Articles | Volume 8, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 923–937, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-923-2015
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 923–937, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-923-2015

Model description paper 31 Mar 2015

Model description paper | 31 Mar 2015

A high-resolution simulation of groundwater and surface water over most of the continental US with the integrated hydrologic model ParFlow v3

R. M. Maxwell et al.

Related authors

A national topographic dataset for hydrological modeling over the contiguous United States
Jun Zhang, Laura E. Condon, Hoang Tran, and Reed M. Maxwell
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3263–3279, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3263-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3263-2021, 2021
Short summary
GMD Perspective: the quest to improve the evaluation of groundwater representation in continental to global scale models
Tom Gleeson, Thorsten Wagener, Petra Döll, Samuel C. Zipper, Charles West, Yoshihide Wada, Richard Taylor, Bridget Scanlon, Rafael Rosolem, Shams Rahman, Nurudeen Oshinlaja, Reed Maxwell, Min-Hui Lo, Hyungjun Kim, Mary Hill, Andreas Hartmann, Graham Fogg, James S. Famiglietti, Agnès Ducharne, Inge de Graaf, Mark Cuthbert, Laura Condon, Etienne Bresciani, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-97,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-97, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Assessment of the ParFlow-CLM CONUS 1.0 integrated hydrologic model: Evaluation of hyper-resolution water balance components across the contiguous United States
Mary M. F. O'Neill, Danielle T. Tijerina, Laura E. Condon, and Reed M. Maxwell
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-364,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-364, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
HESS Opinions: Improving the evaluation of groundwater representation in continental to global scale models
Tom Gleeson, Thorsten Wagener, Petra Döll, Samuel C. Zipper, Charles West, Yoshihide Wada, Richard Taylor, Bridget Scanlon, Rafael Rosolem, Shams Rahman, Nurudeen Oshinlaja, Reed Maxwell, Min-Hui Lo, Hyungjun Kim, Mary Hill, Andreas Hartmann, Graham Fogg, James S. Famiglietti, Agnès Ducharne, Inge de Graaf, Mark Cuthbert, Laura Condon, Etienne Bresciani, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-378,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-378, 2020
Revised manuscript not accepted
Sensitivity of hydrologic and geologic parameters on recharge processes in a highly heterogeneous, semi-confined aquifer system
Stephen R. Maples, Laura Foglia, Graham E. Fogg, and Reed M. Maxwell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2437–2456, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2437-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2437-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
GP-SWAT (v1.0): a two-level graph-based parallel simulation tool for the SWAT model
Dejian Zhang, Bingqing Lin, Jiefeng Wu, and Qiaoying Lin
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5915–5925, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5915-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5915-2021, 2021
Short summary
Development of a coupled simulation framework representing the lake and river continuum of mass and energy (TCHOIR v1.0)
Daisuke Tokuda, Hyungjun Kim, Dai Yamazaki, and Taikan Oki
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5669–5693, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5669-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5669-2021, 2021
Short summary
Hydrostreamer v1.0 – improved streamflow predictions for local applications from an ensemble of downscaled global runoff products
Marko Kallio, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Vili Virkki, Matti Kummu, and Kirsi Virrantaus
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5155–5181, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5155-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5155-2021, 2021
Short summary
Model cascade from meteorological drivers to river flood hazard: flood-cascade v1.0
Peter Uhe, Daniel Mitchell, Paul D. Bates, Nans Addor, Jeff Neal, and Hylke E. Beck
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4865–4890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4865-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4865-2021, 2021
Short summary
DecTree v1.0 – chemistry speedup in reactive transport simulations: purely data-driven and physics-based surrogates
Marco De Lucia and Michael Kühn
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4713–4730, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4713-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4713-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Anyah, R. O., Weaver, C. P., Miguez-Macho, G., Fan, Y., and Robock, A.: Incorporating water table dynamics in climate modeling: 3. Simulated groundwater influence on coupled land-atmosphere variability, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009087, 2008.
Ashby, S. F. and Falgout, R. D.: A parallel multigrid preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm for groundwater flow simulations, Nuclear Sci. Eng., 124, 145–159, 1996.
Beven, K.: Robert e. Horton's perceptual model of infiltration processes, Hydrol. Process., 18, 3447–3460, 2004.
Camporese, M., Paniconi, C., Putti, M., and Orlandini, S.: Surface-subsurface flow modeling with path-based runoff routing, boundary condition-based coupling, and assimilation of multisource observation data, Water Resour. Res., 46, W02512, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr007536, 2010.
Download
Short summary
A model that simulates groundwater and surface water flow has been developed for the major river basins of the continental United States.  Fundamental data sets provide input to the model resulting in a natural organization of stream networks and groundwater flow that is compared to observations of surface water and groundwater. Model results show relationships between flow and area that are moderated by aridity and represent an important step toward integrated hydrological prediction.