Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1125–1141, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1125-2016
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1125–1141, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1125-2016

Development and technical paper 24 Mar 2016

Development and technical paper | 24 Mar 2016

The location of the thermodynamic atmosphere–ice interface in fully coupled models – a case study using JULES and CICE

Alex E. West et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Alex West on behalf of the Authors (18 Feb 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (11 Mar 2016) by Dan Goldberg
Download
Short summary
This study compares two methods of coupling a sea ice model to an atmospheric model in a series of idealized one-dimensional experiments. The JULES method calculates surface variables in the atmosphere; the CICE method calculates surface variables in the sea ice. It is found that simulations of all variables are more accurate in the JULES method, likely because of the shorter time step of the atmosphere.