Behringer, D. and Xue, Y.: Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation
system at NCEP: The Pacific Ocean, in: Proc. Eighth Symp. on Integrated
Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface, Seattle, WA., United States, 11–15 January 2004,
https://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/people/yxue/pub/13.pdf (last access: 22 May 2022), 2004 (data available at:
https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/, last access: 10 February 2021). a
Capotondi, A., Wittenberg, A. T., Newman, M., Di Lorenzo, E., Yu, J.-Y.,
Braconnot, P., Cole, J., Dewitte, B., Giese, B., Guilyardi, E., Jin, F.-F., Karnauskas, K., Kirtman, B., Lee, T., Schneider, N., Xue, Y., and Yeh, S.-W.:
Understanding ENSO diversity, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 96, 921–938, 2015.
a,
b
Chen, D., Lian, T., Fu, C., Cane, M. A., Tang, Y., Murtugudde, R., Song, X.,
Wu, Q., and Zhou, L.: Strong influence of westerly wind bursts on El Niño
diversity, Nat. Geosci., 8, 339–345, 2015. a
Chikamoto, Y., Timmermann, A., Luo, J.-J., Mochizuki, T., Kimoto, M., Watanabe,
M., Ishii, M., Xie, S.-P., and Jin, F.-F.: Skilful multi-year predictions of
tropical trans-basin climate variability, Nat. Commun., 6, 6869,
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7869,
2015.
a
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M., Balsamo, G., Bauer, D. P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Holm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kallberg, P., Koehler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thepaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The
ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data
assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
137, 553–597,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011 (data available at:
https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/, last access: 15 February 2021).
a
Duan, W. and Hu, J.: The initial errors that induce a significant “spring
predictability barrier” for El Niño events and their implications for
target observation: results from an earth system model, Clim. Dynam., 46,
3599–3615, 2016.
a,
b
Duan, W., Mu, M., and Wang, B.: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations as
the optimal precursors for El Nino–Southern Oscillation events, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D23105
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004756, 2004.
a
Duan, W., Yu, Y., Xu, H., and Zhao, P.: Behaviors of nonlinearities modulating
the El Niño events induced by optimal precursory disturbances, Clim.
Dynam., 40, 1399–1413, 2013. a
Duan, W., Tian, B., and Xu, H.: Simulations of two types of El Niño events
by an optimal forcing vector approach, Clim. Dynam., 43, 1677–1692,
2014. a
Duan, W., Huang, C., and Xu, H.: Nonlinearity modulating intensities and
spatial structures of central Pacific and eastern Pacific El Niño events,
Adv. Atmos. Sci., 34, 737–756, 2017. a
Ebert-Uphoff, I. and Hilburn, K.: Evaluation, tuning, and interpretation of
neural networks for working with images in meteorological applications,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E2149–E2170, 2020. a
Fedorov, A. V., Hu, S., Lengaigne, M., and Guilyardi, E.: The impact of
westerly wind bursts and ocean initial state on the development, and
diversity of El Niño events, Clim. Dynam., 44, 1381–1401, 2015. a
Gebbie, G., Eisenman, I., Wittenberg, A., and Tziperman, E.: Modulation of
westerly wind bursts by sea surface temperature: A semistochastic feedback
for ENSO, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3281–3295, 2007. a
Giese, B. S. and Ray, S.: El Niño variability in simple ocean data
assimilation (SODA), 1871–2008, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
116, C02024,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006695, 2011 (data available at:
https://iridl.ldeo.columbia.edu/, last access: 12 June 2021).
a
Ham, Y.-G. and Kug, J.-S.: How well do current climate models simulate two
types of El Niño?, Clim. Dynam., 39, 383–398, 2012. a
Ham, Y.-G., Kug, J.-S., Park, J.-Y., and Jin, F.-F.: Sea surface temperature in
the north tropical Atlantic as a trigger for El Niño/Southern Oscillation
events, Nat. Geosci., 6, 112–116, 2013. a
Ham, Y.-G., Kim, J.-H., and Luo, J.-J.: Deep learning for multi-year ENSO
forecasts, Nature, 573, 568–572, 2019.
a,
b,
c
Hu, J. and Duan, W.: Relationship between optimal precursory disturbances and
optimally growing initial errors associated with ENSO events: Implications to
target observations for ENSO prediction, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 2901–2917, 2016.
a,
b
Hu, S., Fedorov, A. V., Lengaigne, M., and Guilyardi, E.: The impact of
westerly wind bursts on the diversity and predictability of El Niño
events: An ocean energetics perspective, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
4654–4663, 2014. a
Jin, F.-F.: An equatorial ocean recharge paradigm for ENSO. Part I: Conceptual
model, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 811–829, 1997a. a
Jin, F.-F.: An equatorial ocean recharge paradigm for ENSO. Part II: A
stripped-down coupled model, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 830–847,
1997b. a
Kao, H.-Y. and Yu, J.-Y.: Contrasting eastern-Pacific and central-Pacific types
of ENSO, J. Climate, 22, 615–632, 2009. a
Kug, J.-S., Choi, J., An, S.-I., Jin, F.-F., and Wittenberg, A. T.: Warm pool
and cold tongue El Niño events as simulated by the GFDL 2.1 coupled GCM,
J. Climate, 23, 1226–1239, 2010. a
Kug, J.-S., Ham, Y.-G., Lee, J.-Y., and Jin, F.-F.: Improved simulation of two
types of El Niño in CMIP5 models, Environ. Res. Lett., 7,
034002,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034002, 2012.
a
Kumar, A., Wang, H., Xue, Y., and Wang, W.: How much of monthly subsurface
temperature variability in the equatorial Pacific can be recovered by the
specification of sea surface temperatures?, J. Climate, 27,
1559–1577, 2014.
a,
b
Lingjiang, T. and Wansuo, D.: Using a nonlinear forcing singular vector
approach to reduce model error effects in ENSO forecasting, Weather
Forecast., 34, 1321–1342, 2019. a
Mathieu, M., Couprie, C., and LeCun, Y.: Deep multi-scale video prediction
beyond mean square error, arXiv [preprint],
arXiv:1511.05440, 17 November 2015.
a
Meinen, C. S. and McPhaden, M. J.: Observations of warm water volume changes in
the equatorial Pacific and their relationship to El Niño and La Niña,
J. Climate, 13, 3551–3559, 2000. a
Menkes, C. E., Lengaigne, M., Vialard, J., Puy, M., Marchesiello, P., Cravatte,
S., and Cambon, G.: About the role of westerly wind events in the possible
development of an El Niño in 2014, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
6476–6483, 2014. a
Moore, A. M. and Kleeman, R.: The dynamics of error growth and predictability
in a coupled model of ENSO, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 122, 1405–1446, 1996. a
Mu, B., Peng, C., Yuan, S., and Chen, L.: ENSO forecasting over multiple time
horizons using ConvLSTM network and rolling mechanism, in: 2019 International
Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Budapest, Hungary, 14–19 July 2019, IEEE, pp. 1–8,
https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851967, 2019.
a
Mu, B., Qin, B., and Yuan, S.: ENSO-ASC 1.0.0: ENSO deep learning forecast model with a multivariate air–sea coupler, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6977–6999,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6977-2021, 2021.
a
Mu, M., Duan, W. S., and Wang, B.: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation and its applications, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 10, 493–501,
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-10-493-2003, 2003.
a
Mu, M., Yu, Y., Xu, H., and Gong, T.: Similarities between optimal precursors
for ENSO events and optimally growing initial errors in El Niño
predictions, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 115, 461–469, 2014. a
Mu, M., Duan, W., Chen, D., and Yu, W.: Target observations for improving
initialization of high-impact ocean-atmospheric environmental events
forecasting, Natl. Sci. Rev., 2, 226–236, 2015. a
Newman, M., Shin, S.-I., and Alexander, M. A.: Natural variation in ENSO
flavors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L14705,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047658, 2011.
a
Oprea, S., Martinez-Gonzalez, P., Garcia-Garcia, A., Castro-Vargas, J. A.,
Orts-Escolano, S., Garcia-Rodriguez, J., and Argyros, A.: A review on deep
learning techniques for video prediction, IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44, 2806–2826,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3045007, 2020.
a
Rayner, N., Parker, D. E., Horton, E., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L. V.,
Rowell, D., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global analyses of sea surface
temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late
nineteenth century, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4407,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670, 2003 (data available at:
https://rda.ucar.edu/, last access: 10 February 2021).
a
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J.,
Carvalhais, N., and Prabhat: Deep learning and process understanding for
data-driven Earth system science, Nature, 566, 195–204, 2019.
a,
b
Reynolds, R. W., Rayner, N. A., Smith, T. M., Stokes, D. C., and Wang, W.: An
improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate, J. Climate,
15, 1609–1625,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1609:AIISAS>2.0.CO;2, 2002 (data available at:
https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/, last access: 10 February 2021).
a
Shi, X. and Yeung, D.-Y.: Machine learning for spatiotemporal sequence
forecasting: A survey, arXiv [preprint],
arXiv:1808.06865, 21 August 2018.
a
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., and Zisserman, A.: Deep inside convolutional
networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps, arXiv
[preprint],
arXiv:1312.6034, 20 December 2013.
a
Smilkov, D., Thorat, N., Kim, B., Viégas, F., and Wattenberg, M.:
SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise, arXiv [preprint],
arXiv:1706.03825, 12 June
2017.
a
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., and Le, Q. V.: Sequence to sequence learning with
neural networks, in: Advances in neural information processing systems, arXiv [preprint],
arXiv:1409.3215, 14 December 2014.
a
Ben Taieb, S. and Hyndman, R.: Recursive and direct multi-step forecasting: the best of both worlds, Tech. Rep., Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, 2012. a
Tang, Y., Zhang, R.-H., Liu, T., Duan, W., Yang, D., Zheng, F., Ren, H., Lian,
T., Gao, C., Chen, D., and Mu, M.: Progress in ENSO prediction and predictability
study, Natl. Sci. Rev., 5, 826–839, 2018. a
Tian, B. and Duan, W.: Comparison of the initial errors most likely to cause a
spring predictability barrier for two types of El Niño events, Clim.
Dynam., 47, 779–792, 2016. a
Timmermann, A., An, S.-I., Kug, J.-S., Jin, F.-F., Cai, W., Capotondi, A.,
Cobb, K. M., Lengaigne, M., McPhaden, M. J., Stuecker, M. F., Stein, K., Wittenberg, A. T. , Yun, K.-S., Bayr, T., Chen, H.-C., Chikamoto, Y., Dewitte, B., Dommenget, D., Grothe, P., Guilyardi, E., Ham, Y.-G., Hayashi, M., Ineson, S., Kang, D., Kim, S., Kim, W., Lee, J.-Y., Li, T., Luo, J.-J., McGregor, S., Planton, Y., Power, S., Rashid, H., Ren, H.-L., Santoso, A., Takahashi, K., Todd, A., Wang, G. M., Wang, G. J., Xie, R. H., Yang, W.-H., Yeh, S.-W., Yoon, J., Zeller, E., and Zhang, X. B.: El
Niño–southern oscillation complexity, Nature, 559, 535–545, 2018.
a,
b
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., and Lu, L.: Why is image quality assessment so
difficult?, in: 2002 IEEE International conference on acoustics, speech, and
signal processing, Orlando, FL, USA, 13–17 May 2002, vol. 4, IEEE, pp. IV–3313,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2002.5745362, 2002.
a
Xingjian, S., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.-Y., Wong, W.-K., and Woo, W.-c.:
Convolutional LSTM network: A machine learning approach for precipitation
nowcasting, in: Advances in neural information processing systems, arXiv [preprint],
arXiv:1506.04214, 19 September 2015.
a
Yan, J., Mu, L., Wang, L., Ranjan, R., and Zomaya, A. Y.: Temporal
convolutional networks for the advance prediction of ENSO, Scientific
Reports, 10, 8055,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65070-5, 2020.
a
Yu, J.-Y. and Kao, H.-Y.: Decadal changes of ENSO persistence barrier in SST
and ocean heat content indices: 1958–2001, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D13106,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007654, 2007.
a
Yu, J.-Y. and Kim, S. T.: Relationships between extratropical sea level
pressure variations and the central Pacific and eastern Pacific types of
ENSO, J. Climate, 24, 708–720, 2011. a
Yu, J.-Y., Zou, Y., Kim, S. T., and Lee, T.: The changing impact of El Niño
on US winter temperatures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L15702,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052483, 2012.
a
Zhang, J., Duan, W., and Zhi, X.: Using CMIP5 model outputs to investigate the
initial errors that cause the “spring predictability barrier” for El
Niño events, Science China Earth Sciences, 58, 685–696, 2015. a
Zhang, R.-H. and Levitus, S.: Interannual variability of the coupled tropical
Pacific ocean–atmosphere system associated with the El Niño–Southern
Oscillation, J. Climate, 10, 1312–1330, 1997. a
Zinke, J., Browning, S., Hoell, A., and Goodwin, I.: The West Pacific Gradient
tracks ENSO and zonal Pacific sea surface temperature gradient during the
last Millennium, Scientific Reports, 11, 20395,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99738-3, 2021.
a
