Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1125-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1125-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
Development and technical paper
 | 
24 Mar 2016
Development and technical paper |  | 24 Mar 2016

The location of the thermodynamic atmosphere–ice interface in fully coupled models – a case study using JULES and CICE

Alex E. West, Alison J. McLaren, Helene T. Hewitt, and Martin J. Best

Viewed

Total article views: 3,526 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,342 1,053 131 3,526 189 157 185
  • HTML: 2,342
  • PDF: 1,053
  • XML: 131
  • Total: 3,526
  • Supplement: 189
  • BibTeX: 157
  • EndNote: 185
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Nov 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Nov 2015)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 17 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
This study compares two methods of coupling a sea ice model to an atmospheric model in a series of idealized one-dimensional experiments. The JULES method calculates surface variables in the atmosphere; the CICE method calculates surface variables in the sea ice. It is found that simulations of all variables are more accurate in the JULES method, likely because of the shorter time step of the atmosphere.
Read more