Articles | Volume 15, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5045-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5045-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model description paper
| 
04 Jul 2022
Model description paper |
| 04 Jul 2022
| 04 Jul 2022
SnowClim v1.0: high-resolution snow model and data for the western United States
Abby C. Lute
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Water Resources Program, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
now at: Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, MA 02540, USA
John Abatzoglou
Management of Complex Systems, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA
Timothy Link
Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, University of
Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
A. Park Williams, Winslow D. Hansen, Caroline S. Juang, John T. Abatzoglou, Volker C. Radeloff, Bowen Wang, Jazlynn Hall, Jatan Buch, and Gavin D. Madakumbura
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2934, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2934, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The new WULFFSS is a monthly gridded forest-fire model to simulate forest fires across the western United States in response to vegetation, topographic, anthropogenic, and climate factors. This effort is motivated by the ten-fold increase in western U.S. annual forest area burned over the past 40 years. The WULFFSS is highly skillful, accounting for over 80 % of the observed variability in annual forest-fire area and capturing observed spatial, intra-annual variations, and trends.
Bhupinderjeet Singh, Mingliang Liu, John Abatzoglou, Jennifer Adam, and Kirti Rajagopalan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2284, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2284, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrology models rely on simplistic static approaches to precipitation phase partitioning. We evaluate model skill changes for a suite of snow metrics by transitioning to a more accurate dynamic partitioning. We found that the transition resulted in a better match between modeled and observed metrics, with a 50 % reduction in model bias, emphasizing the need for the hydrological modeling community to adopt dynamic partitioning.
Matthew W. Jones, Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle A. Burton, Francesca Di Giuseppe, Maria Lucia F. Barbosa, Esther Brambleby, Andrew J. Hartley, Anna Lombardi, Guilherme Mataveli, Joe R. McNorton, Fiona R. Spuler, Jakob B. Wessel, John T. Abatzoglou, Liana O. Anderson, Niels Andela, Sally Archibald, Dolors Armenteras, Eleanor Burke, Rachel Carmenta, Emilio Chuvieco, Hamish Clarke, Stefan H. Doerr, Paulo M. Fernandes, Louis Giglio, Douglas S. Hamilton, Stijn Hantson, Sarah Harris, Piyush Jain, Crystal A. Kolden, Tiina Kurvits, Seppe Lampe, Sarah Meier, Stacey New, Mark Parrington, Morgane M. G. Perron, Yuquan Qu, Natasha S. Ribeiro, Bambang H. Saharjo, Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz, Jacquelyn K. Shuman, Veerachai Tanpipat, Guido R. van der Werf, Sander Veraverbeke, and Gavriil Xanthopoulos
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3601–3685, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This inaugural State of Wildfires report catalogues extreme fires of the 2023–2024 fire season. For key events, we analyse their predictability and drivers and attribute them to climate change and land use. We provide a seasonal outlook and decadal projections. Key anomalies occurred in Canada, Greece, and western Amazonia, with other high-impact events catalogued worldwide. Climate change significantly increased the likelihood of extreme fires, and mitigation is required to lessen future risk.
Yavar Pourmohamad, John T. Abatzoglou, Erin J. Belval, Erica Fleishman, Karen Short, Matthew C. Reeves, Nicholas Nauslar, Philip E. Higuera, Eric Henderson, Sawyer Ball, Amir AghaKouchak, Jeffrey P. Prestemon, Julia Olszewski, and Mojtaba Sadegh
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3045–3060, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3045-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3045-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The FPA FOD-Attributes dataset provides > 300 biological, physical, social, and administrative attributes associated with > 2.3×106 wildfire incidents across the US from 1992 to 2020. The dataset can be used to (1) answer numerous questions about the covariates associated with human- and lightning-caused wildfires and (2) support descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive wildfire analytics, including the development of machine learning models.
Jianning Ren, Jennifer C. Adam, Jeffrey A. Hicke, Erin J. Hanan, Christina L. Tague, Mingliang Liu, Crystal A. Kolden, and John T. Abatzoglou
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4681–4699, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4681-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4681-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain pine beetle outbreaks have caused widespread tree mortality. While some research shows that water yield increases after trees are killed, many others document no change or a decrease. The climatic and environmental mechanisms driving hydrologic response to tree mortality are not well understood. We demonstrated that the direction of hydrologic response is a function of multiple factors, so previous studies do not necessarily conflict with each other; they represent different conditions.
Sarah E. Godsey, Danny Marks, Patrick R. Kormos, Mark S. Seyfried, Clarissa L. Enslin, Adam H. Winstral, James P. McNamara, and Timothy E. Link
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 1207–1216, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1207-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1207-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Weather data in mountainous rain-to-snow transition zones are limited, but are vital for water resources. We present a 10-year dataset for this zone that includes hourly temperatures, relative humidity, streamflow, snow depth, precipitation, wind speed/direction, solar energy, and soil moisture at 11 stations. Average air temperatures are near freezing 8 months each year, so that slight warming may determine whether rain falls instead of snow, affecting water supplies and fire risk.
Adrian A. Harpold, Michael L. Kaplan, P. Zion Klos, Timothy Link, James P. McNamara, Seshadri Rajagopal, Rina Schumer, and Caitriana M. Steele
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The phase of precipitation as rain or snow is fundamental to hydrological processes and water resources. Despite its importance, the methods used to predict precipitation phase are inconsistent and often overly simplified. We review these methods and underlying mechanisms that control phase. We present a vision to meet important research gaps needed to improve prediction, including new field-based and remote measurements, validating new and existing methods, and expanding regional prediction.
Clarissa L. Enslin, Sarah E. Godsey, Danny Marks, Patrick R. Kormos, Mark S. Seyfried, James P. McNamara, and Timothy E. Link
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2016-44, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2016-44, 2016
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Weather data in mountainous rain-to-snow transition zones are limited, but vital for water resources. We present a 10-year dataset for this zone that includes hourly temperatures, relative humidity, stream flow, snow depth, precipitation, wind speed/direction, solar energy, and soil moisture at 11 stations. Average air temperatures are near freezing eight months each year, so that slight warming may determine whether rain falls instead of snow, affecting water supplies, ecosystems and fire risk.
Related subject area
Cryosphere
Computationally efficient subglacial drainage modelling using Gaussian process emulators: GlaDS-GP v1.0
Anisotropic metric-based mesh adaptation for ice flow modelling in Firedrake
Description and validation of the ice-sheet model Nix v1.0
The Utrecht Finite Volume Ice-Sheet Model (UFEMISM) version 2.0 – Part 1: Description and idealised experiments
A Flexible Snow Model (FSM 2.1.1) including a forest canopy
CMIP6 models overestimate sea ice melt, growth and conduction relative to ice mass balance buoy estimates
Coupling framework (1.0) for the Úa (2023b) ice sheet model and the FESOM-1.4 z-coordinate ocean model in an Antarctic domain
A gradient-boosted tree framework to model the ice thickness of the world's glaciers (IceBoost v1.1)
Comparison of calibration methods of a PICO basal ice shelf melt module implemented in the GRISLI v2.0 ice sheet model
A Python library for solving ice sheet modeling problems using Physics Informed Neural Networks, PINNICLE v1.0
Towards deep-learning solutions for classification of automated snow height measurements (CleanSnow v1.0.2)
Constraining CMIP6 sea ice simulations with ICESat-2
Quantitative sub-ice and marine tracing of Antarctic sediment provenance (TASP v1.0)
Tuning parameters of a sea ice model using machine learning
WRF-Chem simulations of snow nitrate and other physicochemical properties in northern China
Implementation of an intermediate complexity snow-physics scheme (ISBA-Explicit Snow) into a sea-ice model (SI3): 1D thermodynamic coupling and validation
A framework for three-dimensional dynamic modeling of mountain glaciers in the Community Ice Sheet Model (CISM v2.2)
Clustering simulated snow profiles to form avalanche forecast regions
SnowQM 1.0: a fast R package for bias-correcting spatial fields of snow water equivalent using quantile mapping
Simulation of snow albedo and solar irradiance profile with the Two-streAm Radiative TransfEr in Snow (TARTES) v2.0 model
Evaluation of MITgcm-based ocean reanalyses for the Southern Ocean
Improvements in the land surface configuration to better simulate seasonal snow cover in the European Alps with the CNRM-AROME (cycle 46) convection-permitting regional climate model
A three-stage model pipeline predicting regional avalanche danger in Switzerland (RAvaFcast v1.0.0): a decision-support tool for operational avalanche forecasting
A global–land snow scheme (GLASS) v1.0 for the GFDL Earth System Model: formulation and evaluation at instrumented sites
Design and performance of ELSA v2.0: an isochronal model for ice-sheet layer tracing
Southern Ocean Ice Prediction System version 1.0 (SOIPS v1.0): description of the system and evaluation of synoptic-scale sea ice forecasts
Lagrangian tracking of sea ice in Community Ice CodE (CICE; version 5)
openAMUNDSEN v1.0: an open-source snow-hydrological model for mountain regions
OpenFOAM-avalanche 2312: depth-integrated models beyond dense-flow avalanches
Refactoring the elastic–viscous–plastic solver from the sea ice model CICE v6.5.1 for improved performance
A new 3D full-Stokes calving algorithm within Elmer/Ice (v9.0)
A novel numerical implementation for the surface energy budget of melting snowpacks and glaciers
SnowPappus v1.0, a blowing-snow model for large-scale applications of the Crocus snow scheme
A stochastic parameterization of ice sheet surface mass balance for the Stochastic Ice-Sheet and Sea-Level System Model (StISSM v1.0)
Graphics-processing-unit-accelerated ice flow solver for unstructured meshes using the Shallow-Shelf Approximation (FastIceFlo v1.0.1)
A finite-element framework to explore the numerical solution of the coupled problem of heat conduction, water vapor diffusion, and settlement in dry snow (IvoriFEM v0.1.0)
AvaFrame com1DFA (v1.3): a thickness-integrated computational avalanche module – theory, numerics, and testing
Universal differential equations for glacier ice flow modelling
A new model for supraglacial hydrology evolution and drainage for the Greenland Ice Sheet (SHED v1.0)
Modeling sensitivities of thermally and hydraulically driven ice stream surge cycling
A parallel implementation of the confined–unconfined aquifer system model for subglacial hydrology: design, verification, and performance analysis (CUAS-MPI v0.1.0)
Automatic snow type classification of snow micropenetrometer profiles with machine learning algorithms
An empirical model to calculate snow depth from daily snow water equivalent: SWE2HS 1.0
A wind-driven snow redistribution module for Alpine3D v3.3.0: adaptations designed for downscaling ice sheet surface mass balance
The CryoGrid community model (version 1.0) – a multi-physics toolbox for climate-driven simulations in the terrestrial cryosphere
Glacier Energy and Mass Balance (GEMB): a model of firn processes for cryosphere research
Sensitivity of NEMO4.0-SI3 model parameters on sea ice budgets in the Southern Ocean
Introducing CRYOWRF v1.0: multiscale atmospheric flow simulations with advanced snow cover modelling
SUHMO: an adaptive mesh refinement SUbglacial Hydrology MOdel v1.0
Improving snow albedo modeling in the E3SM land model (version 2.0) and assessing its impacts on snow and surface fluxes over the Tibetan Plateau
Tim Hill, Derek Bingham, Gwenn E. Flowers, and Matthew J. Hoffman
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4045–4074, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4045-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4045-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Subglacial drainage models represent water flow beneath glaciers and ice sheets. Here, we train fast statistical models called Gaussian process (GP) emulators to accelerate subglacial drainage modelling by ~ 1000 times. We use the fast emulator predictions to show that three of the model parameters are responsible for > 90 % of the variance in model outputs. The fast GP emulators will enable future uncertainty quantification and calibration of these models.
Davor Dundovic, Joseph G. Wallwork, Stephan C. Kramer, Fabien Gillet-Chaulet, Regine Hock, and Matthew D. Piggott
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4023–4044, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4023-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4023-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate numerical studies of glaciers often require high-resolution simulations, which often prove too demanding even for modern computers. In this paper we develop a method that identifies whether different parts of a glacier require high or low resolution based on its physical features, such as its thickness and velocity. We show that by doing so we can achieve a more optimal simulation accuracy for the available computing resources compared to uniform-resolution simulations.
Daniel Moreno-Parada, Alexander Robinson, Marisa Montoya, and Jorge Alvarez-Solas
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3895–3919, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3895-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3895-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce Nix, an ice-sheet model designed for understanding how large masses of ice behave. Nix is a computer programme that simulates the movement and temperature evolution in ice sheets. It helps us study how ice sheets respond to changes in the atmosphere and ocean. We found that ice temperatures play an essential role in determining the motion and stability of ice sheets. Nix is a useful tool for learning how climate change affects polar ice sheets.
Constantijn J. Berends, Victor Azizi, Jorge A. Bernales, and Roderik S. W. van de Wal
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3635–3659, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3635-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3635-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Ice-sheet models are computer programs that can simulate how the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets will evolve in the future. The accuracy of these models depends on their resolution: how small the details are that the model can resolve. We have created a model with a variable resolution that can resolve a lot of detail in areas where lots of changes happen in the ice and less detail in areas where the ice does not move so much. This makes the model both accurate and fast.
Richard Essery, Giulia Mazzotti, Sarah Barr, Tobias Jonas, Tristan Quaife, and Nick Rutter
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3583–3605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
How forests influence accumulation and melt of snow on the ground is of long-standing interest, but uncertainty remains in how best to model forest snow processes. We developed the Flexible Snow Model version 2 to quantify these uncertainties. In a first model demonstration, how unloading of intercepted snow from the forest canopy is represented is responsible for the largest uncertainty. Global mapping of forest distribution is also likely to be a large source of uncertainty in existing models.
Alex E. West and Edward W. Blockley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3041–3064, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3041-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3041-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses ice mass balance buoys – temperature- and height-measuring devices frozen into sea ice – to find how well climate models simulate (1) melt and growth of Arctic sea ice and (2) conduction of heat through Arctic sea ice. This may help understand why models produce varying amounts of sea ice in the present day. We find that models tend to show more melt, growth or conduction for a given ice thickness than the buoys, although the difference is smaller for models with more physically realistic thermodynamics.
Ole Richter, Ralph Timmermann, G. Hilmar Gudmundsson, and Jan De Rydt
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2945–2960, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2945-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2945-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The new coupled ice sheet–ocean model addresses challenges related to horizontal resolution through advanced mesh flexibility, enabled by the use of unstructured grids. We describe the new model, verify its functioning in an idealised setting and demonstrate its advantages in a global-ocean–Antarctic ice sheet domain. The results of this study comprise an important step towards improving predictions of the Antarctic contribution to sea level rise over centennial timescales.
Niccolò Maffezzoli, Eric Rignot, Carlo Barbante, Troels Petersen, and Sebastiano Vascon
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2545–2568, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2545-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2545-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we introduce IceBoost, a machine learning framework to model the ice thickness distribution of all the world's glaciers with greater accuracy than state-of-the-art methods. The model is trained on 3.7 million measurements globally available and provides skilful estimates across all regions. This advancement will help in better assessing future sea level changes and freshwater resources, with significance for both the scientific community and society at large.
Maxence Menthon, Pepijn Bakker, Aurélien Quiquet, Didier M. Roche, and Ronja Reese
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-777, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-777, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The ice-ocean interaction is a large source of uncertainty in future projections of the Antarctic ice sheet. Here we implement a basal ice shelf melt module (PICO) in a ice sheet model (GRISLI) and test six simple statistical methods to calibrate this module. We show that calculating the mean absolute error of bins best fits the observational datasets under multiple conditions. We also assess the impact of the module implementation and calibration choice on future projections until 2300.
Gong Cheng, Mansa Krishna, and Mathieu Morlighem
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1188, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1188, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Predicting ice sheet contributions to sea level rise is challenging due to limited data and uncertainties in key processes. Traditional models require complex methods that lack flexibility. We developed PINNICLE, an open-source Python library that integrates machine learning with physical laws to improve ice sheet modeling. By combining data and physics, PINNICLE enhances predictions and adaptability, providing a powerful tool for climate research and sea level rise projections.
Jan Svoboda, Marc Ruesch, David Liechti, Corinne Jones, Michele Volpi, Michael Zehnder, and Jürg Schweizer
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1829–1849, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1829-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1829-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurately measuring snow height is key for modeling approaches in climate science, snow hydrology, and avalanche forecasting. Erroneous snow height measurements often occur when snow height is low or changes, for instance during snowfall in summer. We prepare a new benchmark dataset with annotated snow height data and demonstrate how to improve the measurement quality using modern deep-learning approaches. Our approach can be easily implemented in a data pipeline for snow modeling.
Alek Aaron Petty, Christopher Cardinale, and Madison Smith
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-766, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-766, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We put global climate models to the test against NASA’s ICESat-2 satellite to see how well they simulate global sea ice cover. By adding fancy laser data from ICESat-2, we can better assess how well the models are performing compared to the standard assessments of sea ice area. Overall the models do a good job but there’s room for improvement, especially across the Southern Ocean. We should think a bit more about sea ice density if we want more reliable freeboard comparisons.
James W. Marschalek, Edward Gasson, Tina van de Flierdt, Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand, Martin J. Siegert, and Liam Holder
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1673–1708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1673-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1673-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Ice sheet models can help predict how Antarctica's ice sheets respond to environmental change, and such models benefit from comparison to geological data. Here, we use an ice sheet model output and other data to predict the erosion of debris and trace its transport to where it is deposited on the ocean floor. This allows the results of ice sheet modelling to be directly and quantitively compared to real-world data, helping to reduce uncertainty regarding Antarctic sea level contribution.
Anton Korosov, Yue Ying, and Einar Ólason
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 885–904, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-885-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-885-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a new method to improve the accuracy of sea ice models, which predict how ice moves and deforms due to wind and ocean currents. Traditional models use parameters that are often poorly defined. The new approach uses machine learning to fine-tune these parameters by comparing simulated ice drift with satellite data. The method identifies optimal settings for the model by analysing patterns in ice deformation. This results in more accurate simulations of sea ice drift forecasting.
Xia Wang, Tao Che, Xueyin Ruan, Shanna Yue, Jing Wang, Chun Zhao, and Lei Geng
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 651–670, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-651-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-651-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We employed the WRF-Chem model to parameterize atmospheric nitrate deposition in snow and evaluate its performance in simulating snow cover, snow depth, and concentrations of dust and nitrate using new observations from northern China. The results generally exhibit reasonable agreement with field observations in northern China, demonstrating the model's capability to simulate snow properties, including concentrations of reservoir species.
Théo Brivoal, Virginie Guemas, Martin Vancoppenolle, Clément Rousset, and Bertrand Decharme
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3220, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3220, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Snow in polar regions is key to sea ice formation and the Earth's climate, but current climate models simplify snow cover on sea ice. This study integrates an intermediate complexity snow-physics scheme into a sea-ice model designed for climate applications. We show that modelling the temporal changes in properties such as the density and thermal conductivity of the snow layers leads to a more accurate representation of heat transfer between the underlying sea ice and the atmosphere.
Samar Minallah, William Lipscomb, Gunter Leguy, and Harry Zekollari
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4152, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4152, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We implemented a new modeling framework within an Earth system model to study the evolution of mountain glaciers under different climate scenarios and applied it to the European Alps. Alpine glaciers will lose a large volume fraction under current temperatures, with near complete ice loss under warmer scenarios. This is the first use of a 3D, higher-order ice flow model for regional-scale glacier simulations that will enable assessments of coupled land ice and Earth system processes.
Simon Horton, Florian Herla, and Pascal Haegeli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 193–209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-193-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-193-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present a method for avalanche forecasters to analyze patterns in snowpack model simulations. It uses fuzzy clustering to group small regions into larger forecast areas based on snow characteristics, locations, and temporal history. Tested in the Columbia Mountains in two winter seasons, it closely matched real forecast regions regions and identified major avalanche hazard patterns. This approach simplifies complex model outputs, helping forecasters make informed decisions.
Adrien Michel, Johannes Aschauer, Tobias Jonas, Stefanie Gubler, Sven Kotlarski, and Christoph Marty
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8969–8988, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8969-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8969-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a method to correct snow cover maps (represented in terms of snow water equivalent) to match better-quality maps. The correction can then be extended backwards and forwards in time for periods when better-quality maps are not available. The method is fast and gives good results. It is then applied to obtain a climatology of the snow cover in Switzerland over the past 60 years at a resolution of 1 d and 1 km. This is the first time that such a dataset has been produced.
Ghislain Picard and Quentin Libois
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8927–8953, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8927-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8927-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Two-streAm Radiative TransfEr in Snow (TARTES) is a radiative transfer model to compute snow albedo in the solar domain and the profiles of light and energy absorption in a multi-layered snowpack whose physical properties are user defined. It uniquely considers snow grain shape flexibly, based on recent insights showing that snow does not behave as a collection of ice spheres but instead as a random medium. TARTES is user-friendly yet performs comparably to more complex models.
Yoshihiro Nakayama, Alena Malyarenko, Hong Zhang, Ou Wang, Matthis Auger, Yafei Nie, Ian Fenty, Matthew Mazloff, Armin Köhl, and Dimitris Menemenlis
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8613–8638, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8613-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8613-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Global- and basin-scale ocean reanalyses are becoming easily accessible. However, such ocean reanalyses are optimized for their entire model domains and their ability to simulate the Southern Ocean requires evaluation. We conduct intercomparison analyses of Massachusetts Institute of Technology General Circulation Model (MITgcm)-based ocean reanalyses. They generally perform well for the open ocean, but open-ocean temporal variability and Antarctic continental shelves require improvements.
Diego Monteiro, Cécile Caillaud, Matthieu Lafaysse, Adrien Napoly, Mathieu Fructus, Antoinette Alias, and Samuel Morin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7645–7677, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7645-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7645-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Modeling snow cover in climate and weather forecasting models is a challenge even for high-resolution models. Recent simulations with CNRM-AROME have shown difficulties when representing snow in the European Alps. Using remote sensing data and in situ observations, we evaluate modifications of the land surface configuration in order to improve it. We propose a new surface configuration, enabling a more realistic simulation of snow cover, relevant for climate and weather forecasting applications.
Alessandro Maissen, Frank Techel, and Michele Volpi
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7569–7593, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7569-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7569-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By harnessing AI models, this work enables processing large amounts of data, including weather conditions, snowpack characteristics, and historical avalanche data, to predict human-like avalanche forecasts in Switzerland. Our proposed model can significantly assist avalanche forecasters in their decision-making process, thereby facilitating more efficient and accurate predictions crucial for ensuring safety in Switzerland's avalanche-prone regions.
Enrico Zorzetto, Sergey Malyshev, Paul Ginoux, and Elena Shevliakova
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7219–7244, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7219-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We describe a new snow scheme developed for use in global climate models, which simulates the interactions of snowpack with vegetation, atmosphere, and soil. We test the new snow model over a set of sites where in situ observations are available. We find that when compared to a simpler snow model, this model improves predictions of seasonal snow and of soil temperature under the snowpack, important variables for simulating both the hydrological cycle and the global climate system.
Therese Rieckh, Andreas Born, Alexander Robinson, Robert Law, and Gerrit Gülle
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6987–7000, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6987-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6987-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present the open-source model ELSA, which simulates the internal age structure of large ice sheets. It creates layers of snow accumulation at fixed times during the simulation, which are used to model the internal stratification of the ice sheet. Together with reconstructed isochrones from radiostratigraphy data, ELSA can be used to assess ice sheet models and to improve their parameterization. ELSA can be used coupled to an ice sheet model or forced with its output.
Fu Zhao, Xi Liang, Zhongxiang Tian, Ming Li, Na Liu, and Chengyan Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6867–6886, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6867-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we introduce a newly developed Antarctic sea ice forecasting system, namely the Southern Ocean Ice Prediction System (SOIPS). The system is based on a regional sea ice‒ocean‒ice shelf coupled model and can assimilate sea ice concentration observations. By assessing the system's performance in sea ice forecasts, we find that the system can provide reliable Antarctic sea ice forecasts for the next 7 d and has the potential to guide ship navigation in the Antarctic sea ice zone.
Chenhui Ning, Shiming Xu, Yan Zhang, Xuantong Wang, Zhihao Fan, and Jiping Liu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6847–6866, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6847-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6847-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice models are mainly based on non-moving structured grids, which is different from buoy measurements that follow the ice drift. To facilitate Lagrangian analysis, we introduce online tracking of sea ice in Community Ice CodE (CICE). We validate the sea ice tracking with buoys and evaluate the sea ice deformation in high-resolution simulations, which show multi-fractal characteristics. The source code is openly available and can be used in various scientific and operational applications.
Ulrich Strasser, Michael Warscher, Erwin Rottler, and Florian Hanzer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6775–6797, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6775-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6775-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
openAMUNDSEN is a fully distributed open-source snow-hydrological model for mountain catchments. It includes process representations of an empirical, semi-empirical, and physical nature. It uses temperature, precipitation, humidity, radiation, and wind speed as forcing data and is computationally efficient, of a modular nature, and easily extendible. The Python code is available on GitHub (https://github.com/openamundsen/openamundsen), including documentation (https://doc.openamundsen.org).
Matthias Rauter and Julia Kowalski
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6545–6569, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6545-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6545-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snow avalanches can form large powder clouds that substantially exceed the velocity and reach of the dense core. Only a few complex models exist to simulate this phenomenon, and the respective hazard is hard to predict. This work provides a novel flow model that focuses on simple relations while still encapsulating the significant behaviour. The model is applied to reconstruct two catastrophic powder snow avalanche events in Austria.
Till Andreas Soya Rasmussen, Jacob Poulsen, Mads Hvid Ribergaard, Ruchira Sasanka, Anthony P. Craig, Elizabeth C. Hunke, and Stefan Rethmeier
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6529–6544, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6529-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6529-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models (ESMs) today strive for better quality based on improved resolutions and improved physics. A limiting factor is the supercomputers at hand and how best to utilize them. This study focuses on the refactorization of one part of a sea ice model (CICE), namely the dynamics. It shows that the performance can be significantly improved, which means that one can either run the same simulations much cheaper or advance the system according to what is needed.
Iain Wheel, Douglas I. Benn, Anna J. Crawford, Joe Todd, and Thomas Zwinger
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5759–5777, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5759-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5759-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Calving, the detachment of large icebergs from glaciers, is one of the largest uncertainties in future sea level rise projections. This process is poorly understood, and there is an absence of detailed models capable of simulating calving. A new 3D calving model has been developed to better understand calving at glaciers where detailed modelling was previously limited. Importantly, the new model is very flexible. By allowing for unrestricted calving geometries, it can be applied at any location.
Kévin Fourteau, Julien Brondex, Fanny Brun, and Marie Dumont
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1903–1929, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1903-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we provide a novel numerical implementation for solving the energy exchanges at the surface of snow and ice. By combining the strong points of previous models, our solution leads to more accurate and robust simulations of the energy exchanges, surface temperature, and melt while preserving a reasonable computation time.
Matthieu Baron, Ange Haddjeri, Matthieu Lafaysse, Louis Le Toumelin, Vincent Vionnet, and Mathieu Fructus
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1297–1326, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1297-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1297-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Increasing the spatial resolution of numerical systems simulating snowpack evolution in mountain areas requires representing small-scale processes such as wind-induced snow transport. We present SnowPappus, a simple scheme coupled with the Crocus snow model to compute blowing-snow fluxes and redistribute snow among grid points at 250 m resolution. In terms of numerical cost, it is suitable for large-scale applications. We present point-scale evaluations of fluxes and snow transport occurrence.
Lizz Ultee, Alexander A. Robel, and Stefano Castruccio
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1041–1057, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1041-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1041-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The surface mass balance (SMB) of an ice sheet describes the net gain or loss of mass from ice sheets (such as those in Greenland and Antarctica) through interaction with the atmosphere. We developed a statistical method to generate a wide range of SMB fields that reflect the best understanding of SMB processes. Efficiently sampling the variability of SMB will help us understand sources of uncertainty in ice sheet model projections.
Anjali Sandip, Ludovic Räss, and Mathieu Morlighem
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 899–909, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-899-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-899-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We solve momentum balance for unstructured meshes to predict ice flow for real glaciers using a pseudo-transient method on graphics processing units (GPUs) and compare it to a standard central processing unit (CPU) implementation. We justify the GPU implementation by applying the price-to-performance metric for up to million-grid-point spatial resolutions. This study represents a first step toward leveraging GPU processing power, enabling more accurate polar ice discharge predictions.
Julien Brondex, Kévin Fourteau, Marie Dumont, Pascal Hagenmuller, Neige Calonne, François Tuzet, and Henning Löwe
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7075–7106, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7075-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7075-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Vapor diffusion is one of the main processes governing snowpack evolution, and it must be accounted for in models. Recent attempts to represent vapor diffusion in numerical models have faced several difficulties regarding computational cost and mass and energy conservation. Here, we develop our own finite-element software to explore numerical approaches and enable us to overcome these difficulties. We illustrate the capability of these approaches on established numerical benchmarks.
Matthias Tonnel, Anna Wirbel, Felix Oesterle, and Jan-Thomas Fischer
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7013–7035, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7013-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7013-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Avaframe - the open avalanche framework - provides open-source tools to simulate and investigate snow avalanches. It is utilized for multiple purposes, the two main applications being hazard mapping and scientific research of snow processes. We present the theory, conversion to a computer model, and testing for one of the core modules used for simulations of a particular type of avalanche, the so-called dense-flow avalanches. Tests check and confirm the applicability of the utilized method.
Jordi Bolibar, Facundo Sapienza, Fabien Maussion, Redouane Lguensat, Bert Wouters, and Fernando Pérez
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6671–6687, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6671-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6671-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new modelling framework combining numerical methods with machine learning. Using this approach, we focused on understanding how ice moves within glaciers, and we successfully learnt a prescribed law describing ice movement for 17 glaciers worldwide as a proof of concept. Our framework has the potential to discover important laws governing glacier processes, aiding our understanding of glacier physics and their contribution to water resources and sea-level rise.
Prateek Gantayat, Alison F. Banwell, Amber A. Leeson, James M. Lea, Dorthe Petersen, Noel Gourmelen, and Xavier Fettweis
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5803–5823, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5803-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5803-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new supraglacial hydrology model for the Greenland Ice Sheet. This model simulates surface meltwater routing, meltwater drainage, supraglacial lake (SGL) overflow, and formation of lake ice. The model was able to reproduce 80 % of observed lake locations and provides a good match between the observed and modelled temporal evolution of SGLs.
Kevin Hank, Lev Tarasov, and Elisa Mantelli
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5627–5652, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5627-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5627-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Physically meaningful modeling of geophysical system instabilities is numerically challenging, given the potential effects of purely numerical artifacts. Here we explore the sensitivity of ice stream surge activation to numerical and physical model aspects. We find that surge characteristics exhibit a resolution dependency but converge at higher horizontal grid resolutions and are significantly affected by the incorporation of bed thermal and sub-glacial hydrology models.
Yannic Fischler, Thomas Kleiner, Christian Bischof, Jeremie Schmiedel, Roiy Sayag, Raban Emunds, Lennart Frederik Oestreich, and Angelika Humbert
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5305–5322, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5305-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5305-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Water underneath ice sheets affects the motion of glaciers. This study presents a newly developed code, CUAS-MPI, that simulates subglacial hydrology. It is designed for supercomputers and is hence a parallelized code. We measure the performance of this code for simulations of the entire Greenland Ice Sheet and find that the code works efficiently. Moreover, we validated the code to ensure the correctness of the solution. CUAS-MPI opens new possibilities for simulations of ice sheet hydrology.
Julia Kaltenborn, Amy R. Macfarlane, Viviane Clay, and Martin Schneebeli
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4521–4550, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4521-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow layer segmentation and snow grain classification are essential diagnostic tasks for cryospheric applications. A SnowMicroPen (SMP) can be used to that end; however, the manual classification of its profiles becomes infeasible for large datasets. Here, we evaluate how well machine learning models automate this task. Of the 14 models trained on the MOSAiC SMP dataset, the long short-term memory model performed the best. The findings presented here facilitate and accelerate SMP data analysis.
Johannes Aschauer, Adrien Michel, Tobias Jonas, and Christoph Marty
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4063–4081, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4063-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4063-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water equivalent is the mass of water stored in a snowpack. Based on exponential settling functions, the empirical snow density model SWE2HS is presented to convert time series of daily snow water equivalent into snow depth. The model has been calibrated with data from Switzerland and validated with independent data from the European Alps. A reference implementation of SWE2HS is available as a Python package.
Eric Keenan, Nander Wever, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, and Brooke Medley
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3203–3219, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3203-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3203-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Ice sheets gain mass via snowfall. However, snowfall is redistributed by the wind, resulting in accumulation differences of up to a factor of 5 over distances as short as 5 km. These differences complicate estimates of ice sheet contribution to sea level rise. For this reason, we have developed a new model for estimating wind-driven snow redistribution on ice sheets. We show that, over Pine Island Glacier in West Antarctica, the model improves estimates of snow accumulation variability.
Sebastian Westermann, Thomas Ingeman-Nielsen, Johanna Scheer, Kristoffer Aalstad, Juditha Aga, Nitin Chaudhary, Bernd Etzelmüller, Simon Filhol, Andreas Kääb, Cas Renette, Louise Steffensen Schmidt, Thomas Vikhamar Schuler, Robin B. Zweigel, Léo Martin, Sarah Morard, Matan Ben-Asher, Michael Angelopoulos, Julia Boike, Brian Groenke, Frederieke Miesner, Jan Nitzbon, Paul Overduin, Simone M. Stuenzi, and Moritz Langer
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2607–2647, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2607-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2607-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The CryoGrid community model is a new tool for simulating ground temperatures and the water and ice balance in cold regions. It is a modular design, which makes it possible to test different schemes to simulate, for example, permafrost ground in an efficient way. The model contains tools to simulate frozen and unfrozen ground, snow, glaciers, and other massive ice bodies, as well as water bodies.
Alex S. Gardner, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, and Eric Larour
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2277–2302, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2277-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2277-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This is the first description of the open-source Glacier Energy and Mass Balance (GEMB) model. GEMB models the ice sheet and glacier surface–atmospheric energy and mass exchange, as well as the firn state. The model is evaluated against the current state of the art and in situ observations and is shown to perform well.
Yafei Nie, Chengkun Li, Martin Vancoppenolle, Bin Cheng, Fabio Boeira Dias, Xianqing Lv, and Petteri Uotila
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1395–1425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1395-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1395-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
State-of-the-art Earth system models simulate the observed sea ice extent relatively well, but this is often due to errors in the dynamic and other processes in the simulated sea ice changes cancelling each other out. We assessed the sensitivity of these processes simulated by the coupled ocean–sea ice model NEMO4.0-SI3 to 18 parameters. The performance of the model in simulating sea ice change processes was ultimately improved by adjusting the three identified key parameters.
Varun Sharma, Franziska Gerber, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 719–749, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-719-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-719-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Most current generation climate and weather models have a relatively simplistic description of snow and snow–atmosphere interaction. One reason for this is the belief that including an advanced snow model would make the simulations too computationally demanding. In this study, we bring together two state-of-the-art models for atmosphere (WRF) and snow cover (SNOWPACK) and highlight both the feasibility and necessity of such coupled models to explore underexplored phenomena in the cryosphere.
Anne M. Felden, Daniel F. Martin, and Esmond G. Ng
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 407–425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-407-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-407-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present and validate a novel subglacial hydrology model, SUHMO, based on an adaptive mesh refinement framework. We propose the addition of a pseudo-diffusion to recover the wall melting in channels. Computational performance analysis demonstrates the efficiency of adaptive mesh refinement on large-scale hydrologic problems. The adaptive mesh refinement approach will eventually enable better ice bed boundary conditions for ice sheet simulations at a reasonable computational cost.
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Edward Bair, Cenlin He, Huilin Huang, Cheng Dang, Timbo Stillinger, Yu Gu, Hailong Wang, Yun Qian, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 75–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow with the highest albedo of land surface plays a vital role in Earth’s surface energy budget and water cycle. This study accounts for the impacts of snow grain shape and mixing state of light-absorbing particles with snow on snow albedo in the E3SM land model. The findings advance our understanding of the role of snow grain shape and mixing state of LAP–snow in land surface processes and offer guidance for improving snow simulations and radiative forcing estimates in Earth system models.
Cited articles
Abatzoglou, J. T. and Brown, T. J.: A comparison of statistical downscaling
methods suited for wildfire applications, Int. J. Climatol., 32, 772–780,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2312, 2012.
Anderson, E. A.: A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover, NOAA
Technical Report NWS 19, National Weather Service, 150 p., https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/6392 (last access: 1 June 2021), 1976.
Anderson, E. A.: Snow Accumulation and Ablation Model – SNOW-17, US
National Weather Service, Silver Spring, MD, 61 p., https://www.weather.gov/media/owp/oh/hrl/docs/22snow17.pdf (last access: 1 June 2021), 2006.
Armstrong, R. L. and Brun, E.: Snow and Climate: Physical Processes,
Surface Energy Exchange and Modeling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
UK, p. 58, ISBN 9780521130653, 2008.
Bales, R. C., Molotch, N. P., Painter, T. H., Dettinger, M. D., Rice, R.,
and Dozier, J.: Mountain hydrology of the western United States, Water
Resour. Res., 42, W08432, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004387, 2006.
Barsugli, J. J., Ray, A. J., Livneh, B., Dewes, C. F., Heldmyer, A.,
Rangwala, I., Guinotte, J. M., and Torbit, S.: Projections of Mountain
Snowpack Loss for Wolverine Denning Elevations in the Rocky Mountains,
Earths Future, 8, e2020EF001537, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001537, 2020.
Bernhardt, M. and Schulz, K.: SnowSlide: A simple routine for calculating
gravitational snow transport, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L11502,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043086, 2010.
Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Clark, D. B., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R. L. H., Ménard, C. B., Edwards, J. M., Hendry, M. A., Porson, A., Gedney, N., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Cox, P. M., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Harding, R. J.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 677–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011, 2011.
Blöschl, G. and Kirnbauer, R.: Point snowmelt models with different
degrees of complexity – Internal processes, J. Hydrol., 129, 127–147,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(91)90048-M, 1991.
Boone, A.: Description du Schema de Neige ISBA-ES (Explicit
Snow), Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques,
Météo-France, Toulouse, France, 63 p.,
https://www.umr-cnrm.fr/IMG/pdf/snowdoc.pdf (last access: 1 June 2021), 2002.
Braun, L. N.: Simulation of snowmelt-runoff in lowland and lower alpine
regions of Switzerland, PhD dissertation, ETH Zurich, 166 p.,
https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-000334295, 1984.
Burakowski, E. and Magnusson, M.: Climate Impacts on the Winter Tourism
Economy in the United States, Prepared for Protect Our Winters (POW) and
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), 33 p.,
https://scholars.unh.edu/ersc/118/ (last access: 1 June 2021), 2012.
Choi, G., Robinson, D. A., and Kang, S.: Changing Northern Hemisphere Snow
Seasons, J. Climate, 23, 5305–5310,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3644.1, 2010.
Cohen, J.: Snow cover and climate, Weather, 49, 150–156,
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1477-8696.1994.tb05997.x, 1994.
Corripio, M. J. G.: Insol: Solar Radiation, R package version 1.2.1 [code],
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=insol (last access: 1 March 2021), 2015.
Curtis, J. A., Flint, L. E., Flint, A. L., Lundquist, J. D., Hudgens, B.,
Boydston, E. E., and Young, J. K.: Incorporating Cold-Air Pooling into
Downscaled Climate Models Increases Potential Refugia for Snow-Dependent
Species within the Sierra Nevada Ecoregion, CA, PLoS ONE, 9, e106984,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106984, 2014.
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P.,
Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P.,
Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N.,
Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.:
The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data
assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011.
Dettinger, M.: Climate Change, Atmospheric Rivers, and Floods in California
– A Multimodel Analysis of Storm Frequency and Magnitude Changes, J. Am. Water
Resour. As., 47, 514–523,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00546.x, 2011.
DeWalle, D. and Rango, A.: Principles of Snow Hydrology, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535673, 2008.
Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., and Kennedy, P. J.:
Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) Version le as Coupled to the
NCAR Community Climate Model, NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-387+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, p. 80, https://doi.org/10.5065/D67W6959, 1993.
Dietrich, H., Wolf, T., Kawohl, T., Wehberg, J., Kändler, G., Mette, T.,
Röder, A., and Böhner, J.: Temporal and spatial high-resolution
climate data from 1961 to 2100 for the German National Forest Inventory
(NFI), Ann. For. Sci., 76, 6, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0788-5,
2019.
Douville, H., Royer, J.-F., and Mahfouf, J.-F.: A new snow parameterization
for the Meteo-France climate model Part I: validation in stand-alone
experiments, Clim. Dynam., 12, 21–35,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050092, 1995.
Eira, I. M. G., Jaedicke, C., Magga, O. H., Maynard, N. G.,
Vikhamar-Schuler, D., and Mathiesen, S. D.: Traditional Sámi snow
terminology and physical snow classification – Two ways of knowing, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 85, 117–130,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.09.004, 2013.
Essery, R., Morin, S., Lejeune, Y., and B Ménard, C.: A comparison of
1701 snow models using observations from an alpine site, Adv. Water Resour.,
55, 131–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.013, 2013.
Etchevers, P., Martin, E., Brown, R., Fierz, C., Lejeune, Y., Bazile, E.,
Boone, A., Dai, Y. J., Essery, R., Fernandez, A., Gusev, Y., Jordan, R.,
Koren, V., Kowalczyk, E., Pyles, R. D., Schlosser, A., Shmakin, A. B.,
Smirnova, T. G., Strasser, U., Verseghy, D., Yamazaki, T., and Yang, Z. L.: SnowMIP – An
Intercomparison of Snow Models: First Results, International Snow Science
Workshop, Penticton, British Columbia, 353–360, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/objects/issw-2002-353-360.pdf (last access: 1 June 2021), 2002.
Etchevers, P., Martin, E., Brown, R., Fierz, C., Lejeune, Y., Bazile, E.,
Boone, A., Dai, Y.-J., Essery, R., Fernandez, A., Gusev, Y., Jordan, R.,
Koren, V., Kowalczyk, E., Nasonova, N. O., Pyles, R. D., Schlosser, A.,
Shmakin, A. B., Smirnova, T. G., Strasser, U., Verseghy, D., Yamazaki, T., and Yang, Z.-L.: Validation of
the energy budget of an alpine snowpack simulated by several snow models
(Snow MIP project), Ann. Glaciol., 38, 150–158,
https://doi.org/10.3189/172756404781814825, 2004.
Fick, S. E. and Hijmans, R. J.: WorldClim 2: New 1 km spatial resolution
climate surfaces for global land areas, Int. J. Climatol., 37,
4302–4315, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086, 2017.
Fleming, S. W. and Gupta, H. V.: The physics of river prediction, Phys.
Today, 73, 46–52, https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4523, 2020.
Formozov, A. N.: Snow cover as an integral factor of the environment and its
importance in the ecology of mammals and birds, Boreal Institute for
Northern Studies, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, 151 p., https://www.uap.ualberta.ca/titles/276 (last access: 1 June 2021), 1964.
Freudiger, D., Kohn, I., Seibert, J., Stahl, K., and Weiler, M.: Snow
redistribution for the hydrological modeling of alpine catchments, WIRES-Water, 4, e1232,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1232, 2017.
Fritze, H., Stewart, I. T., and Pebesma, E.: Shifts in Western North
American Snowmelt Runoff Regimes for the Recent Warm Decades, J.
Hydrometeorol., 12, 989–1006, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1360.1,
2011.
Fyfe, J. C., Derksen, C., Mudryk, L., Flato, G. M., Santer, B. D., Swart, N.
C., Molotch, N. P., Zhang, X., Wan, H., Arora, V. K., Scinocca, J., and
Jiao, Y.: Large near-term projected snowpack loss over the western United
States, Nat. Commun., 8, 14996, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14996, 2017.
Garen, D. C. and Marks, D.: Spatially distributed energy balance snowmelt
modelling in a mountainous river basin: Estimation of meteorological inputs
and verification of model results, J. Hydrol., 315, 126–153,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.026, 2005.
Gergel, D. R., Nijssen, B., Abatzoglou, J. T., Lettenmaier, D. P., and
Stumbaugh, M. R.: Effects of climate change on snowpack and fire potential
in the western USA, Clim. Change, 141, 287–299,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1899-y, 2017.
Gesch, D. B., Evans, G. A., Oimoen, M. J., and Arundel, S.: The National
Elevation Dataset, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing;
USGS Publications Warehouse [data set], American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 83–110,
http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70201572 (last access: 1 January 2020), 2018.
Grippa, M., Kergoat, L., Le Toan, T., Mognard, N. M., Delbart, N.,
L'Hermitte, J., and Vicente-Serrano, S. M.: The impact of snow depth and
snowmelt on the vegetation variability over central Siberia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L21412, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024286, 2005.
Guan, B., Molotch, N. P., Waliser, D. E., Jepsen, S. M., Painter, T. H., and
Dozier, J.: Snow water equivalent in the Sierra Nevada: Blending snow sensor
observations with snowmelt model simulations, Water Resour. Res., 49,
5029–5046, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20387, 2013.
Günther, D., Marke, T., Essery, R., and Strasser, U.: Uncertainties in
Snowpack Simulations – Assessing the Impact of Model Structure, Parameter
Choice, and Forcing Data Error on Point-Scale Energy Balance Snow Model
Performance, Water Resour. Res., 55, 2779–2800,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023403, 2019.
Hamman, J. J., Nijssen, B., Bohn, T. J., Gergel, D. R., and Mao, Y.: The Variable Infiltration Capacity model version 5 (VIC-5): infrastructure improvements for new applications and reproducibility, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3481–3496, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3481-2018, 2018.
Harpold, A. A., Guo, Q., Molotch, N., Brooks, P. D., Bales, R.,
Fernandez-Diaz, J. C., Musselman, K. N., Swetnam, T. L., Kirchner, P.,
Meadows, M. W., Flanagan, J., and Lucas, R.: LiDAR-derived snowpack data
sets from mixed conifer forests across the Western United States, Water Resour. Res., 50, 2749–2755, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013935, 2014.
Havens, S., Marks, D., FitzGerald, K., Masarik, M., Flores, A. N., Kormos,
P., and Hedrick, A.: Approximating Input Data to a Snowmelt Model Using
Weather Research and Forecasting Model Outputs in Lieu of Meteorological
Measurements, J. Hydrometeorol., 20, 847–862,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0146.1, 2019.
Helgason, W. and Pomeroy, J.: Problems Closing the Energy Balance over a
Homogeneous Snow Cover during Midwinter, J. Hydrometeorol., 13, 557–572,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-0135.1, 2012.
Holden, Z. A., Abatzoglou, J. T., Luce, C. H., and Baggett, L. S.: Empirical
downscaling of daily minimum air temperature at very fine resolutions in
complex terrain, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1066–1073,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.03.011, 2011.
Holden, Z. A., Swanson, A., Klene, A. E., Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S.
Z., Cushman, S. A., Squires, J., Moisen, G. G., and Oyler, J. W.:
Development of high-resolution (250 m) historical daily gridded air
temperature data using reanalysis and distributed sensor networks for the US
Northern Rocky Mountains, Int. J. Climatol., 36, 3620–3632,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4580, 2016.
Huss, M., Bookhagen, B., Huggel, C., Jacobsen, D., Bradley, R. S., Clague,
J. J., Vuille, M., Buytaert, W., Cayan, D. R., Greenwood, G., Mark, B. G.,
Milner, A. M., Weingartner, R., and Winder, M.: Toward mountains without
permanent snow and ice, Earths Future, 5, 2016EF000514,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000514, 2017.
Ikeda, K., Rasmussen, R., Liu, C., Newman, A., Chen, F., Barlage, M.,
Gutmann, E., Dudhia, J., Dai, A., Luce, C., and Musselman, K.: Snowfall and
snowpack in the Western U.S. as captured by convection permitting climate
simulations: Current climate and pseudo global warming future climate, Clim. Dynam., 57, 2191–2215, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05805-w, 2021.
Jennings, K. S., Kittel, T. G. F., and Molotch, N. P.: Observations and simulations of the seasonal evolution of snowpack cold content and its relation to snowmelt and the snowpack energy budget, The Cryosphere, 12, 1595–1614, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1595-2018, 2018a.
Jennings, K. S., Winchell, T. S., Livneh, B., and Molotch, N. P.: Spatial
variation of the rain-snow temperature threshold across the Northern
Hemisphere, Nat. Commun., 9, 1148,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03629-7, 2018b.
Jennings, K., Kittel, T., Molotch, N., and Yang, K.: Infilled climate data
for C1, Saddle, and D1, 1990—2019, hourly [data set], Environmental Data
Initiative, https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/,
2021.
Jones, H. G.: The ecology of snow-covered systems: A brief overview of
nutrient cycling and life in the cold, Hydrol. Process., 13, 13, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199910)13:14/15<2135::AID-HYP862>3.0.CO;2-Y, 1999.
Jordan, R.: A one-dimensional temperature model for a snow cover: Technical
documentation for SNTHERM.89, Special Report 91-16, Cold Regions Research
and Engineering Laboratory,
https://erdc-library.erdc.dren.mil/jspui/bitstream/11681/11677/1/SR-91-16.pdf (last access: 1 June 2021),
1991.
Khu, S. T. and Madsen, H.: Multiobjective calibration with Pareto
preference ordering: An application to rainfall-runoff model calibration,
Water Resour. Res., 41, W03004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003041, 2005.
Knowles, J. F., Blanken, P. D., Williams, M. W., and Chowanski, K. M.:
Energy and surface moisture seasonally limit evaporation and sublimation
from snow-free alpine tundra, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 157, 106–115,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.01.017, 2012.
Knowles, N., Dettinger, M. D., and Cayan, D. R.: Trends in Snowfall versus
Rainfall in the Western United States, J. Climate, 19, 4545–4559,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3850.1, 2006.
Kumar, M., Wang, R., and Link, T. E.: Effects of more extreme precipitation
regimes on maximum seasonal snow water equivalent, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 39, 2012GL052972, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052972, 2012.
Kumar, M., Marks, D., Dozier, J., Reba, M., and Winstral, A.: Evaluation of
distributed hydrologic impacts of temperature-index and energy-based snow
models, Adv. Water Resour., 56, 77–89,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.03.006, 2013.
Lee, R.: Morrill Act of 1862 Indigenous Land Parcels Database, High Country
News, https://www.landgrabu.org/ (last access: 1 June 2021), 2020.
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A simple
hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for
general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14415,
https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD00483, 1994.
Liston, G. E. and Elder, K.: A Distributed Snow-Evolution Modeling System
(SnowModel), J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 1259–1276,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM548.1, 2006.
Louis, J.-F.: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 17, 187–202, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117978,
1979.
Luce, C. H., and Tarboton, D. G.: The application of depletion curves for
parameterization of subgrid variability of snow, Hydrol. Process.,
18, 1409–1422, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1420, 2004.
Luce, C. H., Abatzoglou, J. T., and Holden, Z. A.: The Missing Mountain
Water: Slower Westerlies Decrease Orographic Enhancement in the Pacific
Northwest USA, Science, 342, 1360–1364,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1242335, 2013.
Luce, C. H., Lopez-Burgos, V., and Holden, Z.: Sensitivity of snowpack
storage to precipitation and temperature using spatial and temporal analog
models, Water Resour. Res., 50, 9447–9462,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014844, 2014a.
Luce, C. H., Staab, B., Kramer, M., Wenger, S., Isaak, D., and McConnell,
C.: Sensitivity of summer stream temperatures to climate variability in the
Pacific Northwest, Water Resour. Res., 50, 3428–3443,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014329, 2014b.
Lute, A. C. and Abatzoglou, J. T.: Best practices for estimating
near-surface air temperature lapse rates, Int. J. Climatol., 41, E110–E125,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6668, 2021.
Lute, A. C. and Luce, C. H.: Are Model Transferability and Complexity
Antithetical? Insights From Validation of a Variable-Complexity Empirical
Snow Model in Space and Time, Water Resour. Res., 53, 8825–8850,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020752, 2017.
Lute, A. C., Abatzoglou, J. T., and Hegewisch, K. C.: Projected changes in
snowfall extremes and interannual variability of snowfall in the western
United States, Water Resour. Res., 51, 960–972,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016267, 2015.
Lute, A. C., Abatzoglou, J. T., and Link, T. E.: SnowClim Model and Dataset,
HydroShare [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.acc4f39ad6924a78811750043d59e5d0, 2021.
Marks, D., Domingo, J., Susong, D., Link, T., and Garen, D.: A spatially
distributed energy balance snowmelt model for application in mountain
basins, Hydrol. Process., 13, 1935–1959, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199909)13:12/13<1935::AID-HYP868>3.0.CO;2-C, 1999.
Marks, D., Winstral, A., Reba, M., Pomeroy, J., and Kumar, M.: An evaluation
of methods for determining during-storm precipitation phase and the
rain/snow transition elevation at the surface in a mountain basin, Adv. Water Resour., 55, 98–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.11.012, 2013.
Marsh, C. B., Pomeroy, J. W., and Wheater, H. S.: The Canadian Hydrological Model (CHM) v1.0: a multi-scale, multi-extent, variable-complexity hydrological model – design and overview, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 225–247, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-225-2020, 2020.
Marsh, P.: Water flux in melting snow covers, in: Advances in Porous Media
Volume 1, edited by: Corapcioglu, M. Y., Elsevier Science Publishing,
Amsterdam, 61–124, ISBN 0444889094, 1991.
Marshall, A. M., Abatzoglou, J. T., Link, T. E., and Tennant, C. J.:
Projected Changes in Interannual Variability of Peak Snowpack Amount and
Timing in the Western United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 8882–8892,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083770, 2019a.
Marshall, A. M., Link, T. E., Abatzoglou, J. T., Flerchinger, G. N., Marks,
D. G., and Tedrow, L.: Warming Alters Hydrologic Heterogeneity: Simulated
Climate Sensitivity of Hydrology-Based Microrefugia in the Snow-to-Rain
Transition Zone, Water Resour. Res., 55, 2122–2141,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023063, 2019b.
Marshall, A. M., Link, T. E., Robinson, A. P., and Abatzoglou, J. T.: Higher
Snowfall Intensity is Associated with Reduced Impacts of Warming Upon Winter
Snow Ablation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086409,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086409, 2020.
Mazurkiewicz, A. B., Callery, D. G., and McDonnell, J. J.: Assessing the
controls of the snow energy balance and water available for runoff in a
rain-on-snow environment, J. Hydrol., 354, 1–14,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.12.027, 2008.
McLaughlin, B. C., Ackerly, D. D., Klos, P. Z., Natali, J., Dawson, T. E.,
and Thompson, S. E.: Hydrologic refugia, plants, and climate change, Glob.
Change Biol., 23, 2941–2961, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13629, 2017.
Mergen, B.: Snow in America, Weatherwise, 50, 18–26,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00431672.1997.9926090, 1997.
Mitchell, T. D.: Pattern Scaling: An Examination of the Accuracy of the
Technique for Describing Future Climates, Clim. Change, 60, 217–242,
2003.
Molotch, N. P. and Bales, R. C.: Scaling snow observations from the point
to the grid element: Implications for observation network design, Water Resour. Res., 41, W11421, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004229, 2005.
Mote, P. W., Li, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., Xiao, M., and Engel, R.: Dramatic
declines in snowpack in the western US, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science,
1, 2, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0012-1, 2018.
Mott, R., Vionnet, V., and Grünewald, T.: The Seasonal Snow Cover
Dynamics: Review on Wind-Driven Coupling Processes, Front. Earth Sci., 6, 197, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00197, 2018.
Musselman, K. N., Molotch, N. P., and Brooks, P. D.: Effects of vegetation
on snow accumulation and ablation in a mid-latitude sub-alpine forest,
Hydrol. Process., 22, 2767–2776, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7050, 2008.
Musselman, K. N., Clark, M. P., Liu, C., Ikeda, K., and Rasmussen, R.:
Slower snowmelt in a warmer world, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 214–219,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3225, 2017.
Musselman, K. N., Lehner, F., Ikeda, K., Clark, M. P., Prein, A. F., Liu,
C., Barlage, M., and Rasmussen, R.: Projected increases and shifts in
rain-on-snow flood risk over western North America, Nat. Clim. Change, 8,
808–812, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0236-4, 2018.
National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center: Snow Data
Assimilation System (SNODAS) Data Products at NSIDC, Version 1, NSIDC:
National Snow and Ice Data Center [data set],
https://doi.org/10.7265/N5TB14TC, 2004.
Oleson, K., Dai, Y., Bonan, G., Bosilovichm, M., Dickinson, R., Dirmeyer,
P., Hoffman, F., Houser, P., Levis, S., Niu, G.-Y., Thornton, P.,
Vertenstein, M., Yang, Z.-L., and Zeng, X.: Technical Description of the
Community Land Model (CLM), NCAR/TN-461+STR NCAR Technical Note,
UCAR/NCAR, Boulder, CO, USA, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6N877R0, 2004.
Pomeroy, J. W., Gray, D. M., and Landine, P. G.: The Prairie Blowing Snow
Model: Characteristics, validation, operation, J. Hydrol., 144, 165–192,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90171-5, 1993.
Praskievicz, S.: Downscaling climate-model output in mountainous terrain
using local topographic lapse rates for hydrologic modeling of
climate-change impacts, Phys. Geogr., 39, 99–117,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2017.1378555, 2018.
PRISM Climate Group: PRISM Climate Data, Oregon State University [data set],
http://prism.oregonstate.edu (last access: 1 August 2020), 2015.
Qin, Y., Abatzoglou, J. T., Siebert, S., Huning, L. S., AghaKouchak, A.,
Mankin, J. S., Hong, C., Tong, D., Davis, S. J., and Mueller, N. D.:
Agricultural risks from changing snowmelt, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 459–465,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0746-8, 2020.
Raleigh, M. S. and Clark, M. P.: Are temperature-index models appropriate
for assessing climate change impacts on snowmelt?, In: Proceedings of the
Western Snow Conference, Western Snow Conference, Durango, CO, USA, 14–17 April 2014, https://westernsnowconference.org/sites/westernsnowconference.org/PDFs/2014Raleigh.pdf (last access: 1 June 2021), 2014.
Raleigh, M. S., Landry, C. C., Hayashi, M., Quinton, W. L., and Lundquist,
J. D.: Approximating snow surface temperature from standard temperature and
humidity data: New possibilities for snow model and remote sensing
evaluation, Water Resour. Res., 49, 8053–8069,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013958, 2013.
Rasmussen, R. and Liu, C.: High Resolution WRF Simulations of the Current
and Future Climate of North America, Research Data Archive at the National
Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems
Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6V40SXP, 2017.
Rudisill, W., Flores, A., and McNamara, J.: The Impact of Initial Snow
Conditions on the Numerical Weather Simulation of a Northern Rockies
Atmospheric River, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 155–167,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0018.1, 2021.
Seeherman, J. and Liu, Y.: Effects of extraordinary snowfall on traffic
safety, Accident. Anal. Prev., 81, 194–203,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.029, 2015.
Sexstone, G. A., Clow, D. W., Fassnacht, S. R., Liston, G. E., Hiemstra, C.
A., Knowles, J. F., and Penn, C. A.: Snow Sublimation in Mountain
Environments and Its Sensitivity to Forest Disturbance and Climate Warming,
Water Resour. Res., 54, 1191–1211, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021172,
2018.
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., Huning, L. S.,
Szinai, J., Tague, C., Nico, P. S., Feldman, D. R., Jones, A. D., Collins,
W. D., and Kaatz, L.: A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water
resources in the western United States, Nature Reviews Earth and
Environment, 2, 800–819, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y, 2021.
Slater, A. G., Schlosser, C. A., Desborough, C. E., Pitman, A. J.,
Henderson-Sellers, A., Robock, A., Vinnikov, K. Y., Mitchell, K., Boone, A.,
Braden, H., Chen, F., Cox, P. M., Rosnay, P. D., Dickinson, R. E., Gusev, Y.
M., Habets, F., Kim, J., Koren, V., Kowalczyk, E. A., Nasonova, O. N., Noilhan, J., Schaake, S., Shmakin, A. B., Smirnova, T. G., Verseghy, D., Wetzel, P., Xue, Y., Yang, Z. L., and Zeng, Q.:
The Representation of Snow in Land Surface Schemes: Results from PILPS 2(d),
J. Hydrometeorol., 2, 19, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2001)002<0007:TROSIL>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Sohrabi, M. M., Tonina, D., Benjankar, R., Kumar, M., Kormos, P., Marks, D.,
and Luce, C.: On the role of spatial resolution on snow estimates using a
process-based snow model across a range of climatology and elevation, Hydrol. Process., 33, 1260–1275, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13397, 2019.
Stiegler, C., Lund, M., Christensen, T. R., Mastepanov, M., and Lindroth, A.: Two years with extreme and little snowfall: effects on energy partitioning and surface energy exchange in a high-Arctic tundra ecosystem, The Cryosphere, 10, 1395–1413, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1395-2016, 2016.
Sturm, M., Goldstein, M. A., and Parr, C.: Water and life from snow: A
trillion dollar science question, Water Resour. Res., 53, 3534–3544,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020840, 2017.
Tarboton, D. G. and Luce, C. H.: Utah Energy Balance Snow Accumulation and
Melt Model (UEB): Computer model technical description and user guide, Utah
Water Research Laboratory and USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research
Station,
https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/boise/publications/watershed/rmrs_1996_tarbotond001.pdf (last access: 1 June 2021), 1996.
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A.: An Overview of CMIP5 and
the Experiment Design, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 485–498,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1, 2012.
Thornton, M.M., Shrestha, R., Wei, Y., Thornton, P. E., Kao, S., and Wilson,
B. E.: Daymet: Daily Surface Weather Data on a 1 km Grid for North America,
Version 4, ORNL DACC [data set], https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1840,
2020.
Waliser, D., Kim, J., Xue, Y., Chao, Y., Eldering, A., Fovell, R., Hall, A.,
Li, Q., Liou, K. N., McWilliams, J., Kapnick, S., Vasic, R., De Sale, F.,
and Yu, Y.: Simulating cold season snowpack: Impacts of snow albedo and
multi-layer snow physics, Clim. Change, 109, 95–117,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0312-5, 2011.
Walter, T. M., Brooks, E. S., McCool, D. K., King, L. G., Molnau, M., and
Boll, J.: Process-based snowmelt modeling: Does it require more input data
than temperature-index modeling?, J. Hydrol., 300, 65–75,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.05.002, 2005.
Wang, T., Hamann, A., Spittlehouse, D. L., and Murdock, T. Q.:
ClimateWNA – High-Resolution Spatial Climate Data for Western North America,
J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 16–29,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-043.1, 2012.
Wigmosta, M. S., Vail, L. W., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A distributed
hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain, Water Resour. Res., 30,
1665–1679, https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00436, 1994.
Winstral, A., Elder, K., and Davis, R. E.: Spatial Snow Modeling of
Wind-Redistributed Snow Using Terrain-Based Parameters, J. Hydrometeorol.,
3, 524–538, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0524:SSMOWR>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Winstral, A., Marks, D., and Gurney, R.: Simulating wind-affected snow
accumulations at catchment to basin scales, Adv. Water Resour., 55, 64–79,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.08.011, 2013.
Winstral, A., Marks, D., and Gurney, R.: Assessing the Sensitivities of a
Distributed Snow Model to Forcing Data Resolution, J. Hydrometeorol., 15,
1366–1383, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0169.1, 2014.
Wrzesien, M. L., Durand, M. T., Pavelsky, T. M., Kapnick, S. B., Zhang, Y.,
Guo, J., and Shum, C. K.: A New Estimate of North American Mountain Snow
Accumulation From Regional Climate Model Simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
45, 1423–1432, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076664, 2018.
You, J., Tarboton, D. G., and Luce, C. H.: Modeling the snow surface temperature with a one-layer energy balance snowmelt model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 5061–5076, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5061-2014, 2014.
Short summary
We developed a snow model that can be used to quantify snowpack over large areas with a high degree of spatial detail. We ran the model over the western United States, creating a snow and climate dataset for three time periods. Compared to observations of snowpack, the model captured the key aspects of snow across time and space. The model and dataset will be useful in understanding historical and future changes in snowpack, with relevance to water resources, agriculture, and ecosystems.
We developed a snow model that can be used to quantify snowpack over large areas with a high...
