, Leon Boegman, and Shiliang Shan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7751–7766, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7751-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7751-2024, 2024
Short summary
Deep dive into hydrologic simulations at global scale: harnessing the power of deep learning and physics-informed differentiable models (δHBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Jens de Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Yusuke Satoh, Yoshihide Wada, Jiangtao Liu, Ming Pan, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7181–7198, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7181-2024, 2024
Short summary
PyEt v1.3.1: a Python package for the estimation of potential evapotranspiration
Matevž Vremec, Raoul A. Collenteur, and Steffen Birk
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7083–7103, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, 2024
Short summary
Prediction of hysteretic matric potential dynamics using artificial intelligence: application of autoencoder neural networks
Nedal Aqel, Lea Reusser, Stephan Margreth, Andrea Carminati, and Peter Lehmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6949–6966, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6949-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alcamo, J., Döll, P., Kasper, F., and Siebert, S.: Global change and global scenarios of water use and availability: An Application of WaterGAP1.0., 1997.
Bates, P. D. and de Roo, A.: A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation, J. Hydrol., 236, 54–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00278-X, 2000.
Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., and Fewtrell, T. J.: A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling, J. Hydrol., 387, 33–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027, 2010.
Baugh, C. A., Bates, P. D., Schumann, G. J.-P., and Trigg, M. A.: SRTM vegetation removal and hydrodynamic modeling accuracy, Water Resour. Res., 49, 5276–5289, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20412, 2013.
Beven, K. J., Cloke, H. L., Pappenberger, F., Lamb, R., and Hunter, N. M.: Hyperresolution information and hyperresolution ignorance in modelling the hydrology of the land surface, Sci. China Earth Sci., 58, 25–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-5003-4, 2015.
Download
Short summary
To improve flood hazard assessments, it is vital to model all relevant processes. We here present GLOFRIM, a framework for coupling hydrologic and hydrodynamic models to increase the number of physical processes represented in hazard computations. GLOFRIM is openly available, versatile, and extensible with more models. Results also underpin its added value for model benchmarking, showing that not only model forcing but also grid properties and the numerical scheme influence output accuracy.