Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-803-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-803-2022
Model description paper
 | 
28 Jan 2022
Model description paper |  | 28 Jan 2022

WIFF1.0: a hybrid machine-learning-based parameterization of wave-induced sea ice floe fracture

Christopher Horvat and Lettie A. Roach

Related authors

Sea Ice Concentration Estimates from ICESat-2 Linear Ice Fraction. Part 2: Gridded Data Comparison and Bias Estimation
Christopher Horvat, Ellen M. Buckley, and Madelyn Stewart
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3864,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3864, 2025
Short summary
Sea Ice Concentration Estimates from ICESat-2 Linear Ice Fraction. Part 1: Multi-sensor Comparison of Sea Ice Concentration Products
Ellen M. Buckley, Christopher Horvat, and Pittayuth Yoosiri
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3861,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3861, 2024
Short summary
A method for constructing directional surface wave spectra from ICESat-2 altimetry
Momme C. Hell and Christopher Horvat
The Cryosphere, 18, 341–361, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-341-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-341-2024, 2024
Short summary
Summer sea ice floe perimeter density in the Arctic: high-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation
Yanan Wang, Byongjun Hwang, Adam William Bateson, Yevgeny Aksenov, and Christopher Horvat
The Cryosphere, 17, 3575–3591, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3575-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3575-2023, 2023
Short summary
Altimetric observation of wave attenuation through the Antarctic marginal ice zone using ICESat-2
Jill Brouwer, Alexander D. Fraser, Damian J. Murphy, Pat Wongpan, Alberto Alberello, Alison Kohout, Christopher Horvat, Simon Wotherspoon, Robert A. Massom, Jessica Cartwright, and Guy D. Williams
The Cryosphere, 16, 2325–2353, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2325-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2325-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Cryosphere
CMIP6 models overestimate sea ice melt, growth and conduction relative to ice mass balance buoy estimates
Alex E. West and Edward W. Blockley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3041–3064, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3041-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3041-2025, 2025
Short summary
Coupling framework (1.0) for the Úa (2023b) ice sheet model and the FESOM-1.4 z-coordinate ocean model in an Antarctic domain
Ole Richter, Ralph Timmermann, G. Hilmar Gudmundsson, and Jan De Rydt
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2945–2960, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2945-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2945-2025, 2025
Short summary
A gradient-boosted tree framework to model the ice thickness of the world's glaciers (IceBoost v1.1)
Niccolò Maffezzoli, Eric Rignot, Carlo Barbante, Troels Petersen, and Sebastiano Vascon
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2545–2568, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2545-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2545-2025, 2025
Short summary
Towards deep-learning solutions for classification of automated snow height measurements (CleanSnow v1.0.2)
Jan Svoboda, Marc Ruesch, David Liechti, Corinne Jones, Michele Volpi, Michael Zehnder, and Jürg Schweizer
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1829–1849, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1829-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1829-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantitative sub-ice and marine tracing of Antarctic sediment provenance (TASP v1.0)
James W. Marschalek, Edward Gasson, Tina van de Flierdt, Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand, Martin J. Siegert, and Liam Holder
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1673–1708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1673-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1673-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Aksenov, Y., Popova, E. E., Yool, A., Nurser, A. J., Williams, T. D., Bertino, L., and Bergh, J.: On the future navigability of Arctic sea routes: High-resolution projections of the Arctic Ocean and sea ice, Mar. Policy, 75, 300–317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.027, 2017. a
Asplin, M. G., Galley, R., Barber, D. G., and Prinsenberg, S.: Fracture of summer perennial sea ice by ocean swell as a result of Arctic storms, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 117, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007221, 2012. a
Asplin, M. G., Scharien, R., Else, B., Howell, S., Barber, D. G., Papakyriakou, T., and Prinsenberg, S.: Implications of fractured Arctic perennial ice cover on thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice processes, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 2327–2343, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009557, 2014. a
Bateson, A. W., Feltham, D. L., Schröder, D., Hosekova, L., Ridley, J. K., and Aksenov, Y.: Impact of sea ice floe size distribution on seasonal fragmentation and melt of Arctic sea ice, The Cryosphere, 14, 403–428, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-403-2020, 2020. a, b
Boutin, G., Ardhuin, F., Dumont, D., Sévigny, C., Girard-Ardhuin, F., and Accensi, M.: Floe size effect on wave-ice interactions: possible effects, implementation in wave model, and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 4779–4805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JC013622, 2018. a
Download
Short summary
Sea ice is a composite of individual pieces, called floes, ranging in horizontal size from meters to kilometers. Variations in sea ice geometry are often forced by ocean waves, a process that is an important target of global climate models as it affects the rate of sea ice melting. Yet directly simulating these interactions is computationally expensive. We present a neural-network-based model of wave–ice fracture that allows models to incorporate their effect without added computational cost.
Share