Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1125–1141, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1125-2016
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1125–1141, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1125-2016
Development and technical paper
24 Mar 2016
Development and technical paper | 24 Mar 2016

The location of the thermodynamic atmosphere–ice interface in fully coupled models – a case study using JULES and CICE

Alex E. West et al.

Related authors

Understanding model spread in sea ice volume by attribution of model differences in seasonal ice growth and melt
Alex West, Edward Blockley, and Matthew Collins
The Cryosphere, 16, 4013–4032, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4013-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4013-2022, 2022
Short summary
Using Arctic ice mass balance buoys for evaluation of modelled ice energy fluxes
Alex West, Mat Collins, and Ed Blockley
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4845–4868, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4845-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4845-2020, 2020
Short summary
Induced surface fluxes: a new framework for attributing Arctic sea ice volume balance biases to specific model errors
Alex West, Mat Collins, Ed Blockley, Jeff Ridley, and Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo
The Cryosphere, 13, 2001–2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2001-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2001-2019, 2019
Short summary
The sea ice model component of HadGEM3-GC3.1
Jeff K. Ridley, Edward W. Blockley, Ann B. Keen, Jamie G. L. Rae, Alex E. West, and David Schroeder
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 713–723, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-713-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-713-2018, 2018
Short summary
Development of the Global Sea Ice 6.0 CICE configuration for the Met Office Global Coupled model
J. G. L. Rae, H. T. Hewitt, A. B. Keen, J. K. Ridley, A. E. West, C. M. Harris, E. C. Hunke, and D. N. Walters
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2221–2230, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2221-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2221-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
The Stochastic Ice-Sheet and Sea-Level System Model v1.0 (StISSM v1.0)
Vincent Verjans, Alexander A. Robel, Helene Seroussi, Lizz Ultee, and Andrew F. Thompson
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8269–8293, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8269-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8269-2022, 2022
Short summary
Improved representation of the contemporary Greenland ice sheet firn layer by IMAU-FDM v1.2G
Max Brils, Peter Kuipers Munneke, Willem Jan van de Berg, and Michiel van den Broeke
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7121–7138, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7121-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7121-2022, 2022
Short summary
Modeling the small-scale deposition of snow onto structured Arctic sea ice during a MOSAiC storm using snowBedFoam 1.0.
Océane Hames, Mahdi Jafari, David Nicholas Wagner, Ian Raphael, David Clemens-Sewall, Chris Polashenski, Matthew D. Shupe, Martin Schneebeli, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6429–6449, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, 2022
Short summary
Benchmarking the vertically integrated ice-sheet model IMAU-ICE (version 2.0)
Constantijn J. Berends, Heiko Goelzer, Thomas J. Reerink, Lennert B. Stap, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5667–5688, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5667-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5667-2022, 2022
Short summary
SnowClim v1.0: high-resolution snow model and data for the western United States
Abby C. Lute, John Abatzoglou, and Timothy Link
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5045–5071, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5045-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5045-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Best, M. J., Beljaars, A., Polcher, J., and Viterbo, P.: A Proposed Structure for Coupling Tiled Surfaces with the Planetary Boundary Layer, J. Hydrometerorol., 5, 1271–1278, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-382.1, 2004.
Best, M. J., Cox, P. M., and Warrilow, D. M.: Determining the optimal soil temperature scheme for atmospheric modelling applications, Bound. Lay. Meteorol., 114, 111–142, 2005.
Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Clark, D. B., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R .L. H., Ménard, C. B., Edwards, J. M., Hendry, M. A., Porson, A., Gedney, N., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Cox, P. M., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Harding, R. J.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 677–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011, 2011.
Bitz, C. M. and Lipscomb, W. H.: An energy-conserving thermodynamic model of sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 15669–15677, 1999.
Gordon, C., Cooper, C., Senior, C. A., Banks, H., Gregory, J. M., Johns, T. C., Mitchell, J. F. B., and Wood, R. A.: The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments, Clim. Dynam., 16, 147–168, https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050010, 2000.
Download
Short summary
This study compares two methods of coupling a sea ice model to an atmospheric model in a series of idealized one-dimensional experiments. The JULES method calculates surface variables in the atmosphere; the CICE method calculates surface variables in the sea ice. It is found that simulations of all variables are more accurate in the JULES method, likely because of the shorter time step of the atmosphere.